Gulf languages

{{Distinguish|Gulf Arabic}}

{{short description|Proposed language family}}

{{Infobox language family

| name = Gulf

| acceptance = proposed

| familycolor = American

| family = Proposed language family

| region = Gulf Coast, United States

| child1 = Muskogean

| child2 = Natchez

| child3 = Tunica

| child4 = Atakapa

| child5 = ? Chitimacha

| glotto = none

}}

The Gulf languages are a proposed family of native North American languages composed of the Muskogean languages, along with four language isolates: Natchez, Tunica, Atakapa, and (possibly) Chitimacha.

History of proposal

Gulf was proposed as a language family by Mary Haas (Haas 1951,Haas, Mary. (1951). The Proto-Gulf word for water (with notes on Siouan-Yuchi). International Journal of American Linguistics 17: 71-9. 1952Haas, Mary. (1952). The Proto-Gulf word for 'land' (with notes on Proto-Siouan). International Journal of American Linguistics 18: 238-240.), but the family has not been rigorously established by the comparative method. Historical linguists such as Lyle Campbell (Campbell and Mithun 1979,Campbell, Lyle and Marianne Mithun. 1979. The Languages of Native America: A Historical and Comparative Assessment. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. Campbell 1997Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) list the relationship as unproven, though a number of Muskogean scholars believe that Muskogean is at least related to Natchez (Campbell 1997:305).

However, the Gulf hypothesis is considered by a number of specialists on Muskogean languages, including Mary Haas and Pamela Munro. Munro (1995) has regarded the hypothesis of a Gulf family of languages as promising; Haas thought the closest language to Muskogean would be Natchez, followed by Tunica, Atakapa, and, rather dubiously, Chitimacha.Munro, Pamela. 1995. Gulf and Yuki-Gulf. Anthropological Linguistics 36: 125-222. A difficulty in evaluating the hypothesis is the lack of available data. Most of the data on Chitimacha and Natchez is still unpublished and held in archives.

Additionally, Haas (1958) proposed that the Gulf languages are related to the Algonquian languages.Haas, Mary R. (1958). [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3628848 A New Linguistic Relationship in North America: Algonkian and the Gulf Languages]. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 14(3), 231-264.

Lexical comparisons

Lexical comparisons by Kimball (1994) showing areal similarities among the "Gulf" languages:Kimball, Geoffrey. 1994. Comparative difficulties of the "Gulf" languages. In Langdon, Margaret (ed.), Proceedings of the Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous languages of the Americas July 2–4, 1993 and the Hokan-Penutian Workshop July 3, 1993 (both held at the 1993 Linguistic Institute at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio). Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, Report 8. Berkeley: University of California.{{rp|35–38}}

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Proto-Muskogean !! Tunica

sibling of opposite sex

| *xaya || -áhaya 'sister-in-law'

to want

| *kʷanna || False cognate

wána
big gray heron

| *watola || wátoru-hki 'whooping crane'

fruit; to bear fruit

| *aθi || ʔélu

willow

| osí (Koasati) || ʔx̌ša

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Tunica !! Natchez

to stick in

| čáhka || cak-

to drip

| čólu || col-

corn

| háhka || haku

to gulp

| kɔ́ra || kolkol-

to put in the mouth

| káhpu || hi-kap-

chicken

| kápaši || kapaꞏht(i)

wild goose

| lálahki || láꞏlak

to fart

| píhču || pic-

to shine

| réma || leM-

to snore

| róhku || loꞏk-

sassafras

| rɔ́wasi || waꞏ

to blow the nose

| šímu || šiꞏM-

to blow (of wind)

| wíhu || *wiꞏW-

wild potato

| ʔɔ́ška- || ʔac

to cough

| ʔúhu || ʔohoꞏ-

like, resembling

| -nahku || -neke

intestines

| -yóni || ʔuꞏnuh

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Tunica !! Chitimacha

man / men

| ší || ʔasi / ʔayš

ear

| -ála-wɛ́ča || waʔaš

kingfisher

| čárina || čana

cypress

| háhku || ʔak-šuš

to die

| lúpi || nuꞏp-

war

| náka || nakš

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Tunica !! Atakapa

black

| méli || meːl

to call

| wáli || wan

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Natchez !! Proto-Muskogean

to buy

| ciꞏp-hakiʔiš || *čoʔpa

pine tree

| col || *čolyi

squash

| coꞏY || *tahayo

fox / bark or yelp like a fox

| kaWkup || *kaxʷ-ka

six

| lahanaW || *xana-li

perch / fish

| šaꞏš(i) || *θaθi-xo

wife

| ʔaꞏL || *xalki

tooth

| ʔeNt || *innoti

ten

| ʔoꞏko || *poko-li

nothing but

| -aꞏnah || (Koasati) -nánna

ergative / nominative

| -c || -*t

absolutive / accusative

| -n || -*n

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Natchez !! Chitimacha

water / liquid

| kuN || kuꞏ

hundred

| puꞏp || puꞏp

cow

| waštaꞏN || waštik

spider web

| weykoL || way’

to hear

| ʔeꞏp-le-halʔiš || wopi-

vulture

| ʔoꞏši || ʔoꞏš

twenty / two

| ʔoꞏk-ahp || ʔupa

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Natchez !! Atakapa

name

| ʔinu || eːŋ

persimmon

| ʔoꞏ || oːl

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Chitimacha !! Atakapa

ten

| heyč’i || hišiŋ

liver

| kesi || keːc(k)

woman

| kiča || kiš

gourd

| kupu || kipaco

earth

| ney || neː

Spanish moss

| siꞏc || šiːt

mulberry

| sisč’up || ses

beaver

| ʔaꞏci || oc

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Atakapa !! Proto-Muskogean

shell

| iwal || xʷolo

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Tunica !! Proto-Muskogean !! Natchez

red-headed woodpecker

| čuhčuhina || *čaxčahka || cawcah

pileated woodpecker

| páhpahkana || *kʷahkʷa-ka || pakpakuꞏ-šiꞏL

robin (Quapaw šį́kkokkóke)

| wiškʔohku || *č/kʷiskoko || miškokʷ

breast

| ʔúču || *piči 'suckle; breasts' || šuꞏ

:

class="wikitable"

! gloss !! Tunica !! Chitimacha !! Natchez !! Atakapa !! Proto-Muskogean

hackberry

| kó- || kamu || koŋ || ||

negative

| -ʔaha || || -haꞏt || -hah ||

wind

| húri || howi || || hi ||

uncle

| || waʔa / waꞏ || ʔaweh || wahš ||

hand

| ʔiꞏš || waši || woːš / wiːš || ||

to give

| || ʔaꞏ- || ha-ku-ši-ʔiš || || *im-aka

skunk

| šíki || kištʔeʔe || šic || šikitiš ||

=Comparisons with Algonquian=

Some lexical similarities between the Algonquian and Gulf languages given by Haas (1958):

:

class="wikitable sortable"

! gloss !! Proto-
Central Algonquian
!! Proto-Muskogean !! Natchez !! Tunica !! Chitimacha !! Atakapa

beat

| *pak- || — || paꞏk- || pɛ́ka || — || pak

cold

| *tahk- || — || takap- || láka || č’aki || —

cut

| *kiꞏšk- || *kač- || kec- || káhču || — || kec

die

| *nepe- || *ili- || — || lúpi || nuꞏp- || (pih)

fish

| *nameꞏ- || *ɴaɴi/u || ʔeɴ || níni || (ni-) || nti

hand

| *-neθk-i || *-mkʷi || — || -hkeni || || nok

name

| *-iꞏn- || — || ʔinu || — || nuy-t- || eŋ

neck

| *-hkweꞏ- || — || kʷaht || — || k’eʔ || koy

night

| *tepeθk- || — || tewe || láwu || t’apk’i || iti

one

| *kwet-; *nekwet- || — || wiꞏt- || || ʔunk’u || (ta)nuk

scrape

| *kaꞏšk- || *kaꞏs- || koꞏc- || kɔ́sa || k’atka- || kau-š

see

| *neꞏw- || — || ʔeʟ- || hɛ́ra || heč-t- || ini

sharp(en)

| *kiꞏn-t- || *xʷulut- || pilit- || kíri || kihci || kini

shoot

| *pemw-, *-el- || — || -epenel- || — || paꞏhma- || pem

split

| *paꞏθk- || *paƚ- || paꞏʟ- || pása || [č]ap-t- || paƚ

swallow

| *kwan- || *kʷalak- || -akun- || kɔ́ra || kaꞏč-t- || kul

tail

| *-aθany- || *haci || ʔisi || -ása || mahči || —

three

| *neʔθ- || — || neꞏ- || ʔéni- || — || lat

through

| *šaꞏpw- || *ƚuput- || — || šíhpu || — || ƚop

tree

| *meʔtekw- || *itti/u || cuꞏ || ríhku || šuš || —

turn

| *kwetekw- || — || kitip- || kúra || kut’ih-t- || —

Pronominal comparisons

Below are pronouns comparisons by Geoffrey Kimball (1994) showing areal similarities among the "Gulf" languages.{{rp|39}} Note that Tunica distinguishes masculine and feminine pronominal forms.

:

class="wikitable"

|+Independent pronouns

! gloss !! Proto-Muskogean !! Tunica !! Natchez !! Chitimacha !! Atakapa

I

| *ano || ʔíma || takeꞏha || ʔiš || wiš

you

| *ično || má (M); hɛ́ma (F) || ʔakahni || himʔ || naš

s/he

| — || ʔúwi (M); tíhci (F) || ʔišina || hus || haːš

we

| *posno || ʔinima || takahniꞏ || ʔus || yukitiš

you (pl)

| *hačno || wínima (M); hínima (F) || ʔaNkahniꞏ || was || nakit

they

| — || sɛ́ma (M); sínima (F) || ʔišinaꞏniꞏ || hunks || hakitiš

:

class="wikitable"

|+Possessive pronouns

! gloss !! Proto-Muskogean !! Tunica !! Natchez !! Chitimacha !! Atakapa

my

| *ca- / *am- || ʔi- || -niš || ʔiš || wi

your

| *či- / *čim- || wi- (M); hi-, he- (F) || -piš || himʔ || na

her / his

| *i- / *im- || ʔu- (M); ti- (F) || -ʔiš || hus || ha

our

| *po- / pom- || ʔi-n || — || ʔus || yukit

your (pl)

| *hači- / *hačim- || wi-n- (M); hi-n- (F) || — || was || nakit

their

| — || si- (M); si-n- (F) || — || hunks || hakit

:

class="wikitable"

|+Agentive pronouns

! gloss !! Proto-Muskogean !! Tunica !! Natchez !! Chitimacha !! Atakapa

I

| *-li || -ni || ta- / ya- / ʔa- (ka-) || -ki || -o

you

| *ič- / *či- || wí- (M); hɛ́- (F) || pan- / pi- / paꞏ- || -iʔi || naš

s/he

| *Ø- || ʔú- (M); ʔá- (F) || na- / ʔi- / ʔaꞏ- || -iʔi || haš

we

| *il- / -*li || ʔína- || || -naka || -cel

you (pl)

| *hač- / *-hači || wína- (M); hɛ́na- (F) || — || -naʔa || -tem

they

| *Ø || ʔúna- (M); sina- (F) || — || -naʔa || -oɬ

:

class="wikitable"

|+Patient pronouns

! gloss !! Proto-Muskogean !! Tunica !! Natchez !! Chitimacha !! Atakapa

I

| *ca- || ʔihk- || -t- || -ki- || hi

you

| *či- || wihk- (M); hihk- (F) || -p- || -Ø- || n

s/he

| *Ø- || ʔuhk- (M); tihk- (F) || -Ø- || -Ø- || ha

we

| *po- || ʔink- || — || -kuy- || iš

you (pl)

| *hači- || wink- (M); hink- (F) || — || -Ø- || nak-

they

| — || sihk- (M); sink- (F) || — || -Ø- || šak-

reflexive

| *ili- || — || -hši- || || hat-

reciprocal

| *ixti- || ʔak- || -tahn- || — || hok-

:

class="wikitable"

|+Stative verb subject pronouns

! gloss !! Proto-Muskogean !! Tunica !! Natchez !! Chitimacha !! Atakapa

I

| *ca- || ʔi- || -t- || -ki- || hi

you

| *či- || wi- (M); hi- (F) || -p- || -Ø- || n

s/he

| *Ø- || ʔu- (M); ti- (F) || -Ø- || -Ø- || Ø-

we

| *po- || ʔi-n || — || -kuy- || ic-

you (pl)

| *hači- || wi-n- (M); hi-n- (F) || — || -Ø- || —

they

| — || si- (M); si-n- (F) || — || -Ø- || Ø-

See also

References