Gynocentrism

{{Short description|Dominant or exclusive focus on women in theory or practice}}

Gynocentrism is a dominant or exclusive focus on women in theory or practice.Staff writer (2009), "[https://web.archive.org/web/20160927230438/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gynocentrism Gynocentrism]", in {{cite book | editor-last = OED | title = Oxford English Dictionary - Vers.4.0 | publisher = Oxford University Press | isbn = 9780199563838 }} Anything can be gynocentric when it is considered exclusively with a female or feminist point of view in mind.Staff writer (2010), "[https://web.archive.org/web/20170402081315/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gynocentric Gynocentric]", in {{cite book | editor-last = OED | title = Oxford English Dictionary | publisher = Oxford University Press | isbn = 9780198614241 | year = 2006 }} The opposite practice, placing the masculine point of view at the centre, is androcentrism.

Etymology

The term gynocentrism is derived from ancient Greek, γυνή and κέντρον. Γυνή can be translated as woman or female, but also as wife.{{cite book|last=Kraus|first=Ludwig A.|title=Kritisch-etymologisches medicinisches Lexikon (Dritte Auflage)|publisher=Deuerlich & Dieterich|year=1844|location=Göttingen, Germany|oclc=491993305}}{{cite book|last1=Liddell|first1=Henry G.|title=A Greek-English lexicon / a new edition revised and augmented throughout / by Sir Henry Stuart Jones; with the assistance of Roderick McKenzie and with the co-operation of many scholars|last2=Scott|first2=Robert|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1940|location=Oxford|oclc=630078019|author-link1=Henry Liddell|author-link2=Robert Scott (philologist)}} In ancient Greek compounds with γυνή, the stem γυναικ- is normally used. This stem can be spotted in the genitive case γυναικός, and in the older form of the nominative case γύναιξ. In ancient Greek, no compounds are known to exist with γυνή that start with γυνο- or γυνω-.

The ancient Greek word κέντρον can be translated as sharp point, sting (of bees and wasps), point of a spear and stationary point of a pair of compasses, with the meaning centre of a circle related to the latter. The meaning centre/middle point (of a circle) is preserved in the Latin word centrum,{{cite book | last1 = Lewis | first1 = Charlton T. | last2 = Short | first2 = Charles | author-link1 = Charlton Thomas Lewis | title = A Latin dictionary founded on Andrews' edition of Freund's Latin dictionary | publisher = Clarendon Press | location = Oxford | year = 1879 | oclc = 223667500}}{{cite book | last = Saalfeld | first = Günther Alexander Ernst Adolf | title = Tensaurus Italograecus : ausführliches historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der Griechischen Lehn- und Fremdwörter im Lateinischen | url = https://archive.org/details/tensaurusitalog00saalgoog | publisher = Druck und Verlag von Carl Gerold's Sohn, Buchhändler der Kaiserl. Akademie der Wissenschaften | location = Wien | year = 1884 | oclc = 46301119}} a loanword from ancient Greek. The English word centre is derived from the Latin centrum.{{cite book | last = Klein | first = Ernest | author-link = Ernest Klein | title = A comprehensive etymological dictionary of the English language: Dealing with the origin of words and their sense development thus illustration the history of civilization and culture | publisher = Elsevier Science B.V. | location = Amsterdam | url = https://archive.org/stream/AComprehensiveEtymologicalDictionaryOfTheEnglishLanguageByErnestKlein/A+Comprehensive+Etymological+Dictionary+of+the+English+Language+by+Ernest+Klein_djvu.txt | year = 1971 | oclc = 802030047}} The word κέντρον is derived from the verb κεντεῖν, meaning to sting (of bees), to prick, to goad, and to spur. When trying to explain etymologically the term gynocentrism, it is important to consider the ancient Greek κέντρον, with the signification middle point/centre, and not the more obvious ancient Greek word κεντρισμός (mirroring -centrism).

History

The term gynocentrism has been in use since at least 1897 when it appeared in The Open Court stating that Continental Europeans view Americans "as suffering rather from gynocentrism than anthropocentrism."The Open Court, Volume 11 (Open Court Publishing Company, 1897) In 1914, author George A. Birmingham found American social life to be "gynocentric"; it was "arranged with a view to the convenience and delight of women."George A. Birmingham, From Dublin to Chicago: Some Notes on a Tour in America (George H. Doran Company, 1914)

Beginning with second-wave feminism in the 1970s, the term gynocentrism has been used to describe difference feminism, which displayed a shift towards understanding and accepting gender differences, in contrast to equality feminism.Nicholson, Linda J. (1997), "[https://books.google.com/books?id=EcgSDuc2bWQC&pg=PT147 Gynocentrism: women's oppression, women's identity, and women's standpoint]", in {{cite book | editor-last = Nicholson | editor-first = Linda J. | title = The second wave: a reader in feminist theory (Volume 1) | pages = 147–151 | publisher = Routledge | location = New York | year = 1997 | isbn = 9780415917612 }}

In contemporary society

The Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) community describes themselves as a backlash against the "misandry of gynocentrism".{{cite news |last=Daubney |first=Martin | author-link = Martin Daubney |title=George Lawlor's story shows how universities have become hostile towards men |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=November 24, 2015 |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/george-lawlors-story-shows-how-universities-have-become-hostile/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415034017/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/george-lawlors-story-shows-how-universities-have-become-hostile/ |archive-date=April 15, 2016 |access-date=January 14, 2016 |url-status=dead }}{{cite journal | last = Smith | first = C. Brian|title=The straight men who want nothing to do with women |url=https://melmagazine.com/the-straight-men-who-want-nothing-to-do-with-women-2653920a42e8#.b6ifgbwn7 |date=September 28, 2016 |journal=MEL Magazine |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170214053510/https://melmagazine.com/the-straight-men-who-want-nothing-to-do-with-women-2653920a42e8?gi=1552020583e3 |archive-date=February 14, 2017 |url-status=dead }} According to University of Massachusetts philosopher Christa Hodapp, in modern men's movements gynocentrism is described as a continuation of the courtly love conventions of medieval times, wherein women were valued as a quasi-aristocratic class, and males were seen as a lower serving class. This viewpoint describes feminism as the perpetuation of oppressive medieval conventions such as devotional chivalry and romanticized relationships, rather than as a movement towards liberation.Christa Hodapp, Men's Rights, Gender, and Social Media, Lexington Books (September 5, 2017) {{ISBN|1498526160}}

J. Lasky has characterized gynocentrism as a potential response to androcentrism,Lasky, J. (2023). Gynocentrism. Salem Press Encyclopedia. and that gynocentrism has been used as an argument by anti-feminists, who believe that gynocentrism is anti-male.

In a 2019 study of Trinidad society published in the Justice Policy Journal, researchers concluded that "gynocentrism pervades all aspects of the criminal justice system."Wallace, W. C., Gibson, C., Gordon, N. A., Lakhan, R., Mahabir, J., & Seetahal, C. Domestic Violence: Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Non-Reporting to the Police in Trinidad and Tobago. (2019){{Cite journal |last=Joseph-Edwards |first=Avis |last2=Wallace |first2=Wendell C. |date=2020-09-13 |title=Suffering in Silence, Shame, Seclusion, and Invisibility: Men as Victims of Female Perpetrated Domestic Violence in Trinidad and Tobago |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513x20957047 |journal=Journal of Family Issues |volume=42 |issue=8 |pages=1805–1830 |doi=10.1177/0192513x20957047 |issn=0192-513X}}

Criticism

Christina Hoff Sommers has argued that gynocentrism is anti-intellectual and holds an antagonistic view of traditional scientific and creative disciplines, dismissing many important discoveries and artistic works as masculine. Sommers also writes that the presumption of objectivity ascribed to many gynocentrist theories has stifled feminist discourse and interpretation.Hoff Sommers, Christina (1995), "[https://books.google.com/books?id=EIUtJziqIqAC&pg=PA64 Transforming the academy]", in {{cite book | editor-last = Hoff Sommers | editor-first = Christina | editor-link = Christina Hoff Sommers | title = Who stole feminism?: How women have betrayed women | pages = [https://archive.org/details/whostolefeminism00chri/page/64 64–73] | publisher = Simon & Schuster | location = New York | isbn = 9780684801568 | title-link = Who Stole Feminism? | date = May 1995 }}

Feminist writer Lynda Burns alleges that gynocentrism is a manification of celebration of women's positive differences—of women's history, myths, arts and music—as opposed to an assimilationist model privileging similarity to men.La Caze, Marguerite (2006), "[https://books.google.com/books?id=CdfgMEV3f6oC&pg=PT153 Splitting the difference: between Young and Fraser on identity politics]", in {{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/feministalliance00burn |title=Feminist alliances |publisher=Rodopi |year=2006 |isbn=9789042017283 |editor-last=Burns |editor-first=Lynda |location=Amsterdam New York |page=[https://archive.org/details/feministalliance00burn/page/n161 153] |url-access=limited}}

However observed in practice, the preeminence of women associated with gynocentric narratives is often seen as absolute: interpersonally, culturally, historically, politically, or in broader social contexts such as popular entertainment. As such, it can shade into what Rosalind Coward called "womanism... a sort of popularized version of feminism which acclaims everything women do and disparages men".Coward, Rosalind (2000), "[https://books.google.com/books?id=PTfaNLyXS0wC&pg=PT19 Introduction]", in {{cite book | editor-last = Coward | editor-first = Rosalind | editor-link = Ros Coward | title = Sacred cows: is feminism relevant to the new millennium | page = 11 | publisher = HarperCollins | location = London | isbn = 9780006548201 | year = 2000 }}

In the 2006 book Legalizing Misandry religious studies professors Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young claim that feminist calls for equality or equity are a subterfuge for gynocentrism.{{cite book|title=Legalizing misandry: from public shame to systemic discrimination against men|publisher=McGill-Queen's University Press|year=2006|isbn=9780773559998|last1=Nathanson|first1=Paul| last2=Young|first2=Katherine K.|authorlink2=Katherine K. Young|location=Montreal Ithaca|pages=58, 116, 209|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cqKxhhu55SMC&pg=PT116}} Nathanson and Young state that ideologically, the overriding focus of gynocentrism is to prioritize women hierarchically, and as a result may be interpreted as misandry (hatred of and prejudice towards men). They claim that gynocentrism as a worldview has become de rigueur in law courts and government bureaucracies, resulting in systemic discrimination against men. They define gynocentrism as a form of essentialism as it focuses on the innate virtues of women and the innate vices of men.

According to Margrit Eichler gynocentrism can be seen as sexist bias in social science research.{{Cite book |last=Eichler |first=Margrit |title=Non-sexist research methods. A practical guide |publisher=Allen and Unwin |year=1988 |pages=107 |language=en}}

See also

References

{{reflist|30em}}