Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of Chicago

{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago

|ArgueDate=October 10

|ArgueYear=2017

|DecideDate=November 8

|DecideYear=2017

|FullName=Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, et al.

|USVol=583

|USPage=___

|ParallelCitations=138 S. Ct. 13; 199 L. Ed. 2d 249

|Docket=16-658

|OralArgument=

|Prior=835 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20160831146 761] (7th Cir. 2016)

|Subsequent=

|Holding=Failure to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, Rule 4(a)(5)(C) does not necessitate dismissal of a case.

|Majority=Ginsburg

|JoinMajority=unanimous

|LawsApplied=Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(C)

}}

Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, 583 U.S. ___ (2017), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court, holding that failure to comply with the deadline for filing a notice of appeal, established by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, Rule 4(a)(5)(C), does not necessitate dismissal of a case.{{ussc|name=Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of Chicago|volume=583|year=|docket=16-658}}, slip op. at 1, 10 (2017).