Harrow v. Department of Defense

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Harrow v. Department of Defense

|ArgueDate=

|ArgueYear=

|DecideDate=May 16

|DecideYear=2024

|FullName=Harrow v. Department of Defense

|USVol=601

|USPage=___

|ParallelCitations=

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding=The 60-day filing deadline for appeals of decisions by the Merit Systems Protection Board is not jurisdictional, so courts have discretion to equitably toll it.

|Majority=Kagan

|JoinMajority=unanimous

|Concurrence=

|JoinConcurrence=

|Concurrence2=

|JoinConcurrence2=

|Concurrence/Dissent=

|JoinConcurrence/Dissent=

|Dissent=

|JoinDissent=

|Dissent2=

|JoinDissent2=

|PerCurium=

|NotParticipating=

|LawsApplied=Civil Service Reform Act of 1978

}}

Harrow v. Department of Defense, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the 60-day filing deadline for appeals of decisions by the Merit Systems Protection Board is not jurisdictional, so courts have discretion to equitably toll it.{{ussc|name=Harrow v. Department of Defense|volume=601|page=___|year=2024}}{{Cite web |title=Harrow v. Department of Defense |url=https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/harrow-v-department-of-defense/ |access-date=2024-10-17 |website=SCOTUSblog |language=en-US}}