Hugh White (strategist)
{{short description|Australian defence analyst}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}
{{Use Australian English|date=October 2016}}
{{Infobox academic
| honorific_prefix = Professor
| name = Hugh White
| honorific_suffix = {{post-nominals|country=AUS|AO|FASSA|size=100}}
| birth_date = {{bya|1953}}
| birth_place = Australia
| education =
| alma_mater = University of Oxford
University of Melbourne
| workplaces = Australian National University
| occupation = Government Official
Strategist
Academic
Journalist
| known_for = Australian Defence Policy
Australia-US-China relations
}}
Hugh White {{post-nominals|country=AUS|AO|FASSA}} (born 1953) is an Emeritus Professor of Strategic Studies at the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre of the Australian National University in Canberra, Australia, long-time defence and intelligence analyst, and author who has published works on military strategy and international relations. He was Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Australian Department of Defence from 1995 until 2000 and was the inaugural Director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI).[https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/white-hj Professor Hugh White, Researchers, ANU] His 2019 book How to Defend Australia attracted national attention after raising the proposition of re-examining the proposition of an independently nuclear-armed Australia.{{Cite web|url=https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/hugh-white-calls-for-rekindling-of-nuclear-weapons-debate/11272346|title=Hugh White calls for rekindling of nuclear weapons debate|date=2 July 2019|website=ABC Radio|language=en|access-date=2019-07-09}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/nuclear-arsenal-must-be-on-australia-s-agenda-argues-defence-expert-20190701-p52306.html|title=Nuclear arsenal must be on Australia's agenda, argues defence expert|last=Alexander|first=Harriet|date=1 July 2019|website=The Sydney Morning Herald|language=en|access-date=2019-07-09}}
Education and early career (1970s–2000)
White studied philosophy at the University of Melbourne and the University of Oxford in the 1970s. At Oxford he read for the B.Phil, and was awarded the John Locke Prize in Mental Philosophy in 1978. In the 1980s he was variously a journalist for the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper, an intelligence analyst at the Office of National Assessments, an advisor to Minister for Defence Kim Beazley, and the International Adviser to Prime Minister Bob Hawke. In 1995 he was appointed Deputy Secretary for Strategy and Intelligence in the Department of Defence. During his tenure he was involved in the preparation of the 2000 Defence White Paper, entitled Our Future Defence Forces, published by the Howard government.[http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1516/DefendAust/2000 Defence 2000: Our Future Defence Force (2000 Defence White Paper) – Parliament of Australia] Its central conclusions were that Australia must maintain a self-reliant defence force, retain control of its maritime territories and "seek to attack hostile forces as far from our shores as possible". He has since described himself as the White Paper's "principal author".Hugh White, The China Choice (2010)
Academic career (2000–present)
As an academic in the area of strategic studies White has become prominent within Australia. Crikey's Power Index of influential thinkers in Australia ranked him number seven in 2012.[https://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/27/the-power-index-thinkers-defence-strategist-hugh-white-at-7/ The Power Index: thinkers, defence strategist Hugh White at #7 – Crikey] In the early part of the 2010s, White gained significant coverage in the Australian media with regular commentary in The Australian newspaper, the Sydney Morning Herald, and numerous television appearances. Much of his intellectual work is presented in articles written for The Strategist since 2012.{{Cite web|url=https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/author/hugh-white/|title=Hugh White Archive|website=The Strategist|language=en-US|access-date=2019-07-09}}
In 2010, White published The China Choice: Why We Should Share Power. This work gained significant national attention as well as favourable commentary globally including from journalist and strategist Robert D. Kaplan, the New York Times,Jane Perlez, [http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/16/hugh-white-on-the-china-choice/?_r=0 "Hugh White on 'The China Choice',"] New York Times, 16 October 2013 the Financial Times,Gideon Rachman, [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/cdd14b42-0511-11e3-9ffd-00144feab7de.html "Search for a Safer Path in the Race for Asia"], Financial Times, 18 August 2013 and the New York Review of Books.Ian Johnson, [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/nov/21/dreams-different-china/ "Dreams of a Different China"], New York Review of Books, 21 November 2013 The central argument made in White's book is that there should be a concert of powers in Asia as there was in Europe in the 19th century. However, he believes that Australia's strategic hedging cannot last and that policy makers will one day have to choose whether they are aligned with the US or with China.[http://www.smh.com.au/comment/america-or-china-one-day-we-will-have-to-choose-20130527-2n7a0.html America or China: one day, we will have to choose]
{{quotation | "For more than a century, [the US] has contributed to peace and order, to economic development, to political evolution, and to science, technology and art around the world – and all these contributions have been nothing short of exceptional", Hugh White.Hugh White, The China Choice, p. 109.}}
In The China Choice, White argues the Vietnam War ultimately benefited the Asian region because it demonstrated the lengths the US would go to secure its supremacy over China. White has argued publicly that Australia needs to dramatically increase its maritime capabilities in order for Australia to avoid becoming a small power in Asia.[http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/radio/onairhighlights/sharp-criticism-levelled-against-australian-defence-white-paper Sharp criticism levelled against Australian defence white paper], Connect Asia, ABC Radio Australia
In more recent times White advocated for a reconsideration of the Abbott government's preference for a deal with Japan for the construction of Australia's next generation submarine fleet. The basis for his belief was the negative implications on Australia-China relations, so he instead advocated for deals with France or Germany.[http://www.smh.com.au/comment/if-we-strike-a-deal-with-japan-were-buying-more-than-submarines-20160313-gni3hl.html If we strike a deal with Japan, we're buying more than submarines] White has also been critical of the Rudd and Gillard government's escalation of Australian involvement in the War in Afghanistan which he argues resulted in increased casualties. He was also critical of Prime Minister Tony Abbott's reliance on national security during his term of office.[http://www.theage.com.au/comment/tony-abbott-preoccupation-with-national-security-dangerous-20150705-gi5rjo Tony Abbott's preoccupation with national security dangerous], The Age
White believes that Australia is a key player in the Asian region, but that Australian governments routinely believe Chinese governments are preoccupied with economic interests when China is determined to redistribute regional power in its favour.
{{quotation|"Australia seems to have acquired quite a prominent place in regional power politics, as shown by the way Obama, Xi, Modi and Abe have all come here to deliver big geopolitical speeches. It would be unwise to believe that the Chinese do not care about Australia's position on Asia's great strategic questions", White, 2014[http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/business-spectator/hugh-white-why-i-was-wrong-on-china-fta/news-story/e32aaccbc2ea29c8ac536393aedbe712 Hugh White: Why I Was Wrong on China FTA], The Australian}}
Criticism
White has most often been criticised for his bullish outlook in defence matters, especially in relation to armaments. Writing in the Australian Review, political scientist Graham Cheeseman argued the authors of the 2000 Defence White Paper was "more about politics than policy, driven in large measure by the desires and vested interests of the major actors within the defence establishment and those, primarily within industry and government, who stand to gain from the $160 billion to be spent on Australia’s defence over the coming decade". He also believed the White Paper was much more aggressive than its preoccupation with peaceful solutions was designed to suggest.{{cite journal |url=http://www.australianreview.net/journal/v2/n1/cheeseman.pdf |author=Cheeseman, Graeme |title= The Howard Government's Defence White Paper: Policy, Process and Politics |journal=The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs |volume=2 |issue=1 |date=July 2001 |pages=11–26 |issn=1443-8607}} This same criticism was taken up by ASPI commentator Peter Jennings.[http://www.aspistrategist.org.au/the-uses-and-abuses-of-defence-white-papers/ The uses and abuses of defence white papers], The Strategist A strategist at the University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy, James Goldrick, argued in 2015 that White's bellicosity must be measured against the price of war, stating that "[w]hat we have to be sure [about] is that the end justifies the means".[http://www.aspistrategist.org.au/the-future-of-maritime-conflict-a-response-to-hugh-white/ The future of maritime conflict—a response to Hugh White], The Strategist
Other commentators have argued that White exaggerates the threat posed by China in the Asian region. Professor Paul Dibb from the Australian National University argued that White has overstated the ability of China to assert its power.[http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-13/mcgrath-learning-to-share-power-with-china/4191068 Should the US learn to share power with China?] ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Awards and recognition
White was made an Officer of the Order of Australia (AO) in the 2014 Queen's Birthday Honours for "distinguished service to international affairs, through strategic defence studies as an analyst, academic and adviser to government, and to public administration".{{Cite web|title=Professor Hugh John White|url=https://honours.pmc.gov.au/honours/awards/1149987|access-date=2020-12-05|website=It's An Honour}}
In 2020 White was elected a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia (FASSA).{{Cite web|date=2020-11-10|title=38 Leading Social Scientists elected as Academy Fellows|url=https://socialsciences.org.au/news/newfellows/|access-date=2020-12-05|website=Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia|language=en-AU}}
In February 2022 White was awarded the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters [D.Litt] by ANU for his 'contributions to the study of international affairs, strategic studies and defence issues as an analyst, academic, public servant and adviser to government'.{{cn|date=February 2022}}
Bibliography
{{expand list|date=July 2019}}
- {{cite journal |date=2003 |title=Choosing war |journal=Res Publica |location=Melbourne |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=1–5}}
- {{cite book |title=Beyond the defence of Australia : finding a new balance in Australian strategic policy |location=Sydney |publisher=Longueville Media |year=2006 }}
- {{cite journal |date=Aug 2010 |title=Power shift : Australia's future between Washington and Beijing |journal=Quarterly Essay |volume=39 }}
- The China Choice: Why America Should Share Power, Black, Melbourne, Australia. 2012.
- Without America: Australia in the New Asia, Quarterly Essay No 68, Black: Collingwood, Victoria. 2017.
- [http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/dawn-of-the-post-american-order-in-asia Dawn of the post-American order in Asia], Straits Times, December 2017.
- {{cite journal |date=Mar 2018 |title=Without America |department=Response to Correspondence |journal=Quarterly Essay |volume=69 |pages=130–137}}.
- How to Defend Australia, La Trobe University Press, Melbourne. 2019.{{Cite book|url=https://www.blackincbooks.com.au/books/how-defend-australia|title=How to Defend Australia by Hugh White|date=17 December 2018|language=en}}
- Sleepwalk to War: Australia's Unthinking Alliance with America, Quarterly Essay No 86, Black: Collingwood, Victoria. 2022.
- On Australia and the New World Order, Quarterly Essay No 98, Black: Collingwood, Victoria. 2025.
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
- [http://aus.thechinastory.org/archive/hugh-white-and-the-china-choice/ Hugh White and the China Choice]
{{authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:White, Hugh}}
Category:Alumni of the University of Oxford
Category:Academic staff of the Australian National University
Category:Quarterly Essay people
Category:University of Melbourne alumni
Category:Officers of the Order of Australia
Category:Fellows of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia