In Defense of Looting
{{Short description|Book by American author Vicky Osterweil}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2021}}
{{Infobox book
| name = In Defense of Looting: A Riotous History of Uncivil Action
| author = Vicky Osterweil
| border = yes
| caption =
| language = English
| pub_date = August 20, 2020{{cite web|url=https://www.politics-prose.com/book/9781645036692 |title=In Defense of Looting: A Riotous History of Uncivil Action|publisher= Politics and Prose Bookstore|accessdate=2025-03-02}}
| publisher = Bold Type Books
| country = United States
| image = File:In_Defense_of_Looting.jpg
}}
In Defense of Looting: A Riotous History of Uncivil Action is a 2020 book authored by Vicky Osterweil and published by Bold Type Books.{{Cite news|last=Escobar|first=Natalie|date=2020-08-27|title=One Author's Controversial View: 'In Defense Of Looting'|work=NPR|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2020/08/27/906642178/one-authors-argument-in-defense-of-looting|access-date=2021-03-26}} Osterweil wrote the book in response to the Ferguson unrest in 2014 and 2015.{{Cite news|last=Fallon|first=Claire|date=2020-08-25|title=Are Looters Undermining The Movement — Or Creating It?|work=HuffPost|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/in-defense-of-looting-vicky-osterweil_n_5f43eb88c5b6c00d03b24525|access-date=2021-03-26}}
In the book, Osterweil argues that looting is a valid method of wealth redistribution.{{Cite magazine|last=Chotiner|first=Isaac|date=2020-09-03|title=Examining Vicky Osterweil's Case for Looting|magazine=The New Yorker|url=https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/vicky-osterweils-case-for-looting|access-date=2021-03-26}}
Osterweil denounces nonviolent resistance; she argues that, when non-violence is "pushed as a philosophical, moral, or religious principle, it gains a nasty, authoritarian edge." She also denounces local politicians and political groups who advocate for limiting looting during popular rebellion.
Criticism
In August 2020, Bret Stephens, a columnist for The New York Times, wrote that "In Defense of Looting is not an interesting book. It speaks for almost nobody beyond the fringe left—and certainly not for looters who hadn't thought about 'cisheteropatriarchalism.'"{{Cite news |last=Stephens |first=Bret |date=2020-09-01 |title=Unwitting Progressives for Trump |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/31/opinion/trump-biden-protests.html |access-date=2022-04-28 |issn=0362-4331}}
In a September 2020 review, Graeme Wood, a staff writer for The Atlantic, called the book "The Pinnacle of Looting Apologia", saying that "If the real, lasting change you wish to effect is burning society to cinders and crippling for a generation its ability to serve its poorest citizens, then I suppose I am forced to agree."{{Cite news|last=Wood|first=Graeme|date=2020-09-02|title=The Pinnacle of Looting Apologia|work=The Atlantic|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/09/there-no-defense-looting/615925/|access-date=2021-03-26}}
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
Further reading
- {{cite news |last1=McBride |first1=Kelly |title='Without evidence' Is A New Catchphrase At NPR |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2020/09/03/908835251/without-evidence-is-a-new-catchphrase-at-npr?orgid= |access-date=18 May 2021 |work=NPR.org |language=en}}
External links
- [https://thenewinquiry.com/in-defense-of-looting/ "In Defense of Looting" by Vicky Osterweil], The New Inquiry, 2014
Category:2020 non-fiction books
Category:American history books
Category:American political books
Category:Books about race and ethnicity
Category:Works about rebellions
Category:Looting in the United States