Institutes (Justinian)

{{short description|Sixth century codification of Roman law}}

{{italic title}}

thumb

The Institutes ({{langx|la|Institutiones}}) is a component of the Corpus Juris Civilis, the 6th-century codification of Roman law ordered by the Byzantine emperor Justinian I. It is largely based upon the Institutes of Gaius, a Roman jurist of the second century A.D. The other parts of the Corpus Juris Civilis are the Digest, the Codex Justinianus, and the Novellae Constitutiones ("New Constitutions" or "Novels").See generally, Tony Honoré, "Justinian's Codification" in The Oxford Classical Dictionary 803 (Simon Hornblower and Antony Spawforth eds. 3rd rev. ed 2003).

Drafting and publication

Justinian's Institutes was one part of his effort to codify Roman law and to reform legal education, of which the Digest also was a part.Id. at 804. See also H. F. Jolowicz & Barry Nicholas, Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law 492-493 (3rd ed. 1972). Whereas the Digest was to be used by advanced law students, Justinian's Institutes was to be a textbook for new students.Id. at 492. The need for a new text for first year students was addressed as early as 530 in the constitution "Deo auctore," where reference is made to something "...which may be promulgated to replace the elementary works, so that the raw intelligence of the student, nourished by a simple diet, may proceed more easily to advanced legal studies."Tony Honoré, Tribonian 187 (1978), quoting Deo auctore. Under the supervision of Tribonian, two law professors (Theophilus and Dorotheus) were assigned to extract statements about the basic institutions ("Institutiones") of Roman law from the teaching books created by writers of "authority" (as defined in the Law of Citations). The bulk of this new Institutes is the Institutes of Gaius, much of it taken verbatim; but it also uses material from the Institutes of Marcian, Florentinus, Ulpian, and perhaps Paulus (the other writers of "authority").Honoré, "Justinian's Codification, supra note 1, and Jolowicz & Nicholas, supra note 2 at 493 There is some debate over which of the commission members is responsible for what part of the new Institutes. Most recently it has been suggested that Theophilus and Dorotheus created the extracts taken from the older works, while Tribonian revised and added new imperial laws.Honoré, Tribonian, supra note 3 at 189 (1978).

This new version of the Institutes was published on November 21, 533 and promulgated with the Digest on December 30, 533.Jolowicz and Nicholas, supra note 2 at 493. These new Institutes were not only a textbook for first year law students, but, according to the decree that promulgated them (C. Tanta), they carried the force of law.Id. at 492. First year law students used Justinian's Institutes as their textbook for centuries.Honoré, "Justinian's Codification," supra note 1 at 804.

Structure and content

The Institutes of Justinian is arranged much like Gaius's work, being divided into three subjects in four books covering "persons," "things,", and "actions." The first book considers the legal status of persons (personae), the second and third deal with things (res), while the fourth discusses Roman civil procedure (actiones). Unlike the Digest, the extracts do not provide inscriptions indicating from whom the original material was taken.Id. at 493

Modern editions and translations

Justinian's Institutes was largely unknown in the West. The earliest known manuscript are fragments of a Veronese palimpsest of the ninth century.A. Arthur Schiller, Roman Law, Mechanisms of Development 31 (1978). For a detailed account of the transmission of manuscripts of Justinian's Institutes through the medieval era, see Charles M. Radding & Antonio Ciaralli, The Corpus Iuris Civilis in the Middle Ages: Manuscripts and Transmissions from the Sixth Century to the Juristic Revival 111-131 (2007). The first printed edition of Justinian's Institutes was Petrus Schoyff's in 1468.Schiller, supra note 10 at 31. Scholars using the Veronese palimpsest suggested changes to the existing text, and these criticisms resulted in the definitive texts by Paul Krüger and Eduard Huschke in 1867 and 1868 respectively.Id. at 32. Krüger's Justiniani Institutiones... is available in Europeana at [https://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/03486/6EA35F82BD9E6B2603E114D7BE4F8E708E22EB04.html]. The most frequently used modern version of Justinian's Institutes is that of Krüger,{{Cite book|last=Moraes|first=Bernardo|title=Institutas de Justiniano: primeiros fundamentos de direito romano justinianeu|publisher=YK Editora|year=2021|isbn=978-65-88043-06-6|location=Sao Paulo|pages=9–10}} which is in volume one of the Krüger, Mommsen, Kroll and Schoell stereotype edition.Corpus Iuris Civilis (1877-1895) available in the Internet Archive at [https://archive.org/details/corpusiuriscivi02mommgoog].

There are several translations of Justinian's Institutes into English, the better of the older ones being those of J.B. Moyle and Thomas Collett Sandars.J.B. Moyle, The Institutes of Justinian (1893) available from Project Gutenberg at [http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5983]; J.A.C. Thomas, The Institutes of Justinian (1975). More recent translations by Birks & McLeod are also available as facing editions with Krüger's Latin.Birks, Peter & McLeod, Grant, Institutes of Justinian (Cornell University Press, 1987). Samuel Parsons Scott translated the Institutes into English as part of his translation of the entire "Corpus Juris Civilis," but his translation has not been well received.See Timothy Kearley, [http://www.uwyo.edu/lawlib/blume-justinian/_files/docs/ajcnovels2/novelsart._llj_ed.pdf Justice Fred Blume and the Translation of the Justinian Code] (2nd ed. 2008) 3, 21. Scott's translation is The Civil Law, including the Twelve Tables, the Institutes of Gaius, the Rules of Ulpian, the Enactments of Justinian, and the Constitutions of Leo... 17 vols. (1932) available at [http://www.constitution.org/sps/sps.htm]. For a discussion of the work of Scott, Fred H. Blume, and Clyde Pharr on Roman law translation see Kearley, Timothy G., "From Rome to the Restatement: S.P. Scott, Fred Blume, Clyde Pharr, and Roman Law in Early Twentieth-Century," available at Social Science Research Network [http://ssrn.com/abstract=2737986].

See also

References

{{Reflist|2}}