International Psychoanalytical Association#Constituent organizations

{{Psychoanalysis |Training}}

The International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA) is an association including 12,000 psychoanalysts as members and works with 70 constituent organizations. It was founded in 1910 by Sigmund Freud, from an idea proposed by Sándor Ferenczi.

History

{{Multiple image|

| align = right

| direction = vertical

| width = 250

| image1 = IPV Plaque Nurnberg.jpg

| image2 = Nürnberg — 2013-09-06 und 07 —Mattes (62).JPG

| footer = Plaque commemorating the founding of the International Psychoanalytic Association (IPA) in 1910, Le Méridien Grand Hotel Nürnberg«The International Psychoanalytic Association (IPA) was founded in this house on March 30, 1910 by Sigmund Freud, Carl Gustav Jung, Alfred Adler and other psychoanalysts. From this base of "like-minded people" arose several psychoanalytic directions that found their own organizational form: the International Association for Individual Psychology (IVIP/IAIP) (Alfred Adler, founded in 1954), the International Association for Analytical Psychology (IGAP/IAAP) (Carl Gustav Jung, founded in 1955) and the International Federation of Psychoanalytic Societies (IFPS) (Erich Fromm, founded in 1962). The German Psychoanalytical Association (DPV) and the German Psychoanalytical Society (DPG) are today the two IPA representatives in Germany. Plaque sponsor: German Society for Analytical Psychology (DGAP). Nuremberg, March 20, 2010».

}}

In 1902 Sigmund Freud started to meet every week with colleagues to discuss his work, thus establishing the Psychological Wednesday Society. By 1908 there were 14 regular members and some guests including Max Eitingon, Carl Jung, Karl Abraham, and Ernest Jones, all future Presidents of the IPA.{{Cite web |url=http://www.psychoanalyse.ru/gallery/images/freudfriends/f-commit_1922_berlin_l.jpg |title=Group portrait: Freud and associates in a photograph taken ca. 1922, Berlin. Sitting (from left to right) : Sigmund Freud, Sándor Ferenczi, Hanns Sachs. Standing (from left to right): Otto Rank, Karl Abraham, Max Eitingon, Ernest Jones. |access-date=2007-05-24 |archive-date=2016-03-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303181909/http://www.psychoanalyse.ru/gallery/images/freudfriends/f-commit_1922_berlin_l.jpg |url-status=dead }} The Society became the Vienna Psychoanalytical Society.

In 1907 Jones suggested to Jung that an international meeting should be arranged. Freud welcomed the proposal. The meeting took place in Salzburg on April 27, 1908. Jung named it the "First Congress for Freudian Psychology". It is later reckoned to be the first International Psychoanalytical Congress. Even so, the IPA had not yet been founded.

The IPA was established at the next Congress held at Nuremberg in March 1910.[http://www.ipa.org.uk/default.aspx?page=39 How did the IPA begin?] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090421164844/http://www.ipa.org.uk/default.aspx?page=39 |date=2009-04-21 }} Its first President was Carl Jung, and its first Secretary was Otto Rank. Sigmund Freud considered an international organization to be essential to advance his ideas. In 1914 Freud published a paper entitled The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement.

The IPA is the international accrediting and regulatory body for member organisations. The IPA's aims include creating new psychoanalytic groups, conducting research, developing training policies and establishing links with other bodies. It organizes a biennial Congress.

Regional organizations

There is a Regional Organisation for each of the IPA's three regions:

  • Europe—European Psychoanalytical Federation (or EPF), which also includes Australia, India, Israel, Lebanon, South Africa and Turkey;
  • The IPA is incorporated in England, where it is a company limited by guarantee and also a registered charity. Its administrative offices are at The Lexicon in Central London.
  • Latin America—Federation of Psychoanalytic Societies of Latin America (or FEPAL);
  • North America—North American Psychoanalytic Confederation (or NAPSAC), which also includes Japan and Korea.

Each of these three bodies consists of Constituent Organisations and Study Groups that are part of that IPA region. The IPA has a close working relationship with each of these independent organisations, but they are not officially or legally part of the IPA.

Constituent organizations

The IPA's members qualify for membership by being a member of a "constituent organisation" (or the sole regional association).

Constituent organisations

{{columns-list|colwidth=width|

  • Argentine Psychoanalytic Association
  • Argentine Psychoanalytic Society
  • Australian Psychoanalytical Society
  • Belgian Psychoanalytical Society
  • Belgrade Psychoanalytical Society
  • Brasília Psychoanalytic Society
  • Brazilian Psychoanalytic Society of Rio de Janeiro
  • Brazilian Psychoanalytic Society of São Paulo
  • Brazilian Psychoanalytical Society of Porto Alegre
  • Brazilian Psychoanalytical Society of Ribeirão Preto
  • British Psychoanalytic Association
  • British Psychoanalytical Society
  • Buenos Aires Psychoanalytic Association
  • Canadian Psychoanalytic Society
  • Caracas Psychoanalytic Society
  • Chilean Psychoanalytic Association
  • Colombian Psychoanalytic Association
  • Colombian Psychoanalytic Society
  • Contemporary Freudian Society
  • Cordoba Psychoanalytic Society
  • Croatian Psyhoanalytic Society
  • Czech Psychoanalytical Society
  • Danish Psychoanalytical Society
  • Dutch Psychoanalytical Association
  • Dutch Psychoanalytical Group
  • Dutch Psychoanalytical Society
  • Finnish Psychoanalytical Society
  • French Psychoanalytical Association
  • Freudian Psychoanalytical Society of Colombia
  • German Psychoanalytical Association
  • German Psychoanalytical Society
  • Hellenic Psycho-Analytical Society
  • Hungarian Psychoanalytical Society
  • Indian Psychoanalytical Society
  • Institute for Psychoanalytic Training and Research
  • Israel Psychoanalytic Society
  • Istanbul Psychoanalytical Association
  • Italian Psychoanalytical Association
  • Italian Psychoanalytical Society
  • Japan Psychoanalytic Society
  • Los Angeles Institute and Society for Psychoanalytic Studies
  • Madrid Psychoanalytical Association
  • Mato Grosso do Sul Psychoanalytical Society
  • Mendoza Psychoanalytic Society
  • Mexican Assn for Psychoanalytic Practice, Training & Research
  • Mexican Psychoanalytic Association
  • Monterrey Psychoanalytic Association
  • Moscow Psychoanalytic Society
  • Northwestern Psychoanalytic Society
  • Norwegian Psychoanalytic Society
  • Paris Psychoanalytical Society
  • Pelotas Psychoanalytic Society
  • Peru Psychoanalytic Society
  • Polish Psychoanalytical Society
  • Porto Alegre Psychoanalytical Society
  • Portuguese Psychoanalytical Society
  • Psychoanalytic Center of California
  • Psychoanalytic Institute of Northern California
  • Psychoanalytic Society of Mexico
  • Psychoanalytical Association of The State of Rio de Janeiro
  • Recife Psychoanalytic Society
  • Rio de Janeiro Psychoanalytic Society
  • Romanian Psychoanalytic Society
  • Rosario Psychoanalytic Association
  • Spanish Psychoanalytical Society
  • Swedish Psychoanalytical Association
  • Swiss Psychoanalytical Society
  • Uruguayan Psychoanalytical Association
  • Venezuelan Psychoanalytic Association
  • Vienna Psychoanalytic Society

}}

Provisional Societies

  • Guadalajara Psychoanalytic Association (Provisional Society)
  • Moscow Psychoanalytic Society (Provisional Society)
  • Psychoanalytic Society for Research and Training (Provisional Society)
  • Vienna Psychoanalytic Association

Regional associations

  • American Psychoanalytic Association ("APsaA") is a body which has in membership societies which cover around 75% of psychoanalysts in the United States of America (the remainder are members of "independent" societies which are in direct relationship with the IPA).

IPA Study Groups

"Study Groups" are bodies of analysts which have not yet developed sufficiently to be a freestanding society, but that is their aim.

  • Campinas Psychoanalytical Study Group
  • Center for Psychoanalytic Education and Research
  • Croatian Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Fortaleza Psychoanalytic Group
  • Goiania Psychoanalytic Nucleus
  • Korean Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Latvia and Estonia Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Lebanese Association for the Development of Psychoanalysis
  • Minas Gerais Psychoanalytical Study Group
  • Northern Ireland Psychoanalytic Society
  • Portuguese Nucleus of Psychoanalysis
  • Psychoanalytical Association of Asuncion SG
  • South African Psychoanalytic Association
  • Study Group of Turkey: Psike Istanbul
  • Turkish Psychoanalytical Group
  • Vermont Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Vilnius Society of Psychoanalysts

Allied Centres

"Allied Centres" are groups of people with an interest in psychoanalysis, in places where there are not already societies or study groups.

  • Korean Psychoanalytic Allied Centre
  • Psychoanalysis Studying Centre in China
  • Taiwan Centre for The Development of Psychoanalysis
  • The Centre for Psychoanalytic Studies of Panama

International Congresses

The first 23 Congresses of IPA did not have a specific theme.

border="0" style="border: 1px solid #999; background-color:#FFFFFF; text-align:center"
align="center" bgcolor="#CCCCCC"

! Number!! Year !! City !! President !! Theme

bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 1

1908align="left"| {{flagicon|Austria-Hungary}} Salzburgalign="left"|align="left"|
21910align="left"| {{flagicon|German Empire}} Nurembergalign="left"| C. G. Jungalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 3

1911align="left"| {{flagicon|German Empire}} Weimaralign="left" | C. G. Jungalign="left"|
41913align="left"| {{flagicon|German Empire}} Munichalign="left" | C. G. Jungalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 5

1918align="left"| {{flagicon|Hungary|1867}} Budapestalign="left"| Karl Abrahamalign="left"|
61920align="left"| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} The Haguealign="left"| Sándor Ferenczialign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 7

1922align="left"| {{flagicon|Germany}} Berlinalign="left"| Ernest Jonesalign="left"|
81924align="left"| {{flagicon|Austria}} Salzburgalign="left"| Ernest Jonesalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 9

1925align="left"| {{flagicon|Germany}} Bad Homburgalign="left"| K Abraham / M Eitingonalign="left"|
101927align="left"| {{flagicon|Austria}} Innsbruckalign="left"| Max Eitingonalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 11

1929align="left"| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} Oxfordalign="left"| Max Eitingonalign="left"|
121932align="left"| {{flagicon|Germany}} Wiesbadenalign="left"| Max Eitingonalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 13

1934align="left"| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} Lucernealign="left"| Ernest Jones
141936align="left"| {{flagicon|Czechoslovakia}} Marienbadalign="left"| Ernest Jonesalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 15

1938align="left"| {{flagicon|France}} Parisalign="left"| Ernest Jonesalign="left"|
161949align="left"| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} Zürichalign="left"| Ernest Jonesalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 17

1951align="left"| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} Amsterdamalign="left"| Leo H. Bartemeieralign="left"|
181953align="left"| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} Londonalign="left"| Heinz Hartmannalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 19

1955align="left"| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} Genevaalign="left"| Heinz Hartmannalign="left"|
201957align="left"| {{flagicon|France}} Parisalign="left"| Heinz Hartmannalign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 21

1959align="left"| {{flagicon|Denmark}} Copenhagenalign="left"| William H. Gillespiealign="left"|
221961align="left"| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} Edinburghalign="left"| William H. Gillespiealign="left"|
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 23

1963align="left"| {{flagicon|Sweden}} Stockholmalign="left"| Maxwell Gitelsonalign="left"|
241965align="left"| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} Amsterdamalign="left"| Gillespie/Greenacrealign="left"| Psychoanalytic Treatment of the Obsessional Neurosis
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 25

1967align="left"| {{flagicon|Denmark}} Copenhagenalign="left"| P.J. van der Leeuwalign="left"| On Acting Out and its Role in the Psychoanalytic Process
261969align="left"| {{flagicon|Italy}} Romealign="left"| P.J. van der Leeuwalign="left"| New Developments in Psychoanalysis
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 27

1971align="left"| {{flagicon|Austria}} Viennaalign="left"| Leo Rangellalign="left"| The Psychoanalytical Concept of Aggression
281973align="left"| {{flagicon|France}} Parisalign="left"| Leo Rangellalign="left"| Transference and Hysteria Today
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 29

1975align="left"| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} Londonalign="left"| Serge Lebovicialign="left"| Changes in Psychoanalytic Practice and Experience
301977align="left"| {{flagicon|Israel}} Jerusalemalign="left"| Serge Lebovicialign="left"| Affects and the Psychoanalytic Situation
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 31

1979align="left"| {{flagicon|United States}} New York Cityalign="left"| Edward D. Josephalign="left"| Clinical Issues in Psychoanalysis
321981align="left"| {{flagicon|Finland}} Helsinkialign="left"| Edward D. Josephalign="left"| Early Psychic Development as Reflected in the Psychoanalytic Process
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 33

1983align="left"| {{flagicon|Spain}} Madridalign="left"| Adam Limentanialign="left"| The Psychoanalyst at Work
341985align="left"| {{flagicon|Germany}} Hamburgalign="left"| Adam Limentanialign="left"| Identification and its Vicissitudes
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 35

1987align="left"| {{flagicon|Canada}} Montrealalign="left"| Robert S. Wallersteinalign="left"| Analysis Terminable and Interminable – 50 Years Later
361989align="left"| {{flagicon|Italy}} Romealign="left"| Robert S. Wallersteinalign="left"| Common Ground in Psychoanalysis
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 37

1991align="left"| {{flagicon|Argentina}} Buenos Airesalign="left"| Joseph J. Sandleralign="left"| Psychic Change
381993align="left"| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} Amsterdamalign="left"| Joseph J. Sandleralign="left"| The Psychoanalyst's Mind – From Listening to Interpretation
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 39

1995align="left"| {{flagicon|United States}} San Franciscoalign="left"| R. Horacio Etchegoyenalign="left"| Psychic Reality – Its Impact on the Analyst and Patient Today
401997align="left"| {{flagicon|Spain}} Barcelonaalign="left"| R. Horacio Etchegoyenalign="left"|Psychoanalysis and Sexuality
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 41

1999align="left"| {{flagicon|Chile}} Santiagoalign="left"| Otto F. Kernbergalign="left"| Affect in Theory and Practice
422001align="left"| {{flagicon|France}} Nicealign="left"| Otto F. Kernbergalign="left"| Psychoanalysis – Method and Application
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 43

2004align="left"| {{flagicon|United States}} New Orleansalign="left"| Daniel Widlöcheralign="left"| Working at the Frontiers
442005align="left"| {{flagicon|Brazil}} Rio de Janeiroalign="left"| Daniel Widlöcheralign="left"| Trauma: New Developments in Psychoanalysis
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 45

2007align="left"| {{flagicon|Germany}} Berlinalign="left"| Cláudio Laks Eizirikalign="left"| Remembering, Repeating and Working Through in Psychoanalysis & Culture Today
462009align="left"| {{flagicon|United States}} Chicagoalign="left"| Cláudio Laks Eizirikalign="left"| Psychoanalytic Practice - Convergences and Divergences
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 47

2011align="left"| {{flagicon|Mexico}} Mexico Cityalign="left"| Charles Hanlyalign="left"| Exploring Core Concepts: Sexuality, Dreams and the Unconscious
482013align="left"| {{flagicon|Czech Republic}} Praguealign="left"| Charles Hanlyalign="left"| Facing the Pain: Clinical Experience and the Development of Psychoanalytic Knowledge
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 49

2015align="left"| {{flagicon|United States}} Bostonalign="left"| Stefano Bologninialign="left"| Changing World: the shape and use of psychoanalytic tools today
502017align="left"| {{flagicon|Argentina}} Buenos Airesalign="left"| Stefano Bologninialign="left"| Intimacy
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 51

2019align="left"| {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} Londonalign="left"| Virginia Ungaralign="left" | The Feminine
522021align="left"| {{flagicon|Canada}} Vancouveralign="left"| Virginia Ungaralign="left" | The infantile: its multiple dimensions
bgcolor="#EFEFEF"

| 53

2023align="left"| {{flagicon|Colombia}} Cartagenaalign="left"| Harriet Wolfealign="left" | Mind in the Line of Fire
542025align="left"| {{flagicon|Portugal}} Lisbonalign="left"| Harriet Wolfealign="left"| Psychoanalysis: An Anchor in Chaotic Times

Criticism

In 1975, Erich Fromm questioned this organization and found that the psychoanalytic association was "organized according to standards rather dictatorial"."La mission de Sigmund Freud : une analyse de sa personnalité et de son influence'", Erich Fromm, translation from English by Paul Alexandre. Bruxelles : Complexe, 1975 and in Grandeurs et limites de la pensée freudienne, éditions Laffont, 1980

In 1999, Élisabeth Roudinesco noted that the IPA's attempts to professionalize psychoanalysis had become "a machine to manufacture significance". She also said that in France, "Lacanian colleagues looked upon the IPA as bureaucrats who had betrayed psychoanalysis in favour of an adaptive psychology in the service of triumphant capitalism".Élisabeth Roudinesco, Pourquoi la psychanalyse ? chapter four, « critiques des institutions psychanalytiques ». Fayard, Paris, 1999 She wrote of the "IPA['s] Legitimist Freudianism, as mistakenly called "orthodox"".Élisabeth Roudinesco, Généalogies, 2014, p. 60

On the other hand, most criticisms laid against the IPA tend to come from a 1950s Lacanian point of view,J. Lacan, The situation of psychoanalysis and the training of psychoanalysts in 1956, Ecrits, the first complete edition in English, translated by Bruce Fink, in collaboration with Heloise Fink and Russel Crigg. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, London; Copyright © 1966, 1970, 1971, 1999 by éditions du Seuil - English translation copyright © 2006, 2002 by W. W. Norton & Company. unaware of recent developments, and of the variety of schools and training models within the association in recent decades.Peter Loewenberg & Nellie L. Thompson, 100 years of the IPA, The Centenary History of the International Psychoanalytical Association, 1910–2010; Evolution and change. First published in 2011 by The International Psychoanalytical Association, Broomhills, Woodside Lane, London N12 8UD, United Kingdom. London, Karnac books. {{ISBN|9781905888160}} One of the three training models in the IPA (the French Model), is mostly due to Lacan's ideas and their perspectives regarding the training.Gilbert Diatkine, Les lacanismes, les analystes français et l'Association psychanalytique internationale, Revue française de psychanalyse, hors-série, "Courants de la psychanalyse contemporaine", 2001, 389-400.

=Homophobia=

Among Roudinesco's other criticisms was her reference to "homophobia" in the IPA, considered a "disgrace of psychoanalysis.Élisabeth Roudinesco, « La famille en désordre », in Eric Fassin, « [http://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2003-1-page-263.htm L'inversion de la question homosexuelle] » Revue française de psychanalyse, 2003/1 (Vol. 67).

According to psychiatrist Albert Le Dorze, the association is homophobic.La politisation de l'ordre sexuel by Albert Le Dorze, éditions L'Harmattan, Paris, january 2009 - 238 pages

Archives

The archive of the International Psychoanalytical Association is held at Wellcome Collection (ref no: [https://wellcomecollection.org/works/qkcg2y28 SA/IPA]).

See also

References

{{reflist|22em}}