Internet censorship in Pakistan

In mid-2012 Pakistanis had relatively easy access to a wide range of content, including most sexual, political, social, and religious sites on the Internet. The OpenNet Initiative listed Internet filtering in Pakistan as substantial in the conflict/security area, and as selective in the political, social, and Internet tools areas in August 2012.[http://opennet.net/research/profiles/pakistan "ONI Country Profile: Pakistan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110521195435/http://opennet.net/research/profiles/pakistan |date=21 May 2011 }}, OpenNet Initiative, 6 August 2012. Retrieved 16 November 2013. Additionally, Freedom House rated Pakistan's "Freedom on the Net Status" as "Not Free" in its Freedom on the Net 2022 report.[https://freedomhouse.org/explore-the-map?type=fotn&year=2022&country=PAK "Pakistan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180704063520/https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2013/pakistan |date=4 July 2018 }}, Freedom on the Net 2013, Freedom House, 23 January 2022. Retrieved 23 January 2022. This is still true as of 2022.[https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2015/pakistan"Pakistan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190424161650/https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2015/pakistan |date=24 April 2019 }}, Freedom on the Net 2015, Freedom House, Retrieved 8 July 2016.

Internet filtering in Pakistan is regulated by the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) under the direction of the government, the Supreme Court of Pakistan, and the Ministry of Information Technology (MoIT). Although the majority of filtering in Pakistan is intermittent—such as the occasional block on a major Web site like Blogspot or YouTube—the PTA continues to block sites containing content it considers to be blasphemous, anti-Islamic, or threatening to internal security. Online civil society activism that began in order to protect free expression in the country continues to expand as citizens utilize new media to disseminate information and organize.

Pakistan has blocked access to websites critical of the government or the military. Blocking of websites is often carried out under the rubric of restricting access to "blasphemous" content, pornography, or religious immorality. At the end of 2011, the PTA had officially banned more than 1,000 pornographic websites in Pakistan.[http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2012/pakistan Pakistan, Freedom on the Net 2012] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171022033454/https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2012/pakistan |date=22 October 2017 }} report by Freedom House[http://tribune.com.pk/story/293434/pta-approved-over-1000-porn-sites-blocked-in-pakistan/ PTA approved: Over 1,000 porn sites blocked in Pakistan] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130707094542/http://tribune.com.pk/story/293434/pta-approved-over-1000-porn-sites-blocked-in-pakistan/ |date=7 July 2013 }} The Express Tribune, 18 November 2011

{{See also|Allegations of rigging in the 2024 Pakistani general election}}

X, formerly known as Twitter, has remained inaccessible in Pakistan since February 2024. The Pakistan government blocked access to the social media platform around the time of the 2024 February elections, citing national security concerns. Despite the government's stance, both the government and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) refused to comment on the outages, which were widely reported by internet watchdog groups.

Activists challenging the ban argue that it was designed to suppress dissent following the February 8 general elections, which were marred by widespread claims of vote rigging and subsequent protests. Authorities had also shut down mobile services on the day of the elections, again citing security concerns. NetBlocks, an internet monitoring group, reported that users were unable to access X on 10 February while the country was awaiting the election results.{{Cite web |title=Pakistan says it blocked social media platform X over ‘national security’ |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/17/pakistan-says-it-blocked-social-media-platform-x-over-national-security |access-date=2024-05-15 |website=Al Jazeera |language=en}}

In April 2024, the Sindh High Court ordered the government to restore access to the platform within one week, according to a report by the AFP news agency, citing lawyer Moiz Jaaferi, who had launched a separate challenge against the ban.{{Cite web |title=Sindh High Court orders unblocking of social media platform X in Pakistan |url=https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/international/sindh-high-court-orders-unblocking-of-social-media-platform-x-in-pakistan/384116 |access-date=2024-05-15 |website=www.canadianlawyermag.com |language=en}} Despite this order, access to X has been sporadic, with availability fluctuating based on the internet service provider, forcing users to rely on virtual private networks (VPNs), as noted by Alp Toker of NetBlocks.{{Cite web |date=2024-04-18 |title=X working with Pakistan govt to 'understand concerns' over ban |url=https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20240418-x-working-with-pakistan-govt-to-understand-concerns-over-ban |access-date=2024-05-15 |website=France 24 |language=en}}

Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, a prolific user of social media platforms, has been particularly impacted by this ban. This reliance on social media grew especially after the country’s traditional media began censoring news about Khan and his party in the run-up to the elections. Khan, who has more than 20 million followers on X, saw his party call for protests against alleged rigging in the February 2024 General Elections. A government official’s admission of vote manipulation in mid-February raised further concerns about the transparency of the elections confirming Imran Khan’s claims to many and furthering the allegations.{{Cite web |title=Pakistan official admits involvement in rigging election results |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/17/pakistan-official-admits-involvement-in-rigging-election-results |access-date=2024-05-15 |website=Al Jazeera |language=en}}{{Cite web |title=Key Ally of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Demands End to Ban on X, Formerly Twitter |url=https://thediplomat.com/2024/04/key-ally-of-pakistans-prime-minister-demands-end-to-ban-on-x-formerly-twitter/ |access-date=2024-05-15 |website=thediplomat.com |language=en-US}}

NetBlocks, the internet Observatory confirmed through its Live metrics showing X/Twitter has been restricted in #Pakistan for since February, with service remaining fully or intermittently restricted for most users. They added that the incident comes amidst a surge in internet censorship during elections marred by irregularities in Pakistan.[https://twitter.com/netblocks/status/1765034456509710734 NetBlocks’ official Tweet (1)]

[https://twitter.com/netblocks/status/1761436365387104516?s=61&t=vdRGLwBSDABZzmY0e3e5zA NetBlocks’ official Tweet (2)] Asad Baig, a media strategist at Dawn News said that “The government’s actions reek of authoritarianism, stifling dissent, and silencing voices in the name of maintaining control.”{{Cite web |last=Baig |first=Asad |date=2024-04-27 |title=Censorship and disinformation |url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1829946 |access-date=2024-05-15 |website=DAWN.COM |language=en}}

Several condemnations of the ban were also exchanged by many non-governmental organizations.

The Pakistan Internet Exchange (PIE), operated by the state-owned Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd (PTCL), was created to facilitate the exchange of Internet traffic between ISPs within and outside of Pakistan.[http://www.nsrc.org/db/lookup/report.php?id=1085847930109:488737327&fromISO=PK "The current state of the Internet in Pakistan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928153425/http://www.nsrc.org/db/lookup/report.php?id=1085847930109:488737327&fromISO=PK |date=28 September 2011 }}, Tee Emm, e-mail, archived by the Network Startup Resource Center (NSRC), 27 May 2004 Because the majority of Pakistan's Internet traffic is routed through the PIE (98% of Pakistani ISPs used the PIE in 2004), it provides a means to monitor and possibly block incoming and outgoing Internet traffic as the government deems fit.[http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/s-asia-it/archive/2000/07/msg00028.html "The National Access Point: The Dilemma of Vision"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110820123344/http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/s-asia-it/archive/2000/07/msg00028.html |date=20 August 2011 }}, by Zubair Fasial Abbasi, e-mail sent to s-asia-it, archived at the Asia Pacific Network Information Center (APNIC), 14 July 2000

Internet surveillance in Pakistan is primarily conducted by the PIE under the auspices of the PTA. The PIE monitors all incoming and outgoing Internet traffic from Pakistan, as well as e-mail and keywords, and stores data for a specified amount of time. Law enforcement agencies such as the FIA can be asked by the government to conduct surveillance and monitor content. Under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Ordinance (PECO), ISPs are required to retain traffic data for a minimum of 90 days and may also be required to collect real-time data and record information while keeping their involvement with the government confidential. The ordinance does not specify what kinds of actions constitute grounds for data collection and surveillance.

In April 2003, the PTCL announced that it would be stepping up monitoring of pornographic websites. "Anti-Islamic" and "blasphemous" sites were also monitored.[http://archives.dawn.com/2003/07/28/local7.htm "KARACHI: PTCL begins blocking proxy servers: Proscribed sites"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120524144520/http://archives.dawn.com/2003/07/28/local7.htm |date=24 May 2012 }}, Bahzad Alam, Dawn, 28 July 2003Khan In early March 2004, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) ordered Internet service providers (ISPs) to monitor access to all pornographic content. The ISPs, however, lacked the technical know-how, and felt that the PTCL was in a better position to carry out FIA's order. A Malaysian firm was then hired to provide a filtering system, but failed to deliver a working system.{{citation needed|date=August 2021}}

In March 2012, the Pakistan government took the unusual step of touting for firms that could help build it a nationwide content-filtering service.{{cite news| author=National ICT R&D Fund| title=Request for Proposal| date=March 2012| publisher=National ICT R&D Fund| url=http://ictrdf.org.pk/RFP-%20URL%20Filtering%20&%20Blocking.pdf| access-date=16 December 2019| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120321160014/http://www.ictrdf.org.pk/RFP-%20URL%20Filtering%20%26%20Blocking.pdf| archive-date=21 March 2012| url-status=dead}} The Pakistan Telecommunications Authority published a request for proposals for the "deployment and operation of a national level URL Filtering and Blocking System" which would operate on similar lines to China's Golden Shield, or "Great Firewall". Academic and research institutions as well as private commercial entities had until 16 March to submit their proposals, according to the request's detailed 35-point system requirements list. Key among these is the following: "Each box should be able to handle a block list of up to 50 million URLs (concurrent unidirectional filtering capacity) with processing delay of not more than 1 milliseconds".

The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) states that the DPI system has been installed to implement the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016, particularly to filter and block blasphemous content and any material that is considered to be against the integrity or security of Pakistan.{{Cite web |title=Pakistan's digital spaces and privacy: Unpacking DPI and its implications {{!}} Political Economy {{!}} thenews.com.pk |url=https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/576187-unpacking-dpi-and-its-implications |access-date=2023-11-21 |website=www.thenews.com.pk |language=en}} Canadian firm Sandvine was contracted to provide and set up the equipment in Pakistan.{{Cite web |last=Desk |first=Monitoring |date=2019-10-25 |title=Govt working with controversial firm to monitor internet traffic: report |url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1512784 |access-date=2023-11-21 |website=DAWN.COM |language=en}}

The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy began after 12 editorial cartoons, most of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad, were published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on 30 September 2005. This led to protests across the Muslim world, some of which escalated into violence with instances of firing on crowds of protestors, resulting in more than 100 reported deaths,{{cite news|date=2 March 2006| title=Cartoon Body Count|publisher=Web|url=http://www.cartoonbodycount.com/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060326071135/http://www.cartoonbodycount.com/|archive-date=26 March 2006}} and included the bombing of the Danish embassy in Pakistan, setting fire to the Danish Embassies in Syria, Lebanon and Iran, storming of European buildings, and the burning of the Danish, Dutch, Norwegian, French, and German flags in Gaza City.{{cite news |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,399177,00.html |title=Arson and Death Threats as Muhammad Caricature Controversy Escalates |date=4 February 2006 |work=Spiegel online |access-date=26 April 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070502165608/http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,399177,00.html |archive-date=2 May 2007 |url-status=live }}{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/04/syria.cartoon/ |title=Embassies torched in cartoon fury |date=5 February 2006 |publisher=CNN.com |access-date=26 April 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070206083120/http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/04/syria.cartoon/ |archive-date=6 February 2007 |url-status=live }} The posting of the cartoons online added to the controversy.

On 1 March 2006 the Supreme Court of Pakistan directed the government to keep tabs on Internet sites displaying the cartoons and called for an explanation from authorities as to why these sites had not been blocked earlier.{{cite news | url= http://www.asiaarts.ucla.edu/071102/article.asp?parentid=40226 | publisher= Dawn | title= Blasphemous websites be blocked, orders SC | date= 2 March 2006 | access-date= 14 June 2011 | archive-url= https://archive.today/20120730181659/http://www.asiaarts.ucla.edu/071102/article.asp?parentid=40226 | archive-date= 30 July 2012 | url-status= dead }} On 2 March 2006, pursuant to a petition filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, the Supreme Court sitting en banc ordered the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) and other government departments to adopt measures for blocking websites showing blasphemous content. The Court also ordered Attorney General Makhdoom Ali Khan to explore laws which would enable blocking of objectionable websites. In announcing the decision, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, said, "We will not accept any excuse or technical objection on this issue because it relates to the sentiments of the entire Muslim world. All authorities concerned will have to appear in the Court on the next hearing with reports of concrete measures taken to implement our order".

Consequently, the government kept tabs on a number of websites hosting the cartoons deemed to be sacrilegious. This ban included all the weblogs hosted at the popular blogging service blogger.com, as some bloggers had put up copies of the cartoons – particularly many non-Pakistani blogs.

A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Chaudhry, summoned the country's Attorney General as well as senior communication ministry officials to give a report of "concrete measures for implementation of the court's order". At the hearing on 14 March 2006, the PTA informed the Supreme Court that all websites displaying the Muhammad cartoons had been blocked. The bench issued directions to the Attorney General of Pakistan, Makhdoom Ali Khan, to assist the court on how it could exercise jurisdiction to prevent the availability of blasphemous material on websites the world over.{{cite news |url=http://archives.dawn.com/2006/03/14/top16.htm |title=Websites blocked, PTA tells SC: Blasphemous material |date=14 March 2006 |publisher=Dawn |access-date=14 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130912053554/http://archives.dawn.com/2006/03/14/top16.htm |archive-date=12 September 2013 |url-status=live }}

The blanket ban on the blogspot.com blogs was lifted on 2 May 2006."Blogspot ban lifted in Pakistan", Wikinews, 6 May 2006 Shortly thereafter the blanket ban was reimposed and extended to Typepad blogs. The blanket ban on the blogspot.com blogs was later lifted again.

Allegations of suppressing vote-rigging videos by the Musharraf administration were also leveled by Pakistani bloggers, newspapers, media, and Pakistani anti-Musharraf opposition parties. The ban was lifted on 26 February 2008.

YouTube was blocked in Pakistan following a decision taken by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority on 22 February 2008 because of the number of "non-Islamic objectionable videos."{{cite news | publisher=Reporters Without Borders | url=http://en.rsf.org/pakistan-youtube-access-unblocked-after-27-02-2008,25889.html | title=Access to YouTube blocked until further notice because of "non-Islamic" videos | date=27 February 2008 | access-date=19 May 2010 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151119180621/http://en.rsf.org/pakistan-youtube-access-unblocked-after-27-02-2008,25889.html | archive-date=19 November 2015 | url-status=dead }}[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/19/facebook-blocked-pakistan-muhammad-drawings "Pakistan blocks Facebook in row over Muhammad drawings"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130914225211/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/19/facebook-blocked-pakistan-muhammad-drawings |date=14 September 2013 }}, Declan Walsh, The Guardian, 19 May 2010 One report specifically named Fitna, a controversial Dutch film, as the basis for the block.[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7261727.stm "Pakistan blocks YouTube website"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080307212728/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7261727.stm |date=7 March 2008 }}, BBC News, 24 February 2008 Pakistan, an Islamic republic, ordered its ISPs to block access to YouTube "for containing blasphemous web content/movies."[http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5io-SE_bmENEzM46rwdVuDt9iK5zg "Pakistan blocks YouTube for 'blasphemous' content: officials"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110521105257/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5io-SE_bmENEzM46rwdVuDt9iK5zg |date=21 May 2011 }}, Agence France-Presse (AFP), 24 February 2008 The action effectively blocked YouTube access worldwide for several hours on 24 February. Defaming Muhammad under § 295-C of the Blasphemy law in Pakistan requires a death sentence.[http://www.thepersecution.org/archive/10_c.html "Section 295-C"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140218220810/http://www.thepersecution.org/archive/10_c.html |date=18 February 2014 }}, Pakistan Criminal Code, 12 October 1986 This followed increasing unrest in Pakistan by over the reprinting of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons which depict satirical criticism of Islam. Router misconfiguration by one Pakistani ISP on 24 February 2008 effectively blocked YouTube access worldwide for several hours.{{cite web|url=http://bookchin.net/trip-research/youtube/pakistanBlocksYoutube.html |title=Pakistan move knocked out YouTube |work=CNN.com (Asia) |publisher=Natalie Bookchin (bookchin.net) |date=25 February 2008 |access-date=5 March 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141014220714/http://bookchin.net/trip-research/youtube/pakistanBlocksYoutube.html |archive-date=14 October 2014 }} On 26 February 2008, the ban was lifted after the website had removed the objectionable content from its servers at the demand of the Government of Pakistan.{{Cite news |title=Pakistan lifts YouTube ban |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/27/2173501.htm?section=world |agency=Agence France-Presse |publisher=ABC News (Australia) |date=26 February 2008 |access-date=26 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080301140400/http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/27/2173501.htm?section=world |archive-date=1 March 2008 |url-status=dead }}

On 19 and 20 May 2010, Pakistan's Telecommunication Authority PTA imposed a ban on Wikipedia, YouTube, Flickr, and Facebook in response to a competition entitled Everybody Draw Mohammed Day on Facebook, in a bid to contain "blasphemous" material.[https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iqKZNUdJFQ6c8ctdkUW0C-vktIEA "Pakistan blocks Facebook over Mohammed cartoon"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100522024516/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iqKZNUdJFQ6c8ctdkUW0C-vktIEA |date=22 May 2010 }}, Waqar Hussain, Agence France-Presse (AFP), 19 May 2010{{Cite news |title=Pakistan blocks YouTube access over Muhammad depictions |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/20/pakistan-blocks-youtube-sacrilegious |work=The Guardian |access-date=23 May 2010 |first=Declan |last=Walsh |date=20 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130914225330/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/20/pakistan-blocks-youtube-sacrilegious |archive-date=14 September 2013 |url-status=live }}{{Cite book |last=Gillespie |first=Tarleton |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cOJgDwAAQBAJ |title=Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media |date=2018 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-23502-9 |pages=191 |language=en}} The ban imposed on Facebook was the result of a ruling by the Lahore High Court, while the ban on the other websites was imposed arbitrarily by the PTA on the grounds of "objectionable content", a different response from earlier requests, such as pages created to promote peaceful demonstrations in Pakistani cities being removed because they were "inciting violence". The sitewide ban on Facebook was lifted on 27 May 2010, after Facebook filtered content so that users in Pakistan could not access the "blasphemous" content. However, individual videos deemed offensive to Muslims that are posted on YouTube will continue to be blocked.[http://www.metro.co.uk/news/828161-youtube-ban-lifted-by-pakistan-authorities "YouTube ban lifted by Pakistan authorities"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100722062958/http://www.metro.co.uk/news/828161-youtube-ban-lifted-by-pakistan-authorities |date=22 July 2010 }}, Joanne McCabe, Metro (Associated Newspapers Limited, UK), 27 May 2010, accessed 18 September 2012[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Pakistan-lifts-ban-on-YouTube/articleshow/5978581.cms "Pakistan lifts ban on YouTube"], The Times of India, 27 May 2010

In September 2012, the PTA blocked the video-sharing website YouTube for not removing an anti-Islamic film made in the United States, Innocence of Muslims, which mocks Muhammed. The website would remain suspended, it was stated, until the film was removed.[https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/youtube-blocked-in-pakistan/2012/09/17/30081fa2-00ea-11e2-b257-e1c2b3548a4a_story.html "YouTube blocked in Pakistan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170212193547/https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/youtube-blocked-in-pakistan/2012/09/17/30081fa2-00ea-11e2-b257-e1c2b3548a4a_story.html |date=12 February 2017 }}, Hayley Tsukayama, Washington Post, 17 September 2012{{cite web |title=YouTube blocked in Pakistan for not removing anti-Islam film |url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/youtube-blocked-in-pakistan-for-not-removing-anti-islam-film-268570 |publisher=New Delhi Television (NDTV) |date=17 September 2012 |access-date=18 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120918025124/http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/youtube-blocked-in-pakistan-for-not-removing-anti-islam-film-268570 |archive-date=18 September 2012 |url-status=live }} In a related move, the PTA announced that it had blocked about 20,000 websites due to "objectionable" content.{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-blocks-20000-websites/article3977440.ece |title=Pakistan blocks 20,000 websites |work=The Hindu |date=8 October 2012 |access-date=16 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141129185700/http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-blocks-20000-websites/article3977440.ece |archive-date=29 November 2014 |url-status=live }}

On 25 July 2013, the government announced that it is mulling over reopening YouTube during the second week of August. A special 12-member committee was working under the Minister of IT and Telecommunication, Anusha Rahman, to see if objectionable content can be removed. The Pakistan Telecommunications Authority, the telecom watchdog in the country, has already expressed its inability to filter out select content.{{cite web |url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/581837/youtube-ban-may-be-lifted-after-eid/ |title=YouTube ban may be lifted after Eid |work=The Express Tribune |date=25 July 2013 |access-date=26 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130727212035/http://tribune.com.pk/story/581837/youtube-ban-may-be-lifted-after-eid/ |archive-date=27 July 2013 |url-status=live }}

On 21 April 2014, Pakistan's Senate Standing Committee on Human Rights requested the Federal Government remove the ban on YouTube.{{cite web |title=Pakistan senate panel on Human Rights revokes ban on YouTube |url=http://news.biharprabha.com/2014/04/pakistan-senate-panel-on-human-rights-revokes-ban-on-youtube/ |work=IANS |publisher=news.biharprabha.com |access-date=21 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140423041730/http://news.biharprabha.com/2014/04/pakistan-senate-panel-on-human-rights-revokes-ban-on-youtube/ |archive-date=23 April 2014 |url-status=live }}{{cite news |url=http://arynews.tv/en/exclusive-1000-days-on-youtube-remains-blocked-in-pakistan/ |title=Exclusive: 1,000 days on, YouTube remains blocked in Pakistan |author=Azhar Khan |work=ARY News |date=14 June 2015 |access-date=16 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151026033556/http://arynews.tv/en/exclusive-1000-days-on-youtube-remains-blocked-in-pakistan |archive-date=26 October 2015 |url-status=live }}

On 8 February 2015, the government announced that YouTube will remain blocked 'indefinitely' because no tool or solution had been found which can totally block offensive content.{{cite news |url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1162139 |title=YouTube to remain blocked 'indefinitely' in Pakistan: officials |work=Dawn |agency=Agence France-Presse |date=8 February 2015 |access-date=13 June 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150716025207/http://www.dawn.com/news/1162139 |archive-date=16 July 2015 |url-status=live }} As of June 2015 — 1,000 days on — the ban was still in effect, and YouTube cannot be accessed from either desktop or mobile devices.

The ban was lifted due to technical glitch on 6 December 2015 according to ISPs in Pakistan.{{cite news |url=http://www.thenewstribe.com/2015/12/06/youtube-accessible-in-pakistan-by-mistake/ |title=YouTube accessible in Pakistan by mistake |date=6 December 2015 |access-date=10 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151231201505/http://www.thenewstribe.com/2015/12/06/youtube-accessible-in-pakistan-by-mistake/ |archive-date=31 December 2015 |url-status=live }} As September 2016, the ban has been lifted officially, as YouTube launched a local version for Pakistan.{{cite news|last1=Masood|first1=Tooba|last2=Bashir|first2=Omer|title=YouTube Pakistan officially launched|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1286842|access-date=1 October 2016|publisher=Dawn|date=29 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161001042229/http://www.dawn.com/news/1286842|archive-date=1 October 2016|url-status=live}}

On 25 November 2017, the NetBlocks internet shutdown observatory and Digital Rights Foundation identified mass-scale blocking of social media and content-sharing websites including YouTube, Twitter and Facebook throughout Pakistan imposed by the government in response to the violent Tehreek-e-Labaik protests.{{Cite news|url=https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/press-release-drf-and-netblocks-find-blanket-and-nation-wide-ban-on-social-media-in-pakistan-and-demand-it-to-be-lifted-immediately/|title=DRF and NetBlocks find blanket and nation-wide ban on social media in Pakistan and demand it to be lifted immediately|date=26 November 2017|work=Digital Rights Foundation|access-date=29 November 2017|language=en-GB|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201040815/https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/press-release-drf-and-netblocks-find-blanket-and-nation-wide-ban-on-social-media-in-pakistan-and-demand-it-to-be-lifted-immediately/|archive-date=1 December 2017|url-status=live}}{{Cite news|url=http://nation.com.pk/27-Nov-2017/activists-assail-blanket-ban-on-social-media|title=Activists assail blanket ban on social media|date=27 November 2017|work=The Nation|access-date=29 November 2017|language=en-US|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171128200108/http://nation.com.pk/27-Nov-2017/activists-assail-blanket-ban-on-social-media|archive-date=28 November 2017|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.samaa.tv/social-buzz/2017/11/need-know-nation-wide-internet-disruptions-dharna/|title=All you need to know about nation-wide internet disruptions during dharna|date=27 November 2017|website=Samaa TV|language=en-US|access-date=29 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171127185835/https://www.samaa.tv/social-buzz/2017/11/need-know-nation-wide-internet-disruptions-dharna/|archive-date=27 November 2017|url-status=live}} The technical investigation found that all major Pakistani fixed-line and mobile service providers were affected by the restrictions, which were lifted by the PTA the next day when protests abated following the resignation of Minister for Law and Justice Zahid Hamid.{{Cite news|url=http://nation.com.pk/26-Nov-2017/the-issue-of-social-media-networking|title=The issue of social media networking|date=26 November 2017|work=The Nation|access-date=29 November 2017|language=en-US|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171128200126/http://nation.com.pk/26-Nov-2017/the-issue-of-social-media-networking|archive-date=28 November 2017|url-status=live}}

In 2019, The National Assembly Standing Committee on Information Technology and Telecom was informed by the PTA that 900,000 URLs were blocked in Pakistan for "reasons such as carrying blasphemous and pornographic content and/or sentiments against the state, judiciary or the armed forces."

On 9 October 2020, TikTok was banned by the PTA for "immoral content" {{cite news |last1=Hussain|first1=Javed|title=PTA bans TikTok over complaints against 'immoral content'|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1584123|access-date=18 October 2020|work=dawn.com|date=9 October 2020|language=en}}

On 16 April 2021, various social media applications were banned. The Ministry of Interior ordered the PTA to restrict access of Pakistani users to Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, and Telegram.[https://www.dawn.com/news/1618552/ Social Media blocked in Pakistan] It was issued to block these social media websites from 11:00 AM to 03:00 PM on Friday with an immediate effect. The reason to put a temporary ban on these social media platforms was not mentioned on the official notice. Later on, PTA explained the ban by putting forward the statement, "In order to maintain public order and safety, access to certain social media applications has been restricted temporarily." There was a severe condition in Pakistan due to Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan anti-France protests. The condition became more intense after Pakistan announced to ban Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan under Anti-Terror Law.[https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/14/pakistan-to-ban-far-right-religious-party-after-violent-protest/ Pakistan to ban Tehreek-e-Labbaik]

On Sunday 5 February 2023, Wikipedia was banned due to not removing purportedly blasphemous materials but it could still be accessed using the app.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}} The ban was lifted on Tuesday 7 February 2023, with the PM Office stating, "Blocking the site in its entirety was not a suitable measure to restrict access to some objectionable contents and sacrilegious matter on it."{{Cite web |date=2023-02-06 |title=PM orders immediate restoration of Wikipedia |url=https://tribune.com.pk/story/2399664/pm-orders-immediate-restoration-of-wikipedia-across-pakistan |access-date=2023-02-07 |website=The Express Tribune |language=en}}

In February 2024, X (formerly Twitter) was reportedly blocked as per reports of users. However there were no official announcements from the government. On 17 April 2024, Pakistan's interior ministry told the Islamabad High Court that the block was amid general election over national security concerns. Later the court asked the government to restore the platform within one week.{{Cite web |date=2024-04-17 |title=Pakistan blocked social media platform X over national security, ministry tells court |url=https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-blocked-social-media-platform-x-over-national-security-ministry-says-712304 |access-date=2024-04-17 |website=WION |language=en-us}}

In November 2024, Bluesky was banned by Pakistani authorities, which was confirmed by internet watchdog NetBlocks.https://www.techradar.com/pro/vpn/pakistan-blocks-bluesky-amid-popularity-surge

In June 2013, the Citizen Lab interdisciplinary research laboratory uncovered that Canadian internet-filtering product Netsweeper to be in use at the national level in Pakistan. The system has categorized billions of URLs and is adding 10 million new URLs every day. The lab also confirmed that ISPs in Pakistan are using methods of DNS tampering to block websites at the behest of Pakistan Telecommunication Authority.

According to the report published by the lab, "Netsweeper technology is being implemented in Pakistan for purposes of political and social filtering, including websites of secessionist movements, sensitive religious topics, and independent media.""[http://tribune.com.pk/story/565879/pakistan-government-using-netsweeper-for-internet-filtering-report/ Pakistani government using Netsweeper for internet filtering] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130722090901/http://tribune.com.pk/story/565879/pakistan-government-using-netsweeper-for-internet-filtering-report/ |date=2013-07-22 }}" The Express Tribune. 20 June 2013.

In October 2020 Government of Pakistan issued new policy rules called Citizens Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules 2020 or the Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Content (Procedure, Oversight and Safeguards) under 2016 Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA).

The government of Pakistan intends to access internet user data and control and remove objectionable content.{{Cite web|last=Welle (www.dw.com)|first=Deutsche|title=Pakistan seeks to 'control digital media' amid anti-government protests {{!}} DW {{!}} 28 October 2020|url=https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-seeks-to-control-digital-media-amid-anti-government-protests/a-55422291|access-date=14 January 2021|website=DW.COM|language=en-GB}}{{Cite web|last=Welle (www.dw.com)|first=Deutsche|title=Pakistan: Social media curbs shrink free speech space {{!}} DW {{!}} 21 December 2020|url=https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-social-media-restrictions-hurt-free-speech/a-56012599|access-date=14 January 2021|website=DW.COM|language=en-GB}}{{Cite news|last=Shahzad|first=Asif|date=19 November 2020|title=New internet rules to give Pakistan blanket powers of censorship|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/pakistan-socialmedia-censorship-idINKBN27Z2KF|access-date=14 January 2021}} The companies would be required to remove or block any asked content from their websites within 24 hours after being reported by Pakistani authorities, social media companies or internet service providers face may be fined of up to $3.14 million (€2.57 million) for failure to curb the sharing of content deemed to be defamatory of Islam, promoting terrorism, hate speech, pornography or any content viewed as problematic to Pakistan's national security.

Rights activists complain that new rules are compromising user privacy at mercy of Pakistani establishment sans judicial oversight, likely to erode media freedom and freedom of expression further there by erode political freedoms and result in increased censorship.

Since then, dating apps like Tinder are banned in Pakistan, video sharing app named TikTok faced a temporary ban til removed content; issued notices to U.S.A. based Ahmadiyya community web portal TrueIslam.com, Google and Wikipedia for returning search results displaying Ahmadiyya community and their leadership, Mirza Masroor Ahmad, 's claims of Muslimness.{{Cite web|date=13 January 2021|title=Pakistan attempts to prosecute Ahmadi US citizens for digital blasphemy|url=https://religionnews.com/2021/01/13/pakistan-attempts-to-prosecute-ahmadi-us-citizens-for-digital-blasphemy-980-1000/|access-date=14 January 2021|website=Religion News Service|language=en-US}}{{Cite web|last=Hussain|first=Javed|date=25 December 2020|title=PTA issues notices to Google, Wikipedia for 'disseminating sacrilegious content'|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1597761|access-date=14 January 2021|website=DAWN.COM|language=en}}

{{Dynamic list|date=June 2014}}

{{Main|List of banned video games in Pakistan}}

In July 2020, PTA banned the online game PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds,{{Cite web|title=Media Center {{!}} PTA|url=https://www.pta.gov.pk/en/media-center/single-media/pta-temporarily-suspends-pubg-game-010720|access-date=28 July 2020|website=www.pta.gov.pk}} Millions of social media users of Pakistan have flooded sites like Facebook, Twitter and have shown overwhelming support for PUBG (PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds).{{Cite web|title=Pakistani PUBG Players are Tweeting to PM Imran Khan to Unban the Popular Game|url=https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/pakistani-pubg-players-are-tweeting-to-pm-imran-khan-to-unban-popular-game-2737503.html|access-date=28 July 2020|website=News18|date=27 July 2020}} In response, PTA lifted ban on the popular online game.{{Cite web|last=Jahangir|first=Ramsha|date=28 July 2020|title=Ban on PUBG to remain in interest of public order: PTA|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1571533|access-date=28 July 2020|website=DAWN.COM|language=en}}

{{Main|Pornography in Pakistan}}

• Richard Dawkins's website{{cite news |url=http://torrentfreak.com/top-torrent-sites-and-richard-dawkins-blocked-in-pakistan-130723/ |title=Top torrent sites and Richard Dawkins blocked in Pakistan |work=TorrentFreak |date=23 July 2013 |access-date=25 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130724044416/http://torrentfreak.com/top-torrent-sites-and-richard-dawkins-blocked-in-pakistan-130723/ |archive-date=24 July 2013 |url-status=live }} and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb){{cite news |title=Why was IMDB blocked? |url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/636013/why-was-imdb-blocked/ |author=Nighat Dad |work=The Express Tribune |date=23 November 2013 |access-date=30 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140903130857/http://tribune.com.pk/story/636013/why-was-imdb-blocked/ |archive-date=3 September 2014 |url-status=live }} were blocked for brief periods in 2013.
• Xbox Live and GameRanger were blocked accidentally on 7 February 2013 by the Pakistan Telecom Authority.{{cite web |last=Pirzada |first=Usman |title=Xbox Live, Playstation Network and GameRanger blocked in Pakistan – Accidentally |url=http://wccftech.com/xbox-live-playstation-network-gameranger-blocked-pakistan/ |work=WCCFTech |publisher=WCCFTech |access-date=9 February 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222135530/http://wccftech.com/xbox-live-playstation-network-gameranger-blocked-pakistan/ |archive-date=22 February 2014 |url-status=dead }}
• Major Torrenting Websites. In July 2013, Pakistani ISPs banned 6 of the top 10"[http://torrentfreak.com/top-10-most-popular-torrent-sites-of-2013-130106/ Top 10 most popular torrent sites of 2013] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130712191259/http://torrentfreak.com/top-10-most-popular-torrent-sites-of-2013-130106/ |date=2013-07-12 }}" TorrentFreak. 6 January 2013. public Torrent sites in Pakistan. These sites include Piratebay, Kickass torrents, Torrentz, Bitsnoop, Extra Torrent and Torrent Reactor."[http://torrentfreak.com/top-torrent-sites-and-richard-dawkins-blocked-in-pakistan-130723/ Top Torrent sites banned in Pakistan] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130724044416/http://torrentfreak.com/top-torrent-sites-and-richard-dawkins-blocked-in-pakistan-130723/ |date=2013-07-24 }}" TorrentFreak. 25 July 2013. They also banned the similar site Mininova."[https://www.nation.com.pk/25-Jul-2013/isps-gratuitously-filter-torrent-sites ISPs gratuitously filter Torrent sites] " The Nation. 25 July 2013. However proxies for these torrent sites are still active and P2P connections are working normally."[http://propakistani.pk/2013/07/24/torrent-websites-blocked-in-pakistan-for-time-being-yes/ Are Torrents banned in Pakistan? For the time being, yes] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130725053050/http://propakistani.pk/2013/07/24/torrent-websites-blocked-in-pakistan-for-time-being-yes/ |date=2013-07-25 }}" ProPakistani. 24 July 2013. This move lead to a massive public backlash, especially from the Twitter and Facebook communities of Pakistan. In the aftermath of such critique, the IT Minister of Pakistan, Anusha Rahman, deactivated her Twitter account."[http://tribune.com.pk/story/581423/it-ministers-twitter-account-deactivated-amidst-critique-of-policies/ IT Minister's Twitter account deactivated amidst critique of policies] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130727193036/http://tribune.com.pk/story/581423/it-ministers-twitter-account-deactivated-amidst-critique-of-policies/ |date=2013-07-27 }}" The Express Tribune. 24 July 2013. Popular BitTorrent client μTorrent is also banned in Pakistan, it gives an "ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR", but with a virtual private network (VPN), the site works, users are facing this issue from few years, still facing in 2022.
• Pouet, a website about demoscene was banned as of 19 June 2015.
• Imgur, a website about image sharing/hosting was banned in December 2015. Reddit (NSFW content only) was also banned in 2019. No reason have been given for these bans.
• An extreme form of word censorship is effective on all website's URLs. URLs containing words like sex, porn are blocked, this includes pages on medical information sites like WebMD, MedicineNet about sexual health and couples therapy. This is similar to word censorship in effect for SMS and text messages.[http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/pakistan-banned-words-text-messages/ "No sexting in Pakistan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820135711/http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/pakistan-banned-words-text-messages/ |date=20 August 2016 }}, DailyDot. Retrieved 21 November 2011[https://gizmodo.com/5861375/heres-every-single-word-youre-not-allowed-to-text-in-pakistan "Here's Every Single Word You're Not Allowed to Text in Pakistan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170718134336/http://gizmodo.com/5861375/heres-every-single-word-youre-not-allowed-to-text-in-pakistan |date=18 July 2017 }}, Gizmodo. Retrieved 21 November 2011[https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/pakistan-telecommunication-authority-tries-ban-%E2%80%9Cobscene%E2%80%9D-texts "Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Attempts to Ban 'Obscene' Words from Texts"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160916033851/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/pakistan-telecommunication-authority-tries-ban-%E2%80%9Cobscene%E2%80%9D-texts |date=16 September 2016 }}, Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved 28 November 2011

{{Portal|Freedom of speech|Internet|Pakistan|Law|Politics}}

• Censorship in Pakistan
• Censorship in South Asia
• Constitution of Pakistan
• Freedom of speech in Pakistan
• Freedom of the press in Pakistan
• Information technology in Pakistan
• Internet in Pakistan
• Pornography in Pakistan

{{reflist}}

• [http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2006/07/060729_ptc_website.shtml "Ban on the web in the national interest"] (Urdu), Reba Shahid, BBC Urdu.com, 29 July 2006, [https://www.google.com/translate_c?langpair=en&u=http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2006/07/060729_ptc_website.shtml (English translation)]
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20110819153723/http://kuj.com.pk/ Karachi Union of Journalists], website

{{Censorship}}

{{Censorship and websites}}

{{Internet censorship by country}}

{{Social issues in Pakistan}}

{{Asia in topic|Internet censorship in}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Internet Censorship In Pakistan}}

Category:Mass media in Pakistan

Category:Law of Pakistan

Pakistan

Pakistan

Category:Censorship in Pakistan

Censorship

Category:History of mass media in Pakistan