Intersex rights in Germany
{{short description|Overview of intersex people's rights in Germany}}
{{Infobox intersex rights
| location_header = Germany
| image = EU-Germany.svg
| caption = {{map_caption|location_color=dark green|country=Germany|region=Europe|region_color=dark grey|subregion=the European Union|subregion_color=light green|legend=EU-Germany.svg}}
| prohibit_harmful = Yes, with loopholes
| discrimination_protections = Yes{{cite web | url = https://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/EN/about-discrimination/grounds-for-discrimination/gender-and-gender-identity/intersex/intersex_node.html| title = German government official page for info related to laws concerning intersex persons}}
| access_identification =
| equality_men_women =
| mf_identification = Yes
| third_identification = Yes (since December 2018)
| marriage = Yes (since 1 October 2017)
}}
{{Intersex sidebar}}
Intersex people in Germany have legal recognition of their rights to physical integrity and bodily autonomy, with exceptions, but no specific protections from discrimination on the basis of sex characteristics. In response to an inquiry by the German Ethics Council in 2012, the government passed legislation in 2013 designed to classify some intersex infants as a de facto third category. The legislation has been criticized by civil society and human rights organizations as misguided.
Research published in 2016 found no substantive reduction in the numbers of intersex medical interventions for infants and children with intersex conditions in the period from 2005 to 2014. In 2021, the Bundestag (the German parliament) passed legal protections, albeit protections that have been criticized due to exceptions to the law.
History
{{Further|Intersex in history}}
The 12th-century canon law collection known as the Decretum Gratiani states that "Whether a hermaphrodite may witness a testament, depends on which sex prevails" ("Hermaphroditus an ad testamentum adhiberi possit, qualitas sexus incalescentis ostendit.").Decretum Gratiani, C. 4, q. 2 et 3, c. 3{{cite web | url = http://geschichte.digitale-sammlungen.de/decretum-gratiani/kapitel/dc_chapter_1_1585 | title = Decretum Gratiani (Kirchenrechtssammlung) | work = Bayerische StaatsBibliothek (Bavarian State Library) | date = February 5, 2009 | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20161220084841/http://geschichte.digitale-sammlungen.de/decretum-gratiani/kapitel/dc_chapter_1_1585 | archive-date = December 20, 2016 }} On ordainment, Raming, Macy and Cook found that the Decretum Gratiani states, "item Hermafroditus. If therefore the person is drawn to the feminine more than the male, the person does not receive the order. If the reverse, the person is able to receive but ought not to be ordained on account of deformity and monstrosity."{{cite book | title = A History of Women and Ordination | last1 = Raming | first1 = Ida | last2 = Macy | first2 = Gary | last3 = Bernard J | first3 = Cook | publisher = Scarecrow Press | date = 2004 | page = 113}} Historical accounts of intersex people are scarce, but 19th-century medical journals document Gottlieb Göttlich, a man who made a living from being studied by medical practitioners, and Karl Dürrge. Dürrge also made his living as a medical subject, but his life also illustrates the historical legal tradition. Assigned female at birth, Dürrge changed name and designation to male as an adult, in line with articles Articles 19-24 of the Prussian Code of 1792, which enabled hermaphrodites to choose to live as either male or female from the age of majority.{{Cite web|url=https://opinioiuris.de/quelle/1622#Erster_Titel._Von_Personen_und_deren_Rechten_ueberhaupt|title=Allgemeines Landrecht für die Preußischen Staaten (01.06.1794), Erster Theil - section 20|date=1794-06-01|website=Allgemeines Landrecht für die Preußischen Staaten}}
In the 20th century, the term intersex was coined by the German-born geneticist Richard Goldschmidt.{{Citation | doi = 10.1210/endo-1-4-433 | last1 = Goldschmidt | first1 = R. | year = 1917 | title = Intersexuality and the endocrine aspect of sex | url =https://zenodo.org/record/1448726 | journal = Endocrinology | volume = 1 | issue = 4| pages = 433–456 }} In 1932 gynecologist and obstetrician Hans Naujoks performed what was described as the first complete and comprehensive intersex surgery and hormone treatment on a patient with both ovarian and testicular tissue, at the University of Marburg. The female patient was described as fully functional after surgery and, starting in 1934, spontaneously menstruated.{{Cite book|url=http://stop.genitalmutilation.org/public/Naujoks_Genitalamputation_1934_web.pdf|title=Über echte Zwitterbildung beim Menschen und ihre therapeutische Beeinflussung. In: Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. Band 109.|last=Naujoks|first=Hans|publisher=W. Stoeckel|year=1934|location=Berlin|pages=135–161}}
=Nazi Germany=
File:Misogynistic intersex pseudo-diagnosis in Nazi Germany 1943 - Waibel Lehrbuch Frauenheilkunde.jpg in 1943. The text reads: "The intersex type is physical and psychologically expressed. There are also sexual intermediate stages, where female characteristics are only weakly developed. Hair growth is excessive and atypical, the features are male, the voice is deep. Puberty occurs with delay, there is frigidity and reduced fertility in the case of hypoplasia of the gonads and hyperfunction of the pituitary gland, sometimes eunuch-like tall stature, also disorders in the function of the thyroid gland. Often dysmenorrhea is observed."]]
During Nazi rule in Germany, many intersex people were either killed or hidden from the public.Gender, Intersections, and Institutions; 18 German athlete Dora Ratjen competed in the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin, placing fourth in the women's high jump. She later competed and set a world record for the women's high jump at the 1938 European Championships. Raised as a girl, tests by the German police concluded that Ratjen was a man. Ratjen later took the name Heinrich Ratjen following an official registry change.{{cite news |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,649104,00.html |last=Berg |first=Stefan |title=How Dora the Man Competed in the Woman's High Jump |publisher=Der Spiegel |date=15 September 2009 |access-date=31 August 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100909011939/http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,649104,00.html |archive-date=9 September 2010 }} Formal sex verification testing was controversially later introduced in sport.{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/03/magazine/the-humiliating-practice-of-sex-testing-female-athletes.html|title=The Humiliating Practice of Sex-Testing Female Athletes|last=Padawer|first=Ruth|date=2016-06-28|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160628124045/http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/03/magazine/the-humiliating-practice-of-sex-testing-female-athletes.html|archive-date=2016-06-28|access-date=2016-06-28}} Time magazine later reported that Ratjen tearfully confessed that he had been forced by the Nazis to pose as a woman "for the sake of the honor and glory of Germany".[https://web.archive.org/web/20080612003903/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,836386,00.html#ixzz0yDtRtjn4 "Track & Field: Preserving la Difference"], Time, 16 September 1966, retrieved 18 March 2011.
=Post World War II=
In the 21st century, legal cases by Christiane Völling and Michaela Raab, provide first and later examples of successful legal action against coercive intersex medical interventions.{{Cite web| last = International Commission of Jurists| author-link = International Commission of Jurists| title = In re Völling, Regional Court Cologne, Germany (6 February 2008)| access-date = 27 December 2015| url = http://www.icj.org/sogicasebook/in-re-volling-regional-court-cologne-germany-6-february-2008/| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160105074337/http://www.icj.org/sogicasebook/in-re-volling-regional-court-cologne-germany-6-february-2008/| archive-date = 5 January 2016}}{{Cite web| last = Zwischengeschlecht| title = Nuremberg Hermaphrodite Lawsuit: Michaela "Micha" Raab Wins Damages and Compensation for Intersex Genital Mutilations!| access-date = 2015-12-21| date = December 17, 2015| url = http://stop.genitalmutilation.org/post/Nuremberg-Hermaphrodite-Lawsuit-Damages-and-Compensation-for-Intersex-Genital-Mutilations| url-status = live| archive-url = https://archive.today/20160511101133/http://stop.genitalmutilation.org/post/Nuremberg-Hermaphrodite-Lawsuit-Damages-and-Compensation-for-Intersex-Genital-Mutilations| archive-date = May 11, 2016}}
Also in this century, Germany introduced what may be the first form of third gender recognition in Europe, albeit controversially as a requirement for some intersex infants and otherwise not available.{{Citation|title=Human rights and intersex people, Issue Paper|date=April 2015|url=https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CommDH/IssuePaper(2015)1&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original|last1=Council of Europe|last2=Commissioner for Human Rights|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160106203349/https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CommDH%2FIssuePaper%282015%291&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original|archive-date=2016-01-06|author1-link=Council of Europe|access-date=2018-01-04}}{{Cite web| last = OII Germany| title = OII Germany: CEDAW Shadow Report. With reference to the combined Seventh and Eighth Periodic Report from the Federal Republic of Germany on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)| date = January 20, 2017| url = http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/DEU/INT_CEDAW_NGO_DEU_26315_E.pdf| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170211160901/http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/DEU/INT_CEDAW_NGO_DEU_26315_E.pdf| archive-date = February 11, 2017}} This was introduced as a measure to prevent early intersex medical interventions, but intersex civil society organizations fear that it will encourage such interventions, and there is no evidence of reductions in surgery numbers.
Civil society organizations, including Intergeschlechtliche Menschen, OII Germany and Zwischengeschlecht, have submitted reports to Land, federal and international human rights institutions.
In the spring of 1999, Heike Bödeker coined the term endosex, as an opposite or antonym for the term intersex.{{Cite book | first = Heike | last = Bödeker | editor1 = Michaela Katzer | editor2 = Heinz-Jürgen Voß | title = Geschlechtliche, sexuelle und reproduktive Selbstbestimmung | chapter = Intersexualität, Individualität, Selbstbestimmtheit und Psychoanalyse Ein Besinnungsaufsatz | doi = 10.30820/9783837967999-117 | publisher = Psychosozial-Verlag | place = Gießen | isbn = 978-3-8379-2546-3 | language = de | date = 2016| pages = 117–136 }}
Physical integrity and bodily autonomy
[[File:Protection of intersex children from harmful practices.svg|thumb|right|260px|
{{legend|#002255|Legal prohibition of non-consensual medical interventions}}
{{legend|#0066FF|Regulatory suspension of non-consensual medical interventions}}]]
{{Further|Intersex human rights|Intersex medical interventions}}
The organization Intersexuelle Menschen first submitted a Shadow Report to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) in July 2008, detailing human rights violations in medical settings and failures to act in the best interests of the child.{{Cite web| last = Intersexuelle Menschen| title = Shadow Report To the 6th National Report of the Federal Republic of Germany On the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)| location = Hamburg| date = July 2008| url = http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/ngos/AIP_Germany43_en.pdf| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170204170616/http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/ngos/AIP_Germany43_en.pdf| archive-date = 2017-02-04}}
In 2010, the German Ethics Council was instructed to review the situation of intersex people in Germany following a demand by CEDAW to protect the human rights of intersex persons. A 2012 report by the German Ethics Council stated that, "Many people who were subjected to a 'normalizing' operation in their childhood have later felt it to have been a mutilation and would never have agreed to it as adults."{{Cite book| isbn = 978-3-941957-50-3| last = German Ethics Council| title = Intersexuality, Opinion| date = February 2012| url = http://www.ethikrat.org/publications/opinions/intersexuality| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170421134819/http://www.ethikrat.org/publications/opinions/intersexuality| archive-date = 2017-04-21| access-date = 2017-02-04}} Legislation was subsequently passed to assign infants who could not be determined as male or female to a de facto third classification.{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.de/third-sex-option-on-birth-certificates/a-17193869|title=Deutsche Welle, "Third sex option on birth certificates", 1 November 2013|work=DW.DE|access-date=6 October 2014|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141010184218/http://www.dw.de/third-sex-option-on-birth-certificates/a-17193869|archive-date=10 October 2014}}
Research published by Ulrike Klöppel at the Humboldt University in December 2016 shows that, over the period 2005 to 2014, there were no significant trends in numbers of intersex medical interventions.{{Cite journal| issn = 0947-6822| issue = 42| last = Klöppel| first = Ulrike| title = Zur Aktualität kosmetischer Operationen "uneindeutiger" Genitalien im Kindesalter| journal = Gender Bulletin| date = December 2016| url = https://www.gender.hu-berlin.de/de/publikationen/gender-bulletins/texte-42/kloeppel-2016_zur-aktualitaet-kosmetischer-genitaloperationen| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170204171338/https://www.gender.hu-berlin.de/de/publikationen/gender-bulletins/texte-42/kloeppel-2016_zur-aktualitaet-kosmetischer-genitaloperationen| archive-date = 2017-02-04| access-date = 2017-02-04}}{{Cite news| last = Achtelik| first = Kirsten| title = Umgang mit intersexuellen Kindern: Operationen gehören verboten| work = die tageszeitung| access-date = 2017-02-03| date = December 7, 2016| url = https://www.taz.de/Umgang-mit-intersexuellen-Kindern/!5361693/| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170204170520/https://www.taz.de/Umgang-mit-intersexuellen-Kindern/!5361693/| archive-date = February 4, 2017}} An average of 99 feminizing surgeries took place each year, with a change only to the types of medical classification adopted. Rising numbers of masculinizing surgeries took place, exceeding 1600 per year. Between 10 and 16% of children diagnosed with hypospadias underwent a plastic reconstruction of the penis.{{Cite web| last = Zwischengeschlecht.org| author-link = Zwischengeschlecht| title = NGO Report to the 7th and 8th Report of Germany on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)| location = Zurich| date = January 2017| url = http://intersex.shadowreport.org/public/2017-CEDAW-Germany-NGO-Zwischengeschlecht-Intersex-IGM.pdf| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170223213829/http://intersex.shadowreport.org/public/2017-CEDAW-Germany-NGO-Zwischengeschlecht-Intersex-IGM.pdf| archive-date = 2017-02-23}}
In a hearing of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, German government stated that irreversible medical interventions were permissible where they are "a life-saving procedure, or the best interest of the child, for example if a child was suicidal."
In 2017, Amnesty International published a report condemning "non-emergency, invasive and irreversible medical treatment with harmful effects" on children born with variations of sex characteristics in Germany and Denmark. It found that surgeries take place with limited psychosocial support, based on gender stereotypes, but without firm evidence. Amnesty International reported that "there are no binding guidelines for the treatment of intersex children".{{Cite book| last = Amnesty International| title = First, Do No Harm| date = 2017| url = https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur01/6086/2017/en/| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170517005403/https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur01/6086/2017/en/| archive-date = 2017-05-17}}{{Cite web| last = Amnesty International| title = First, Do No Harm: ensuring the rights of children born intersex.| access-date = 2017-05-13| date = 2017| url = https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/05/intersex-rights/| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170511113659/https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/05/intersex-rights/| archive-date = 2017-05-11}}{{Cite web| last = Semple| first = Ross| title = Intersex children subject to 'invasive' surgery to 'normalise' their sex, reports Amnesty International| work = Attitude Magazine| access-date = 2017-05-13| date = May 10, 2017| url = http://attitude.co.uk/intersex-children-subject-to-invasive-surgery-to-normalise-their-sex-reports-amnesty-international/| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170513051737/http://attitude.co.uk/intersex-children-subject-to-invasive-surgery-to-normalise-their-sex-reports-amnesty-international/| archive-date = May 13, 2017}}{{Cite web | title = Amnesty denounces 'human rights violations' on intersex children | first = Elena | last = Cherubini | date = May 11, 2017 | access-date = 2017-05-11 | url = http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/05/11/amnesty-denounces-human-rights-violations-on-intersex-children/ | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170511162157/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/05/11/amnesty-denounces-human-rights-violations-on-intersex-children/ | archive-date = May 11, 2017 }}
= Legal protections, 2021 =
A law that provides for a general ban on operations in children and adolescents with 'variations of sex development' ('Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung') was passed in the German parliament on 25 March 2021.[https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2021/kw12-de-geschlechterentwicklung-kinder-830122 Bundestag.de: Schutz von Kindern mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung], 25 March 2021.[http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP19/2677/267726.htmlGesetz zum Schutz von Kindern mit Varianten der Geschlechtsentwicklung] Dokumentations- und Informationssystem des Deutschen Bundestages, Retrieved 21 March 2021. According to a report in the Deutsches Ärzteblatt, the law is intended to strengthen the self-determined decision-making of children and adolescents and avoid possible damage to their health. Surgical changes to sex characteristics should only take place - even with the consent of the parents - if the operation cannot be postponed until age 14. The majority of legal scholars and psychologists consulted support the approach. The Federal Chamber of Psychotherapists requires the mandatory participation of a counsellor with experience in intersex in an assessment before a possible intervention.Petra Bühring: [https://www.aerzteblatt.de/archiv/217721/Intersexuelle-Kinder-Recht-zur-Selbstbestimmung Intersexuelle Kinder: Recht zur Selbstbestimmung.] Auf: aerzteblatt.de; retrieved 21 March 2021. While supportive of progress,{{Cite web| last = OII Europe | author-link = OII Europe | url = https://oiieurope.org/a-good-first-step-germany-adopts-law-banning-igm/ | title = A good first step: Germany adopts law banning IGM. But there is still room for improvement | date = March 30, 2021 | accessdate = April 4, 2021}} the law that was finally passed was criticized by the Organisation Intersex International (OII) Germany, OII Europe, and Intergeschlechtliche Menschen e.V., because they provide too many exceptions. Whether the protection takes hold in an individual case depends on whether the medical professional diagnoses the child with variations of sex development (the German implementation of disorders of sex development) or not.{{Cite web | last = Intergeschlechtliche Menschen e.V. | url = https://im-ev.de/pm-2021-03-26-gesetz-vdg/ | title = Bundestag verabschiedet Gesetz zum Schutz von Kindern mit Varianten der Geschle | date = March 26, 2021 | accessdate = April 4, 2021}}[https://oiigermany.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Stellungnahme-OII-Germany-Nov-2020_.pdf Stellungnahme] des OII Germany zum Gesetzentwurf (PDF).[https://oiigermany.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Presseerkla%CC%88rung-Internationale-Vereinigung-Intergeschlechtlicher-Menschen_3_2021.pdf Pressemitteilung] des OII zur Verabschiedung des Gesetzes (PDF).
Remedies and claims for compensation
[[File:Inclusion of sex characteristics in anti-discrimination law.svg|thumb|right|260px|
{{legend|#002255|Explicit protection from discrimination on grounds of sex characteristics}}
{{legend|#0066FF|Explicit protection on grounds of intersex status}}
{{legend|#9FCFFF|Explicit protection on grounds of intersex within attribute of sex}}]]
Two legal cases seeking compensation for "unwanted, harmful medical interventions" have succeeded, those of Christiane Völling and Michaela Raab. Both were adults at the time of the medical interventions. There appear to be no statutory provisions offering compensation, however, at a hearing of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in February 2017, the German government said that a compensation fund for victims of intersex genital mutilation is under discussion.{{Citation| last = United Nations Office at Geneva| title = Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women considers the reports of Germany| date = February 21, 2017| url = http://www.unog.ch/unog/website/news_media.nsf/(httpNewsByYear_en)/9F8ED815BA5A5E23C12580CE005BBD79?OpenDocument| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170223214214/http://www.unog.ch/unog/website/news_media.nsf/(httpNewsByYear_en)/9F8ED815BA5A5E23C12580CE005BBD79?OpenDocument| archive-date = February 23, 2017| access-date = February 23, 2017}}
= Christiane Völling case =
{{main|Christiane Völling}}
In Germany in 2011, Christiane Völling won what may be the first successful case against non-consensual "normalizing" medical treatment. The surgeon was ordered to pay €100,000 in damages{{cite web |url=http://zwischengeschlecht.org/pages/Hermaphrodite-wins-damage-claim |title=Christiane Völling: Hermaphrodite wins damage claim over removal of reproductive organs |last1=Zwischengeschlecht |date=August 12, 2009 |access-date=2015-07-20 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150705201148/http://zwischengeschlecht.org/pages/Hermaphrodite-wins-damage-claim |archive-date=July 5, 2015 |author1-link=Zwischengeschlecht }} after a legal battle that began in 2007, thirty years after the removal of her reproductive organs.{{Cite web| title = German Gender-Assignment Case Has Intersexuals Hopeful| publisher = Deutsche Welle| date = 12 December 2007| work = DW.COM| access-date = 2015-12-21| url = http://www.dw.com/en/german-gender-assignment-case-has-intersexuals-hopeful/a-3000902| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151222145816/http://www.dw.com/en/german-gender-assignment-case-has-intersexuals-hopeful/a-3000902| archive-date = 22 December 2015}}{{Cite web| last = DW Staff| title = Christiane Völling| publisher = German Ethics Council| date = August 2010| access-date = 2015-12-21| url = http://diskurs.ethikrat.org/christiane-volling/| url-status = dead| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160304060821/http://diskurs.ethikrat.org/christiane-volling/| archive-date = 2016-03-04}}
= Michaela Raab case =
In 2015, Michaela Raab sued doctors in Nuremberg, Germany, who failed to properly advise her. Doctors stated that they "were only acting according to the norms of the time - which sought to protect patients against the psychosocial effects of learning the full truth about their chromosomes".{{Cite web| last = The Local| author-link = The Local| title = Intersex person sues clinic for unnecessary op| date = February 27, 2015| access-date = 2015-12-21| url = http://www.thelocal.de/20150227/intersex-person-sues-doctors-for-unwanted-op| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151214092025/http://www.thelocal.de/20150227/intersex-person-sues-doctors-for-unwanted-op| archive-date = December 14, 2015}} On 17 December 2015, the Nuremberg State Court ruled that the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Clinic must pay damages and compensation.{{Cite web| last = Zwischengeschlecht| title = Nuremberg Hermaphrodite Lawsuit: Michaela "Micha" Raab Wins Damages and Compensation for Intersex Genital Mutilations!| access-date = 2015-12-21| date = December 17, 2015| url = http://stop.genitalmutilation.org/post/Nuremberg-Hermaphrodite-Lawsuit-Damages-and-Compensation-for-Intersex-Genital-Mutilations| url-status = live| archive-url = https://archive.today/20160511101133/http://stop.genitalmutilation.org/post/Nuremberg-Hermaphrodite-Lawsuit-Damages-and-Compensation-for-Intersex-Genital-Mutilations| archive-date = May 11, 2016}}
Identification documents
{{main|Legal recognition of intersex people}}
[[File:World map nonbinary gender recognition.svg|thumb|right|260px|
{{legend|#002255|Nonbinary / third gender available as voluntary opt-in}}
{{legend|#FFCC00|Opt-in for intersex people only}}
{{legend|#FF8C00|Mandatory for some born intersex, and opt in}}
{{legend|#FF0000|Mandatory for some born intersex}}
{{legend|#CCCCCC|Nonbinary / third gender not legally recognized / no data}}]]
In November 2013, Germany became the first European country to allow "indeterminate" sex, requiring this where a child may not be assigned male or female. This was criticized by intersex civil society organizations such as OII Germany{{cite web | url = http://oiieurope.org/bluff-package-for-inter-leaving-sex-entry-open-is-not-an-option/ | title = Sham package for Intersex: Leaving sex entry open is not an option | work = OII Europe | date = 15 February 2013 | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140829115843/http://oiieurope.org/bluff-package-for-inter-leaving-sex-entry-open-is-not-an-option/ | archive-date = 29 August 2014 | access-date = 4 February 2017 }} and Zwischengeschlecht who argued that "if a child's anatomy does not, in the view of physicians, conform to the category of male or the category of female, there is no option but to withhold the male or female labels given to all other children."[https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/germany-has-an-official-third-gender/281254/ Germany Has an Official Third Gender] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170901021259/https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/germany-has-an-official-third-gender/281254/ |date=2017-09-01 }} The German Ethics Council and the Swiss National Advisory Commission also criticized the law, saying that "instead of individuals deciding for themselves at maturity, decisions concerning sex assignment are made in infancy by physicians and parents."{{citation needed|date=July 2017}}
Many intersex advocates in Germany and elsewhere have suggested that the law might encourage surgical interventions, rather than reduce them.{{cite web | url = http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2013/11/06/op-ed-germany’s-third-gender-law-fails-equality | first = Hida | last = Viloria | work = The Advocate | title = Op-ed: Germany's Third-Gender Law Fails on Equality | date = November 6, 2013 | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170103013558/http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2013/11/06/op-ed-germany%E2%80%99s-third-gender-law-fails-equality | archive-date = January 3, 2017 }}{{cite web|url=http://oii.org.au/23183/germany-third-gender-birth-certificates/|title=OII Australia, "German proposals for a "third gender" on birth certificates miss the mark", 20 August 2013|work=OII Australia - Intersex Australia|date=20 August 2013 |access-date=6 October 2014|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141007042039/http://oii.org.au/23183/germany-third-gender-birth-certificates/|archive-date=7 October 2014}} The Council of Europe Issue Paper on intersex restates these concerns:
{{quotation|Human rights practitioners fear that the lack of freedom of choice regarding the entry in the gender marker field may now lead to an increase in stigmatisation and to "forced outings" of those children whose sex remains undetermined. This has raised the concern that the law may also lead to an increase in pressure on parents of intersex children to decide in favour of one sex.}}
File:Aktion Standesamt 2018 Abschlusskundgebung vor dem Kanzleramt in Berlin 46 (cropped).png
In June 2016, Germany's High Court ruled that German law would not allow entry of a third option of "inter" or "diverse" in the birth registry. The High Court said it found no violation of the plaintiff's basic rights since intersex people have been able since 2013 to leave the gender entry in German birth registries blank.[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-gender-idUSKCN10F2FB German high court rejects 'intersex' as third gender category] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171008233621/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-gender-idUSKCN10F2FB |date=2017-10-08 }} Reuters In November 2017, the German Constitutional Court ruled that civil status law must allow a third gender option. Open sex entries don't "reflect that the complainant does not see themself as a genderless person, but rather perceives themself as having a gender beyond male or female".{{cite web |url=http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2017/bvg17-095.html |title=Bundesverfassungsgericht - Press - Civil status law must allow a third gender option |access-date=2017-12-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171115083403/http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2017/bvg17-095.html |archive-date=2017-11-15 }} This ruling was followed in August 2018 by a cabinet decision to create a new sex classification, "diverse", for intersex people only. This has been criticized for failing to address concerns about medical interventions, and for failing to make this non-binary gender category available to non-intersex people.{{cite web | last = OII Europe| author-link = OII Europe | title = New draft bill in Germany fails to protect intersex people| access-date = 2018-09-10| date = August 2018| url = https://oiieurope.org/new-draft-bill-in-germany-fails-to-protect-intersex-people/}} The proposal was approved by the Bundestag in December 2018.{{cite web|url=https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/gesellschaft/id_84943634/-maennlich-weiblich-divers-bundestag-gibt-gruenes-licht-fuer-dritte-geschlechtsoption.html|title=Bundestag gibt grünes Licht für dritte Geschlechtsoption|work=t-online.de|date=14 December 2018|language=de}} On 22 December 2018, the adopted act entered into force, allowing the choice for intersex people (both at birth and at a later age) between "female", "male", "diverse" and no gender marker at all. In case of a change later in life, first names can also be changed.[http://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&jumpTo=bgbl118s2635.pdf Gesetz zur Änderung der in das Geburtenregister einzutragenden Angaben (Act modifying the information to be entered into the birth register)] In the meantime, an appeals court had held that a nonbinary status must also be open to non-intersex non-binary people; the adopted act does not address this category of people and their situation therefore remains unclear pending additional case-law.[https://www.lsvd.de/fileadmin/pics/Dokumente/Rechtsprechung8/OLGCelle170511.pdf Celle Court of Appeal, decision of 11 May 2017].
Marriage
Since 2017, persons classified as neither male nor female (or intersex people) can legally marry another person of any sex/gender within Germany. Since 1 October 2017, same-sex marriage became legal within Germany and registered partnerships that had been legally available since 2001, were abolished. Same-sex step adoption has also been legal since 2005 and was expanded in 2013 to allow someone in a same-sex relationship to adopt a child already adopted by their partner and full adoption rights for same-sex couples has been legally available since 1 October 2017 within Germany.[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-adoption-idUSBRE91I0TS20130219 German court expands adoption rights of gay couples] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170805183509/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-adoption-idUSBRE91I0TS20130219 |date=2017-08-05 }}
See also
References
{{Reflist|30em}}
Bibliography
- {{Cite web| last = Intersexuelle Menschen| title = Shadow Report To the 6th National Report of the Federal Republic of Germany On the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)| location = Hamburg| date = July 2008| url = http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/ngos/AIP_Germany43_en.pdf}}
- {{Cite book| isbn = 978-3-941957-50-3| last = German Ethics Council| title = Intersexuality, Opinion| date = February 2012| url = http://www.ethikrat.org/publications/opinions/intersexuality| author-link = German Ethics Council| access-date = 2017-02-04| archive-date = 2017-04-21| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170421134819/http://www.ethikrat.org/publications/opinions/intersexuality| url-status = dead}}
- {{Cite web| last = International Commission of Jurists| title = In re Völling, Regional Court Cologne, Germany (6 February 2008)| url = http://www.icj.org/sogicasebook/in-re-volling-regional-court-cologne-germany-6-february-2008/ | author-link = International Commission of Jurists | access-date = 2017-05-15}}
- {{Cite journal| issn = 0947-6822| issue = 42| last = Klöppel| first = Ulrike| title = Zur Aktualität kosmetischer Operationen "uneindeutiger" Genitalien im Kindesalter| journal = Gender Bulletin| date = December 2016| url = https://www.gender.hu-berlin.de/de/publikationen/gender-bulletins/texte-42/kloeppel-2016_zur-aktualitaet-kosmetischer-genitaloperationen| publisher = Humboldt University| language = de| access-date = 2017-02-04| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170204171338/https://www.gender.hu-berlin.de/de/publikationen/gender-bulletins/texte-42/kloeppel-2016_zur-aktualitaet-kosmetischer-genitaloperationen| archive-date = 2017-02-04| url-status = dead}}
- {{Cite journal| issue = 9| last1 = Kromminga| first1 = Ins A| last2 = Blaine| last3 = Klöppel| first3 = Ulrike| title = Intergeschlechtlichkeit ist kein medizinisches Problem!| journal = Gen-Ethische Informationsdienst| date = December 2009| url = https://oiigermany.org/wp-content/uploads/GID_Spezial9_IVIM.pdf|language = de}}
- {{Cite web | last = OII Germany | title = OII Germany: CEDAW Shadow Report. With reference to the combined Seventh and Eighth Periodic Report from the Federal Republic of Germany on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) | date = January 20, 2017 | url = http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/DEU/INT_CEDAW_NGO_DEU_26315_E.pdf | author-link = Organisation Intersex International | access-date = February 11, 2017 | archive-date = February 11, 2017 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170211160901/http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/DEU/INT_CEDAW_NGO_DEU_26315_E.pdf | url-status = dead }}
- {{Cite book| publisher = Dr Werner Klinkhardt| last = von Neugebauer| first = Franz Ludwig| title = Hermaphroditismus beim Menschen| url = https://archive.org/details/hermaphroditismu00neug| location = Leipzig| date = 1908|language = de| ol = 25266971M}}
- {{Cite book| last = Zwischengeschlecht.org| title = Intersex Genital Mutilations Human Rights Violations Of Children With Variations Of Sex Anatomy: NGO Report on the Answers to the List of Issues (LoI) in Relation to the Initial Periodic Report of Germany on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)| location = Zurich| date = March 2015 | url = http://intersex.shadowreport.org/public/2015-CRPD-LoI-Germany_NGO-Report_Zwischengeschlecht_Intersex-IGM.pdf | author-link = Zwischengeschlecht}}
External links
- [https://im-ev.de/ Intersexuelle Menschen]
- [https://oiigermany.org/ OII Germany]
- [http://zwischengeschlecht.org Zwischengeschlecht]
{{Europe topic |prefix=Intersex rights in}}
{{Intersex}}
{{Germany topics}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Intersex rights In Germany}}