Irish Film Classification Office

File:IFCO 1962cover.jpg sent to local office of 20th Century Fox with certifying cachet of the Film Censor's Office]]

The Irish Film Censor's Office was set up in 1923, under the Censorship of Films Act 1923.{{Cite ISB|title=Censorship of Films Act 1923|year=1923|number=23|section=1|schedno=|stitle=Establishment of office of Official Censor of Films|parl=ifs|date=16 July 1923}} This law was amended in [http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1925/en/act/pub/0021/index.html 1925], [http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1930/en/act/pub/0013/index.html 1930], [http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1970/en/act/pub/0007/index.html 1970], and [http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1992/en/act/pub/0029/index.html 1992]; and a substantial revision of the law occurred in the [https://web.archive.org/web/20051206051939/http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1989_22.html Video Recordings Act, 1989] which extended the remit of the office to the regulation of the video importation and supply industry. On 21 July 2008 the Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2008 came into force. Section 70 changes some of the provisions with regard censorship of films in the State. Section 71 renames the Film Censor as the Director of Film Classification and consequent to this, the Irish Film Censor's Office became the Irish Film Classification Office.

The office consists of 21 staff members:

• Acting Director of Film Classification – George Sinclair
• Deputy Director – Vacant
• 10 Assistant Classifiers
• Office Manager
• 6 Civil Servants from the Department of Justice
• 2 Projectionists

The 10 assistant classifiers are paid €168 per day and are entitled to claim expenses on top of this. According to a freedom of information request granted to the Irish edition of the Sunday Times the assistant classifiers claimed €306,683 in fees and €52,569 of expenses in 2007; €339,608 in fees and €49,898 of expenses in 2008; and €162,263 in fees and €21,401 of expenses for the first half of 2009. This equates to a payment of approximately €60 per film rated.{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/ireland/article6982430.ece|title=Ex-politicians paid €40,000 to watch films|newspaper=Sunday Times|first=Colin|last=Coyle|date=10 January 2010|access-date=26 November 2014|archive-date=19 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211219022459/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/|url-status=dead}}

Before 1965, there were no certificates and all films were tailored for a general audience, resulting in several bans and cuts (no doubt also due to extremely conservative societal standards). As of 2004, 2,500 theatrical films had been banned and about 11,000 cut, largely from before the overhaul.{{cite web|last1=Rockett|first1=Kevin|title=Irish film censorship – an outline account|url=http://www.ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/lookupreports2/AA073005F7A0F95780256F020055DD28/$File/a+history.pdf?openelement|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=8 March 2018|archive-date=8 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508142718/http://www.ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/lookupreports2/AA073005F7A0F95780256F020055DD28/$File/a+history.pdf?openelement|url-status=live}}

Public controversy over the office's harsh methods came to a head in late 1964 – in 1963 alone, 31 films were rejected and 156 were cut.{{cite news|title=Censorship of films|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=11 February 1964}} Critically acclaimed hits were no exception – Dr. Strangelove was cut, including Ripper's reference to Communists trying to "sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids" with fluoridated water, and Irish-shot medical drama Of Human Bondage was banned due to the heroine dying of syphilis.{{cite news|title=End of "thaw" in film censorship? Too few limited showings|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=21 November 1964}} Even after the ban was overturned the following year,{{cite news|title=Film censor responsible|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=12 March 1965}} it still received an over-18's certificate{{cite news|last1=O'Brien|first1=E.C.|title=Letters to the editor: Film censorship|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=26 March 1965}} with cuts{{cite news|last1=Cassidy|first1=J|title=Letters to the Editor: Cinema '65|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=13 January 1966}}{{cite news|last1=Linehan|first1=Fergus|title=Censorship again|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=7 February 1966}} – nude sculptures made by Auguste Rodin were removed from the background of the title sequence.{{cite news|last1=Keenan|first1=Patrick|title=Letters to the Editor: Rodin Out|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=31 March 1965}}

In 1964, Brian Lenihan, the newly appointed Minister for Justice, met with the Cinema and Theatre Association in November to consider their views{{cite news|title=Protest over severe film censorship|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=28 November 1964}} and even proposed to view recently banned films, including Of Human Bondage.{{cite news|title=Lenihan intervenes in film censorship: Will see banned films|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=30 November 1964}}{{cite news|title=Minister to see banned film|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=4 December 1964}} On 28 November, Lenihan announced he'd be appointing a new Film Appeals Board and would be able to reform censorship without changing existing legislation – film correspondent Fergus Linehan pointed out that the 1923 Act explicitly supported age certification:

{{Quote box

|quote = If the Official Censor is of opinion that any picture in respect of which an application is made to him under this section is not fit for general exhibition in public but is fit for exhibition in public in certain places in Saorstát Eireann or under special conditions or in the presence of certain classes of persons, he shall grant a certificate that such picture is fit for exhibition in public subject to such restrictions and conditions (which shall be expressed on the certificate) in regard to the places at which or the special conditions under which the picture may be exhibited or the classes of persons who may be admitted to an exhibition of the picture as in the opinion of the Official Censor are necessary to prevent the exhibition of the picture in public being subversive of public morality.

|source = Censorship of Films Act 1923, Section 7, Part 3

|quoted = 1

}}

Lenihan announced the new Appeals board, which came into effect on 18 January 1965.{{cite news|title=Films appeal board announced|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=9 January 1965}} Their main task was to begin enforcing limited certificates (alongside the general certificate).{{cite book|last1=Flynn|first1=Roderick|last2=Brereton|first2=Patrick|title=Historical Dictionary of Irish Cinema|url=https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio00flyn|url-access=limited|date=30 July 2007|publisher=Scarecrow Press|isbn=978-0810855571|page=[https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio00flyn/page/n88 53]}} which were as follows, according to the Appeals Board chairman:{{cite news|last1=Maguire|first1=Conor P.|title=Film censorship in Ireland: Appeals chairman's views|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=12 October 1966}}

• Over 16
• Over 18
• Young persons under 12 years of age must be accompanied by an adult
• Educational

In addition, Over-21s certificates were awarded to four films,Rockett 2004 pp. 200, 203, including Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Alfie, and Marat/Sade.{{cite news |title=Cinemas |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/archive/1967/1016/Pg009.html#Ar00908 |url-access=subscription |access-date=27 March 2024 |newspaper=The Irish Times |date=16 October 1967 |page=9 col 1 |quote=International— ... 6.25 and 8.45: "Marat Sade" Over 21s}}

File:The_World_is_Not_Enough_-_Irish_Film_Censor's_Office_age_certificate_PG_1999.jpg

The current cinematic certificates were announced in December 2004 at the European Conference of Film Classifiers in Paris and introduced on 1 January 2005.{{cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/censor-s-changes-to-film-certs-1.1169376|title=Censor's changes to film certs|first=Michael|last=Dwyer|newspaper=The Irish Times|access-date=26 September 2018|archive-date=26 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180926205452/https://www.irishtimes.com/news/censor-s-changes-to-film-certs-1.1169376|url-status=live}} In November 2005, a public campaign was launched to raise awareness of them, including booklets, posters, stickers and an animated certificate produced by Brown Bag Films which drew attention to their relatively new website.{{Cite web |url=http://www.ifco.ie/website/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/web/news?opendocument&news=yes&type=graphic |title=News from IFCO |website=Irish Film Classification Office |access-date=9 February 2019 |archive-date=26 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190226173106/http://www.ifco.ie/website/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/web/news?opendocument&news=yes&type=graphic |url-status=dead}}{{cite web |url=https://www.breakingnews.ie/showbiz/animated-film-certificate-to-raise-ratings-awareness-230375.html|title=Animated film certificate to raise ratings awareness|date=15 November 2005|website=Breaking News|access-date=9 February 2019|archive-date=10 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190210044507/https://www.breakingnews.ie/showbiz/animated-film-certificate-to-raise-ratings-awareness-230375.html|url-status=live}}{{cite web | url=http://www.iftn.ie/news/?act1=record&only=1&aid=73&rid=1531&tpl=archnews&force=1 | title=Film Censor Launches Awareness Campaign | date=16 November 2005 | publisher=IFTN | access-date=7 June 2020 | archive-date=1 February 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210201231606/http://www.iftn.ie/news/?act1=record&only=1&aid=73&rid=1531&tpl=archnews&force=1 | url-status=live }}{{cite web|url=https://www.superannrte.ie/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2129:Newsletter-19th-November-2005-2129&catid=23&Itemid=184|title=Newsletter 19th November 2005|website=superannrte.ie|access-date=9 February 2019|archive-date=10 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190210044519/https://www.superannrte.ie/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2129:Newsletter-19th-November-2005-2129&catid=23&Itemid=184|url-status=live}}

• G – General: Suitable for all
• PG – Parental Guidance: Suitable for children aged eight and older; parents are advised to accompany younger children.
• 12A – Minimum age for admission is 12, but younger children can be admitted if accompanied by an adult (12PG between 1 June 2001 – 1 January 2005).
• 15A – Minimum age for admission is 15, but younger children can be admitted if accompanied by an adult (15PG between 1 June 2001 – 1 January 2005).
• 16 – Minimum age for admission is 16; younger viewers will not be admitted under any circumstance (introduced on 1 January 2005).
• 18 – Minimum age for admission is 18; younger viewers will not be admitted under any circumstance.

These were introduced on 1 September 1994:{{cite ISB|year=1994|type=si|num=134|title=Video Recordings Act 1989 (Supply Certificate and Labelling) Regulations 1994|date=12 May 1994|access-date=9 February 2019|archive-date=9 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209232021/http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1994/si/134/made/en/print}}

• G – Fit for viewing by persons generally
• 12RA – Fit for viewing by persons generally, but in the case of a child under 12 years, only in the company of a responsible adult.
• 15 – Fit for viewing by persons aged 15 or more.
• 18 – Fit for viewing by persons aged 18 or more.

From that date it was an offence to trade uncertified videos, which carried fines of up to £1000 and a maximum sentence of three years.{{cite news|title=New labels to show video's suitability|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=31 August 1994}} Additional rates came in at £180 per rental title, £80 per sale title and £20 per advert/trailer. This limited the market, especially for London distributors whose releases previously went to Ireland automatically.{{cite news|last1=Foley|first1=Michael|title=Additional cost limits Ireland's video choice|newspaper=The Irish Times|date=27 February 1995}}

In 1996, the 12RA certificate was officially replaced by PG and 12,{{cite ISB|year=1996|type=si|num=407|title=Video Recordings Act 1989 (Supply Certificate and Labelling) (Amendment) Regulations 1996|date=20 December 1996|access-date=9 February 2019|archive-date=9 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209232517/http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1996/si/407/made/en/print?q=video+recordings+act|url-status=live}} although releases still used it into the 2000s.{{cite web|title=Filmogs – The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers|url=https://www.filmo.gs/release/42578-the-lord-of-the-rings-the-two-towers|access-date=9 February 2019|archive-date=1 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181001142510/https://www.filmo.gs/release/42578-the-lord-of-the-rings-the-two-towers|url-status=live}}

The current certificates for home video formats such as DVD and Blu-ray that are issued are:

• G – General: Suitable for all
• PG – Suitable for general viewing, but parents are advised to watch with children younger than 12 years old.
• 12 – Suitable for people aged 12 and over, and not to be supplied to someone below that age.
• 15 – Suitable for people aged 15 and over, and not to be supplied to someone below that age.
• 18 – Suitable for people aged 18 and over, and not to be supplied to someone below that age.

A retired certificate only used on home video is:

• 12RA (no longer issued) Not suitable for people aged younger than 12 unless they view with an adult, and not to be supplied to someone below that age. The "RA" stands for "Responsible Adult". Retired around 2003 (officially replaced in 1996).{{cite web|url=http://www.ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/lookupreports2/1C09242E19D2559D80256EC1005CC251/$File/Film+Censors+Report+.pdf?openelement|title=1686 – Film Censors Report 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315120336/http://www.ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/lookupreports2/1C09242E19D2559D80256EC1005CC251/$File/Film+Censors+Report+.pdf?openelement|url-status=dead|archive-date=15 March 2016|date=15 March 2016}}

[[File:IFCO_-_12RA_video_certificate.png|center

|80px]]

This is the crossover, or change, in a certificate that will happen when a film which has been shown in cinemas, is released on home video, but this only applies if:

• There is no extra material (bonuses, trailers, etc.) which is not appropriate to the main feature, and would cause it to receive a higher certificate.
• The film has not been edited (material taken out, etc.) in a way which would cause the main feature to receive a lower certificate.

The standard crossovers are as follows:

Note: The certificate "12RA" did not have a corresponding cinematic certificate, and thus, did not have a standard crossover (certain 12A films received the certificate before it was withdrawn in the mid-2000s).

If the two rules above apply to a film's home video release, then, generally, it will be re-rated completely, but this does not mean certificates will always coincide for all formats, as occasionally (usually the DVD or Blu-ray) one edition will contain extra features while the other does not, causing one to be re-rated, and the other to take a Standard Crossover (for instance, a film which received a 15A certificate in cinemas may have received a 15 certificate on VHS but an 18 certificate on DVD; usually DVDs in these circumstances would carry a label on the reverse, informing viewers of this).

File:Irish film censor dvd stamp.jpg

Until February 2009, the home video certificates were always the certificate surrounded by an octagon, followed by the words "FILM CENSOR'S OFFICE" and "OIFIG SCRÚDÓIR NA SCANNÁN", which were then surrounded by another, larger, octagon. The colours were cyan and white, but the order they appear in varied. Although the Office was renamed in July 2008, these continued to bear the old name until February 2009, when they were altered to read "IRISH FILM CLASSIFICATION OFFICE" and its Irish equivalent.

Unlike the BBFC in the UK, which prior to PEGI ratings becoming legally enforceable in the UK on 30 July 2012 rated video games that met certain criteria (such as very graphic violence), the Irish Film Censor's Office does not usually rate video games, leaving ratings to PEGI, unless the game's content is deemed prohibitable under section 3 (1) of the Act.

IFCO ratings for video games were introduced in 2001 and retired in 2003. Although the Silent Hill Collection was released in 2006, it contained re-releases of the second and third games, which were rated and released in 2001 and 2003 respectively.

Only 9 games have ever been submitted to and rated by the IFCO:

Despite the lack of legally binding ratings, most (if not all) video game retailers attempt to prohibit the sale of PEGI 18+ rated games to people under the age of 18, and prior to PEGI ratings the same was done with BBFC 18 ratings on games (the same packaging is usually used in games sold in Ireland as in the UK).

The only prohibition notice for a video game was issued for Manhunt 2 in 2007.{{cite web |url=http://www.ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/web/news?opendocument&news=yes&type=graphic |title=Manhunt 2 video game prohibited |website=Irish Film Classification Office |access-date=19 June 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071120192726/http://www.ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/web/news?opendocument&news=yes&type=graphic |archive-date=20 November 2007 |url-status=dead }}

All decisions made with regard to certification, may be appealed for up to 6 months after the certificate is initially issued. An appeal is issued to the Classification of Films Appeal Board.

Works may also be submitted for re-classification after seven years since the original certification have passed (not an appeal per se, but rather seen as an update of classification based on current standards).

The most recent example of a (failed) appeal is The First Purge, which received an 18 certificate for strong bloody violence, sustained threat and disturbing scenes.http://www.ifco.ie/website/IFCO/ifcoweb.nsf/SearchViewFilm/671B1E91BB983227802582C100301FF2?OpenDocument&OpenUp=True {{dead link|date=November 2019}} The distributor (Universal Pictures) argued the case for a 16 certificate:

{{Quote box

|quote = We would contend that the last two films in the franchise, in particular, are similar in tone and viscerality to the current film.{{ref|firsttwo|A}}

The First Purge is a thematic continuation of how a group of people must fight to survive a night of government-sanctioned mayhem. Similar to Anarchy and Election Year, The First Purge features intensely depicted violence and some gory imagery but has contextual justification. There are sustained scenes of threat in which the characters are terrorised by masked killers but the guidelines for a 16 classification on the IFCO suggest that strong horror and sustained threat may be acceptable in this category.

The violence is presented in an extremely stylised way in an equivalent manner to the earlier films in the franchise as well as similar titles like Atomic Blonde (16), John Wick (16) and John Wick: Chapter 2 (16).

|source = Direct correspondence between Universal Pictures and the IFCO

|quoted = 1

}}

:A.{{Note|firsttwo}} The Purge: Anarchy and The Purge: Election Year both received 16 certificates, for "frequent strong bloody violence, disturbing sequences, strong threat of sexual violence"http://www.ifco.ie/website/IFCO/ifcoweb.nsf/SearchViewFilm/22C5B19D8795AF0180257D0A004CFC3F?OpenDocument&OpenUp=True {{dead link|date=November 2019}} and "strong bloody violence throughout"http://www.ifco.ie/website/IFCO/ifcoweb.nsf/SearchViewFilm/0CF88647F7AE23F680257FE700504C41?OpenDocument&OpenUp=True {{dead link|date=November 2019}} respectively. The distributor also mentioned the film's 15 certificate in the UK,{{cite web|url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/first-purge-2018|title=THE FIRST PURGE | British Board of Film Classification|website=bbfc.co.uk|access-date=10 November 2019|archive-date=10 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110080940/https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/first-purge-2018|url-status=live}} which is consistent throughout the franchise.{{cite web|url=https://bbfc.co.uk/search/releases/purge|title=Search for releases | British Board of Film Classification|website=bbfc.co.uk|access-date=10 November 2019|archive-date=10 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110080957/https://bbfc.co.uk/search/releases/purge|url-status=live}}

After first being viewed on 15 June, it was re-viewed on 21 June when the Appeal Board stuck by the original decision.

Ger Connolly wrote back, explaining the decision in greater detail:

{{Quote box

|quote = This is the fourth film of this particular franchise. As can sometimes be the case with long-running horror franchises, in evolution they become more violent and explicit to maintain the interest of their audience. This is, in my opinion, the case with The Purge series of films. The first instalment, essentially a 'home invasion' thriller, was classified 15A. The next two (The Purge: Anarchy and The Purge: Election Year) broadened out the story and intensified in terms of body count and the graphic way in which some of the violence was depicted. Both were classified 16 on cinema release. The Purge: Election Year was classified 18 on DVD release. In most cases films classified 16 theatrically are classified 15 on DVD release. This classification is more restrictive than 15A. In rarer cases the DVD classification is increased to 18 to reflect the level of content.

The First Purge intensifies the extremely graphic violence – the violence here is brutal and sustained. It also contained a scene of sexual assault as well as scenes of very overt brutal racist violence against African Americans with the attackers in full Ku Klux Klan regalia. These were not present in the other instalments.

I suggest that the context here is not sufficient to warrant a 16 classification due to the extremely brutal and frenzied acts of violence combined with racial hatred and that The First Purge is appropriately classified at 18.

|source = Ger Connolly, in direct correspondence with Universal Pictures

|quoted = 1

}}

{{cite web|url=https://www.thejournal.ie/the-purge-appeal-classification-ireland-4231610-Sep2018/|title=Appeal after 'brutal and frenzied violence' leads to film getting 18 rating|first=Aoife|last=Barry|website=TheJournal.ie|date=16 September 2018 |access-date=10 November 2019|archive-date=10 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110080940/https://www.thejournal.ie/the-purge-appeal-classification-ireland-4231610-Sep2018/|url-status=live}}

Films may be refused a certificate, e.g. on grounds of obscenity. Such films may not be shown in public cinemas or sold in shops, but are not ipso facto banned and have been shown at film festivals and art house clubs such as the Irish Film Theatre and Irish Film Institute. These may also show films which have not been submitted for certification, as the submission fee may be prohibitive if a film is screened only a few times at a small venue.

Prohibitions and revocations, with justification, are listed in the official gazette, {{lang|ga|Iris Oifigiúil}}, under the headings of PROHIBITION ORDER and REVOCATION ORDER.

Despite the recommendations in the 2000 review of certification that no further films be banned, bans are still occasionally issued, although usually overturned on appeal. Boy Eats Girl, a 2005 movie, was initially banned, with the option of a cut being provided to the producers. On appeal, the film was passed uncut, and granted a 15A rating,{{cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/boy-will-get-to-eat-girl-after-all-1.476854|title=Boy will get to eat girl after all|first=Donald|last=Clarke|newspaper=The Irish Times|access-date=26 September 2018|archive-date=19 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211219022510/https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/boy-will-get-to-eat-girl-after-all-1.476854|url-status=live}} although the video certificate was raised to 18.{{cite web |url=http://www.ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/lookupreports2/D2E379DFC484D98E802571AB0039E72B/$File/2005%20Annual%20Report.pdf?openelement |title=Annual Report of the Official Censor of Films for 2005 |website=Irish Film Classification Office |access-date=26 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171114121206/http://ifco.ie/ifco/ifcoweb.nsf/lookupreports2/D2E379DFC484D98E802571AB0039E72B/$File/2005%20Annual%20Report.pdf?openelement |archive-date=14 November 2017 |url-status=dead }}

Movies which are never submitted for cinema release in Ireland are occasionally banned on attempted video releases, although only one such order was made in 2004, banning the pornographic Anabolic Initiations 5, with the appeals board upholding the censor's order. One order was issued in 2005, reiterating the ban on Deep Throat. The only order in 2006 banned the pornographic film Steal Runaway.

For a complete list of banned films, see Film censorship in the Republic of Ireland#Notable banned or cut films

{{more citations needed|section|date=November 2019}}

Like many systems of entertainment classification, the IFCO has received criticism for several decisions they have made in the past. The board has been described as too zealous and conservative. Many titles that receive 15 certificates from the BBFC are rated 18 by the IFCO. DVD examples include Kick-Ass{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/1D0A22A500736BA7|title=Kick-Ass (2010)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171502/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/1D0A22A500736BA7|url-status=live}} and Black Swan.{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/2819C5B30078DC14|title=Black Swan (2011)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171505/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/2819C5B30078DC14|url-status=live}} Rarer cinema examples (which bypass the 16 rating) include Free Fire and You Were Never Really Here.{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/3922AF0E0050DC8D|title=You Were Never Really Here (2018)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171500/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/3922AF0E0050DC8D|url-status=live}}

However, the IFCO are more lenient with strong language than the BBFC are, especially with very strong language (e.g. 'cunt'). Examples include Frost/Nixon and The Visitor receiving 15 certificates in the UK{{cite web|url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/frostnixon-2008|title=FROST/NIXON |website=British Board of Film Classification|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171556/https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/frostnixon-2008|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/visitor-2007|title=THE VISITOR | British Board of Film Classification|website=bbfc.co.uk|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171459/https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/visitor-2007|url-status=live}} but PG's in Ireland{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/5AC1C25E00569F45|title=Frost/Nixon (2009)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171503/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/5AC1C25E00569F45|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/D3A2B1CE00441548|title=Visitor, The (2008)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171504/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/D3A2B1CE00441548|url-status=live}} despite the use of the stronger term 'motherfucker', and Gone Girl receiving an 18 in the UK{{cite web|url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/gone-girl-film|title=GONE GIRL | British Board of Film Classification|website=bbfc.co.uk|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171459/https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/gone-girl-film|url-status=live}} but a 15 (on video) in Ireland{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/36D416210078DB60|title=Gone Girl (2014)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171503/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/36D416210078DB60|url-status=live}} despite four aggressive uses of 'cunt'. The 2014 documentary Red Army received a 15 in the UK{{cite web|url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/red-army-2014|title=RED ARMY | British Board of Film Classification|website=bbfc.co.uk|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031173059/https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/red-army-2014|url-status=live}} but a 12A in Ireland{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/855BF77500403E42|title=Red Army (2015)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171506/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/855BF77500403E42|url-status=live}} for a single use of 'cocksucker' (although the video rating was upgraded to 15).{{cite web|url=http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/9DECB130007369A9|title=Red Army (2015)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=31 October 2019|archive-date=31 October 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191031171502/http://ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/9DECB130007369A9|url-status=live}}

Three titles in particular drew criticism of the board: Election,https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/8QYAAOSwfAtgpTgq/s-l1600.jpg {{Bare URL image|date=March 2022}} But I'm a Cheerleaderhttps://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/KC0AAOSwyj5hZw3F/s-l1600.jpg {{Bare URL image|date=March 2022}} and Brokeback Mountain.https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/6f0AAOSw7qdhgT5J/s-l1600.jpg {{Bare URL image|date=March 2022}} All three were rated 18 in Ireland and 15 in the UK, although Brokeback Mountain was rated 16 for cinema release because the system is different than for video releases (it was only an 18 on video) – But I'm a Cheerleader was re-rated 15 in 2021.{{Cite web|url=http://www.ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/0179D3230078ECA6|title=But I'm a Cheerleader (Director's Cut) (2021)|website=Irish Film Classification Office|access-date=8 January 2022|archive-date=8 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220108225453/http://www.ifco.ie/en/ifco/pages/0179D3230078ECA6|url-status=dead}}

The IFCO is established on a statutory basis and thus the appeals procedure is final. Where a film or video game is banned, there can be no further appeal, but the work may be resubmitted after seven years.

• British Board of Film Classification – the equivalent body to the IFCO in the United Kingdom
• Censorship in the Republic of Ireland
• Film censorship in the Republic of Ireland
• Television content rating systems

{{reflist}}

• {{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/europe/confessions-of-an-irish-censor-why-clark-gable-casablanca-and-cliff-got-the-chop-792076.html |work=The Independent |title=Confessions of an Irish censor: why Clark Gable, 'Casablanca' and Cliff got the chop |first=David |last=McKittrick |date=6 March 2008 |access-date=14 December 2016}}
• {{cite book |first=Kevin |last=Rockett | author-link = Kevin Rockett|title=Irish film censorship: a cultural journey from silent cinema to internet pornography |location=Dublin |publisher=Four Courts Press |year=2004 |isbn= 1-85182-844-3}}

• {{official website}}
• [https://www.tcd.ie/irishfilm/censor/ Irish Film Censors' Records] – searchable calendar at Trinity College Dublin, mostly from period 1923–38

{{Pornography legality|state=collapsed}}

{{authority control}}

Category:Motion picture rating systems

Category:Mass media in the Republic of Ireland

Category:Entertainment rating organizations

Category:Censorship in the Republic of Ireland

Category:Government agencies of the Republic of Ireland

Category:Department of Justice (Ireland)