Kardashian Index

The relationship between the expected number of Twitter followers $F$ given the number of citations $C$ is described as

$$F(C)\; =\; 43.3\backslash ,C^\{0.32\},$$

which is derived from the Twitter accounts and citation counts of a "randomish selection of 40 scientists" in 2014. The Kardashian Index is thus calculated as

$$\backslash text\{K-index\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{F\_a\}\{F(C)\},$$

where $F\_a$ is the actual number of Twitter followers of researcher $X$, and $F(C)$ is the number that researcher should have, given their citations.

A high K-index indicates an over-blown scientific fame, while a low K-index suggests that a scientist is being undervalued. According to the author Hall, researchers whose K-index > 5 can be considered "Science Kardashians". Hall wrote:

{{blockquote|

I propose that all scientists calculate their own K-index on an annual basis and include it in their Twitter profile. Not only does this help others decide how much weight they should give to someone’s 140 character wisdom, it can also be an incentive{{snd}} if your K-index gets above 5, then it’s time to get off Twitter and write those papers.

}}

Hall also added "a serious note" noticing the gender disparity in his sample. Of 14 female scientists, 11 had lower than predicted K-indices, while only one of the high-index scientists was female.

On February 11, 2022, on Twitter, Neil Hall stated that he intended the Kardashian Index to be a “dig at metrics not Kardashians” and that “the entire premise is satire”.{{cite tweet |last=Hall |first=Neil |user=neilhall_uk |number=1492259823114723329 |date=11 February 2022 |title=@GidMK @WvSchaik It's a dig at metrics not Kardashians. It's like taking a quiz to see what character from Game of Thrones you are and finding out you're Joffrey Baratheon. It doesn't matter{{snd}} it's not a real test. Thankfully |language=en |access-date=21 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214201456/https://twitter.com/neilhall_uk/status/1492259823114723329 |archive-date=14 February 2022 |url-status=live}}

Many jocular indices of scientific productivity were proposed in the immediate aftermath of publication of the K-Index paper. The Tesla Index measured social isolation of scientists relative to their productivity, named after Nikola Tesla, whose work was hugely influential, while he remained a social recluse.{{Cite web |date=July 31, 2014 |first=Keith |last=Bradnam |title=The Tesla index: a measure of social isolation for scientists |url=http://www.acgt.me/blog/2014/7/31/the-tesla-index-a-measure-of-social-isolation-for-scientists |access-date=2022-04-20 |website=ACGT |language=en-GB}} People tweeted suggestions hashtagged #alternatesciencemetrics.{{Cite magazine |last=Rothkopf |first=Joanna |date=2014-08-04 |title=The Kardashian index and the 10 best #alternatesciencemetrics tweets |url=https://www.salon.com/2014/08/04/the_kardashian_index_and_the_10_best_alternatesciencemetrics_tweets/ |access-date=2022-04-20 |website=Salon |language=en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140807214130/https://www.salon.com/2014/08/04/the_kardashian_index_and_the_10_best_alternatesciencemetrics_tweets/ |archive-date=2014-08-07 |url-status=dead}}

In 2022, John Ioannidis authored a paper in The BMJ arguing that signatories of the Great Barrington Declaration about how to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic were shunned as a fringe minority by those in favor of the John Snow Memorandum. According to him, the latter used their large numbers of followers on Twitter and other social media and op-eds to shape a scientific "groupthink" against the former, who had less influence.{{Cite news |last=Knapton |first=Sarah |date=February 15, 2022 |title=Lockdown debate skewed because sceptical scientists were shunned on social media |language=en-GB |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/15/lockdown-debate-skewed-sceptical-scientists-shunned-social-media/ |access-date=March 3, 2022 |issn=0307-1235}}

The version of the index that Ioannidis used Scopus citations instead of Google Scholar citations, since many of the signatories had no Google Scholar pages.{{Cite journal |last=Ioannidis |first=John |date=February 1, 2022 |title=Citation impact and social media visibility of Great Barrington and John Snow signatories for COVID-19 strategy |url=https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/2/e052891 |journal=BMJ Open |language=en |volume=12 |issue=2 |pages=e052891 |doi=10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052891 |issn=2044-6055 |pmid=35140152|pmc=8829837 }}

The K-index suggests that the number of citations of a given scientist is comparable to their scientific value. This assumption has been criticized.{{cite web |url=http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/40613/title/Introducing-the--K-Index-/ |title=Introducing the "K Index"}}{{cite web |url=http://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2014/07/30/citations-are-not-a-measure-of-quality/ |title=Citations are not a measure of quality |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140819090745/http://biomickwatson.wordpress.com/2014/07/30/citations-are-not-a-measure-of-quality/ |archivedate=2014-08-19}}

The proposal of the K-Index has been interpreted as a criticism to the assumption that scientists should have a social media impact at all, while in reality, social media footprint has no correlation to the scientific quality or scientific impact.{{cite journal |last1=Houstein |first1=Stefanie |last2=Peters |first2=Isabella |last3=Sugimoto |first3=Cassidy R. |author3-link=Cassidy Sugimoto|last4=Thelwall |first4=Mike |last5=Larivière |first5=Vincent |date=April 2014 |title=Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature |journal=Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology |volume=65 |issue=4 |pages=656–669 |doi=10.1002/asi.23101|arxiv=1308.1838 |s2cid=11113356 }}

• Academic authorship
• Attention inequality

{{reflist}}

• {{cite news |last=Francisco |first=Mikael Angelo |date=2014-07-31 |title=The Kardashian Index: A scientific measure of unwarranted fame |url=http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/372797/scitech/science/the-kardashian-index-a-scientific-measure-of-unwarranted-fame |newspaper=GMA Network |accessdate=2014-10-10 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011003621/http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/372797/scitech/science/the-kardashian-index-a-scientific-measure-of-unwarranted-fame |archivedate=2014-10-11 |url-status=dead }}
• {{cite news |author=Staff writer |date=2014-08-05 |title=Scientist proposes Kardashian Index |url=https://uk.news.yahoo.com/scientist-proposes-kardashian-index-154911316.html |publisher=Yahoo! News |agency=Press Association |accessdate=2014-10-10 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011003834/https://uk.news.yahoo.com/scientist-proposes-kardashian-index-154911316.html |archivedate=2014-10-11 |url-status=dead }}
• {{cite news |last=Larki |first=Shadan |date=2014-08-05 |title=The 'Kardashian index' measures researchers' social clout |url=http://www.dailydot.com/geek/kardashian-index-scientists-researchers-social-clout/ |newspaper=The Daily Dot |accessdate=2014-10-10 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011002936/http://www.dailydot.com/geek/kardashian-index-scientists-researchers-social-clout/ |archivedate=2014-10-11 |url-status=dead }}
• {{cite journal |last=Woolston |first=Chris |date=2014-08-14 |title=Clash over the Kardashians of science |journal=Nature |volume=512 |issue=17 |page=517 |doi=10.1038/512117e |bibcode=2014Natur.512..117W |doi-access=free }}
• {{cite news |last=Parr |first=Chris |date=2014-08-14 |title=Kardashian Index: the academics famous just for being famous |url=http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/kardashian-index-the-academics-famous-just-for-being-famous/2015070.article |newspaper=Times Higher Education |accessdate=2014-10-10 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011003116/http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/kardashian-index-the-academics-famous-just-for-being-famous/2015070.article |archivedate=2014-10-11 }}
• {{cite news |last=Steinbauer |first=Von Anna |date=2014-09-22 |title="Kardashian"-Index in der Wissenschaft |url=http://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/kardashian-index-in-der-wissenschaft-risiken-des-ruhms-1.2139035 |newspaper=Süddeutsche Zeitung |accessdate=2014-10-10 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011004102/http://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/kardashian-index-in-der-wissenschaft-risiken-des-ruhms-1.2139035 |archivedate=2014-10-11 |url-status=dead }}

• [http://theinformationalturn.net/kardashian-index/ An online automatic K-Index calculator]

Category:2014 introductions

Category:Author-level metrics

Category:Social media

Category:Kardashian–Jenner family

{{Academic publishing}}