Kepler–Poinsot polyhedron

The great icosahedron edge length is $\backslash phi^4\; =\; \backslash tfrac12\backslash bigl(7+3\backslash sqrt5\backslash ,\backslash bigr)$ times the original icosahedron edge length.

The small stellated dodecahedron, great dodecahedron, and great stellated dodecahedron edge lengths are respectively $\backslash phi^3\; =\; 2+\backslash sqrt5,$ $\backslash phi^2\; =\; \backslash tfrac12\backslash bigl(3+\backslash sqrt5\backslash ,\backslash bigr),$ and $\backslash phi^5\; =\; \backslash tfrac12\backslash bigl(11+5\backslash sqrt5\backslash ,\backslash bigr)$ times the original dodecahedron edge length.

These figures have pentagrams (star pentagons) as faces or vertex figures. The small and great stellated dodecahedron have nonconvex regular pentagram faces. The great dodecahedron and great icosahedron have convex polygonal faces, but pentagrammic vertex figures.

In all cases, two faces can intersect along a line that is not an edge of either face, so that part of each face passes through the interior of the figure. Such lines of intersection are not part of the polyhedral structure and are sometimes called false edges. Likewise where three such lines intersect at a point that is not a corner of any face, these points are false vertices. The images below show spheres at the true vertices, and blue rods along the true edges.

For example, the small stellated dodecahedron has 12 pentagram faces with the central pentagonal part hidden inside the solid. The visible parts of each face comprise five isosceles triangles which touch at five points around the pentagon. We could treat these triangles as 60 separate faces to obtain a new, irregular polyhedron which looks outwardly identical. Each edge would now be divided into three shorter edges (of two different kinds), and the 20 false vertices would become true ones, so that we have a total of 32 vertices (again of two kinds). The hidden inner pentagons are no longer part of the polyhedral surface, and can disappear. Now Euler's formula holds: 60 − 90 + 32 = 2. However, this polyhedron is no longer the one described by the Schläfli symbol {5/2, 5}, and so can not be a Kepler–Poinsot solid even though it still looks like one from outside.

A Kepler–Poinsot polyhedron covers its circumscribed sphere more than once, with the centers of faces acting as winding points in the figures which have pentagrammic faces, and the vertices in the others. Because of this, they are not necessarily topologically equivalent to the sphere as Platonic solids are, and in particular the Euler relation

:$\backslash chi=V-E+F=2\backslash$

does not always hold. Schläfli held that all polyhedra must have χ = 2, and he rejected the small stellated dodecahedron and great dodecahedron as proper polyhedra. This view was never widely held.

A modified form of Euler's formula, using density (D) of the vertex figures ($d\_v$) and faces ($d\_f$) was given by Arthur Cayley, and holds both for convex polyhedra (where the correction factors are all 1), and the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra:

:$d\_v\; V\; -\; E\; +\; d\_f\; F\; =\; 2D.$

The Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra exist in dual pairs. Duals have the same Petrie polygon, or more precisely, Petrie polygons with the same two dimensional projection.

The following images show the two dual compounds with the same edge radius. They also show that the Petrie polygons are skew.

Two relationships described in the article below are also easily seen in the images: That the violet edges are the same, and that the green faces lie in the same planes.

File:Relationship among regular star polyhedra (direction colors).png)Conway et al. (2008), p.405 Figure 26.1 Relationships among the three-dimensional star-polytopes]]

John Conway defines the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra as greatenings and stellations of the convex solids.

In his naming convention, the small stellated dodecahedron is just the stellated dodecahedron.

Stellation changes pentagonal faces into pentagrams. (In this sense stellation is a unique operation, and not to be confused with the more general stellation described below.)

Greatening maintains the type of faces, shifting and resizing them into parallel planes.

|-

!style="color:#00a7e1"| greatening

|

|-

!style="color:#00cb00"| duality

|

|}

The great icosahedron is one of the stellations of the icosahedron. (See The Fifty-Nine Icosahedra)

The three others are all the stellations of the dodecahedron.

The great stellated dodecahedron is a faceting of the dodecahedron.

The three others are facetings of the icosahedron.

If the intersections are treated as new edges and vertices, the figures obtained will not be regular, but they can still be considered stellations.{{Example needed|s|date=December 2018}}

(See also List of Wenninger polyhedron models)

The great stellated dodecahedron shares its vertices with the dodecahedron. The other three Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra share theirs with the icosahedron.

{{awrap|The skeletons of the solids sharing vertices are topologically equivalent.}}

The small and great stellated dodecahedron

can be seen as a regular and a great dodecahedron with their edges and faces extended until they intersect.

The pentagon faces of these cores are the invisible parts of the star polyhedra's pentagram faces.

For the small stellated dodecahedron the hull is $\backslash varphi$ times bigger than the core, and for the great it is $\backslash varphi\; +\; 1\; =\; \backslash varphi^2$ times bigger.

{{awrap|(See Golden ratio)}}

(The midradius is a common measure to compare the size of different polyhedra.)

Traditionally the two star polyhedra have been defined as augmentations (or cumulations),

{{awrap|i.e. as dodecahedron and icosahedron with pyramids added to their faces.}}

Kepler calls the small stellation an augmented dodecahedron (then nicknaming it hedgehog)."augmented dodecahedron to which I have given the name of Echinus"

(Harmonices Mundi, Book V, Chapter III — p. 407 in the translation by E. J. Aiton)

{{awrap|In his view the great stellation is related to the icosahedron as the small one is to the dodecahedron."These figures are so closely related the one to the dodecahedron the other to the icosahedron that the latter two figures, particularly the dodecahedron, seem somehow truncated or maimed when compared to the figures with spikes."

(Harmonices Mundi, Book II, Proposition XXVI — p. 117 in the translation by E. J. Aiton)}}

These naïve definitions are still used.

E.g. MathWorld states that the two star polyhedra can be constructed by adding pyramids to the faces of the Platonic solids."A small stellated dodecahedron can be constructed by cumulation of a dodecahedron,

i.e., building twelve pentagonal pyramids and attaching them to the faces of the original dodecahedron."

{{MathWorld |id=SmallStellatedDodecahedron |title=Small Stellated Dodecahedron |access-date=2018-09-21}}

"Another way to construct a great stellated dodecahedron via cumulation is to make 20 triangular pyramids [...] and attach them to the sides of an icosahedron."

{{MathWorld |id=GreatStellatedDodecahedron |title=Great Stellated Dodecahedron |access-date=2018-09-21}}

{{awrap|This is just a help to visualize the shape of these solids, and not actually a claim that the edge intersections (false vertices) are vertices.}}

{{awrap|If they were, the two star polyhedra would be topologically equivalent to the pentakis dodecahedron and the triakis icosahedron.}}

All Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra have full icosahedral symmetry, just like their convex hulls.

The great icosahedron and its dual resemble the icosahedron and its dual in that they have faces and vertices on the 3-fold (yellow) and 5-fold (red) symmetry axes.

In the great dodecahedron and its dual all faces and vertices are on 5-fold symmetry axes (so there are no yellow elements in these images).

The following table shows the solids in pairs of duals. In the top row they are shown with pyritohedral symmetry, in the bottom row with icosahedral symmetry (to which the mentioned colors refer).

The table below shows orthographic projections from the 5-fold (red), 3-fold (yellow) and 2-fold (blue) symmetry axes.

Most, if not all, of the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra were known of in some form or other before Kepler. A small stellated dodecahedron appears in a marble tarsia (inlay panel) on the floor of St. Mark's Basilica, Venice, Italy. It dates from the 15th century and is sometimes attributed to Paolo Uccello.{{cite book|contribution=Regular and semiregular polyhedra|first=H. S. M.|last=Coxeter|author-link= Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter|pages=41–52|title=Shaping Space: Exploring Polyhedra in Nature, Art, and the Geometrical Imagination|edition=2nd|editor-first=Marjorie|editor-last=Senechal|editor-link=Marjorie Senechal|publisher=Springer|year=2013|doi=10.1007/978-0-387-92714-5|isbn=978-0-387-92713-8 }} See in particular p. 42.

In his Perspectiva corporum regularium (Perspectives of the regular solids), a book of woodcuts published in 1568, Wenzel Jamnitzer depicts the great stellated dodecahedron and a great dodecahedron (both shown below). There is also a truncated version of the small stellated dodecahedron.:File:Perspectiva Corporum Regularium 27e.jpg It is clear from the general arrangement of the book that he regarded only the five Platonic solids as regular.

The small and great stellated dodecahedra, sometimes called the Kepler polyhedra, were first recognized as regular by Johannes Kepler around 1619.H.S.M. Coxeter, P. Du Val, H.T. Flather and J.F. Petrie; The Fifty-Nine Icosahedra, 3rd Edition, Tarquin, 1999. p.11 He obtained them by stellating the regular convex dodecahedron, for the first time treating it as a surface rather than a solid. He noticed that by extending the edges or faces of the convex dodecahedron until they met again, he could obtain star pentagons. Further, he recognized that these star pentagons are also regular. In this way he constructed the two stellated dodecahedra. Each has the central convex region of each face "hidden" within the interior, with only the triangular arms visible. Kepler's final step was to recognize that these polyhedra fit the definition of regularity, even though they were not convex, as the traditional Platonic solids were.

In 1809, Louis Poinsot rediscovered Kepler's figures, by assembling star pentagons around each vertex. He also assembled convex polygons around star vertices to discover two more regular stars, the great icosahedron and great dodecahedron. Some people call these two the Poinsot polyhedra. Poinsot did not know if he had discovered all the regular star polyhedra.

Three years later, Augustin Cauchy proved the list complete by stellating the Platonic solids, and almost half a century after that, in 1858, Bertrand provided a more elegant proof by faceting them.

The following year, Arthur Cayley gave the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra the names by which they are generally known today.

A hundred years later, John Conway developed a systematic terminology for stellations in up to four dimensions. Within this scheme the small stellated dodecahedron is just the stellated dodecahedron.

Image:Alexander's Star.jpg

Regular star polyhedra first appear in Renaissance art. A small stellated dodecahedron is depicted in a marble tarsia on the floor of St. Mark's Basilica, Venice, Italy, dating from ca. 1430 and sometimes attributed to Paulo Uccello.

In the 20th century, artist M. C. Escher's interest in geometric forms often led to works based on or including regular solids; Gravitation is based on a small stellated dodecahedron.

A dissection of the great dodecahedron was used for the 1980s puzzle Alexander's Star.

Norwegian artist Vebjørn Sand's sculpture The Kepler Star is displayed near Oslo Airport, Gardermoen. The star spans 14 meters, and consists of an icosahedron and a dodecahedron inside a great stellated dodecahedron.

• Regular polytope
• Regular polyhedron
• List of regular polytopes
• Uniform polyhedron
• Uniform star polyhedron
• Polyhedral compound
• Regular star 4-polytope – the ten regular star 4-polytopes, 4-dimensional analogues of the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra

{{Reflist}}

• J. Bertrand, Note sur la théorie des polyèdres réguliers, Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 46 (1858), pp. 79–82, 117.
• Augustin-Louis Cauchy, Recherches sur les polyèdres. J. de l'École Polytechnique 9, 68–86, 1813.
• Arthur Cayley, On Poinsot's Four New Regular Solids. Phil. Mag. 17, pp. 123–127 and 209, 1859.
• John H. Conway, Heidi Burgiel, Chaim Goodman-Strauss, The Symmetry of Things 2008, {{isbn|978-1-56881-220-5}} (Chapter 24, Regular Star-polytopes, pp. 404–408)
• Kaleidoscopes: Selected Writings of H. S. M. Coxeter, edited by F. Arthur Sherk, Peter McMullen, Anthony C. Thompson, Asia Ivic Weiss, Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1995, {{isbn|978-0-471-01003-6}} [http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471010030.html] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160711140441/http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471010030.html |date=2016-07-11 }}
• (Paper 1) H.S.M. Coxeter, The Nine Regular Solids [Proc. Can. Math. Congress 1 (1947), 252–264, MR 8, 482]
• (Paper 10) H.S.M. Coxeter, Star Polytopes and the Schlafli Function f(α,β,γ) [Elemente der Mathematik 44 (2) (1989) 25–36]
• Theoni Pappas, (The Kepler–Poinsot Solids) The Joy of Mathematics. San Carlos, CA: Wide World Publ./Tetra, p. 113, 1989.
• Louis Poinsot, Memoire sur les polygones et polyèdres. J. de l'École Polytechnique 9, pp. 16–48, 1810.
• Lakatos, Imre; Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge University Press (1976) - discussion of proof of Euler characteristic
• {{cite book | first=Magnus | last=Wenninger | author-link=Magnus Wenninger | title=Dual Models | publisher=Cambridge University Press | date=1983 | isbn=0-521-54325-8 }}, pp. 39–41.
• John H. Conway, Heidi Burgiel, Chaim Goodman-Strauss, The Symmetries of Things 2008, {{isbn|978-1-56881-220-5}} (Chapter 26. pp. 404: Regular star-polytopes Dimension 3)
• {{cite book | author= Anthony Pugh | date= 1976 | title= Polyhedra: A Visual Approach | publisher= University of California Press Berkeley | location= California | isbn= 0-520-03056-7 }} Chapter 8: Kepler Poisot polyhedra

{{Commons category|Kepler-Poinsot solids}}

• {{Mathworld | urlname=Kepler-PoinsotSolid | title=Kepler–Poinsot solid }}
• [http://www.software3d.com/Kepler.php Paper models of Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra]
• [http://www.korthalsaltes.com/cuadros.php?type=k Free paper models (nets) of Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra]
• [http://www.mathconsult.ch/showroom/unipoly/ The Uniform Polyhedra]
• [http://dmccooey.com/polyhedra/KeplerPoinsot.html Kepler-Poinsot Solids] in Visual Polyhedra
• [http://www.georgehart.com/virtual-polyhedra/kepler-poinsot-info.html VRML models of the Kepler–Poinsot polyhedra]
• [http://www.steelpillow.com/polyhedra/StelFacet/history.html Stellation and facetting - a brief history]
• [http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php Stella: Polyhedron Navigator]: Software used to create many of the images on this page.

{{Nonconvex polyhedron navigator}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Kepler-Poinsot Polyhedron}}

Category:Johannes Kepler

Category:Nonconvex polyhedra