Knights of Labor

In 1869, Uriah Smith Stephens, James L. Wright, and a small group of Philadelphia tailors founded a secret organization known as the Noble Order of the Knights of Labor. The collapse of the National Labor Union in 1873 left a vacuum for workers looking for organization. The Knights became better organized with a national vision when, in 1879, they replaced Stephens with Terence V. Powderly, who was just 30 years old at the time. The body became popular with trade unions and Pennsylvania coal miners during the economic depression of the mid-1870s, then it grew rapidly. The KOL was a diverse industrial union open to all workers. The leaders felt that it was best to have a versatile population in order to get points of view from all aspects. The Knights of Labor barred five groups from membership: bankers, land speculators, lawyers, liquor dealers and gamblers.{{Cite journal |last=Scharnau |first=Ralph |date=1991 |title=The Knights of Labor in Iowa |journal=The Annals of Iowa |pages=30 |via=uiowa}} Its members included low skilled workers, railroad workers, immigrants, and steel workers. This helped the workers to get an organizational identity. As one of the largest labor organizations in the nineteenth century, Knights wanted to classify the workers, as it was a time where large scale factories and industries were rapidly growing. Even though skilled workers were prioritized at the beginning 1880s, by the time of 1886, nearly a million workers were enrolled. {{Cite journal |last=Voss |first=Kim |date=1988 |title=Labor Organization and Class Alliance: Industries, Communities, and the Knights of Labor |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/657519 |url-status=live |journal=Theory and Society |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=329–364 |doi=10.1007/BF00160843 |issn=0304-2421 |jstor=657519 |s2cid=147551660 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327174422/https://www.jstor.org/stable/657519 |archive-date=27 March 2023 |access-date=5 May 2023|url-access=subscription }}

File:Powderly-terence-1890.jpg, Grand Master Workman of the Knights of Labor during its meteoric rise and precipitous decline (1890)]]

As membership expanded, the Knights began to function more as a labor union and less as a secret organization. During the 1880s, the Knights of Labor played a massive role in independent and third-party movements. Local assemblies began to emphasize cooperative enterprises and initiate strikes to win concessions from employers. The Knights of Labor brought together workers of different religions, races, and genders and helped them all create a bond and unify all for the exact cause. {{Cite journal |last=Scharnau |first=Ralph |date=1991 |title=The Knights of Labor in Iowa |journal=The Annals of Iowa |pages=30 |via=uiowa}} The new leader, Powderly, opposed strikes as a "relic of barbarism", but the size and the diversity of the Knights afforded local assemblies a great deal of autonomy.   

In 1882, the Knights ended their membership rituals and removed the words "Noble Order" from their name. This was intended to mollify the concerns of Catholic members and the bishops who wanted to avoid any resemblance to freemasonry. Though initially averse to strikes to advance their goals, the Knights did aid various strikes and boycotts. The Wabash Railroad strike in 1885 saw Powderly finally adapt and support an eventually successful strike against Jay Gould's Wabash Line after C. A. Hall, a carpenter and Knights member, was fired for attending a meeting in February. The strike included stopping track, yard, engine maintenance, the control or sabotage of equipment, and the occupation of shops and roundhouses.{{Cite journal |last=Case |first=Theresa A. |date=2009 |title=Blaming Martin Irons: Leadership and Popular Protest in the 1886 Southwest Strike |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40542736 |journal=The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=51–81 |doi=10.1017/S1537781400001006 |jstor=40542736 |s2cid=147049676 |issn=1537-7814 |access-date=5 May 2023 |archive-date=29 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230329171840/https://www.jstor.org/stable/40542736 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }} Gould met with Powderly and agreed to call off his campaign against the Knights of Labor, which had caused the turmoil originally. This gave momentum to the Knights and membership surged. By 1886, the Knights had more than 700,000 members.

The Knights' primary demand was for the eight-hour workday. They also called for legislation to end child and convict labor as well as a graduated income tax. They also supported cooperatives. The only woman to hold office in the Knights of Labor, Leonora Barry, worked as an investigator. She described the horrific conditions in factories employing women and children. These reports made Barry the first person to collect national statistics on the American working woman.Whitman, American Reformers, 57.

Powderly and the Knights tried to avoid divisive political issues, but in the early 1880s, many Knights had become followers of Henry George's ideology known now as Georgism. In 1883, Powderly officially recommended George's book and announced his support of "single tax" on land values. During the New York mayoral election of 1886, Powderly was able to successfully push the organization towards the favor of Henry George.{{cite journal|last1=Weir|first1=Robert E.|title=A Fragile Alliance: Henry George and the Knights of Labor|journal=The American Journal of Economics and Sociology|date=October 1997|volume=56|issue=4|doi=10.1111/j.1536-7150.1997.tb02653.x}} In 1886, the Knights became of the part of the short lived United Labor Party, an alliance of labor organizations formed in support of George's campaign in the 1886 New York City mayoral election.{{Cite journal|last=Genovese|first=Frank C.|date=1991|title=Henry George and Organized Labor: The 19th Century Economist and Social Philosopher Championed Labor's Cause, but Used Its Candidacy for Propaganda|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3487043|journal=The American Journal of Economics and Sociology|volume=50|issue=1|pages=113–127|doi=10.1111/j.1536-7150.1991.tb02500.x|jstor=3487043|issn=0002-9246|access-date=8 November 2021|archive-date=7 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211107025835/https://www.jstor.org/stable/3487043|url-status=live|url-access=subscription}}

The Knights of Labor helped to bring together many different types of people from all walks of life; for example, Catholic and Protestant Irish-born workers. The KOL appealed to them because they worked very closely with the Irish Land League.{{cite journal|last1=Hallgrimsdottir|first1=Helga|last2=Benoit|first2=Cecilia|title=From Wage Slaves to Wage Workers|journal=Cultural Opportunity Structures and the Evolution of the Wage Demands of the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor, 1880-1900|date=2007|volume=85|issue=3|pages=1393–1411}} The Knights had a mixed record on inclusiveness and exclusiveness. They accepted women and African Americans (after 1878) and their employers as members and advocated the admission of blacks into local assemblies. However, the organization tolerated the segregation of assemblies in the South. Bankers, doctors, lawyers, stockholders, and liquor manufacturers were excluded because they were considered unproductive members of society. Asians were also excluded, and in November 1885, a branch of the Knights in Tacoma, Washington violently expelled the city's Chinese workers, who amounted to nearly a tenth of the overall city population at the time.{{Cite web | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KGQUnQAACAAJ |title = A Radical History of Seattle's International District: A Walking Tour|year = 2015}} Black membership stood at 60,000 in 1886, and there were 400 all-black locals, primarily in the south.{{sfn|Foner|1977|p=63}}

The Union Pacific Railroad came into conflict with the Knights. When the Knights in Wyoming refused to work more hours in 1885, the railroad hired Chinese workers as strikebreakers and to stir up racial animosity. The result was the Rock Springs massacre, that killed scores of Chinese workers, and drove the rest out of Wyoming.Craig Storti, Incident at Bitter Creek: The Story of the Rock Springs Chinese Massacre (1990), About 50 African-American sugar-cane laborers organized by the Knights went on strike and were murdered by strikebreakers in the 1887 Thibodaux massacre in Louisiana. The Knights strongly supported passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Contract Labor Law of 1885, as did many other labor groups, demonstrating the limits of their commitment to solidarity. While they claimed to not be "against immigration", their anti-Asian racism demonstrated the limits and inconsistency of their anti-racist platform.{{Cite book|title=Knights Across the Atlantic: The Knights of Labor in Britain and Ireland|last=Parfitt|first=Steven|publisher=Liverpool University Press|pages=43}}

Nearly 12,000 Knights Assemblies (11,957) have been identified and mapped by historian Jonathan Garland. They were located in more than 5,600 cities and towns across every state and territory of the United States, with others in Canada, Great Britain, and Australia. In the peak year, 1886, the Knights reported 729,677 members in 5,892 Local Assemblies. But Garland explains that "this was actually an undercount. The organization had trouble keeping track of local assemblies and membership in the midst of this growth period." The actual membership approached one million.{{Cite web | last= Garland | first=Jonathan| title=Knights of Labor History and Geography 1869-1899|website=Mapping American Social Movements Project| url= https://depts.washington.edu/moves/knights_labor_map.shtml}}

In the first decade, 1869-1879, the organization was concentrated in coal mining towns in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and Illinois. But in the early 1880s, craft assemblies and mixed assemblies appeared in big cities and small towns across the Midwest, then after 1885 the movement surged into the South and through the mining and railroad towns of the West.{{Cite web | last= Garland | first=Jonathan| title=Knights of Labor History and Geography 1869-1899|website=Mapping American Social Movements Project| url= https://depts.washington.edu/moves/knights_labor_map.shtml}}

The Knights aimed to educate and uplift workers and negotiate salaries and contracts with employers. The Knights had a few primary demands that they wanted to see established. For one, they wanted the workers to see a proper share of the wealth that they created; in other words, they tried to diminish or at least decrease the wage gap. They wanted to educate workers, create cooperative institutions, and enact labor laws such as child labor laws. The Knights also wanted to make sure that workers were protected and that their workplace was improved. The 8-hour workday was something that became very important to the Knights.

In 1882 the Knight of Labor made their way into Arkansas, and by 1887 they gained over 5000 members. There were two main strikes that took place in Arkansas, the Great Southwest Railroad Strike, which took place across the whole country, and a strike that took place on a Plantation in Pulaski County, near Little Rock.{{Cite journal |last=Hild |first=Matthew |date=2020 |title=The Knights of Labor in Arkansas: A Research Note |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26924945 |journal=The Arkansas Historical Quarterly |volume=79 |issue=1 |pages=59–63 |issn=0004-1823}} The strike began from forty farmhands demanding higher wages, and living conditions. Ultimately the strike was not successful, but it sparked a tradition of protests across the state. After the failed strike the Knights of Labor worked closely with agricultural organizations to try and push for political change.

File:Sovereign-J-R-1894.jpg

{{Main|Great Southwest railroad strike of 1886}}

The Great Southwest railroad strike of 1886 was a Knights strike involving more than 200,000 workers. Beginning on March 1, 1886, railroad workers in five states struck against the Union Pacific and Missouri Pacific railroads, owned by Jay Gould. At least ten people were killed. The unravelling of the strike within two months led directly to the collapse of the Knights of Labor and the formation of the American Federation of Labor.Theresa A. Case, The Great Southwest Railroad Strike and Free Labor (Texas A&M University Press, 2010); [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/433283/summary online review]

In 1886, following their peak, they started to lose more members to the American Federation of Labor. The Knights of Labor's fall is believed to have been due to their lack of adaptability and beliefs in old-style industrial capitalism. Another large reason for their decline was the tension between skilled craftsmen and unskilled workers.  

The Knights of Labor attracted many Catholics, who were a large part of the membership, perhaps a majority. Powderly was also a Catholic. However, the Knights's use of secrecy, similar to the Masons, during its early years concerned many bishops of the Church. The Knights used secrecy and deception to help prevent employers from firing members.

After the Archbishop of Quebec condemned the Knights in 1884, twelve American archbishops voted 10 to 2 against doing likewise in the United States. Furthermore, Cardinal James Gibbons and Bishop John Ireland defended the Knights. Gibbons went to the Vatican to talk to the hierarchy.James Hennesey, American Catholics, Oxford University Press, 1981, page 188.

In 1886, right after the peak of the Knights of Labor, they started to lose more members to the American Federation of Labor. It has been believed that the fall of the Knights of Labor was due to their lack of adaptability and beliefs in the old-style industrial capitalism.{{Cite book|title=The Future of the American Labor Movement|url=https://archive.org/details/futureamericanla00whee|url-access=limited|last=Wheeler|first=Hoyt|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2002|pages=[https://archive.org/details/futureamericanla00whee/page/n106 85]}}

Scholars pit the skilled and unskilled workers as another reason for the Knights of Labor's downfall. The Union worked for both groups, but since the results of the union efforts often benefited one or the other and not both, the tension persisted. {{Cite journal |last=Voss |first=Kim |date=1988 |title=Labor Organization and Class Alliance: Industries, Communities, and the Knights of Labor |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/657519 |journal=Theory and Society |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=329–364 |doi=10.1007/BF00160843 |issn=0304-2421 |jstor=657519 |s2cid=147551660 |access-date=5 May 2023 |archive-date=27 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327174422/https://www.jstor.org/stable/657519 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }} Unskilled workers often benefited from equal opportunities. Skilled workers would become upset when someone took their jobs with less skill. Skilled workers benefit from better pay, but many unskilled workers do not receive those benefits. This tension discouraged new members and lead existing ones to leave the Knights of Labor and ultimately caused many members to leave.{{Cite journal |last=Kaufman |first=Jason |date=2001 |title=Rise and Fall of a Nation of Joiners: The Knights of Labor Revisited |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/206859 |journal=The Journal of Interdisciplinary History |volume=31 |issue=4 |pages=553–579 |doi=10.1162/00221950151115089 |jstor=206859 |issn=0022-1953 |access-date=2 September 2017 |archive-date=25 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200425134321/https://www.jstor.org/stable/206859 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }}

Though often overlooked, the Knights of Labor contributed to the tradition of labor protest songs in America. The Knights frequently included music in their regular meetings, and encouraged local members to write and perform their work. In Chicago, James and Emily Talmadge, printers and supporters of the Knights of Labor, published the songbook "Labor Songs Dedicated to the Knights of Labor" (1885). The song "Hold the Fort" [also "Storm the Fort"], a Knights of Labor pro-labor revision of the hymn by the same name, became the most popular labor song prior to Ralph Chaplin's IWW (Industrial Workers of the World) anthem "Solidarity Forever". Pete Seeger often performed this song and it appears on a number of his recordings. Songwriter and labor singer Bucky Halker includes the Talmadge version, entitled "Our Battle Song," on his CD Don't Want Your Millions (Revolting Records 2000). Halker also draws heavily on the Knights songs and poems in his book on labor song and poetry, For Democracy, Workers and God: Labor Song-Poems and Labor Protest, 1865-1895 (University of Illinois Press, 1991).

The Knights of Labor supported the Chinese Exclusion Act, claiming that industrialists were using Chinese workers as a wedge to keep wages low. To stop companies from doing this, they supported Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and also the Alien Contract labor law 1885. Even though the Acts were useful to pass the laws they wanted, they weren't satisfied so they attacked Chinese workers and burned down their places.{{Cite web|title= Knights of Labor - Definition, Goals & Leader|date= 7 October 2021|url= https://www.history.com/topics/19th-century/knights-of-labor#attacks-on-chinese-workers|access-date= 5 May 2023|archive-date= 28 May 2023|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230528024909/https://www.history.com/topics/19th-century/knights-of-labor#attacks-on-chinese-workers|url-status= live}}

Not only did the Knights of Labor speak poorly about the Chinese, but they happened to be one of the only groups they excluded from their group. Immigrants of countries from non-Western Europe were considered to be second-class citizens at this time. A major factor in why the Chinese were excluded from the Knights of Labor. “Only at accepting Chinese did the Knights generally draw the line,” Alexander Saxton wrote. {{Cite journal |last=Weir |first=Rob |date=November 2000 |title=Blind in One Eye Only: Western and Eastern Knights of Labor View the Chinese Question |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/002365600449137 |journal=Labor History |language=en |volume=41 |issue=4 |pages=421–436 |doi=10.1080/002365600449137 |issn=0023-656X |access-date=3 May 2024 |archive-date=3 April 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240403011730/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/002365600449137 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }} The Knights of Labor consistently made efforts towards many problems in the workforce but often left out any advances that would benefit the Chinese communities.

Anti-Chinese rhetoric and violence were more prevalent among the western chapters of the Knights. In 1880, San Francisco Knights wrote, "They bear the semblance of men, but live like beasts...who eat rice and the offal of the slaughter house." The article also calls Chinese "natural thieves" and states that all Chinese women are prostitutes. In March 1882, Knights joined the San Francisco rally to demand expulsion of the Chinese. Several years later, mobs led by the Knights of Labor, a loosely structured labor federation, rounded up Seattle's Chinese-born workers and campaigned to prevent further immigration.

Historian Catharine Collomp notes that "Chinese exclusion was the only issue about which the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor constantly lobbied the Federal government."

The labor movement, including those in the Knights of Labor, were rallying for an eight-hour workday and protesting with their slogan: "Eight Hours for Work, Eight Hours for Rest, Eight Hours for What We Will." Through Eight Hour rallies and legislative lobbying, labor leaders came into direct conflict with employers, who neither accepted unions nor believed that governments should intervene on workers' behalf. During an Eight Hour campaign in Chicago in 1886, a conflict between organized laborers and employers turned violent. By the mid-1880s, Chicago was the center of immigrant and working-class organizing, with a wide array of labor organizations. Demands for the eight-hour workday were at the heart of a strike against one of Chicago's most powerful employers, the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, which refused to bargain with the union.

While workingmen had gathered to strike against the plant, some of them had drawn fire from authorities. City police and private guards had injured and killed some of the strikers. Which prompted responses from a bigger working class, which included anarchists Albert Parsons, Michael Schwab, August Spies, Adolph Fischer, and labor organizer Oscar Neebe. On May 4, they organized a protest in Chicago's Haymarket Square. After the main speakers, Parson and Spies, left the platform, someone from the crowd threw a bomb into a group of police standing in the square, which left seven police dead, and sixty protesters from the crowd injured. Afterwards, the eight anarchists were arrested and seven of them were sentenced to death in a trial that focused on political beliefs, not the actions of the anarchists. Two of the condemned had their sentences commuted; but after Louis Lingg committed suicide in prison, the remaining four were executed.

The Haymarket trial had two distinct effects on the labor movement: first, a nationwide campaign to round up anarchists and, second, a steep decline in the Knights of Labor's membership. Terence Powderly, the Knights president, disavowed the Haymarket eight, even as local trade unions and Knights assemblies around the country protested the arrests. Rapid growth of the labor union in the mid-1880s weakened the bonds that held it together, New Knights members had joined the organization in the wake of its victories over southwestern railroads, but without fully understanding or accepting the Knights' movement culture. While it would be over a decade before the Knights disbanded, these organizational weaknesses, and the strength of the new trade federation union, led to the Knights' decline.{{Cite book |last=Faue |first=Elizabeth |title=Rethinking the American Labor Movement |publisher=Routledge |year=2017 |isbn=9780415895835 |location=New York |pages=22–24 |language=en-us}}

:1878: Uriah Smith Stephens{{cite book |last1=McNeill |first1=George E. |title=The Labor Movement: The Problem of To-day |date=1887 |publisher=M. W. Hazen |location=New York |url=https://ia902808.us.archive.org/28/items/labormovementpro00mcneiala/labormovementpro00mcneiala.pdf |page=621}}

:1879: Terence V. Powderly{{cite book |title=Reports of the Industrial Commission on Labor Organizations, Labor Disputes, and Arbitration, and on Railway Labor |date=1901 |publisher=Government Printing Office |location=Washington DC}}

:1893: James Sovereign

:1897: Henry A. Hicks

:1898: John N. Parsons

:1900: Isaac D. Chamberlain

:1900: Simon Burns

:1901: Henry A. Hicks{{cite news |title=Labor leader is deposed |work=New York Times |date=November 17, 1901}}

:1902: John Hayes

:1878: Ralph Beaumont{{cite book |title=The Samuel Gompers Papers |date=1986 |publisher=University of Illinois Press |isbn=9780252033896}}

:1879: Terence V. Powderly

:1879: Richard Griffiths

:1882: Ralph Beaumont

:1883: Henry A. Coffeen

:1884: Richard Griffiths

:1888: Morris L. Wheat

:1890: Hugh Cavanaugh

:1893: Michael J. Bishop

:1896: Thomas McGuire

:1897: Isaac D. Chamberlain

:1901: Arthur McConnell

:1902: Isaac A. Sanderson

:1910s: William A. Denison

{{Portal|Organized labour}}

• Labor unions in the United States
• Labor federation competition in the United States
• IWW
• Olivier-David Benoît
• Mary Harris Jones
• Mary Stirling, first woman delegate to annual convention

{{Reflist}}

• {{cite book |last=Foner |first=Philip |author-link=Philip S. Foner |title=American Socialism and Black Americans: From The Age of Jackson to World War II |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=1977 |isbn=0837195454}}

• Arvidsson, Stefan (2018). The style and mythology of socialism: socialist idealism, 1871-1914. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge
• {{cite journal

| last = Birdsall

| first = William C.

| title = The Problem of Structure in the Knights of Labor

| journal = Industrial and Labor Relations Review

| volume = 6

| issue = 4

| pages = 532–546

| date = July 1953

| doi = 10.2307/2518795

| jstor = 2518795}}

• Blum, Edward J. " 'By the Sweat of Your Brow': The Knights of Labor, the Book of Genesis, and the Christian Spirit of the Gilded Age." Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas 11.2 (2014): 29–34.
• Browne, Henry J. The Catholic Church and the Knights of Labor. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1949.
• Case, Theresa A. The Great Southwest Railroad Strike and Free Labor (Texas A&M University Press, 2010); [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/433283/summary online review], on 1886
• {{cite journal

| last = Cassity

| first = Michael J.

| title = Modernization and Social Crisis: The Knights of Labor and a Midwest Community, 1885-1886

| journal = Journal of American History

| volume = 66

| issue = 1

| pages = 41–61

| date = June 1979

| doi = 10.2307/1894673

| jstor = 1894673}}

• Commons, John R. et al., History of Labour in the United States: Volume 2, 1860-1896. (4 vol 1918). vol 2
• Conell, Carol, and Kim Voss. "Formal Organization and the Fate of Social Movements: Craft Association and Class Alliance in the Knights of Labor," American Sociological Review Vol. 55, No. 2 (Apr., 1990), pp. 255–269 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095631 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200426143546/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095631 |date=26 April 2020 }}, focus on steel industry
• de Leon, Cedric. "Black from white: How the rights of white and black workers became 'labor' and 'civil' rights after the US civil war." Labor Studies Journal 42.1 (2017): 10–26. [https://www.academia.edu/download/51550071/BlackFromWhite_deLeon_LSJ_MS_accepted_version.pdf online]{{Dead link|date=October 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
• Fink, Leon. "The New Labor History and the Powers of Historical Pessimism: Consensus, Hegemony, and the Case of the Knights of Labor," Journal of American History Vol. 75, No. 1 (Jun., 1988), pp. 115–136 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1889657 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200804044828/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1889657 |date=4 August 2020 }}, historiography
• Fink, Leon. Workingmen's Democracy: The Knights of Labor and American Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1983. [https://archive.org/details/workingmensdemoc00fink online]
• Grob, Gerald N. "The Knights of Labor and the Trade Unions, 1878-1886," Journal of Economic History Vol. 18, No. 2 (Jun., 1958), pp. 176–192 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2115102 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200426024358/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2115102 |date=26 April 2020 }}
• Hild, Matthew. Greenbackers, Knights of Labor, and Populists: Farmer-Labor Insurgency in the Late-Nineteenth-Century South (U of Georgia Press, 2010).
• Hild, Matthew. "Building the Alabama Labor Movement: Nicholas Byrne Stack and the Knights of Labor." Alabama Review 73.2 (2020): 91–117.
• Hild, Matthew. "The Knights of Labor and the Third-Party Movement in Texas, 1886–1896." Southwestern Historical Quarterly 119.1 (2015): 24–43. [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/588662/summary online]
• Hoffman, Richard C. "Producer co-operatives of the Knights of Labor: seeking worker independence." Labor History (2022): 1–19.
• {{cite journal

| last = Kessler

| first = Sidney H.

| title = The Organization of Negroes in the Knights of Labor

| journal = Journal of Negro History

| volume = 37

| pages = 248–276

| date = July 1937

| doi = 10.2307/2715493

| jstor = 2715493

| issue = 3| s2cid = 149648934

}}

• Kaufman, Jason. "Rise and Fall of a Nation of Joiners: The Knights of Labor Revisited," Journal of Interdisciplinary History Vol. 31, No. 4 (Spring, 2001), pp. 553–579 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/206859 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200425134321/https://www.jstor.org/stable/206859 |date=25 April 2020 }} statistical study of competition with other unions and with fraternal societies for members
• {{cite journal

| last = Kemmerer

| first = Donald L.

|author2=Edward D. Wickersham

| title = Reasons for the Growth of the Knights of Labor in 1885-1886

| journal = Industrial and Labor Relations Review

| volume = 3

| issue = 2

| pages = 213–220

| date = January 1950

| jstor =2518830

| doi = 10.2307/2518830}}

• Keohane, Jennifer. " 'Labor is Noble and Holy': Ironic Inclusion and Exclusion in the Knights of Labor, 1885-1890." Rhetoric Review 38.3 (2019): 311–324. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07350198.2019.1618114 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230515125142/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07350198.2019.1618114 |date=15 May 2023 }}
• Levine, Susan. "Labor's True Woman: Domesticity and Equal Rights in the Knights of Labor," Journal of American History Vol. 70, No. 2 (Sep., 1983), pp. 323–339 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1900207 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210604162045/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1900207 |date=4 June 2021 }}
• Levine, Susan. True Women: Carpet Weavers, Industrialization, and Labor Reform in the Gilded Age. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984.
• {{cite journal

| last1 = Licht

| first1 = Walter

| title = The Knights of Labor Commemorated and Reconsidered: : Dreaming of What Might Be: The Knights of Labor in Ontario, 1880-1900; Workingmen's Democracy: The Knights of Labor and American Politics

| journal = Journal of Interdisciplinary History

| volume = 16

| issue = 1

| pages = 117–123

| date = Summer 1985

| doi = 10.2307/204327

| jstor = 204327

| last2 = Kealey

| first2 = Gregory

| last3 = Palmer

| first3 = Bryan

| last4 = Fink

| first4 = Leon }}

• {{cite journal

| last = Miner

| first = Claudia

| title = The 1886 Convention of the Knights of Labor

| journal = Pylon

| volume = 44

| issue = 2

| pages = 147–159

| date = 1983

| doi = 10.2307/275026

| jstor = 275026}}

• McLaurin, Melton Alonza. The Knights of Labor in the South. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1978.
• Phelan, Craig. Grand Master Workman: Terence Powderly and the Knights of Labor (Greenwood, 2000), scholarly biography [https://www.questia.com/library/120072755/grand-master-workman-terence-powderly-and-the-knights online edition] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190627115035/https://www.questia.com/library/120072755/grand-master-workman-terence-powderly-and-the-knights |date=27 June 2019 }}
• Taussig, Frank W. "The South-Western Strike of 1886." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1.2 (1887): 184–222; detailed coverage by a leading scholar; [https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1880770.pdf online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230515125143/https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1880770.pdf |date=15 May 2023 }}
• Voss, Kim. The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994. Sociological study. [https://www.questia.com/library/103669123/the-making-of-american-exceptionalism-the-knights online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190627115042/https://www.questia.com/library/103669123/the-making-of-american-exceptionalism-the-knights |date=27 June 2019 }}
• Ware, Norman J. The Labor Movement in the United States, 1860 - 1895: A Study In Democracy. (1929).
• Weir, Robert E. Beyond Labor's Veil: The Culture of the Knights of Labor. (Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996) [https://www.questia.com/library/2350134/beyond-labor-s-veil-the-culture-of-the-knights-of online edition] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190627115033/https://www.questia.com/library/2350134/beyond-labor-s-veil-the-culture-of-the-knights-of |date=27 June 2019 }}
• Weir, Robert E. (1997). [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0254/is_n4_v56/ai_20381867/?tag=content;col1 A fragile alliance: Henry George and the Knights of Labor]{{dead link|date=May 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 56, 421–439.
• Weir, Robert E. Knights Unhorsed: Internal Conflict in Gilded Age Social Movement (Wayne State University Press, 2000)
• {{cite book|last=White|author-link=Richard White (historian)|first=Richard|title=Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company|date=2011|isbn=978-0-393-06126-0|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/railroadedtransc00whit_0}}
• Wright, Carroll D. "An Historical Sketch of the Knights of Labor," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 1, no. 2 (January 1887), pp. 137–168. [https://www.jstor.org/pss/1880768 in JSTOR]

• Arvidsson, Stefan The style and mythology of socialism: socialist idealism, 1871-1914. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017.
• Kealey, Gregory, and Brian Palmer, Dreaming of What Might Be: The Knights of Labor in Ontario, 1880-1900. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
• Parfitt, Steven. Knights Across the Atlantic: The Knights of Labor in Britain and Ireland (2017) [https://academic.oup.com/liverpool-scholarship-online/book/43247 contents] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230516044620/https://academic.oup.com/liverpool-scholarship-online/book/43247 |date=16 May 2023 }} also see [https://www.storre.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/30137/1/Toth-2019-BookReview.pdf online review] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221208163407/https://www.storre.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/30137/1/Toth-2019-BookReview.pdf |date=8 December 2022 }}
• Parfitt, Steven. "A nexus between labour movement and labour movement: the Knights of Labor and the financial side of global labour history." Labor History 58.3 (2017): 288–302.
• Parfitt, Steven. "Transnational Borrowings: Scottish Sons of Labour and American Knights of Labor, 1887–1890." Labour History Review 85.2 (2020): 127–157.
• Parfitt, Steven. "The First-and-a-half International: The Knights of Labor and the History of International Labour Organization in the Nineteenth Century." Labour History Review 80.2 (2015): 135–167.
• Parfitt, Steven. "Completing the Order’s History Down Under: The Knights of Labor in Australia." Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History 110 (2016): 1–18.
• Parfitt, Steven. "Constructing the Global History of the Knights of Labor." Labor 14.1 (2017): 13–37.
• {{cite journal

| last = Pelling

| first = Henry

| title = The Knights of Labor in Britain, 1880-1901

| journal = Economic History Review

| volume = 9 (new series)

| issue = 2

| pages = 313–331

| year = 1956

| doi = 10.2307/2591749

| jstor = 2591749}}, shows that American workers in the window glass industry set up an English chapter in 1884 to watch the business in Europe; it remained small

• Toth, Gyorgy. "Knights across the Atlantic: The Knights of Labor in Britain and Ireland." (2019): 151–156.
• Watillon, Leon. and Frederic Meyers, The Knights of Labor in Belgium. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1978. Also in partial translation by Frederic Meyers, Institute of Industrial Relations, Los Angeles, 1959: http://www.oac.cdlib.org/ark:/28722/bk0003t812j/?brand=oac4 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303233810/http://www.oac.cdlib.org/ark:/28722/bk0003t812j/?brand=oac4 |date=3 March 2016 }}

• {{cite book

| author = Knights of Labor

| title = Proceedings of the General Assembly, 10th - 30th

| format = microfilm

| date = 1887–1913

| publisher = Library of American civilization

| url = http://catalog.wrlc.org/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=20&ti=1,20&Search%5FArg=Knights%20of%20Labor&SL=None&Search%5FCode=SUBJ%5F&CNT=25&PID=896&SEQ=20061008221735&SID=3

| id = LAC 23217-20

| access-date = 9 October 2006

| archive-date = 10 May 2017

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170510140208/http://catalog.wrlc.org/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=20&ti=1,20&Search%5FArg=Knights%20of%20Labor&SL=None&Search%5FCode=SUBJ%5F&CNT=25&PID=896&SEQ=20061008221735&SID=3

| url-status = live

}}

• {{cite book

| author = Knights of Labor

| title = Record of the proceedings of the General Assembly, 1st - 9th

| format = microfilm

| date = 1878–1886

| publisher = Library of American civilization

| url = http://catalog.wrlc.org/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=21&ti=1,21&Search%5FArg=Knights%20of%20Labor&SL=None&Search%5FCode=SUBJ%5F&CNT=25&PID=896&SEQ=20061008221735&Sisbn=3

| id = LAC 23214-16

| access-date = 1 December 2008

| archive-date = 10 May 2017

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170510140106/http://catalog.wrlc.org/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=21&ti=1,21&Search%5FArg=Knights%20of%20Labor&SL=None&Search%5FCode=SUBJ%5F&CNT=25&PID=896&SEQ=20061008221735&Sisbn=3

| url-status = live

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Powderly

| first = Terence Vincent

| title = Thirty Years of Labor. 1859-1889

| publisher = Excelsior publishing house

| year = 1889

| pages = 693

| url = https://archive.org/details/thirtyyearslabo00powdgoog

| quote = Terence Vincent Powderly.

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Powderly

| first = Terence Vincent

| title = Thirty Years of Labor. 1859-1889

| publisher = Excelsior publishing house

| year = 1889

| pages = 693

| url = https://archive.org/details/thirtyyearslabo00powdgoog

| quote = Terence Vincent Powderly.

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Powderly

| first = Terence Vincent

|author2=Edmund Janes James

| title = The Labor Movement: The Problem of To-day

| publisher = The M. W. Hazen Company

| year = 1891

| pages = [https://archive.org/details/labormovementpr00jamegoog/page/n706 628]

| url = https://archive.org/details/labormovementpr00jamegoog

| quote = Terence Vincent Powderly.

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Powderly

| first = Terence Vincent

| title = The Labor Movement: The Problem of To-day; Chapter XV: The History of the Knights of Labor

| year = 1891

| pages = [https://archive.org/details/labormovementpr00jamegoog/page/n457 397]–428

| publisher = New York, M.W. Hazen Co.

| url = https://archive.org/details/labormovementpr00jamegoog

| quote = Terence Vincent Powderly.

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Powderly

| first = Terence Vincent

|author2=John Williams Hayes

| editor = John A. Turcheneske Jr

| title = Terence Vincent Powderly Papers 1864-1937 and John Williams Hayes Papers 1880-1921, The Knights of Labor

| year = 1891

| pages = 109 reels

}}

• [https://archives.lib.umd.edu/repositories/2/resources/1480 William Baillie Baird papers] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210514021912/https://archives.lib.umd.edu/repositories/2/resources/1480 |date=14 May 2021 }}, at the University of Maryland libraries. Baird was a commissioned organizer of the Knights of Labor.

• A.C. Dunham, [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ0722-0045-70 "The Knights of Labor,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121210193328/http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ0722-0045-70 |date=10 December 2012 }} New Englander and Yale Review, vol. 45, no. 195 (June 1886), pp. 490–498.
• John Stephens Durham, [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABK2934-0081-28 "The Labor Unions and the Negro,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121214150128/http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABK2934-0081-28 |date=14 December 2012 }} Atlantic Monthly, vol. 81, no. 484 (February 1898), pp. 222–231.
• Henry George, [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0145-3 "The New Party,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121212135859/http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0145-3 |date=12 December 2012 }} North American Review, vol. 145, no. 368 (July 1887), pp. 1–8.
• Rufus Hatch, [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0142-72 "The Labor Crisis,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121211120150/http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0142-72 |date=11 December 2012 }} North American Review, vol. 142, no. 355 (June 1886), pp. 602–607.
• Richard J. Hinton, [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0140-7 "American Labor Organizations,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121211143551/http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0140-7 |date=11 December 2012 }} North American Review, vol. 140, no. 338 (January 1885), pp. 48–63.
• M.E.J. Kelley, [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0166-38 "Women and the Labor Movement] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121210091241/http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0166-38 |date=10 December 2012 }}, North American Review, vol. 166, no. 497 (April 1898), pp. 408–418.
• George Frederic Parsons, [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABK2934-0058-12 "The Labor Question,"] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121214150837/http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABK2934-0058-12 |date=14 December 2012 }} Atlantic Monthly, vol. 58, no. 345 (July 1886), pp. 97–113.
• Carroll D. Wright, "An Historical Sketch of the Knights of Labor," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 1, no. 2 (January 1887), pp. 137–168.

{{Wikisource|The New International Encyclopædia/Knights of Labor}}

• [https://archive.org/details/RecordOfProceedingsOfTheGeneralAssemblyOfTheKnightsOfLabor Record of proceedings of the General Assembly of the Knights of Labor 1878]
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20060907193135/http://libraries.cua.edu/achrcua/bibkol.html "Select Bibliography of Terence V. Powderly and the Knights of Labor,"] Catholic University of America. Retrieved October 8, 2006.
• {{Cite NIE|wstitle=Knights of Labor|year=1905 |short=x}}
• [https://depts.washington.edu/moves/knights_labor_map.shtml/ Knights of Labor History and Geography 1869-1899 - Mapping American Social Movements]-maps

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Knights Of Labor}}

Category:Knights of Labor

Category:American cooperative organizers

Category:Defunct trade unions in the United States

Category:Defunct American political movements

Category:Service organizations based in the United States

Category:Trade unions in Canada

Category:Trade unions in New Zealand

Category:National trade union centers of the United States

Category:Trade unions established in 1869

Category:1869 establishments in the United States

Category:Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States

Category:Anti-immigration politics in the United States