Lévy hierarchy#Definitions

In set theory and mathematical logic, the Lévy hierarchy, introduced by Azriel Lévy in 1965, is a hierarchy of formulas in the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, which is typically called just the language of set theory. This is analogous to the arithmetical hierarchy, which provides a similar classification for sentences of the language of arithmetic.

Definitions

In the language of set theory, atomic formulas are of the form x = y or x ∈ y, standing for equality and set membership predicates, respectively.

The first level of the Lévy hierarchy is defined as containing only formulas with no unbounded quantifiers and is denoted by \Delta_0=\Sigma_0=\Pi_0.Walicki, Michal (2012). Mathematical Logic, p. 225. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. {{isbn|9789814343862}} The next levels are given by finding a formula in prenex normal form which is provably equivalent over ZFC, and counting the number of changes of quantifiers:T. Jech, 'Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, revised and expanded'. Springer Monographs in Mathematics (2006). ISBN 3-540-44085-2.p. 184

A formula A is called:J. Baeten, [https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/12723/12723D.pdf Filters and ultrafilters over definable subsets over admissible ordinals] (1986). p.10

  • \Sigma_{i+1} if A is equivalent to \exists x_1 ... \exists x_n B in ZFC, where B is \Pi_i
  • \Pi_{i+1} if A is equivalent to \forall x_1 ... \forall x_n B in ZFC, where B is \Sigma_i
  • If a formula has both a \Sigma_i form and a \Pi_i form, it is called \Delta_i.

As a formula might have several different equivalent formulas in prenex normal form, it might belong to several different levels of the hierarchy. In this case, the lowest possible level is the level of the formula.{{citation needed|date=July 2023}}

Lévy's original notation was \Sigma_i^\mathsf{ZFC} (resp. \Pi_i^\mathsf{ZFC}) due to the provable logical equivalence,A. Lévy, 'A hierarchy of formulas in set theory' (1965), second edition strictly speaking the above levels should be referred to as \Sigma_i^\mathsf{ZFC} (resp. \Pi_i^\mathsf{ZFC}) to specify the theory in which the equivalence is carried out, however it is usually clear from context.K. Hauser, "Indescribable cardinals and elementary embeddings". Journal of Symbolic Logic vol. 56, iss. 2 (1991), pp.439--457.pp. 441–442 Pohlers has defined \Delta_1 in particular semantically, in which a formula is "\Delta_1 in a structure M".W. Pohlers, Proof Theory: The First Step into Impredicativity (2009) (p.245)

The Lévy hierarchy is sometimes defined for other theories S. In this case \Sigma_i and \Pi_i by themselves refer only to formulas that start with a sequence of quantifiers with at most i−1 alternations,{{citation needed|date=July 2023}} and \Sigma_i^S and \Pi_i^S refer to formulas equivalent to \Sigma_i and \Pi_i formulas in the language of the theory S. So strictly speaking the levels \Sigma_i and \Pi_i of the Lévy hierarchy for ZFC defined above should be denoted by \Sigma^{ZFC} _i and \Pi^{ZFC}_i.

Examples

=Σ<sub>0</sub>=Π<sub>0</sub>=Δ<sub>0</sub> formulas and concepts=

  • x = {y, z}Jon Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic (1975)p. 14
  • x ⊆ y D. Monk 2011, [https://web.archive.org/web/20111206123643/http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/m6730/gradsets14.pdf Graduate Set Theory] (pp.168--170). Archived 2011-12-06
  • x is a transitive set
  • x is an ordinal, x is a limit ordinal, x is a successor ordinal
  • x is a finite ordinal
  • The first infinite ordinal ω
  • x is an ordered pair. The first entry of the ordered pair x is a. The second entry of the ordered pair x is b p. 14
  • f is a function. x is the domain/range of the function f. y is the value of f on x p. 14
  • The Cartesian product of two sets.
  • x is the union of y
  • x is a member of the αth level of Godel's LW. A. R. Weiss, [https://www.math.toronto.edu/weiss/Set_Theory.pdf An Introduction to Set Theory] (chapter 13). Accessed 2022-12-01
  • R is a relation with domain/range/field a p. 14
  • X is Hausdorff.

=Δ<sub>1</sub>-formulas and concepts=

  • x is a well-founded relation on y K. J. Williams, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.03955.pdf Minimum models of second-order set theories] (2019, p.4). Accessed 2022 July 25.
  • x is finite p.15
  • Ordinal addition and multiplication and exponentiation F. R. Drake, Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals (p.83). Accessed 1 July 2022.
  • The rank (with respect to Gödel's constructible universe) of a set p. 61
  • The transitive closure of a set.
  • The specifiability relation Sp(A) for a set A. F. R. Drake, Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals (p.127). Accessed 4 October 2024.

=Σ<sub>1</sub>-formulas and concepts=

  • x is countable.
  • |X|≤|Y|, |X|=|Y|.
  • x is constructible.
  • g is the restriction of the function f to a p. 23
  • g is the image of f on a p. 23
  • b is the successor ordinal of a p. 23
  • rank(x) p. 29
  • The Mostowski collapse of (x,\in) p. 29

=Π<sub>1</sub>-formulas and concepts=

=Δ<sub>2</sub>-formulas and concepts=

=Σ<sub>2</sub>-formulas and concepts=

=Π<sub>2</sub>-formulas and concepts=

  • The axiom of choiceAzriel Lévy, "On the logical complexity of several axioms of set theory" (1971). Appearing in Axiomatic Set Theory: Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13 part 1, pp.219--230
  • The generalized continuum hypothesis
  • The axiom of constructibility: V = L

=Δ<sub>3</sub>-formulas and concepts=

=Σ<sub>3</sub>-formulas and concepts=

=Π<sub>3</sub>-formulas and concepts=

=Σ<sub>4</sub>-formulas and concepts=

Properties

Let n\geq 1. The Lévy hierarchy has the following properties:p. 184

  • If \phi is \Sigma_n, then \lnot\phi is \Pi_n.
  • If \phi is \Pi_n, then \lnot\phi is \Sigma_n.
  • If \phi and \psi are \Sigma_n, then \exists x\phi, \phi\land\psi, \phi\lor\psi, \exists(x\in z)\phi, and \forall(x\in z)\phi are all \Sigma_n.
  • If \phi and \psi are \Pi_n, then \forall x\phi, \phi\land\psi, \phi\lor\psi, \exists(x\in z)\phi, and \forall(x\in z)\phi are all \Pi_n.
  • If \phi is \Sigma_n and \psi is \Pi_n, then \phi\implies\psi is \Pi_n.
  • If \phi is \Pi_n and \psi is \Sigma_n, then \phi\implies\psi is \Sigma_n.

Devlin p. 29

See also

References

  • {{cite book | last=Devlin | first=Keith J. | authorlink=Keith Devlin | title=Constructibility | url=https://archive.org/details/constructibility00devl_407 | url-access=limited | zbl=0542.03029 | series=Perspectives in Mathematical Logic | location= Berlin | publisher=Springer-Verlag | year=1984 | pages=[https://archive.org/details/constructibility00devl_407/page/n40 27]–30 }}
  • {{cite book | last1=Jech | first1=Thomas | author1-link=Thomas Jech | title=Set Theory | edition=Third Millennium | publisher=Springer-Verlag | location=Berlin, New York | series=Springer Monographs in Mathematics | isbn=978-3-540-44085-7 | year=2003 | zbl=1007.03002 | page=183 }}
  • {{cite journal | first=Akihiro | last=Kanamori | authorlink=Akihiro Kanamori | title=Levy and set theory | journal=Annals of Pure and Applied Logic | volume=140 | year=2006 | issue=1–3 | pages=233–252 | zbl=1089.03004 | doi=10.1016/j.apal.2005.09.009 | doi-access=free }}
  • {{cite book | last=Levy | first=Azriel | authorlink=Azriel Lévy | title=A hierarchy of formulas in set theory | zbl=0202.30502 | series=Mem. Am. Math. Soc. | volume=57 | year=1965 }}

=Citations=