List of Brazilian federative units by Human Development Index
{{Short description|None}}
[[File:Mapa dos estados brasileiros por IDH (2021).svg|thumb|351x351px|Map of the Brazilian states by HDI in 2021.
Caption:
{{legend|#003135|0.800 – 1.000 (very high HDI)}}
{{legend|#00726a|0.700 – 0.799 (high HDI)}}
{{legend|#00bfac|0.600 – 0.699 (medium HDI)}}]]
Introduced by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 1990, the Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of education, income and longevity indices, calculated in order to measure social and economic development within countries.{{cite web | title = Human Development Index (HDI) | publisher = United Nations Development Programme | url = http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi/ | access-date = August 5, 2013 }}{{sfn|Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|p=24}} It consists of a number between 0 and 1, comprising five tiers of human development—very low, low, medium, high, or very high—wherein the development is considered higher when closer to 1.{{sfn |Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|p=27}} According to the latest Human Development Report, published in 2015 and reflecting data from 2014, Brazil placed 75th among 188 countries with an HDI value of 0.755.{{sfn |Human Development Report|2013|p=145}}{{cite book | title = Human Development Report | chapter = Brazil | chapter-url = http://hdrstats.undp.org/images/explanations/BRA.pdf | publisher = United Nations Development Programme | edition = 2013 | date = March 14, 2013 | access-date = August 5, 2013 }} The UNDP highlighted the "rapid advance" of Brazil in two decades, leaving a situation of low human development (0.590) in 1990, reaching medium development (0.669) in 2000 and, finally, achieving high human development (0.726) in 2010.{{sfn |Human Development Report|2013|p=1}}{{cite press release | title = UNDP report highlights Brazil's social progress | publisher = Brazilian Ministry of Social Development and Fight against Hunger | date = March 15, 2013 | url = http://www.brasil.gov.br/para/press/press-releases/march-2013/undp-report-highlights-brazil2019s-social-progress | access-date = August 5, 2013 | url-status = dead | archiveurl = https://archive.today/20130805232312/http://www.brasil.gov.br/para/press/press-releases/march-2013/undp-report-highlights-brazil2019s-social-progress | archivedate = August 5, 2013 }}{{cite web | title = Brazil | work = Country Profile: Human Development Indicators | publisher = United Nations Development Programme | url = http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/BRA.html | access-date = August 5, 2013 | url-status = dead | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20130606221018/http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/BRA.html | archivedate = June 6, 2013 }}
In order to bring a human development perspective to the national level, the UNDP also created, in 1998, the Human Development Atlas in Brazil, which calculates the HDI of all the Brazilian administrative divisions, based on data provided by the decennial censuses conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE).{{cite web | title = 1998 Human Development Atlas | publisher = United Nations Development Programme | language = Portuguese | url = http://www.pnud.org.br/IDH/Atlas1998.aspx?indiceAccordion=1&li=li_Atlas1998 | access-date = August 5, 2013 }}{{sfn|Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|p=13}} Released in 2013, in partnership with the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA) and the João Pinheiro Foundation (FJP), the latest edition of the Human Development Atlas in Brazil shows that the average HDI of the Brazilian federative units grew by 47.5% from 1991 to 2010.{{cite news | last = Richard | first = Ivan | title = Brazil's Human Development Index nearly doubled in 20 years | publisher = EBC | location = Brasília | date = July 29, 2013 | url = http://www.ebc.com.br/english/2013/07/brazils-human-development-index-nearly-doubled-in-20-years | access-date = August 5, 2013 }}{{cite news | last1 = Acayaba | first1 = Cíntia | last2 = Oliveira | first2 = Mariana | title = Municipal HDI of Brazil grows 47,5% in 20 years, appoints UNDP | publisher = G1 | location = Brasília | language = Portuguese | date = July 29, 2013 | url = http://g1.globo.com/brasil/noticia/2013/07/idh-municipal-do-brasil-cresce-475-em-20-anos-aponta-pnud.html | access-date = August 5, 2013 }}
Since the beginning of the statistical series in 1991, the Federal District, which contains the national capital—Brasília—, has the highest HDI among the 27 federative units of Brazil, being the only one to fall in the category of very high human development according to 2010 figures. It also topped every subindex composing the HDI, except for longevity, when, in 1991, it was surpassed by Santa Catarina. Meanwhile, Alagoas set out the lowest HDI since 2000, especially due to a poor performance in education. Tocantins put forward the fastest progress in HDI value (0.330) from 1991 to 2010, while Rio de Janeiro had the smallest increase (0.188). According to the UNDP report, the states of the North and Northeast regions have the lowest indicators, with most municipalities registering low or medium human development, while in the South, more than 65% of municipalities have achieved high human development. The South and Southeast regions and the Federal District have the highest indicators and human development indices.
{{sfn |Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|p=45}}{{cite news | title = Brazil's Human Development Improves | publisher = Bernama | location = Rio de Janeiro | date = July 30, 2013 | url = http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v7/wn/newsworld.php?id=966993 | access-date = August 5, 2013 }}
''Human Development Atlas''
The methodology used by the UNDP to measure the HDI of all 5,565 Brazilian municipalities and 27 federative units differs from that used for countries. Although it has the same three dimensions of the global HDI—education, income and longevity—it adapts the global methodology to the Brazilian context and the availability of national indicators.{{sfn|Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|pages=24–29}} Therefore, a comparison between Brazilian federative units and countries is discouraged and the numbers cannot be used as a parameter. The global report uses mean years of schooling and expected years of schooling to evaluate education, while the local report utilizes schooling of the adult population and school flow of young people.{{sfn|Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|pages=24–29}} In the case of income, while the global report uses GNI per capita (PPP USD), the local report makes use of the Municipal Income per capita (BRL).{{sfn|Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|pages=24–29}} As for longevity, both use life expectancy at birth as indicator.{{sfn|Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013|pages=24–29}}
valign="top" |
;Abbreviations {| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" | HDI
|
E
|
I
| Income index |
L
| Longevity index |
| valign="top" |
;Legend
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
| {{Color box|#D5E5FF|0.800–1.000 |border=darkgray}} | Very high human development |
{{Color box|#E3F4D7|0.700–0.799 |border=darkgray}}
| High human development |
{{Color box|#FFF6D5|0.600–0.699 |border=darkgray}}
| Medium human development |
{{Color box|#FFE6D5|0.500–0.599 |border=darkgray}}
| Low human development |
{{Color box|#FFD5D5|0.000–0.499 |border=darkgray}}
| Very low human development |
|}
class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders" style="padding: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; text-align: center; font-size: 90%"
|+List of Brazilian federative units according to Human Development Index and its subindices of Education, Income and Longevity{{Cite web |title=Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil. Pnud Brasil, Ipea e FJP, 2022. |url=http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/ranking |access-date=2023-06-11 |website=www.atlasbrasil.org.br}}{{cite web | title = 2013 Human Development Atlas in Brazil | work = Database | publisher = United Nations Development Programme | language = Portuguese | url = http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/consulta/ | access-date = August 5, 2013 }}{{sfn|Human Development Report|2013|pages=148–151}}{{cite web|url=http://atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/data/rawData/Radar%20IDHM%20PNADC_2019_Book.pdf|title=Radar IDHM: evolução do IDHM e de seus índices componentes no período de 2012 a 2017|author=PNUD Brasil}} ! colspan="2" style="background-color: white; border-top: 1px solid transparent; border-left: 1px solid transparent" | ! colspan="4" | 2010 ! colspan="4" | 2000 ! colspan="4" | 1991 | |||||||||
scope="col" class="unsortable" | Rank
! scope="col" | Federative unit !HDI !E !I !L ! scope="col" | HDI ! scope="col" | E ! scope="col" | I ! scope="col" | L ! scope="col" | HDI ! scope="col" | E ! scope="col" | I ! scope="col" | L ! scope="col" | HDI ! scope="col" | E ! scope="col" | I ! scope="col" | L | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Federal District}} {{flag|Distrito Federal|name=Federal District}} | style="background-color: #d5e5ff" |{{nts|0.814}} |0.817 |0.821 |0.803 | style="background-color: #d5e5ff" | {{nts|0.824}} | {{nts|0.742}} | {{nts|0.863}} | {{nts|0.873}}
| style="background-color: #e3f4d7" | {{nts|0.725}} | {{nts|0.582}} | {{nts|0.805}} | {{nts|0.814}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.616}} | {{nts|0.419}} | {{nts|0.762}} | {{nts|0.731}} |
2
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|São Paulo}} {{flag|São Paulo}} | style="background-color: #d5e5ff" |{{nts|0.806}} |0.839 |0.771 |0.810 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" | {{nts|0.783}} | {{nts|0.719}} | {{nts|0.789}} | {{nts|0.845}}
| style="background-color: #e3f4d7" | {{nts|0.702}} | {{nts|0.581}} | {{nts|0.756}} | {{nts|0.786}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" | {{nts|0.578}} | {{nts|0.363}} | {{nts|0.729}} | {{nts|0.730}} |
3
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Santa Catarina}} {{flag|Santa Catarina}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.792}} |0.790 |0.759 |0.827 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" | {{nts|0.774}} | {{nts|0.697}} | {{nts|0.773}} | {{nts|0.860}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.674}} | {{nts|0.526}} | {{nts|0.717}} | {{nts|0.812}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" | {{nts|0.543}} | {{nts|0.329}} | {{nts|0.648}} | {{nts|0.753}} |
4
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Minas Gerais}} {{flag|Minas Gerais}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.774}} |0.762 |0.718 |0.846 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.731}} | {{nts|0.638}} | {{nts|0.730}} | {{nts|0.838}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.624}} | {{nts|0.470}} | {{nts|0.680}} | {{nts|0.759}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.478}} | {{nts|0.257}} | {{nts|0.618}} | {{nts|0.689}} |
rowspan="2" | 5
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Rio Grande do Sul}} {{flag|Rio Grande do Sul}} | rowspan="2" style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.771}} |0.750 |0.767 |0.797 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.761}} | {{nts|0.675}} | {{nts|0.782}} | {{nts|0.835}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.664}} | {{nts|0.530}} | {{nts|0.745}} | {{nts|0.740}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.573}} | {{nts|0.392}} | {{nts|0.696}} | {{nts|0.690}} |
scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Espírito Santo}} {{flag|Espírito Santo}}
|0.742 |0.715 |0.864 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.740}}||{{nts|0.653}}||{{nts|0.743}}||{{nts|0.835}} | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.640}}||{{nts|0.491}}||{{nts|0.687}}||{{nts|0.777}} | style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.505}}||{{nts|0.304}}||{{nts|0.619}}||{{nts|0.686}} | |||||||||
7
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Paraná}} {{flag|Paraná}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.769}} |0.780 |0.744 |0.785 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.746}} | {{nts|0.642}} | {{nts|0.769}} | {{nts|0.840}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.664}} | {{nts|0.505}} | {{nts|0.720}} | {{nts|0.804}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.542}} | {{nts|0.328}} | {{nts|0.667}} | {{nts|0.729}} |
8
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Rio de Janeiro}} {{flag|Rio de Janeiro}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.762}} |0.758 |0.759 |0.769 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.749}} | {{nts|0.668}} | {{nts|0.757}} | {{nts|0.830}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.650}} | {{nts|0.522}} | {{nts|0.704}} | {{nts|0.747}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.507}} | {{nts|0.298}} | {{nts|0.644}} | {{nts|0.679}} |
9
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Mato Grosso do Sul}} {{flag|Mato Grosso do Sul}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.742}} |0.741 |0.733 |0.751 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.729}} | {{nts|0.629}} | {{nts|0.740}} | {{nts|0.833}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.613}} | {{nts|0.445}} | {{nts|0.687}} | {{nts|0.752}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.488}} | {{nts|0.259}} | {{nts|0.641}} | {{nts|0.699}} |
10
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Goiás}} {{flag|Goiás}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.737}} |0.778 |0.714 |0.721 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.735}} | {{nts|0.646}} | {{nts|0.742}} | {{nts|0.827}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.615}} | {{nts|0.439}} | {{nts|0.686}} | {{nts|0.773}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.487}} | {{nts|0.273}} | {{nts|0.633}} | {{nts|0.668}} |
11
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Mato Grosso}} {{flag|Mato Grosso}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.736}} |0.758 |0.720 |0.730 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.725}} | {{nts|0.635}} | {{nts|0.732}} | {{nts|0.821}}
| style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.601}} | {{nts|0.426}} | {{nts|0.689}} | {{nts|0.740}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.449}} | {{nts|0.221}} | {{nts|0.627}} | {{nts|0.654}} |
12
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Ceará}} {{flag|Ceará}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.734}} |0.766 |0.658 |0.784 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.682}} | {{nts|0.615}} | {{nts|0.651}} | {{nts|0.793}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.541}} | {{nts|0.377}} | {{nts|0.588}} | {{nts|0.713}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.405}} | {{nts|0.204}} | {{nts|0.532}} | {{nts|0.613}} |
13
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Tocantins}} {{flag|Tocantins}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.731}} |0.732 |0.684 |0.779 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.699}} | {{nts|0.624}} | {{nts|0.690}} | {{nts|0.793}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.525}} | {{nts|0.348}} | {{nts|0.605}} | {{nts|0.688}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.369}} | {{nts|0.155}} | {{nts|0.549}} | {{nts|0.589}} |
14
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Rio Grande do Norte}} {{flag|Rio Grande do Norte|name=Rio Grande do Norte}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.728}} |0.680 |0.692 |0.819 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.684}} | {{nts|0.597}} | {{nts|0.678}} | {{nts|0.792}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.552}} | {{nts|0.396}} | {{nts|0.608}} | {{nts|0.700}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.428}} | {{nts|0.242}} | {{nts|0.547}} | {{nts|0.591}} |
15
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Pernambuco}} {{flag|Pernambuco}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.719}} |0.721 |0.647 |0.797 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.673}} | {{nts|0.574}} | {{nts|0.673}} | {{nts|0.789}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.544}} | {{nts|0.372}} | {{nts|0.615}} | {{nts|0.705}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.440}} | {{nts|0.232}} | {{nts|0.569}} | {{nts|0.617}} |
16
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Acre}} {{flag|Acre}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.710}} |0.692 |0.655 |0.788 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.663}} | {{nts|0.559}} | {{nts|0.671}} | {{nts|0.777}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" | {{nts|0.517}} | {{nts|0.325}} | {{nts|0.612}} | {{nts|0.694}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.402}} | {{nts|0.176}} | {{nts|0.574}} | {{nts|0.645}} |
17
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Sergipe}} {{flag|Sergipe}} | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.702}} |0.684 |0.662 |0.764 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.665}} | {{nts|0.560}} | {{nts|0.672}} | {{nts|0.781}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.518}} | {{nts|0.343}} | {{nts|0.596}} | {{nts|0.678}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.413}} | {{nts|0.211}} | {{nts|0.552}} | {{nts|0.581}} |
rowspan="2" | 18
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Amazonas}} {{flag|Amazonas}} | rowspan="2" style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.700}} |0.720 |0.641 |0.744 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.674}} | {{nts|0.561}} | {{nts|0.677}} | {{nts|0.805}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.515}} | {{nts|0.324}} | {{nts|0.608}} | {{nts|0.692}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.430}} | {{nts|0.204}} | {{nts|0.605}} | {{nts|0.645}} |
scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Rondônia}} {{flag|Rondônia}}
|0.694 |0.677 |0.731 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.690}}||{{nts|0.577}}||{{nts|0.712}}||{{nts|0.800}} | style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.537}}||{{nts|0.345}}||{{nts|0.654}}||{{nts|0.688}} | style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.407}}||{{nts|0.181}}||{{nts|0.585}}||{{nts|0.635}} | |||||||||
20
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Roraima}} {{flag|Roraima}} | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.699}} |0.673 |0.680 |0.745 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.707}} | {{nts|0.628}} | {{nts|0.695}} | {{nts|0.809}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.598}} | {{nts|0.457}} | {{nts|0.652}} | {{nts|0.717}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.459}} | {{nts|0.240}} | {{nts|0.643}} | {{nts|0.628}} |
21
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Paraíba}} {{flag|Paraíba}} | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.698}} |0.669 |0.653 |0.779 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.658}} | {{nts|0.555}} | {{nts|0.656}} | {{nts|0.783}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.506}} | {{nts|0.331}} | {{nts|0.582}} | {{nts|0.672}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.382}} | {{nts|0.191}} | {{nts|0.515}} | {{nts|0.565}} |
22
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Bahia}} {{flag|Bahia}} | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.691}} |0.659 |0.648 |0.772 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.660}} | {{nts|0.555}} | {{nts|0.663}} | {{nts|0.783}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" | {{nts|0.512}} | {{nts|0.332}} | {{nts|0.594}} | {{nts|0.680}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.386}} | {{nts|0.182}} | {{nts|0.543}} | {{nts|0.582}} |
rowspan="2" | 23
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Piauí}} {{flag|Piauí}} | rowspan="2" style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.690}} |0.698 |0.649 |0.726 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.646}} | {{nts|0.547}} | {{nts|0.635}} | {{nts|0.777}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.484}} | {{nts|0.301}} | {{nts|0.556}} | {{nts|0.676}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.362}} | {{nts|0.164}} | {{nts|0.488}} | {{nts|0.595}} |
scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Pará}} {{flag|Pará}}
|0.686 |0.645 |0.744 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.646}}|| {{nts|0.528}}|| {{nts|0.646}}|| {{nts|0.789}} | style="background-color: #ffe6d5" | {{nts|0.518}}|| {{nts|0.319}}|| {{nts|0.601}}|| {{nts|0.725}} | style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.413}}|| {{nts|0.194}}|| {{nts|0.567}}|| {{nts|0.640}} | |||||||||
25
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Amapá}} {{flag|Amapá}} | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.688}} |0.647 |0.648 |0.778 | style="background-color: #e3f4d7" |{{nts|0.708}} | {{nts|0.629}} | {{nts|0.694}} | {{nts|0.813}}
| style="background-color: #ffe6d5" |{{nts|0.577}} | {{nts|0.424}} | {{nts|0.638}} | {{nts|0.711}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" |{{nts|0.472}} | {{nts|0.254}} | {{nts|0.620}} | {{nts|0.668}} |
26
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Alagoas}} {{flag|Alagoas}} | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.684}} |0.679 |0.630 |0.748 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.631}} | {{nts|0.520}} | {{nts|0.641}} | {{nts|0.755}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.471}} | {{nts|0.282}} | {{nts|0.574}} | {{nts|0.647}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.370}} | {{nts|0.174}} | {{nts|0.527}} | {{nts|0.552}} |
27
! scope="row" style="text-align: left" | {{anchor|Maranhão}} {{flag|Maranhão}} | style="background-color: #fff6d5" |{{nts|0.676}} |0.716 |0.603 |0.715 | style="background-color: #fff6d5" | {{nts|0.639}} | {{nts|0.562}} | {{nts|0.612}} | {{nts|0.757}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.476}} | {{nts|0.312}} | {{nts|0.531}} | {{nts|0.649}}
| style="background-color: #ffd5d5" | {{nts|0.357}} | {{nts|0.173}} | {{nts|0.478}} | {{nts|0.551}} |
;Maps
{{multiple image
| footer = Every region of Brazil has significantly increased its Human Development Index in the span of two decades, with no federative unit under low human development by 2010. South, Southeast and Central-West are the most advanced regions, while the North and Northeast still presented states with a medium human development.
| align = left
| caption_align = center
| direction =
| width1 =226
| image1 = Mapa dos estados brasileiros por IDH (1991).svg
| alt1 = Map of Brazil displaying its first-level administrative divisions (Federative units) according to the category of their Human Development Index.
| caption1 = 1991
| image2 = Mapa dos estados brasileiros por IDH (2000).svg
| width2 =226
| alt2 = Map of Brazil displaying its first-level administrative divisions (Federative units) according to the category of their Human Development Index.
| caption2 = 2000
| image3 = Mapa dos estados brasileiros por IDH (2010).svg
| width3 =226
| alt3 = Map of Brazil displaying its first-level administrative divisions (Federative units) according to the category of their Human Development Index.
| caption3 = 2010
| image4 = Mapa dos estados brasileiros por IDH (2021).svg
| width4 =226
| alt4 = Map of Brazil displaying its first-level administrative divisions (Federative units) according to the category of their Human Development Index.
| caption4 = 2021
}}{{-}}
See also
References
;Specific
{{reflist|30em}}
;General
:* {{cite book | title = Human Development Atlas in Brazil | publisher = United Nations Development Programme | location = Brasília | edition = 2013 | language = Portuguese | date = July 29, 2013 | url = http://ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/130729_AtlasPNUD_2013.pdf | isbn = 978-85-7811-171-7 | ref = {{harvid|Human Development Atlas in Brazil|2013}} }}
:* {{cite book | title = Human Development Report | publisher = United Nations Development Programme | publication-place = Mexico City | edition = 2013 | date = March 14, 2013 | url = http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/HDR/2013GlobalHDR/English/HDR2013%20Report%20English.pdf | isbn = 978-92-1-126340-4 | ref = {{harvid|Human Development Report|2013}} }}
{{Subnational entities by Human Development Index}}
{{Lists of Brazilian states}}
{{Economy of Brazil}}
{{Portal bar|Economics|Brazil}}
Federative units by Human Development Index
Brazilian federative units by Human Development Index