List of former planets
{{Short description|none}}
This is a list of astronomical objects formerly widely considered planets under any of the various definitions of this word in the history of astronomy. As the definition of planet has evolved, the de facto and de jure definitions of planet have changed over the millennia. As of 2024, there are eight official planets in the Solar System per the International Astronomical Union (IAU),{{cite news |url=http://www.iau.org/static/resolutions/Resolution_GA26-5-6.pdf |title=Definition of a Planet in the Solar System: Resolutions 5 and 6 |date=August 24, 2006 |work=IAU 2006 General Assembly |publisher=International Astronomical Union |access-date=January 26, 2008 |author=IAU}} which has also established a definition for exoplanets. Several objects formerly considered exoplanets have been found actually to be stars or brown dwarfs.
Background
Throughout antiquity, several astronomical objects were considered Classical Planets, meaning "wandering stars", not all of which are now considered planets. The moons discovered around Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus after the advent of the telescope were also initially considered planets by some. The development of more powerful telescopes resulted in the discovery of the asteroids, which were initially considered planets. Then Pluto, the first Trans-Neptunian Object, was discovered. More Trans-Neptunian Objects of the Kuiper Belt were found with the help of electronic imaging. One of these, Eris, was widely hailed as a "new planet", which prompted the 2006 recategorization of solar system bodies.
Some planetary scientists reject the 2006 definition of planet, and thus would still consider some of the objects on this list to be planets under a geophysical definition. See the list of gravitationally rounded objects of the Solar System for a list of geophysical planets.
List
class="wikitable sortable" | |||||||
+ Former planets of the Solar System | |||||||
class="unsortable"|
!| Former planet !| {{tooltip|Discovery|discovery date, planet status conferment}} !| {{tooltip|Removal|planet status removed}} !| Current status !class="unsortable"| !class="unsortable" width=100%| Notes !class="unsortable"| | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | {{sort|Morning Star|The Morning Star}}It is an aspect of the planet Venus. | {{sort | |||||
9999|Antiquity}} | {{sort | ||||||
400|Antiquity}}
|rowspan=2| {{sort|Aspect|Aspects of Venus}} | 50px
|rowspan=2| "Phosphorus", the Morning Star of Greek antiquity (Eosphorus, the Dawn-Bringer; called "Lucifer" by the Romans), and "Hesperus", the Evening Star (called "Vesper" by the Romans), were later identified as a single planet, Venus (Aphrodite). | rowspan=2| {{cite episode |url= http://www.jackstargazer.com/scripts_feb2009.html |title= The Great Cosmic Light Called Hesperus, Brother Of Lucifer, Reaches Greatest Brilliancy |series= Star Gazer |number= 09-07 (1628) |date= February 2009 }} | ||||||
| | {{sort|Evening Star|The Evening Star}} | {{sort | |||||
9999|Antiquity}} | {{sort | ||||||
400|Antiquity}} | 50px | ||||||
| | ApolloIt is an aspect of the planet Mercury. | {{sort | |||||
9999|Antiquity}} | {{sort | ||||||
300|Antiquity}} | {{sort|Aspect|Aspect of Mercury}} | 50px | Like the Morning and Evening Stars, Mercury was deemed to be a distinct planet when it was visible during daytime, and dedicated to Apollo by the Greeks. Eventually, in the 4th century BC, Mercury and Apollo were found to be one and the same. | {{Cite web|url=https://www.space.com/29265-mercury-planet-facts-for-skywatchers.html|title=Planet Mercury: Some Surprising Facts for Skywatchers|website=Space.com|date=29 April 2015}} | |||
| File:Sun symbol (fixed width).svg | Sun | {{sort | |||||
9999|Antiquity}} | 1543 | Star | 50px | In antiquity, it was believed that the Sun and all the planets orbit the Earth. Thus the Sun was categorised as a planet. Following the acceptance of the Copernican model, it was recognized that the planets (including Earth) orbit the Sun, and it was no longer regarded as a planet. Subsequent discoveries show that the Sun is a star. | {{cite news |url= http://www.universetoday.com/36487/difference-between-geocentric-and-heliocentric/ |title= What Is The Difference Between the Geocentric and Heliocentric Models of the Solar System? |date= 23 December 2015 |work= Universe Today |author= Elizabeth Howell }}
{{cite web |url= http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/OrbitsHistory/page1.php |title= Planetary Motion: The History of an Idea That Launched the Scientific Revolution |author= Holli Riebeek |date= 7 July 2009 |work= The Science: Orbital Mechanics |publisher= NASA Earth Observatory }} {{cite web |url= http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~blackman/ast104/copernican9.html |title= The Copernican Model: A Sun-Centered Solar System |work= Astronomy 104 – The Solar System |date= 2006 |author= Eric G. Blackman |publisher= University of Rochester, School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Physics and Astronomy }} | ||
| File:Moon decrescent symbol (fixed width).svg | Moon | {{sort | |||||
9999|Antiquity}} | 1543 | {{sort|Moon|Moon of Earth}} | 50px | Following the acceptance of the Copernican model, planets were defined as objects which orbit the Sun. Since the Moon can be said to orbit the Earth, it was no longer regarded as a planet, but this is debated; see double planet. | |||
| | Io | 1610 | 1700s
| rowspan=4| {{sort|Moon|Moons of Jupiter}} | 50px
| rowspan=4|Originally presented as satellite planets orbiting the planet Jupiter. Planetary status later rescinded, leaving them only as satellites. Ganymede is the largest satellite in the Solar System, and is slightly larger than Mercury, but is about half as massive. | rowspan=4| {{cite journal |title= Sidereus Nuncius |author= Galileo Galilei |year= 1610 |language=la}} {{cite web |url= http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/observations/jupiter_satellites.html |title= Satellites of Jupiter |date= 1995 |author= Al Van Helden |work= The Galileo Project |publisher= Rice University }} {{cite web |url= http://solarviews.com/eng/galdisc.htm |title= The Discovery of the Galilean Satellites |publisher= Views of the Solar System |author= Calvin J. Hamilton |date= 2009 }} {{cite journal |url= http://inference-review.com/article/the-provencal-humanists-and-copernicus |title= Montaigne, Peiresc, Gassendi, and Cassini - The Provençal Humanists and Copernicus |author= Jean-Pierre Luminet |volume= 2 |number= 4 |journal= Inference: International Review of Science |date= 31 December 2016 }} | |||
| | Europa | 1610 | 1700s | 50px | |||
| | Ganymede | 1610 | 1700s | 50px | |||
| | Callisto | 1610 | 1700s | 50px | |||
| | Titan | 1656 | 1700s
| rowspan=5| {{sort|Moon|Moons of Saturn}} | 50px
| rowspan=5|Originally presented as satellite planets orbiting the planet Saturn. Planetary status later rescinded, leaving them only as satellites. Titan is the second largest satellite in the Solar System, and is slightly larger than Mercury, but less massive. |
{{cite journal |title= Systema Saturnium |author= Cristiani Hugenii (Christiaan Huygens) |year= 1659 |language=la}} | ||
| | Iapetus | 1671 | 1700s | 50px
| rowspan=2| {{cite journal |title= Découverte de deux nouvelles planètes autour de Saturne |author= Jean-Dominique Cassini (Giovanni Domenico Cassini) |year= 1673 |publisher= Paris Observatory |language=fr}} | |||
| | Rhea | 1672 | 1700s | 50px | |||
| | Tethys | 1684 | 1700s | 50px
| rowspan=2| {{cite journal |doi= 10.1098/rstl.1686.0013 |author = Jean-Dominique Cassini (Giovanni Domenico Cassini) |year= 1686–1692 |title= An Extract of the Journal Des Scavans. Of April 22 st. N. 1686. Giving an Account of Two New Satellites of Saturn, Discovered Lately by Mr. Cassini at the Royal Observatory at Paris |journal= Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London |volume= 16 |issue= 179–191 |pages= 79–85 |jstor= 101844 |bibcode = 1686RSPT...16...79C |doi-access= free }} | |||
| | Dione | 1684 | 1700s | 50px | |||
| | Titania | 1787 | 1700s
| rowspan=2| {{sort|Moon|Moons of Uranus}} | 50x50px
| rowspan=2|Originally presented as satellite planets orbiting the planet Uranus.{{cite journal| doi = 10.1098/rstl.1787.0016| last = Herschel | first = W. S.| author-link = William Herschel| title = An Account of the Discovery of Two Satellites Revolving Round the Georgian Planet| journal = Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London| volume = 77| pages = 125–129| year = 1787| jstor = 106717| doi-access = free |quote=And the heavens now displayed the original of my drawing, by shewing, in the situation I had delineated them, The Georgian Planet attended by two satellites. | |||
| | Oberon | 1787 | 1700s | 50px | |||
| File:Ceres symbol (fixed width).svg | Ceres | 1801 | 1867 | Asteroid and dwarf planet | 50px
|rowspan=7| The first asteroids to be discovered were accepted as planets in the Copernican system, since they directly orbited the Sun. By 1855 the number of known bodies in the asteroid belt had grown to 15, at which point astronomers started distinguishing these from the eight known major planets. The 1867 edition of Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch placed all the new bodies in the asteroid belt into a separate category as 'minor planets' or 'asteroids', by which point almost 100 asteroids had been observed.{{Cite web|url=http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/astronomical-applications/astronomical-information-center/minor-planets/|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120406222551/http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/astronomical-applications/astronomical-information-center/minor-planets/|archive-date = 2012-04-06|title = When did the asteroids become minor planets? – Naval Oceanography Portal}} | rowspan=7| {{cite web|url=http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/minorplanets.php |title=When did the asteroids become minor planets? |author=James L. Hilton |date=18 April 2016 |work=Astronomical Applications Department |publisher=U.S. Naval Observatory |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080324182332/http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/minorplanets.php |archive-date=24 March 2008 }} | ||
| File:Pallas symbol (fixed width).svg | Pallas | 1802 | 1867
|rowspan=6| Asteroid | 50px | |||
| File:Juno symbol (fixed width).svg | Juno | 1804 | 1867 | 50px | |||
| x50px | Vesta | 1807 | 1867 | 50px | |||
| x50px | Astraea | 1845 | 1867 | ||||
| 50px | Hebe | 1847 | 1867 | 50px | |||
| 50px | Iris | 1847 | 1867 | 50px | |||
| File:Chiron symbol (fixed width).svg | Chiron | 1977 | 1980 | {{sort|Centaur|Centaur}} | 50x50px | The discovery of Chiron was hailed by the press and astrologers as that of a new planet. Astronomically, it was different from any other planets, asteroids and comets known at the time, and it was classified as unique at that time. Later it was called an asteroid, and then was found to exhibit characteristics of a comet, leading to multiple classifications. Later it was placed into its own category of centaurs, and many other centaurs have been discovered subsequently. |
{{cite journal |title= The Discovery of Chiron: Some Reflections |author= Hodgson, Richard G. |journal= The Minor Planet Bulletin |volume= 5 |number= 3 |pages= 21–22 |date= March 1978 |bibcode= 1978MPBu....5...21H |publisher= IAU MPC }} {{cite web |url= https://www.spiritualastrology.com/article15.html |title= Chiron and the Centaurs |date= 2004 |work= Emerald Visions |publisher= Mystic Visions Spiritual Astrology }} {{cite book |title= Chiron: Rainbow Bridge Between the Inner and Outer Planets |author= Barbara Hand Clow |year= 1987 |isbn= 087542094X |publisher= Llewellyn }} {{cite book |title= Chiron: The New Planet in Your Horoscope, The Key to Your Quest |author= Richard Nolle |isbn= 0866902368 |year= 1983 |publisher= American Federation of Astrologers }} {{cite magazine |title= In Greenwich |magazine= Popular Mechanics |date= January 1982 |volume= 158 |number= 1 |page= 28 }} |
| File:Pluto monogram (fixed width).svg File:Pluto symbol (large orb, fixed width).svg | Pluto | 1930 | 2006 | Dwarf planet | 50px | Following its discovery in 1930, Pluto was considered the ninth planet. Numerous scientific discoveries in the 1990s and early 2000s placed doubt on this classification, and after the discovery of Eris, which was thought to be larger than Pluto, the International Astronomical Union met to determine a definition of a planet. Like the asteroids before them, Pluto was grouped with Eris and similar bodies as members of a group of smaller objects designated as dwarf planets. |
{{cite news |url= http://www.space.com/2791-pluto-demoted-longer-planet-highly-controversial-definition.html |title= Pluto Demoted: No Longer a Planet in Highly Controversial Definition |date= 24 August 2006 |author= Robert Roy Britt |publisher= SPACE.com }} |
| | Charon | 1978 | 2006 | {{sort|Moon|Moon of Pluto}} | 50px | When discovered, Charon, the moon of Pluto, was found to be very large, leading to the declaration by many that the Pluto-Charon system was a double planet (binary planet). The 2006 IAU redefinition of planet excludes the possibility of double planets. |
{{cite web |url= http://archive.oapd.inaf.it/E-MOSTRA/NEW/A2024PLU.HTM |title= Pluto and Charon |author= E. Mostra |work= Voyage in the Universe |date= 1998 |publisher= Astronomical Observatory of Padua }} |
| | 15760 Albion | 1992 | unknown
|rowspan=2|Trans-Neptunian object | 50x50px
|rowspan=2|When discovered, these bodies were briefly hailed as the tenth and eleventh planets by the press, but it was then decided that 15760 Albion was the prototype of trans-Neptunian objects or cubewanos. | {{Cite journal|last1=Collander-Brown|first1=S.|last2=Maran|first2=M.|last3=Williams|first3=I. P.|date=2000-10-11|title=The effect on the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt of a large distant tenth planet|journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society|language=en|volume=318|issue=1|pages=101–108|doi=10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03640.x|bibcode=2000MNRAS.318..101C|issn=0035-8711|doi-access=free}}{{Cite book|title=The earth|last=Coote, Roger. /|isbn=9781842399491|location=London|oclc=671197414|date= 2008|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/earth0000coot}} | ||
| | (181708) 1993 FW | 1992 | unknown | ||||
| File:Eris symbol (fixed width).svg | Eris | 2005 | 2006 | Dwarf planet | 50px | The discovery of Eris, hailed worldwide by the press as the tenth planet, prompted the International Astronomical Union to meet and establish a new definition of planet. It was recategorised as a dwarf planet, together with Pluto and numerous other objects. |
{{cite web |url= http://www.space.com/9563-man-killed-pluto-astronomer-mike-brown.html |title= The Man Who Killed Pluto: Q & A with Astronomer Mike Brown |author= Mike Wall |date= 19 November 2010 |publisher= Space.com }} {{cite news |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4730061.stm |date= 30 July 2005 |title= Astronomers detect '10th planet' |author= David Whitehouse |work= BBC News }} |
See also
Notes
{{Reflist|group=NB}}
References
{{reflist}}
{{Solar System}}
{{Exoplanet}}
{{Portal bar|Stars|Spaceflight|Outer space|Science}}