Lomankus

File:Triarthrus (3).jpg from Beecher's Beds, showing the site's characteristic pyritic preservation style. ]]

Located within Oneida County, New York, and the larger Frankfort Shale, Beecher's Trilobite Bed is a Konservat-Lagerstätten fossil site that dates to the Katian stage of the upper Ordovician.[http://www3.amherst.edu/~jwhagadorn/theses/martha/ Martha Buck's senior thesis on the Beecher's Trilobite Bed] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080706145036/http://www.amherst.edu/~jwhagadorn/theses/martha/|date=2008-07-06}} Originally discovered in 1892, the site was lost when Charles Emerson Beecher, who discovered it, died in 1904.{{cite journal |author=Raymond, Percy E. |year=1920 |title=The Appendages, Anatomy and Relationships of Trilobites |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/4695285/Appendages-Anatomy-and-Relationships-of-Trilobites-1920 |journal=The Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences |volume=7 |issue= |pages=}}{{cite journal |author=Cisne, John L. |year=1973 |title=Beecher's Trilobite Bed revisited; ecology of an Ordovician deepwater fauna |journal=Postilla |volume=160 |pages=1–25}} Afterwards, the majority of research conducted on the trilobite bed was done on previously excavated specimens housed within public collections. However, the trilobite bed was later rediscovered by fossil collectors Tom E. Whiteley (who also helped rediscover the Walcott–Rust quarry) and Dan Cooper in 1984, and has since been protected by the Yale Peabody Museum.{{cite journal |author1=Brett, Carlton E. |author2=Whiteley, Thomas E. |year=2005 |title=Presentation of the Harrell L. Strimple Award of the Paleontological Society to Thomas E. Whitely/response by Thomeas E. Whitely |url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1666/0022-3360%282005%29079%5B0831%3APOTHLS%5D2.0.CO%3B2 |journal=Journal of Paleontology |volume=79 |issue=4 |pages=831–4 |doi=10.1666/0022-3360(2005)079[0831:POTHLS]2.0.CO;2 |s2cid=130851276}}[http://earth.geology.yale.edu/~deb47/index.cgi?page-selection=2 Yale Peabody (Briggs Laboratory) research projects.] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080425125235/http://earth.geology.yale.edu/~deb47/index.cgi?page-selection=2|date=2008-04-25}} The site itself exists within a small quarry located in Cleveland's Glen, and is found in between fine grained turbidite beds, and on top of mudstone layers containing fossilized burrows. The rock layers that contain the fossils are around 40 mm (4 cm) thick, and were most likely deposited via strong currents due to the common alignment that the majority of the fossils from the beds show.{{cite journal |author1=Derek E.G. Briggs |author2=Simon H. Bottrell |author3=Robert Raiswell |year=1991 |title=Pyritization of soft-bodied fossils: Beecher's Trilobite Bed, Upper Ordovician, New York State |journal=Geology |volume=19 |issue=12 |pages=1221–1224 |bibcode=1991Geo....19.1221B |doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<1221:POSBFB>2.3.CO;2}} The beds are composed of high levels of iron, as well as low concentrations of organic carbon and sulfur. Beecher's Beds are most well known for its exceptional mode of preservation, where soft body parts are replaced by pyrite, giving the fossils a shiny, gold-like appearance. Another notable quality of the site are the hundreds of well preserved remains of various trilobite genera, which preserve the rare appendages (antennae, briamous limbs, etc) that are not normally preserved. However, other groups of organisms, including graptolites, brachiopods, nautiloids, ostracods and various unnamed genera are also known as well.{{Cite journal |author1=James W. Hagadorn |author2=Martha M. Buck |year=2004 |title=Digital Paleobiology and Taphonomy of an Ordovician lagerstätte: Beecher's Trilobite Bed |url=http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2004AM/finalprogram/abstract_78505.htm |journal=Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs |volume=36 |issue=5 |pages=383}}

The fossil specimens belonging to Lomankus were discovered relatively recently from excavations in Beecher's Beds following a large scale excavation in 2004.{{Cite journal |last1=Parry |first1=Luke A. |last2=Briggs |first2=Derek E.G. |last3=Ran |first3=Ruixin |last4=O’Flynn |first4=Robert J. |last5=Mai |first5=Huijuan |last6=Clark |first6=Elizabeth G. |last7=Liu |first7=Yu |date=October 2024 |title=A pyritized Ordovician leanchoiliid arthropod |journal=Current Biology |volume=34 |issue=23 |pages=5578–5586.e2 |language=en |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.013 |doi-access=free|pmid=39476836 |bibcode=2024CBio...34.5578P }} This discovery shows that Beecher's Beds still hold a number of undiscovered remains, even after the various expeditions that took place after the site was rediscovered. This genus was properly described by Parry et al., 2024, who analyzed five specimens from the Yale Peabody Museum. The holotype specimen of Lomankus, cataloged as YPM IP 256612, is a ventral-oriented fossil showing the underside of the megacheiran. Other specimens, including YPM IP 236743 and YPM IP 516237 preserve the arthropod in a lateral view.

The arthropods genus name, Lomankus, is derived from the Greek words loma, meaning "edge", and ankos, meaning "valley"., referencing Gregory Edgecombe, who has helped greatly in the furthering the understanding of arthropod evolution. The species name, edgecombei, is also in honour of Edgecombe, making the full translation of the scientific name “Edgecombe’s edgecombe”.

File:Parry et al. 2024 f02.jpg. ]]

Lomankus was a relativity small arthropod, with a body length of around 8–20 mm (0.8–2 cm) long, excluding the terminal flagella. The cephalic region was almost triangular in appearance, and bore a pair of frontal appendages, as well as 4 pairs of briamous appendages. An ocular region is present on the cephalon, but lacks any evidence of eyes being present. It also possessed a well developed ventral plate that sat anterior to the arthropods mouth, and represents the first leanchoiliid known with this feature. The frontal appendages appear to lack endites of any kind, with the long flagella appearing to attach directly to the podomeres. This contrasts with the long endites usually seen in other leanchoiliids, including Yawunik kootenayi and Leanchoilia superlata.{{cite journal |author=Diego C. García-Bellido & Desmond Collins |year=2007 |title=Reassessment of the genus Leanchoilia (Arthropoda, Arachnomorpha) from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, British Columbia, Canada |journal=Palaeontology |volume=50 |issue=3 |pages=693–709 |bibcode=2007Palgy..50..693G |doi=10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00649.x |doi-access=free}}{{Cite journal |last1=Aria |first1=Cédric |last2=Caron |first2=Jean-Bernard |last3=Gaines |first3=Robert |date=2015 |title=A large new leanchoiliid from the Burgess Shale and the influence of inapplicable states on stem arthropod phylogeny |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pala.12161 |journal=Palaeontology |language=en |volume=58 |issue=4 |pages=629–660 |doi=10.1111/pala.12161 |bibcode=2015Palgy..58..629A |issn=1475-4983}} There are at least three main flagella bearing podomeres, with the first one being the largest, and the others experiencing a dramatic decrease in size and width. The other four pairs of cephalic appendages are smaller than those on the trunk region, and consist of at most four podomeres, multiple pairs of rami, as well as paddle-shaped exopods that bore copious amounts of lamellae and setae. The trunk region of this megacheiran is composed of around 11 distinct tergites, that gradually decrease in both width and length, and seem to have no defined pleurae. The trunk appendages also decrease in size gradually, and are composed of around five distinct podomeres, a terminal claw, and exopods that increase in size before gradually decreasing by the fourth appendage. The telson is elongate, and triangular in shape, and ends in an extremely elongated flagelliform structure that exceeded the arthropods whole body length. This heavily contrasts with the majority of other megacheirans, which typically have a small telson with copious amounts of spines. The only other described megacheiran known with a similar structure is the distantly related Tanglangia longicaudata, but the telson of that species is not as flexible as the one possessed by L. edgecombei.{{Cite journal |last1=Schmidt |first1=Michel |last2=Hou |first2=Xianguang |last3=Mai |first3=Huijuan |last4=Zhou |first4=Guixian |last5=Melzer |first5=Roland R. |last6=Zhang |first6=Xilin |last7=Liu |first7=Yu |date=2024-04-29 |title=Unveiling the ventral morphology of a rare early Cambrian great appendage arthropod from the Chengjiang biota of China |journal=BMC Biol |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=96 |doi=10.1186/s12915-024-01889-y |doi-access=free |issn=1741-7007 |pmc=11057168 |pmid=38679748}}

File:Parry et al. 2024 f03 (taxonomy).jpg

Lomankus belongs to an order of arthropods known as the Megacheira, more specifically the family Leanchoiliidae. Megacheirans are often colloquially known as "great appendage arthropods", due to the pair of large frontal appendages and endites possessed by the majority of the species. The frontal appendages of this group show a great deal of morphological diversity, with claw-like endites, and whip-like flagella being found in various genera.{{Cite journal |last=Stein |first=Martin |date=1 March 2010 |title=A new arthropod from the Early Cambrian of North Greenland, with a 'great appendage'-like antennula |url=https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/158/3/477/3798454 |url-status=live |journal=Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society |language=en |volume=158 |issue=3 |pages=477–500 |doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00562.x |issn=0024-4082 |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191103021239/https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/158/3/477/3798454 |archive-date=3 November 2019 |access-date=29 October 2019}} Despite being known for more than a century, the Megacheira were only recognized as a distinct group as recently as the late 1990s.{{Cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Junyuan |last2=Waloszek |first2=Dieter |last3=Maas |first3=Andreas |date=2004 |title=A new 'great-appendage' arthropod from the Lower Cambrian of China and homology of chelicerate chelicerae and raptorial antero-ventral appendages |journal=Lethaia |language=en |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=3–20 |bibcode=2004Letha..37....3C |doi=10.1080/00241160410004764 |issn=1502-3931}} Their taxonomic placement has remained a contentious point of discussion, with some studies classifying them as either stem-group chelicerates, or stem-group deuteropods.{{Cite journal |last=Aria |first=Cédric |date=26 April 2022 |title=The origin and early evolution of arthropods |url=http://paleorxiv.org/4zmey/download |url-status=live |journal=Biological Reviews |language=en |volume=97 |issue=5 |pages=1786–1809 |doi=10.1111/brv.12864 |issn=1464-7931 |pmid=35475316 |s2cid=243269510 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240508131708/http://paleorxiv.org/4zmey/download |archive-date=8 May 2024 |access-date=8 May 2024}}{{cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Cong |last2=Fu |first2=Dongjing |last3=Wu |first3=Yu |last4=Zhang |first4=Xingliang |date=July 2024 |title=Cambrian euarthropod Urokodia aequalis sheds light on the origin of Artiopoda body plan |journal=iScience |volume=27 |issue=8 |pages=110443 |bibcode=2024iSci...27k0443L |doi=10.1016/j.isci.2024.110443 |pmc=11325232 |pmid=39148713 |doi-access=free}} Parry et al., 2024 conducted multiple phylogenetic analyses on Lomankus, and favored their bayesian analyses, which found that it occupied a relatively derived position within the group, with most of the analyses performed suggesting it to be a sister taxon to Leanchoilia.

The discovery of Lomankus not only extends the temporal range of the Megacheira into the upper Ordovician, but also adds more evidence to the theory that the Cambrian–Ordovician extinction event was not as severe as once suggested, and the lack of "Cambrian type organisms" in later Paleozoic strata is instead a result of taphonomic bias.{{cite journal |author1=Roy, P.V. |author2=Orr, P.J. |author3=Botting, J.P. |author4=Muir, L.A. |author5=Vinther, J. |author6=Lefebvre, B. |author7=el Hariri, K. |author8=Briggs, D.E.G. |name-list-style=amp |year=2010 |title=Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type |journal=Nature |volume=465 |issue=7295 |pages=215–218 |bibcode=2010Natur.465..215V |doi=10.1038/nature09038 |pmid=20463737 |s2cid=4313285}} Although several other post-Cambrian arthropods, including Enalikter aphson and Bundenbachiellus giganteus, have been suggested to represent late surviving megacheirans, this placement has been contested by other studies.{{Cite journal |last1=Siveter |first1=Derek J. |last2=Briggs |first2=Derek E. G. |last3=Siveter |first3=David J. |last4=Sutton |first4=Mark D. |last5=Legg |first5=David |last6=Joomun |first6=Sarah |date=2014-03-07 |title=A Silurian short-great-appendage arthropod |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=281 |issue=1778 |pages=20132986 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2013.2986 |pmc=3906945 |pmid=24452026}} Because of this Lomankus represents the youngest definitive megacheiran so far described, and its unique anatomy helps show how the group evolved into the Ordovician.

File:MBUSGS.jpg

Lomankus possesses several unique traits compared to other megacheirans, including a terminal flagella, lack of eyes, and more greatly reduced endites and frontal appendages. Because of this, this taxon probably lived a more different lifestyle compared to its Cambrian relatives. Parry et al., 2024 suggests that this megacheiran most likely occupied a deposit feeding niche (feeding on dead, or decaying organic matter),{{cite book |title=Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. |vauthors=Wetzel RG |date=2001 |publisher=Academic Press |isbn=978-0-12-744760-5 |edition=3rd. |pages=700}} and that the flagella on its frontal appendages most likely were used as sensory structures, compared to the raptorial nature they filled in other taxa. This indicates that megacheirans most likely diversified into other ecological niches following the transition from the Cambrian to the Ordovician, similarly to other groups like the radiodonts.{{cite journal |last1=Potin |first1=G. J.-M. |last2=Gueriau |first2=P. |last3=Daley |first3=A. C. |year=2023 |title=Radiodont frontal appendages from the Fezouata Biota (Morocco) reveal high diversity and ecological adaptations to suspension-feeding during the Early Ordovician |journal=Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |volume=11 |at=1214109 |doi=10.3389/fevo.2023.1214109 |doi-access=free}}

The ecosystem of the Beecher's Trilobite bed most likely inhabited very deep water, and has been compared to the various deep water faunas inhabiting enclosed basins off the coast of southern California. The depth of the area is indicated by the presence of other blind animals, including the trilobite Cryptolithus, and the majority of the other taxa known occupying deposit and suspension feeding niches.{{Cite journal |last=Cisne |first=John |date=1973-03-31 |title=Beecher's Trilobite Bed revisited: Ecology of an Ordovician deepwater fauna |url=https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/peabody_museum_natural_history_postilla/160/ |journal=Postilla |issue=160}} The presence of turbidite beds in the surrounding sediments also adds evidence to this theory, as they are often deposited in deep water areas.Reading, H.G., Richards, M., (1994). Turbidite systems in deepwater basin margins classified by grain size and feeder system. AAPG Bulletin 78, p.794. The main source of food in the ecosystem would've been marine snow, and other various organic material floating downward from shallower areas. The environment would've also been dysaerobic, which may have aided in killing the organisms before they were buried by sediments via turbidity currents. The contemporary fauna included various trilobites, graptolites, brachiopods, nautiloids, ostracods, poriferans, bryozoans, annelids, phyllocarids, bivalves, and echinoderms.

{{reflist}}{{Megacheira}}

{{Taxonbar|from=Q131451977}}

Category:Megacheira

Category:Late Ordovician arthropods

Category:Prehistoric arthropod genera

Category:Paleontology in New York (state)

Category:Fossil taxa described in 2024