MOS talk:ETY#Purpose
Purpose
What's the purpose of this redirect and MOS:Ety? Is it short for "etymology"? But the target page doesn't talk about etymology... maybe it did in the past. Also in that case, a non-abbreviated version MOS:ETYMOLOGY should probably be created.
— W.andrea (talk) 21:11, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
:I found hints from what links here:
:{{tqb| If the original language uses a non-Latin alphabet, the orthography should be surrounded by two straight single quotation marks (vertical apostrophes)
before and after to avoid automatic italicizing (see MOS:Ety)|source=Template:Etymology}}
:{{tqb|Foreign terms in a non-Latin alphabet should not be italicized (MOS:Ety), so there needs to be a way to specify non-italicization for Greek and Arabic etymons, for example|source=Erutuon 22:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC) in {{slink|Template_talk:Etymology|Italicization of non-Latin alphabets}}}}
:— W.andrea (talk) 21:57, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
::If that's what these redirects are meant for, I suggest any use of them should be replaced with MOS:BADITALICS, where it says: {{tqb|Text in non-Latin scripts (such as Greek, Cyrillic or Chinese) should neither be italicized as non-English nor bolded}}
::— W.andrea (talk) 22:00, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
: Just checked: the versions at the time when the redirects were created on April 7th, 2011, and February 11th, 2013, didn't mention etymology. But that was and is a common place where terms in a non-Latin alphabet would be used in random non-linguistic articles. — Eru·tuon 23:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)