Machiavellianism (politics)
{{Short description|Political philosophy of Niccolò Machiavelli}}
{{Broader|Niccolò Machiavelli}}
{{Other uses|Machiavellianism (disambiguation){{!}}Machiavellianism}}
Machiavellianism (or Machiavellism) is widely defined as the political philosophy of the Italian Renaissance diplomat Niccolò Machiavelli, usually associated with realism in foreign and domestic politics, and with the view that those who lead governments must prioritize the stability of the regime over ethical concerns."Machiavellianism is a radical type of political realism that is applied to both domestic and international affairs."
- Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian, [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/ "Political Realism in International Relations"], The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.),{{cite book |last=Meinecke |first=Friedrich |date=1957 |title=Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d'État and Its Place in Modern History |page=36 |url=https://archive.org/details/machiavellismdoc00mein |publisher=Yale University Press}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Machiavellianism|title=Definition of MACHIAVELLIANISM|website=www.merriam-webster.com|language=en|access-date=2018-11-07}} There is no scholarly consensus as to the precise nature of Machiavelli's philosophy, or what his intentions were with his works.For example, Benedetto Croce once stated that Machiavelli is an "enigma that will never be resolved".
- [https://books.google.com/books?id=5hlHEAAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&lpg=PA40&dq=%22croce%22%20%22enigma%20that%20perhaps%20will%20never%22&pg=PA40#v=onepage&q&f=false Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx], pg. 40 {{Cite web |title=Machiavelli, Niccolò {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/machiave/ |access-date=2024-04-19 |language=en-US}} The word Machiavellianism first appeared in the English language in 1607, due to Machiavelli's popularity, often as a byword for unsavory government politics.Evrigenis, I. D., & Somos, M. (2011). Wrestling with Machiavelli. History of European Ideas, 37(2), 85-93.
Overview
=The Prince=
After his exile from political life in 1512, Machiavelli took to a life of writing, which led to the publishing of his most famous work, The Prince. The book would become infamous for its recommendations for absolute rulers to be ready to act in unscrupulous ways, such as resorting to fraud and treachery, elimination of political opponents, and the use of fear as a means of controlling subjects.The Prince, especially chapters VIII, XVII, and XVIII Machiavelli's view that acquiring a state and maintaining it requires evil means has been noted as the chief theme of the treatise.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E7mScxst9UoC&q=leo+strauss+history+of+political+philosophy|title=History of Political Philosophy|last1=Strauss|first1=Leo|last2=Cropsey|first2=Joseph|date=2012-06-15|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=9780226924717|location=|pages=301|language=en}}"We shall not shock anyone, we shall merely expose ourselves to good-natured or at any rate harmless ridicule, if we profess ourselves inclined to the old fashioned and simple opinion according to which Machiavelli was a teacher of evil." -Leo Strauss, [https://books.google.com/books?id=oi2GDwAAQBAJ&dq=thoughts%20on%20machiavelli%20leo%20strauss&pg=PA9 Thoughts on Machiavelli] He has become infamous for this advice, so much so that the adjective Machiavellian would later on describe a type of politics that is "marked by cunning, duplicity, or bad faith".{{Cite web|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Machiavellian|title=Definition of MACHIAVELLIAN|website=www.merriam-webster.com|language=en|access-date=2019-02-26}}
=Republicanism and other ideas=
While Machiavelli has become widely popular for his work on principalities, his other major work, The Discourses on Livy, focused mainly on republican statecraft, and his recommendations for a well ordered republic. Machiavelli noted how free republics have power structures that are better than principalities. He also notes how advantageous a government by a republic could be as opposed to just a single ruler. However, Machiavelli's more controversial statements on politics can also be found even in his other works.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q4EULB2IM50C&q=machiavelli's+virtue|title=Machiavelli's Virtue|last=Mansfield|first=Harvey C.|date=1998-02-25|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=9780226503721|language=en}}{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ia_oOgHlR58C|title=Machiavelli's New Modes and Orders: A Study of the Discourses on Livy|last=Mansfield|first=Harvey C.|date=2001-04-15|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=9780226503707|language=en}} For example, Machiavelli notes that sometimes extraordinary means, such as violence, can be used in re-ordering a corrupt city.{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Niccolo-Machiavelli|title=Niccolo Machiavelli {{!}} Biography, Books, Philosophy, & Facts|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2019-02-22}} In one area, he praises Romulus, who murdered his brother and co-ruler in order to have power by himself to found the city of Rome.{{cite web | url=https://www.constitution.org/mac/disclivy1.htm | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180812053706/https://www.constitution.org/mac/disclivy1.htm | archive-date=2018-08-12 | title=Discourses on Livy: Book 1 }} In a few passages he sometimes explicitly acts as an advisor of tyrants as well.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oi2GDwAAQBAJ&q=leo+strauss+thoughts+on+machiavelli|title=Thoughts on Machiavelli|last=Strauss|first=Leo|date=2014-07-04|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=9780226230979|language=en}} pg. 48Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Discourses on Livy trans. by Harvey Mansfield. Chap 16See Harvey Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov's essay at the beginning of their translation of The Discourses.
Some scholars have even asserted that the goal of his ideal republic does not differ greatly from his principality, as both rely on rather ruthless measures for aggrandizement and empire.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZqroV-TkIhgC&q=Rahe+machiavelli|title=Machiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy|last=Rahe|first=Paul A.|date=2005-11-14|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9781139448338|language=en}}
In one passage of The Prince, Machiavelli subverts the advice given by Cicero to avoid duplicity and violence, by saying that the prince should "be the fox to avoid the snares, and a lion to overwhelm the wolves". It would become one of Machiavelli's most notable statements.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2kiYz6d278IC&q=machiavelli+skinner|title=Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction|last=Skinner|first=Quentin|date=2000-10-12|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=9780191540349|language=en}}
Because cruelty and deception play such important roles in his politics, it is not unusual for related issues—such as murder and betrayal—to rear their heads with regularity.{{Cite web|url=https://www.iep.utm.edu/machiave/|title=Niccolò Machiavelli, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy|last=|first=|date=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}
Machiavelli's own concept of virtue, which he calls "virtù", is original and is usually seen by scholars as different from the traditional viewpoints of other political philosophers.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q4EULB2IM50C&q=machiavelli's+virtue+mansfield|title=Machiavelli's Virtue|last=Mansfield|first=Harvey C.|date=1998-02-25|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=9780226503721|language=en}} Virtù can consist of any quality at the moment that helps a ruler maintain his state, even being ready to engage in necessary evil when it is advantageous.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yCsxDwAAQBAJ&q=citizen+machiavelli|title=Citizen Machiavelli|last=Hulliung|first=Mark|date=2017-07-05|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781351528481|language=en}}{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2kiYz6d278IC&q=quentin+skinner+machiavelli|title=Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction|last=Skinner|first=Quentin|date=2000-10-12|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=9780191540349|language=en}}
Due to the treatise's controversial analysis on politics, in 1559, the Catholic Church banned The Prince, putting it on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum.
Machiavelli criticized and rejected the classical biblical and Christian thought as he viewed that it celebrated humility and otherworldly things, and thus it made the Italians of his day "weak and effeminate".{{Cite web|url=https://www.constitution.org/mac/disclivy2.htm|title=Discourses on Livy: Book 2 Chapter 2|last=|first=|date=|website=www.constitution.org|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2019-05-05}} While Machiavelli's own religious allegiance has been debated, it is assumed that he had a low regard of contemporary Christianity.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q4EULB2IM50C&q=machiavelli's+virtue|title=Machiavelli's Virtue|last=Mansfield|first=Harvey C.|date=1998-02-25|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=9780226503721|language=en}}
Scholars have noted that Machiavelli provides a framework for state building specifically designed for the maintenance of governments.See for example Mark Hulliung, Citizen Machiavelli pg 55 To some, his ideas often set aside traditional doctrines, focusing instead on an original approach to government. Machiavelli usually focuses on the most extreme events in history such as the foundations of human societies and governments.Strauss, Thoughts on Machiavelli, pg 18 Machiavelli views that the ideas entertained by the rulers of his day hurt their abilities to govern effectively. Discourses on Livy, book 3, chapter 27
Machiavelli emphasizes the originality of his endeavor in several instances. Many scholars note that Machiavelli seems particularly original and that he frequently seems to act “without any regard” for his predecessors.Mansfield, Machiavelli's Virtue, pg. ix (Introduction) Some interpreters have even referred to him as the initiator of contemporary philosophy. However, all thinkers engage to some extent with their predecessors, even (or perhaps particularly) those who aim to fundamentally disagree with prior thoughts.Berlin, I. (2014). ‘The Originality of Machiavelli'. In Reading Political Philosophy (pp. 43-58). Routledge. Therefore, even with a figure as seemingly innovative as Machiavelli, scholars have looked deeper into his works to consider possible historical and philosophical influences. Although Machiavelli examined ancient humanists, he does not frequently reference them as authorities. In his time, the most commonly cited discussion of classical virtues was Book 1 of Cicero’s De officiis. Yet, Cicero is never mentioned in The Prince, and is mentioned only three times in the Discourses.[https://iep.utm.edu/machiave/ Niccolò Machiavelli, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] Machiavelli advocates for all governments to focus on the foundation of their states, with his advice aiming to ensure the stability and longevity of the specific regime he was referring to.Pedullà, G. (2018). Machiavelli in Tumult: The Discourses on Livy and the Origins of Political Conflictualism. Cambridge University Press.
=Reception of Machiavelli=
Anti-Machiavellism
In the late 1530s, immediately following the publication of The Prince, Machiavelli's philosophy was seen as an immoral ideology that corrupted European politics. Reginald Pole read the treatise while he was in Italy, and on which he commented: "I found this type of book to be written by an enemy of the human race. It explains every means whereby religion, justice and any inclination toward virtue could be destroyed".{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ip1oAgAAQBAJ&dq=found+this+type+of+book+to+be+written+by+an+enemy+of+the+human+race.+It+explains+every+means+whereby+religion,+justice+and+any+inclination+toward+virtue+could+be+destroyed%22&pg=PR20|title=Machiavelli's Prince: A New Reading|last=Benner|first=Erica|date=2013-11-28|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=9780191003929|language=en}} Machiavelli's works were received similarly by other popular European authors, especially in Elizabethan England. The English playwrights William Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe incorporated their views into some of their works. Shakespeare's titular character, Richard III, refers to Machiavelli in Henry VI, Part III, as the "murderous Machiavel".
The Anti-Machiavel is an 18th-century essay by Frederick the Great, king of Prussia and patron of Voltaire, rebutting The Prince. It was first published in September 1740, a few months after Frederick became king.{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Anti-Machiavel|title=Anti-Machiavel {{!}} treatise by Frederick the Great|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2019-04-16}} Denis Diderot, the French philosopher, viewed Machiavellianism as "an abhorrent type of politics" and the "art of tyranny".Diderot, Denis (ascribed by Jacques Proust). "Machiavellianism." The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Translated by Timothy Cleary. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2004. Trans. of "Machiavelisme," Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vol. 9. Paris, 1765. Accessed 31 March 2015.
See also
References
{{Reflist|30em}}
External links
- [https://www.iep.utm.edu/machiave/ Machiavelli, Niccolò -- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
- [https://www.britannica.com/biography/Niccolo-Machiavelli Niccolo Machiavelli, Encyclopedia Britannica]
- [https://thegreatthinkers.org/machiavelli/ Great Thinkers- Machiavelli]
{{Niccolò Machiavelli}}
{{Political philosophy}}
{{authority control}}
Category:16th-century neologisms
Category:Eponymous political ideologies