Maintenance of Certification

Some major medical organizations gain profit from and have expressed support for the Maintenance of Certification program including the following:

• American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)
• American Osteopathic Association (AOA)
• American Medical Association (AMA)
• American Hospital Association (AHA)
• National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME)
• Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB)
• Council of Medical Specialty Societies (CMSS)
• Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)
• Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)
• Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG)

Some major medical organizations do not gain profit from and do not support the Maintenance of Certification program, including the following:

• Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
• National Board of Physicians and Surgeons (NBPAS)
• Docs 4 Patient Care Foundation (D4PC)
• Physicians for Certification Change
• Independent Physicians for Patient Independence (IP4PI)

The ABMS Program for MOC involves ongoing measurement of six core competencies defined by ABMS and ACGME:{{cite web|url=https://www.abms.org/board-certification/a-trusted-credential/based-on-core-competencies/|title=Based on Core Competencies - American Board of Medical Specialties|website=www.abms.org}}

• Practice-based Learning and Improvement
• Patient Care and Procedural Skills
• Systems-based Practice
• Medical Knowledge
• Interpersonal and Communication Skills
• Professionalism

These competencies, which are the same ones used in the ACGME's Next Accreditation System, are measured in the ABMS Program for MOC within a four-part framework:{{cite web|url=https://www.abms.org/board-certification/a-trusted-credential/assessed-through-a-four-part-framework/|title=Four-Part Assessment - American Board of Medical Specialties|website=www.abms.org}}

• Part I: Professionalism and Professional Standing
• Part II: Lifelong Learning and Self-Assessment
• Part III: Assessment of Knowledge, Judgment, and Skills
• Part IV: Improvement in Medical Practice

Some health plans are implementing programs that recognize and reward physicians who are actively participating in Maintenance of Certification activities.[http://www.abim.org/pressroom/press_release/08_07_07_NHCO.shtm Four National Health Care Organizations to Use American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Board Certification Tools in Their Physician Recognition Programs]. American Board of Internal Medicine press release, August 7, 2007. ABMS member boards are actively working with other health care organizations to advance quality initiatives and reduce measurement redundancy through recognition of physicians' Maintenance of Certification program participation. A growing number of hospitals and health systems are beginning to use Maintenance of Certification components to engage physicians in quality improvement. Many hospitals are now endorsing and accepting certification from the National Board of Physicians and Surgeons (NBPAS) instead of ABMS board certification.

Studies suggest that board-certified physicians provide improved quality of patient care and better clinical outcomes than those physicians without board certification,{{cite journal | pmc = 1828098 | pmid=16637823 | doi=10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00326.x | volume=21 | issue=3 | title=Physician board certification and the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction | year=2006 | journal=J Gen Intern Med | pages=238–44 | vauthors=Chen J, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM}} However Close examination of this article discloses that the difference is minor, the type of data used is of poor validity and indeed, cardiologist care was much better than any internist group. including a 15% reduction in mortality rate among heart attack patients treated by board-certified physicians.[http://www.academicmedicine.org/pt/re/acmed/searchresults.htm;jsessionid=GPlfpG7bfcqfxG2J4NVR20mGdGNS9zh2lLFpZTv2vM9NLRckXqLR!319339476!181195628!8091!-1?&index=1&results=1&searchid=3 The Certification Status of Generalist Physicians and the Mortality of Their Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction]. Academic Medicine 2001 October; 76(10) Supplement:S21-S23. Considering a recent meta-analysis that shows a decline in physician performance associated with the time elapsed since the physician's initial training,{{cite journal | vauthors = Choudhry NK| date = February 2005 | title = The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health Care | doi = 10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00008 | pmid = 15710959 | journal = Annals of Internal Medicine | volume = 142 | issue = 4| pages = 260–273 | s2cid = 15129824 | doi-access = }} it is essential for physicians to participate in programs such as Maintenance of Certification in order to keep current with medicine's expanding knowledge base and technical advances, and to apply this knowledge to quality improvement in their medical practice. There is, however, no evidence MOC participation has any effect on this alleged age-related decline in performance and no evidence MOC is as good as any other intervention or no intervention. Maintenance of Certification strives to help physicians and other health care stakeholders address the critical need to enhance patient safety and patient care quality.[http://www.abim.org/pressroom/press_release_pdf/JAMA%20Article%20090104.pdf The Role of Physician Specialty Board Certification Status in the Quality Movement] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928054820/http://www.abim.org/pressroom/press_release_pdf/JAMA%20Article%20090104.pdf |date=2007-09-28 }}. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). 2004 September; 292(9):1038–1043. There is no evidence to support any efficacy for maintenance of certification in enhancing patient safety and patient care quality. It is important to recognize the extensive conflicts of interests in studies funded by and performed by ABMS and specialty board employees.

Studies have shown that a physician's ability to independently and accurately self-assess is poor,{{cite journal|vauthors=Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L|title=Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review|journal=JAMA|year=2006|volume=296|issue=9|pages=1094–1102|doi=10.1001/jama.296.9.1094|pmid=16954489|s2cid=2637137 }} that more clinical experience does not necessarily lead to better outcomes of care{{cite journal|vauthors=Eva KW, Regehr G|title="I'll never play professional football" and other fallacies of self-assessment.|journal=J Contin Educ Health Prof|date=2008|volume=28|issue=28|pages=14–19|doi=10.1002/chp.150|pmid=18366120}} and that fewer than 30% of physicians examine their own performance data and try to improve.{{cite journal|vauthors=Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB|title=Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care.|journal=Ann Intern Med|volume=142|date=2005|issue=4|pages=260–273|doi=10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00008|pmid=15710959|s2cid=15129824 |doi-access=}} The MOC program structure strives to address these concerns with a sound theoretical rationale via the six ACGME competencies framework and a respectable body of scientific evidence, and to address its relationship to patient outcomes, physician performance, validity of the assessment or educational methods utilized and learning or improvement potential.{{cite journal|vauthors=Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC|title=Measure, learn, and improve: Physicians' involvement in quality improvement.|journal=Health Aff (Millwood)|volume=24|date=2005|issue=3|pages=843–853|doi=10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.843|pmid=15886180|doi-access=}} A study presented at the AcademyHealth conference in June 2013 found a correlation between an MOC requirement and reduced cost of care and emergency department visits; this paper is currently under review. There are no data suggesting MOC is in any way superior to a number of self-assessment programs, sponsored by physician specialty societies, that are significantly less expensive than MOC.

• American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)
• American Osteopathic Association Bureau of Osteopathic Specialists (AOABOS)

{{reflist}}

• [http://www.abms.org/About_Board_Certification/MOC.aspx Official ABMS Maintenance of Certification Website]
• http://www.changeboardrecert.com
• http://www.nbpas.org National Board of Physicians and Surgeons

{{DEFAULTSORT:Maintenance Of Certification}}

Category:Medical credentials