Malmstrom UFO incident

File:341st Missile Wing - MAF.png. Echo flight is labelled 'E'.]]

In 1967, personnel from Malmstrom operated an underground missile complex that was located between Hilger and Winifred, given the designation "Echo Flight". An Air Force report noted that "On 16 March 1967 at 0845, all sites in Echo (E) Flight, Malmstrom AFB, shut-down with No-Go indications... All [launch facilities] in E Flight lost strategic alert nearly simultaneously. No other Wing I configuration lost strategic alert at that time." The report continued: "Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during the time of the fault were disproven. A Mobile Strike Team, which had checked all November Flight's [launch facilities] on the morning of 16 March 67, were question[ed] and stated that no unusual activity or sightings were observed."Command History of the 341st Strategic Missile Wing and 341st Combat Support Group

The malfunction, termed the "Echo Flight Incident", required maintenance crews to be dispatched to the complex. The missiles were brought back online within a day.

In August 13, 1996, the Great Falls Tribune published an article about Robert Salas and his story of a UFO report associated with the Echo Flight malfunction. Robert Salas had been a 26 year old Air Force Lieutenant during the 1967 malfunction.

According to Salas, on the night of the malfunction, he was assigned to the underground capsule at the complex. According to Salas, a security guard on the surface contacted him to report flying objects in the distance doing strange maneuvers; Later, guards reported seeing a glowing red object hovering above the front gate. According to Salas, minutes later the complex's ten Minutemen nuclear missiles went offline. The red object reportedly disappeared and maintenance crews took a full day to restore the system to operational status.{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/great-falls-tribune-1967-ufo-incident-st/169023820/|title=1967 UFO incident still mystifies man|date=August 13, 1996|pages=9|via=newspapers.com}}

In the August 1996 piece, Salas denies being a "UFO junkie" and doesn't suggest extra-terrestrial involvement; He further says he wants to find answers to the mystery, requesting anyone with information to contact him.

In 2000, the story began to be covered in papers throught the region.{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-independent-record-close-encounter-p/169100334/|title=Close encounter prompts nuclear shutdown|date=October 29, 2000|pages=23|via=newspapers.com}}

In 2001, the incident was featured in the Missoula Independent. {{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/missoula-independent-how-they-learned-to/169099851/|title=How they Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb|date=July 26, 2001|pages=15|via=newspapers.com}} That year, Air Force documents on the incident were released under the Freedom of Information Act. The Independent returned to the topic the following year.{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-missoulian-robert-salas/169100151/|title=Robert Salas|date=September 22, 2002|pages=46|via=newspapers.com}} {{External media and documents|document1=[https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/malmstromufo.pdf 2001 FOIA response] on Malmstrom UFO incident}}

In 2005, Salas authored Faded Giant on the topic of UFOs. By 2005, Salas speculated the government was covering up evidence of extraterrestrials in order to exploit their technology for weaponry.https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-los-angeles-times-robert-salas/169100514/

In 2008, UFO author Robert Hastings discussed the incident in his book UFOs and Nukes. Salas authored a letter to the editor defending the book from criticism by skeptics.{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/albuquerque-journal-ufo-critics-arent-g/169101321/|title=UFO Critics Aren't Grounded in Reality|date=September 3, 2008|pages=9|via=newspapers.com}}

On September 27, 2010, Salas appeared at the National Press Club in Washington D.C., along with other UFO speakers.{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/irish-independent-aliens-landed-and-inte/169102498/|title=Aliens landed and interfered with missiles, US pilots claim|date=September 28, 2010|pages=T28|via=newspapers.com}} In 2014, Salas authored a second book Unidentified: The UFO Phenomenon. In 2017, the Great Falls Tribune marked the event's 50th anniversary.{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/great-falls-tribune-ufo-sighting-still-g/169098813/|title=UFO sighting still gripping|date=February 27, 2017|pages=A1|via=newspapers.com}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/great-falls-tribune-ufo-sighting-still-g/169099396/|title=UFO sighting still gripping Continued|date=February 27, 2017|pages=A3|via=newspapers.com}} In 2023, Salas authored a third book: UAPs and the Nuclear Puzzle.

{{clear-right}}

Science writer Mick West wrote that the military investigated at the time and found no connection to any UFO sighting, but the story has remained in UFO culture largely due to the promotional efforts of Salas. Skeptical investigators maintain they have found numerous issues with Robert Salas’s account.{{cite web |last1=West |first1=Mick |title=Great Expectations: UFOs in Congress |url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/great-expectations-ufos-in-congress/|website=skepticalinquirer.org |date=25 May 2022 |publisher=Skeptical Inquirer |access-date=30 March 2025}}

According to Brian Dunning, Salas memories differ from records of the 341st Strategic Missile Wing, which show that nobody had reported anything usual on the night he claims UFOs were seen. Dunning wrote that on March 16, Echo Flight missiles were restarted following a commonplace commercial power failure, "and eight days later, some people reported a UFO to the newspapers in a town 50km away. There is no rational reason to conclude one thing had anything to do with the other". Dunning speculated that Salas was "honestly mistaken in piecing together certain memories, and I also believe he's become invested in his version of the recollection and has erred on the side of confirmation bias".{{cite web |last1=Dunning |first1=Brian |title=The Day the UFO Deactivated the Nukes |url=https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4842 |website=skeptoid.com |publisher=Skeptoid |access-date=30 March 2025}}

In 2008, Salas appeared on CNN along with skeptic Michael Shermer. When asked if he believed Salas was lying, Shermer replied "No, not at all. I think we're not always reliable observers. It's hard to say. We misunderstand, honestly misunderstand or misperceive things. I think before we say something is out of this world, let's first make sure that it's not in it. And just because we can't explain something doesn't mean it's, you know, extraterrestrial."{{Cite web|url=https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/lkl/date/2008-01-24/segment/01|title=CNN.com - Transcripts|website=transcripts.cnn.com}}

Skeptic Robert Sheaffer argued the UFO sighted was likely Mars, writing: "So, in the case of Oscar Flight, a UFO was sighted [very likely Mars], but no missiles went offline. In the case of Echo Flight, missiles did go offline due to an electronic glitch, but UFOs had nothing to do with it. I can't un-complicate it any more than that."{{Cite web|url=https://badufos.blogspot.com/2014/01/discovery-canadas-close-encounters-mars.html|title=Discovery Canada's "Close Encounters": Mars Mangles Missiles?|first=Robert|last=Sheaffer|date=January 15, 2014}}

In 2025, the Pentagon reported that incident had actually been caused by a test of an electromagnetic pulse device.https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/ufo-us-disinformation-45376f7e

{{reflist}}

• Big Sur UFO

Category:1967 in the United States

Category:UFO conspiracy theories