Manova News

{{Short description|German online magazine}}

{{Infobox website

| name = Manova News

| logo =

| logo_size =

| logo_alt =

| logo_caption =

| screenshot =

| collapsible =

| collapsetext =

| background =

| screenshot_size =

| screenshot_alt =

| caption =

| url = [https://www.manova.news/ www.manova.news]

| commercial = Yes

| type = Journalism portal

| registration = No

| language = German

| num_users =

| content_license =

| programming_language =

| owner = Jens Wernicke

| author =

| editor =

| launch_date = 2017

| revenue =

| alexa =

| issn =

| eissn =

| oclc =

| current_status = Active

| footnotes =

}}

Manova News, formerly branded Rubikon, is a German online blog described to be following the Querfront strategy as well as spreading conspiracy ideologies. The motto of the blog is "Magazine for Freedom and Peace, Environment and Human Rights".

Owner, publisher and deputy editor-in-chief is the German Jens Wernicke. Editor-in-chief is Roland Rottenfußer.

Content

Content on the website is written by various authors. In the early days of the blog, some authors supported Rubikon as an independend media outlet to amplify progressive discourse within German society.

German publicist Wolf Wetzel, who wrote at Rubikon from its foundation until his departure in 2018, criticized this construction for having „eine [...] klare [...] Hierarchie“ ("a [...] clear [...] hierarchy"): „Gesellschafter, Herausgeber, Geschäftsführer, Chefredakteur. Von »unten« gibt es kein Durchkommen, kein Gegengewicht, keine Form der »Gewaltenteilung«, keine Möglichkeit, den Kurs zu beeinflussen. Das Ganze hängt folglich ganz vom Goodwill des Herausgebers und Geschäftsführers ab, der sich gleichzeitig den Posten des Chefredakteurs zugedacht hat“ ("Shareholder, publisher, managing director, editor-in-chief. From »below« there is no getting through, no counterweight, no form of »separation of powers«, no possibility of influencing the course. The whole thing therefore depends entirely on the goodwill of the publisher and managing director, who has also intended to be editor-in-chief"). According to him, no effective influence is possible via the editorial statute.{{Cite web|date=2018-02-13|title=Über Macht- und Entscheidungsstrukturen "alternativer Medien"|url=https://wolfwetzel.wordpress.com/2018/02/13/ueber-macht-und-entscheidungsstrukturen-alternativer-medien/|access-date=2020-10-28|website=Eyes Wide Shut|language=de-DE}}

In the first few years after its founding, Rubikon quickly developed into a medium in which crude political theses were disseminated with the impetus to represent suppressed opinions.

Reception

= Scientific reception =

The Americanist Michael Butter includes Rubikon in the alternative media with outlets such as KenFM, Telepolis or NachDenkSeiten, which would all form a counter-public to the traditional quality media and public broadcasting. They used conspiracy theories like that of the "lying press" and sold them as serious news.Michael Butter: Verschwörungs(theorie)panik. „Filter Clash“ zweier Öffentlichkeiten. In: Heiner Hastedt (publisher): Deutungsmacht von Zeitdiagnosen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld 2019, {{ISBN|978-3-8376-4592-7}}, p. 197–211, p. 205 (accessed via De Gruyter Online).

= Journalistic reception =

When the website was launched for three months in 2017, the journalist Christiane Enkeler told Deutschlandfunk that the magazine presented itself as „sehr heterogen“ ("very heterogeneous"). According to her, the critical analysis of leading media was successful. Overall, Rubikon would still be in development.{{Cite web|title=Das Magazin "Rubikon" - Journalistischer Grenzgänger|url=https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/das-magazin-rubikon-journalistischer-grenzgaenger.2907.de.html?dram:article_id=390378|access-date=2020-10-28|website=Deutschlandfunk|language=de-DE}}

Simon Hurtz referred to the website in the Süddeutsche Zeitung in 2020 as „Querfront-Magazin“.{{Cite web|last=Hurtz|first=Simon|title=Falsch, aber faszinierend|url=https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/im-feindbild-vereint-falsch-aber-faszinierend-1.4903960|access-date=2020-10-28|website=Süddeutsche.de|language=de}} Roger Schawinski calls it an „Internetportal mit Verschwörungstheoretiker-Groove“ ("Internet portal with a conspiracy theorist groove").Roger Schawinski: Verschwörung! Die fanatische Jagd nach dem Bösen in der Welt. NZZ Libro, Zürich 2018, p. 50 f.

According to Erik Peter from taz, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Rubikon became a platform for the conspiracy scene in Berlin that negated the danger of the virus.{{Cite news|last=Peter|first=Erik|date=2020-03-31|title=Corona und Verschwörungstheoretiker: Mit Grundgesetz gegen den Verstand|language=de|work=Die Tageszeitung: taz|url=https://taz.de/!5675712/|access-date=2020-10-28|issn=0931-9085}} Der Spiegel called Rubikon „eine Art Hausmedium der Protestler“ ("a kind of in-house media for protesters") around Anselm Lenz, in which „verschwörungsideologische Beiträge“ ("contributions to the ideology of conspiracies") were published again and again.{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Deutschlands neue Wutbürger: Sturm der Lügen - DER SPIEGEL - Politik|url=https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/innenminister-warnen-vor-corona-verschwoerungstheorien-wut-und-wahnsinn-a-00000000-0002-0001-0000-000170816289|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-10-28|website=www.spiegel.de|language=de}}

References

{{Reflist}}