McIntosh v. United States

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants = McIntosh v. United States

|ArgueDate= February 27

|ArgueYear= 2024

|DecideDate= April 17

|DecideYear= 2024

|FullName= Louis McIntosh v. United States

|Opinion = https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/601us2r17_nmio.pdf

|USVol= 601

|USPage= 330

|ParallelCitations=

|Docket= 22-7386

|OralArgument=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-7386

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding= A court's failure to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not necessarily bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing.

|Majority= Sotomayor

|JoinMajority= unanimous

|LawsApplied=Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(B)

}}

McIntosh v. United States, {{ussc|601|330|2024|el=no}}, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a court's failure to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not necessarily bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing.McIntosh v. United States, 601 U.S. 330 (2024).