McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

|ArgueDate=

|ArgueYear=

|DecideDate=April 3

|DecideYear=2017

|FullName=

|USVol=581

|USPage=72

|Docket=15-1248

|ParallelCitations=

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding=A district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.

|Majority=Sotomayor

|JoinMajority=Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan

|Concurrence/Dissent=Ginsburg

|NotParticipating=

|LawsApplied=

}}

McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 581 U.S. 72 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.{{ussc|name=McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission|docket=15-1248|volume=581|year=2017}}.{{Cite web |date=2017-04-04 |title=Opinion analysis: Court unanimously adopts abuse-of-discretion review for district court decisions to enforce EEOC subpoenas |url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/04/opinion-analysis-court-unanimously-adopts-abuse-discretion-review-district-court-decisions-enforce-eeoc-subpoenas/ |access-date=2024-11-02 |website=SCOTUSblog |language=en-US}}