Menzerath's law

In the 19th century, Eduard Sievers observed that vowels in short words are pronounced longer than the same vowels in long words.Karl-Heinz Best: Eduard Sievers (1850–1932). In: Glottometrics 18, 2009, {{ISSN|1617-8351}}, S. 87–91. (PDF [https://www.ram-verlag.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/g18zeit.pdf#page=91 Full text]).Eduard Sievers: Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Breitkopf & Härtel, Leipzig 1876.{{Pg|page=122}} Menzerath & de Oleza (1928)Menzerath, Paul, & de Oleza, Joseph M. (1928). Spanische Lautdauer. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Berlin/ Leipzig: de Gruyter. expanded this observation to state that, as the number of syllables in words increases, the syllables themselves become shorter on average.

From this, the following hypothesis developed:

The larger the whole, the smaller its parts.

In particular, for linguistics:

The larger a linguistic construct, the smaller its constituents.

In the early 1980s, Altmann, Heups,Heups, Gabriela. Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Satzlänge zu Clauselänge am Beispiel deutscher Texte verschiedener Textklassen. 1980.

and Köhler demonstrated using quantitative methods that this postulate can also be applied to larger constructs of natural language: the larger the sentence, the smaller the individual clauses, etc. A prerequisite for such relationships is that a relationship between units (here: sentence) and their direct constituents (here: clause) is examined.{{Cite web |date=2015-12-29 |title=Hierarchic relations - Laws in Quantitative Linguistics |url=http://lql.uni-trier.de/index.php/Hierarchic_relations |access-date=2024-09-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151229144232/http://lql.uni-trier.de/index.php/Hierarchic_relations |archive-date=2015-12-29 }}{{Pg|page=Übersichten}}

According to Altmann (1980),

{{cite journal| author=Gabriel Altmann |year=1980 |title=Prolegomena to Menzerath's law |journal=Glottometrika |volume=2 |pages=1–10}}

it can be mathematically stated as:

$$y=a\; \backslash cdot\; x^\{b\}\; \backslash cdot\; e^\{-c\; x\}$$

where:

• $y$ is the constituent size (e.g. syllable length);
• $x$ is the size of the linguistic construct that is being inspected (e.g. number of syllables per word);
• $a$, $b$, $c$ are positive parameters.

The law can be explained by assuming that linguistic segments contain information about their structure (besides the information that needs to be communicated).

{{cite journal| author=Reinhard Köhler |year=1984 |title= Zur Interpretation des Menzerathschen Gesetzes |journal=Glottometrika |volume=6 |pages=177–183}}

The assumption that the length of the structure information is independent of the length of the other content of the segment yields the alternative formula that was also successfully empirically tested.

{{cite journal| author=Jiří Milička |year=2014 |title= Menzerath's Law: The whole is greater than the sum of its parts|journal=Journal of Quantitative Linguistics |volume=21 |issue=2|pages=85–99 |doi=10.1080/09296174.2014.882187|s2cid=205625169 }}

Gerlach (1982)Rainer Gerlach: Zur Überprüfung des Menzerath'schen Gesetzes im Bereich der Morphologie. In: Werner Lehfeldt, Udo Strauss (eds.): Glottometrika 4. Brockmeyer, Bochum 1982, ISBN 3-88339-250-2, S. 95–102. checked a German dictionaryGerhard Wahrig (ed.): dtv-Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich 1978, ISBN 3-423-03136-0. with about 15,000 entries:

class="wikitable centered hintergrundfarbe2" style="text-align:center;"
$x$ ! $n$ ! $y$ ! $y^*$
1 | 2391 | 4.53 | 4.33
2 | 6343 | 3.25 | 3.37
3 | 4989 | 2.93 | 2.91
4 | 1159 | 2.78 | 2.62
5 | 112 | 2.65 | 2.42
6 | 13 | 2.58 | 2.26

Where $x$ is the number of morphs per word, $n$ is the number of words in the dictionary with length $x$; $y$ is the observed average length of morphs (number of phonemes per morph); $y^*$ is the prediction according to $y\; =\; ax^\{b\}$ where $a,\; b$ are fited to data. The F-test has .

As another example, the simplest form of Menzerath's law, $y=ax^\{b\}$, holds for the duration of vowels in Hungarian words:Ernst A. Meyer, Zoltán Gombocz: Zur Phonetik der ungarischen Sprache. Berlings Buchdruckerei, Uppsala 1909, page 20; Karl-Heinz Best: Gesetzmäßigkeiten der Lautdauer. In: Glottotheory 1, 2008, page 6.

class="wikitable" style="margin:auto; text-align:center;" !Word length (syllables per word) !Sound duration (sec/100) using the vowel ā as an example: observed !Sound duration (sec/100) using the vowel ā as an example: predicted

1 | 27.2 | 27.64

2 | 24.2 | 23.18

3 | 20.9 | 20.91

4 | 19.0 | 19.43

5 | 18.2 | 18.36

More examples are on the German Wikipedia pages on phoneme duration, syllable duration, word length, clause length, and sentence length.

This law also seems to hold true for at least a subclass of Japanese Kanji characters.Claudia Prün: Validity of Menzerath-Altmann's Law: Graphic Representation of Language, Information Processing Systems and Synergetic Linguistics. In: Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1, 1994, S. 148–155.

Beyond quantitative linguistics, Menzerath's law can be discussed in any multi-level complex systems. Given three levels, $x$ is the number of middle-level units contained in a high-level unit, $y$ is the averaged number of low-level units contained in middle-level units, Menzerath's law claims a negative correlation between $y$ and $x$.

Menzerath's law is shown to be true for both the base-exon-gene levels in the human genome,

{{cite journal| author=Wentian Li |year=2012 |title= Menzerath's law at the gene-exon level in the human genome|journal=Complexity |volume=17 |issue=4|pages=49–53 |doi=10.1002/cplx.20398|bibcode=2012Cmplx..17d..49L }}

and base-chromosome-genome levels in genomes from a collection of species.

{{cite journal| author= Ramon Ferrer-I-Cancho, Núria Forns |year=2009 |title= The self-organization of genomes|journal=Complexity |volume=15 |issue=5|pages=34–36 |doi= 10.1002/cplx.20296|hdl=2117/180111 |hdl-access=free }}

In addition, Menzerath's law was shown to accurately predict the distribution of protein lengths in terms of amino acid number in the proteome of ten organisms.{{cite journal|last1=Eroglu|first1=S|title=Language-like behavior of protein length distribution in proteomes|journal=Complexity|date=10 Jan 2014|volume=20|issue=2|pages=12–21|doi=10.1002/cplx.21498|bibcode=2014Cmplx..20b..12E}}

Furthermore, studies have shown that the social behavior of baboon groups also corresponds to Menzerath's Law: the larger the entire group, the smaller the subordinate social groups.{{Pg|page=99 ff}}

In 2016, a research group at the University of Michigan found that the calls of geladas obey Menzerath's law, observing that calls are abbreviated when used in longer sequences.{{cite web |last1=Martin |first1=Cassie |title=Gelada monkeys know their linguistic math |url=https://www.sciencenews.org/article/gelada-monkeys-know-their-linguistic-math |website=Science News |access-date=12 August 2024}}{{cite journal |last1=Gustison |first1=Morgan |title=Gelada vocal sequences follow Menzerath's linguistic law |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=April 18, 2016 |volume=113 |issue=19 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1522072113 |doi-access=free |hdl=2117/89435 |hdl-access=free }}

{{div col|colwidth=20em}}

• Zipf's law
• Brevity law
• Heaps' law
• Bradford's law
• Benford's law
• Pareto distribution
• Principle of least effort
• Rank–size distribution

{{Div col end}}

{{Reflist}}

Category:Quantitative linguistics

Category:Linguistics