Microstates and the European Union#Summary

{{short description|Relationship overview}}

{{Distinguish|Microstates and the United Nations}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}

{{Image label begin|image=European Microstates and EU.svg|width=300|Version of File:European microstates map.svg without flags to work as clicky map]]{{!}}border|font-size=110%|overflow-x=visible}}

{{Image label|x=0.10|y=0.55|scale=300|text=Andorra File:Flag of Andorra.svg}}

{{Image label|x=0.66|y=0.25|scale=300|text=File:Flag of Liechtenstein.svg Liechtenstein}}

{{Image label|x=0.36|y=0.44|scale=300|text=Monaco File:Flag of Monaco.svg}}

{{Image label|x=0.70|y=0.49|scale=300|text=File:Flag of San Marino.svg San Marino}}

{{Image label|x=0.60|y=0.62|scale=300|text=Vatican City File:Flag of the Vatican City (2023–present).svg}}

{{Image label|x=0.02|y=1.04|scale=300|text=The third-country European microstates{{efn|Malta, despite being considered one of the European microstates is not highlighted on this map because it is a full member of the European Union. Iceland is also excluded due to its geographical size.}}}}

{{Image label end}}

Currently, all of the European microstates have some form of relations with the European Union (EU).{{cite web|url=http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/11/st11/st11466.en11.pdf|title=EU relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Republic of San Marino and the Principality of Monaco|publisher=Council of the European Union|date=14 June 2011|access-date=12 September 2012}}

Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino, and the Vatican City remain outside the Union. Andorra is, by population, the largest of the five microstates with around 85,500 citizens according to a 2022 estimate.{{cite web |title=Andorra |url=https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/andorra/ |website=The World Factbook |publisher=Central Intelligence Agency |access-date=19 November 2022 |language=en |date=14 November 2022}} Two other small countries, Luxembourg and Malta, are full members of the EU and both inhabited by populations over 600,000 and over 500,000 respectively.

Status of relations

Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and the Vatican City use the euro through monetary agreements with the EU, and have been granted the right to issue a limited number of euro coins. They were allowed to do so as they had used or been tied to the old eurozone currencies. Liechtenstein, on the other hand, uses the Swiss franc.

Liechtenstein is a full member in its own right of the Schengen Agreement, European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and Dublin Regulation on asylum and has signed an agreement to participate in the Prüm Decisions, while Monaco has an open border with France and Schengen laws are administered as if it were a part of France. San Marino and the Vatican City, both enclaves within Italy, have open borders with Italy and are de facto part of the Schengen Area. No systematic border checks are conducted between Andorra and the Schengen Area. None of them have any airport, but all have heliports. Monaco has the only seaport; the others are landlocked. Arrival from outside the Schengen Area is allowed in Monaco,Both by sea and helicopter{{Cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:037:0010:0023:EN:PDF|title=Update of the list of border crossing points referred to in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons cross borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ C 316, 28.12.2007)}} but not in San Marino and the Vatican City as they have no border controls.

Monaco is a part of the EU customs territory through an agreement with France, and is administered as part of France. San Marino and Andorra are in a customs union with the bloc. Liechtenstein, as a member of the EEA, is within the European Single Market and applies certain EU laws. All of the microstates are also part of other organisations such as the Council of Europe (except Vatican City) and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.

Iceland and Liechtenstein are members of the European Economic Area (EEA) through the EFTA. San Marino had considered joining the EEA in the past,{{cite web|url=http://www.esteri.sm/on-line/en/home/news/articolo1000972.html|title=The Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs has met the European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy|date=17 July 2009|access-date=1 April 2013}}{{cite web|url=http://www.italica.sm/shownews.php?newsid=0000000520|title=San Martino to participate to the EEA|date=21 July 2009|access-date=1 April 2013}} and held a referendum on submitting an application for EU membership, which was approved by its electorate; however, not enough votes were cast for the result to be considered valid. Iceland was previously an official candidate for accession to the European Union. Had Iceland acceded to the Union, it would have become the EU's smallest state measured by population, but twelfth largest by geographical size. The Icelandic government withdrew its application for membership in 2015.[http://europe.mfa.is/phase1/timeline/ Timeline of events – Iceland's application for membership of the EU], Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110903164421/http://europe.mfa.is/phase1/timeline/ |date=3 September 2011 }}

Future of relations

[[File:European Union future possible members 2.0.svg|thumb|Countries that could join the European Union

{{legend|#003399|Current members}}

{{legend|#46a43b|Candidate countries}}

{{legend|#ffd617|Applicant / potential candidate countries}}

{{legend|#F29527|Membership possible}}

{{legend|#da2131|Membership not possible}}]]

Andorra, Monaco, and San Marino have all stated their desire to deepen relations with the EU. In November 2012, after the Council of the European Union had called for an evaluation of the EU's relations with these microstates, which they described as "fragmented",{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/118458.pdf|title=Council conclusions on EU relations with EFTA countries|publisher=Council of the European Union|date=14 December 2010|access-date=1 April 2013}} the European Commission published a report outlining options for their further integration into the EU.{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0680:REV1:EN:HTML|title=Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions - EU Relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco and the Republic of San Marino - Options for Closer Integration with the EU|date=2012}} Unlike Liechtenstein, which is a member of the EEA via the EFTA and the Schengen Agreement, relations with these three states are based on a collection of agreements covering specific issues. The report examined four alternatives to the current situation: 1) a Sectoral Approach with separate agreements with each state covering an entire policy area, 2) a comprehensive, multilateral Framework Association Agreement (FAA) with the three states, 3) EEA membership, and 4) EU membership. The Commission argued that the sectoral approach did not address the major issues and was still needlessly complicated, while EU membership was dismissed in the near future because "the EU institutions are currently not adapted to the accession of such small-sized countries." The remaining options, EEA membership and a FAA with the states, were found to be viable and were recommended by the Commission. In response, the Council requested that negotiations with the three microstates on further integration continue, and that a report be prepared by the end of 2013 detailing the implications of the two viable alternatives and recommendations on how to proceed.{{cite web|url=http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/trans/134524.pdf |title=Council conclusions on EU relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Republic of San Marino and the Principality of Monaco |publisher=Council of the European Union |date=20 December 2012 |access-date=1 April 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130517000353/http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/trans/134524.pdf |archive-date=17 May 2013 }}

As EEA membership is currently only open to EFTA or EU members, the consent of existing EFTA member states is required for the microstates to join the EEA without becoming members of the EU. In 2011, Jonas Gahr Støre, the then Foreign Minister of Norway which is an EFTA member state, said that EFTA/EEA membership for the microstates was not the appropriate mechanism for their integration into the internal market due to their different requirements than large countries such as Norway, and suggested that a simplified association would be better suited for them.{{cite web|url=http://www.nationen.no/2011/05/19/politikk/eos/eos-avtalen/eu/eeas/6642688/|title=Norge sier nei til nye mikrostater i EØS|date=19 May 2011|access-date=6 April 2013}} Espen Barth Eide, Støre's successor, responded to the Commission's report in late 2012 by questioning whether the microstates have sufficient administrative capabilities to meet the obligations of EEA membership. However, he stated that Norway was open to the possibility of EFTA membership for the microstates if they decide to submit an application, and that the country had not made a final decision on the matter.{{cite web|url=http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/ud/aktuelt/taler_artikler/eide_taler/2013/eosutvalget_130128.html?id=712742|title=Innlegg på møte i Stortingets europautvalg|date=28 January 2013|access-date=1 April 2013|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway}}{{cite web|url=http://www.klassekampen.no/61007/article/item/null |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130413223348/http://www.klassekampen.no/61007/article/item/null |url-status=dead |archive-date=13 April 2013 |title=Eide: Bedre blir det ikke |date=21 December 2012 |access-date=1 April 2013 }}{{cite web|url=http://www.nationen.no/2012/12/08/politikk/eos-avtalen/eos/san_marino/eu/7845048/|title=Regjeringa open for diskutere EØS-medlemskap for mikrostatar|language=no|last=Aalberg Undheim|first=Eva|date=8 December 2012|access-date=6 April 2013}}{{cite web|url=http://www.latribunasammarinese.net/edizioni/2013/01-gennaio/03-01-2013boiw.pdf |title=La Norvegia chiude le porte a San Marino |date=3 January 2013 |access-date=6 April 2013 |publisher=La Tribuna Sammarinese |page=7 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307181930/http://www.latribunasammarinese.net/edizioni/2013/01-gennaio/03-01-2013boiw.pdf |archive-date=7 March 2014 }} Pascal Schafhauser, the Counsellor of the Liechtenstein Mission to the EU, said that Liechtenstein, another EFTA member state, was willing to discuss EEA membership for the microstates provided their joining did not impede the functioning of the organization. However, he suggested that the option direct membership in the EEA for the microstates, outside of both the EFTA and the EU, should be given consideration.

On 18 November 2013 the EU Commission published their report which concluded that "the participation of the small-sized countries in the EEA is not judged to be a viable option at present due to the political and institutional reasons", but that Association Agreements were a more feasible mechanism to integrate the microstates into the internal market, preferably via a single multilateral agreement with all three states (Andorra, Monaco & San Marino).{{cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0793|title=EU Relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco and the Republic of San Marino: Options for their participation in the Internal Market|date=2013-11-18|access-date=2024-01-28|publisher=European Commission}} In December 2014 the Council of the European Union approved negotiations being launched on such an agreement,{{cite web|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/er/146317.pdf|title=Council adopts mandate to negotiate association agreement(s) with Andorra, Monaco and San Marino|date=2014-12-16|access-date=2014-12-22|publisher=Council of the European Union}} and they began in March 2015.{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/avservices/video/player.cfm?ref=I100473|title=RECORDED HRVP Federica MOGHERINI host the ceremony on the occasion of the launching of the Association Agreement(s) negotiations with the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco and the Republic of San Marino|date=2015-03-18|access-date=2015-03-18|publisher=European Commission}} Negotiations had been planned to be concluded by 2020.{{cite web|url=http://www.mfa.gov.lv/en/news/latest-news/56632-foreign-minister-confirms-latvia-is-prepared-to-sign-a-double-taxation-avoidance-agreement-with-andorra|title=Foreign Minister confirms Latvia is prepared to sign a double taxation avoidance agreement with Andorra|date=2017-04-24|access-date=2017-05-11|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia}} In December 2023, the European Commission announced the conclusion of negotiations on a new Association Agreement between the EU and Andorra and San Marino;{{Cite web |date=12 December 2023 |title=The Commission welcomes the end of the negotiations for an Association Agreement with Andorra and San Marino |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6522 |access-date=2024-01-28 |website=European Commission}} negotiations with Monaco had been suspended in September 2023 due to disputes over financial regulation.{{Cite web |last=Brenton |first=Hannah |date=2023-09-15 |title=EU suspends trade talks with Monaco after financial watchdogs' warning |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-suspends-trade-talks-with-monaco-after-financial-watchdogs-warning/ |access-date=2024-01-28 |website=POLITICO |language=en}} The Commission formally put forward a proposal to the Council of the European Union in April 2024 to adopt decisions approving that the agreement be signed and concluded.{{cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_24_2286|title=Commission proposes Association Agreement with Andorra and San Marino to the Council|date=2024-04-26|accessdate=2024-05-19|publisher=European Commission}}

Andorran ambassador to Spain Jaume Gaytán stated in 2015 that he hoped that the new Association Agreement would include provisions to make the states associate members of the Schengen Agreement,{{cite web|url=http://thediplomatinspain.com/en-un-par-de-anos-andorra-podra-formar-parte-del-espacio-schengen/|title=En un par de años Andorra podrá formar parte del Espacio Schengen|access-date=26 October 2015|first=Alberto|last=Rubio|date=26 October 2015|archive-date=20 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020170939/http://thediplomatinspain.com/en-un-par-de-anos-andorra-podra-formar-parte-del-espacio-schengen/|url-status=dead}} though the final text did not include such provisions. However, on 30 May 2024 the Council of the European Union authorised the opening of negotiations for separate agreements between the European Union and Andorra and San Marino, respectively, in order to create a legal basis for the absence of border controls between these countries and the Schengen Area.{{cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401693|title=Council Decision (EU) 2024/1693 of 30 May 2024 authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra on several aspects in the field of border management|date=2024-06-14|accessdate=2024-07-06|publisher=European Commission}}{{cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401733|title=Council Decision (EU) 2024/1733 of 30 May 2024 authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Republic of San Marino on several aspects in the field of border management|date=2024-06-20|accessdate=2024-07-06|publisher=European Commission}}

Summary

=Integration level=

This table summarises the various components of EU laws applied in the microstates. Some territories of EU member states also have a special status in regard to EU laws applied as is the case with some European Free Trade Association members and their sovereign territories.

class="wikitable sortable" style="line-height:1.2"
valign="bottom"

! Microstates

! Association Agreement

! Eurozone{{cite web|title=The euro outside the euro area |publisher=Europa (web portal) |url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/world/outside_euro_area/index_en.htm |access-date=26 February 2011}}

! Schengen Area

! EU single market

! EU customs territory{{cite web|url=http://exporthelp.europa.eu/thdapp/display.htm?page=rt/rt_EUCustomsUnion.html&docType=main&languageId=EN|title=EU Customs Union|access-date=18 June 2015|publisher=European Commission|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150619052718/http://exporthelp.europa.eu/thdapp/display.htm?page=rt%2Frt_EUCustomsUnion.html&docType=main&languageId=EN|archive-date=19 June 2015|url-status=dead}}

! EU VAT area{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/common/travellers/within_eu/faq_1179_en.htm |title=Taxation and Customs Union - Within the EU |access-date=9 September 2012 |publisher=European Commission |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111165632/http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/common/travellers/within_eu/faq_1179_en.htm |archive-date=11 November 2012 }}

! Dublin Regulation

! Prüm Decisions

{{AND}} (relations)

|{{No|Negotiating}}

|{{Yes|Yes}}{{refn|name=euros|group=Note}}

|{{partial|Open border}}{{refn|Although not formally part of the Schengen area, has a de facto open border with France and Spain.{{cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401693|title=Council Decision (EU) 2024/1693 of 30 May 2024 authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra on several aspects in the field of border management|date=2024-06-14|accessdate=2024-07-06|publisher=European Commission}}{{cite web|url=http://www.exteriors.ad/en/travel-to-andorra|title=Travel to Andorra|access-date=3 October 2014|work=Government of Andorra}}{{cite web |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52012SC0388 |title=Obstacles to access by Andorra, Monaco and San Marino to the EU's Internal Market and Cooperation in other Areas |year=2012 |access-date=30 March 2013}}|group=Note}}

|{{No}}

|{{partial}}{{refn|Customs Union Agreement that eliminates barriers in trade between the country and the EU, as well as the adoption of the EU acquis on imports in regards to third countries; however there are certain exceptions and standard customs procedures still apply between the country and the EU.{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0388:FIN:EN:HTML|title=Obstacles to access by Andorra, Monaco and San Marino to the EU's Internal Market and Cooperation in other Areas|date=2012|access-date=30 March 2013}}{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/433906/vol1-part2.pdf |title=Part 2 - The European Community and accession of new member states |publisher=Government of the United Kingdom |access-date=19 June 2015 |archive-date=19 June 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150619052642/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/433906/vol1-part2.pdf |url-status=dead }}{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/rules_origin/customs_unions/article_412_en.htm |title=Andorra : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements |publisher=European Commission |access-date=12 September 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121026034312/http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/rules_origin/customs_unions/article_412_en.htm |archive-date=26 October 2012 }}{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/rules_origin/customs_unions/article_413_en.htm |title=San Marino : Customs Unions and preferential arrangements |publisher=European Commission |access-date=12 September 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121026034319/http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/rules_origin/customs_unions/article_413_en.htm |archive-date=26 October 2012 }}|name=CU|group=Note}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

{{LIE}} (relations)

|{{Yes}}{{refn|Agreement on the European Economic Area.|group=Note}}

|{{No}}{{refn|Uses the Swiss franc.|group=Note}}

|{{Yes}}

|{{Yes}}{{refn|Member state of the European Economic Area.|group=Note}}

|{{No}}{{refn|Customs union with Switzerland.{{cite web|url=http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp150_e.htm|title= Switzerland and Liechtenstein: December 2000|date=6 December 2000|access-date=16 September 2012|publisher=World Trade Organization}}|group=Note}}

|{{No}}

|{{Yes}}

|{{Yes}}{{cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/treaties-agreements/agreement/?id=2019021&DocLanguage=en|title=Agreement details|publisher=Council of the European Union|access-date=2019-07-19}}

{{MCO}} (relations)

|{{No|Negotiating}}

|{{Yes|Yes}}{{refn|Monetary agreement with the EU to issue euros.|name=euros|group=Note}}

|{{Partial|De facto}}{{refn|Although not a contracting party to the Schengen Agreement, has an open border with France and Schengen laws are administered as if it were a part of France.{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:41998D0019:EN:HTML|title= The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Executive Committee of 23 June 1998 on Monegasque residence permits|date=22 September 2000|access-date=9 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}|group=Note}}

|{{Partial}}{{refn|Through an agreement with France.[http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/11/st11/st11466.en11.pdf EU relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Republic of San Marino and the Principality of Monaco]: "If France adopts internal legislation transposing EU directives in certain areas covered by bilateral Agreements with Monaco, the Principality directly applies the French legislation in certain areas"|group=Note}}

|{{Yes}}{{refn|Through an agreement with France. Part of the EU Customs territory, administered as part of France.{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/common/faq/faq_1178_en.htm |title=Taxation and Customs - FAQ |publisher=European Commission |access-date=12 September 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120608000239/http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/common/faq/faq_1178_en.htm |archive-date=8 June 2012 }}{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1992:302:0001:0050:EN:PDF|title=Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code|journal=Official Journal of the European Union|date=19 October 1992|access-date=12 September 2012}}|name=france|group=Note}}

|{{Yes}}{{refn|Also part of the EU excise territory.{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/customs/procedural_aspects/general/sad/guide/1619-08annexi_en.pdf |title=Annex 1: Overview of European Union countries |publisher=European Commission |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140504214400/http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/customs/procedural_aspects/general/sad/guide/1619-08annexi_en.pdf |archive-date=4 May 2014 }}|group=Note}}{{refn|Through an agreement with France. Administered as a part of France for taxation purposes.{{cite journal|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:009:0012:0030:EN:PDF|title=COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC|date=14 January 2009|access-date=10 September 2012|journal=Official Journal of the European Union}}|group=Note}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

{{SMR}} (relations)

|{{No|Negotiating}}

|{{Yes|Yes}}{{refn|name=euros|group=Note}}

|{{partial|Open border}}{{refn|Although not formally part of the Schengen area, has a de facto open border with Italy.|name=italyborder|group=Note}}

|{{No}}

|{{partial}}{{refn|name=CU|group=Note}}

|{{No}}{{refn|Partially participates in the EU excise territory.|group=Note}}{{refn|Through an agreement with Italy. Administered as a part of Italy for taxation purposes.|group=Note}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

{{VAT}} (relations)

|{{No}}

|{{Yes|Yes}}{{refn|name=euros|group=Note}}

|{{partial|Open border}}{{refn|name=italyborder|group=Note}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

|{{No}}

==Notes==

{{Reflist|group="Note"|30em}}

=Size comparison=

This table provides a comparison between major statistics of the microstates to the smallest EU member states.

class="wikitable sortable" style="line-height:1.2"
valign="bottom"

! Microstates

! Relationship

! Population

! Area (km{{sup|2}})

! GDP (nom)

! HDI

{{AND}}

|Agreements

|79,877

|467

|$3.4 billion

|0.845

{{ISL}}

|EEA State

|376,248{{cite web|url=https://www.statice.is/statistics/population/inhabitants/overview/ |publisher=Statistics Iceland |access-date=17 August 2022|title=Statistics Iceland: Overview }}

|102,775{{cite web |url=http://www.ruv.is/frett/island-er-minna-en-talid-var |title=Ísland er minna en talið var |publisher=RÚV |date=26 February 2015 |access-date=10 March 2015 |language=is |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150315001109/http://www.ruv.is/frett/island-er-minna-en-talid-var |archive-date=15 March 2015 |url-status=dead}}

|$27.7 billion{{cite web |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October/weo-report?c=176,&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,&sy=2019&ey=2020&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1 |title=Iceland |publisher=International Monetary Fund}}

|0.959{{cite web|url=https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2021-22pdf_1.pdf|title=Human Development Report 2021/2022|language=en|publisher=United Nations Development Programme|date=8 September 2022|access-date=8 September 2022}}

{{LIE}}

|EEA State

|37,340

|160

|$5.3 billion

|0.908

{{LUX}}

|EU State

|672,050

|2,586

|$90.532 billion

|0.892

{{MLT}}

|EU State

|519,562

|316

|$17.15 billion

|0.839

{{MCO}}

|Agreements

|38,300

|2

|$7.672 billion

|n/a

{{SMR}}

|Agreements

|33,600

|61

|$1.62 billion

|n/a

{{VAT}}

|Agreements

|453

|0.44

|n/a

|n/a

See also

Notes

{{notelist}}

Further reading

  • {{cite journal

| first =Graham

| last =Butler

| date=2022

| title =The Legal Relations of the European Union with the Vatican City State and Holy See

| journal =European Foreign Affairs Review

| volume =27

| issue =2

| pages =263–282

| doi=10.54648/EERR2022022

| s2cid =252274803

| url= https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/European+Foreign+Affairs+Review/27.2/EERR2022022

}}

  • {{cite journal

| first =Graham

| last =Butler

| date=2023

| title =The Legal Relations of the European Union with the Principality of Monaco

| journal =European Foreign Affairs Review

| volume =28

| issue =3

| pages =259–282

| doi=10.54648/EERR2023021

| s2cid =264153080

| url= https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/European+Foreign+Affairs+Review/28.3/EERR2023021

| url-access =subscription

}}

  • {{cite journal

| first =Graham

| last =Butler

| date=2024

| title =The Legal Relations of the European Union with the Republic of San Marino

| journal =European Foreign Affairs Review

| volume =29

| issue =3

| pages =247–274

| doi=10.54648/eerr2024012

| s2cid =

| url= https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/European+Foreign+Affairs+Review/29.5/EERR2024012

}}

References

{{reflist}}

{{Foreign relations of the European Union 2}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Microstates and the European Union}}

*EU

European Union

European Union

European Union

European Union

Category:Third-country relations of the European Union

European Union