Ming Pao#Ming Pao Weekly Magazine Awards

{{Short description|Chinese-language newspaper from Hong Kong}}

{{EngvarB|date=April 2016}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2024}}

{{More citations needed|date=May 2007}}

{{Infobox newspaper

| name = Ming Pao
{{nobold|{{lang|zh-Hant|italic=no|明報}}}}

| logo = File:Ming Pao logo.svg

| logo_size = 175px

| image =

| caption =

| type = Daily newspaper

| format = Broadsheet

| owners = Media Chinese International

| publisher = Media Chinese International

| editor =

| chiefeditor =

| assoceditor =

| maneditor =

| newseditor =

| managingeditordesign =

| campuseditor =

| campuschief =

| opeditor =

| sportseditor =

| photoeditor =

| staff =

| foundation = 20 May 1959

| political =

| language = Chinese (in Traditional Chinese characters)

| ceased publication =

| headquarters =

| publishing_region = Hong Kong

| circulation =

| sister newspapers = {{ubl|Ming Pao Toronto|Ming Pao Vancouver|see Media Chinese International for full list}}

| ISSN =

| oclc =

| website = {{url|https://www.mingpao.com.hk/}}

| free = {{url|https://news.mingpao.com}}

}}

{{Infobox Chinese

| showflag = stp

| s = 明报

| t = 明報

| p = Míng Bào

| bpmf = ㄇㄧㄥˊ ㄅㄠˋ

| l = transparent newspaper

| mi = {{IPAc-cmn|m|ing|2|-|b|ao|4}}

| myr = Míng Bàu

| w = Ming2 Pao4

| j = Ming4 Bou3

| y = Mìhng Bou

| ci = {{IPA|yue|mȅŋ pōu|}}

}}

Ming Pao ({{zh|t=明報|link=no}}) is a Chinese-language newspaper published by Media Chinese International in Hong Kong. In the 1990s, Ming Pao established four overseas branches in North America; each provides independent reporting on local news and collects local advertisements. Currently, of the overseas editions, only the two Canadian editions remain: Ming Pao Toronto and Ming Pao Vancouver. In a 2022 survey from the Chinese University of Hong Kong sampling 994 local households, Ming Pao was listed as the second most credible paid newspaper in Hong Kong.{{cite web | title=Public Evaluation on Media Credibility | website=Centre for Communication and Public Opinion Survey | date=21 January 2023 | url=https://ccpos.com.cuhk.edu.hk/public-evaluation-on-media-credibility/ | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240427123834/https://ccpos.com.cuhk.edu.hk/public-evaluation-on-media-credibility/ | archive-date=27 April 2024 | url-status=live | access-date=3 May 2024}}{{cite web | title=Citizens' Evaluation of Media Credibility in Recent Years | website=ccpos.com.cuhk.edu.hk | date=30 April 2023 | url=https://ccpos.com.cuhk.edu.hk/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Public-Evaluation-on-Media-Credibility-2022.pdf | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230925024614/https://ccpos.com.cuhk.edu.hk/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Public-Evaluation-on-Media-Credibility-2022.pdf | archive-date=25 September 2023 | url-status=dead | access-date=3 May 2024}}

History

= Launch, early days =

Ming Pao was first published on 20 May 1959, and was founded by the famous Chinese Wuxia novelist Louis Cha, known better by his pseudonym Jin Yong (金庸), and his friend, Shen Pao Sing (沈寶新).

Daisy Li Yuet-Wah won an International Press Freedom Award from the Committee to Protect Journalists for her work with the paper in 1994.{{cite web|url=http://www.cpj.org/attacks96/frontmatter/ipfa.html |title=Journalists Receive 1996 Press Freedom Awards |year=1996 |publisher=Committee to Protect Journalists |access-date=28 May 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120605095952/https://www.cpj.org/attacks96/frontmatter/ipfa.html |archive-date=5 June 2012 }}

Before British Hong Kong's handover to the People's Republic of China by the United Kingdom in 1997, Ming Pao was considered hostile to the Chinese authority.{{Cite news|last=Kahn|first=Joseph|date=21 April 1997|title=Ming Pao Has Already Pushed The Dissidents Off Page One|language=en-US|work=The Wall Street Journal|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB861578605402810000|access-date=2020-05-26|issn=0099-9660|archive-date=31 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231132223/https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB861578605402810000|url-status=live}} When China reunited with Hong Kong, the controversial editors of Ming Pao turned favorable towards the Chinese government.{{cite web|url=https://cpj.org/reports/1997/09/soften.php|title=Hong Kong Newspaper Softens Its Voice|website=Cpj.org|date=22 April 1997|author=Joseph Kahn|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=16 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916202651/https://cpj.org/reports/1997/09/soften.php|url-status=live}}{{Cite journal|last1=LEE|first1=FRANCIS L.F.|last2=LIN|first2=ANGEL M.Y.|date=2006|title=Newspaper editorial discourse and the politics of self-censorship in Hong Kong|journal=Discourse & Society|volume=17|issue=3|pages=331–358|issn=0957-9265|jstor=42889054|doi=10.1177/0957926506062371|hdl=10722/92430|s2cid=53127938 |hdl-access=free}}

= Merger with Malaysia Sinchew and Nanyang Groups =

{{see also|Media Chinese International }}

In October 1995, the publisher of Ming Pao, Ming Pao Enterprise was taken over by Tiong Hiew King (Chinese: 張曉卿). On 29 January 2007, Tiong released a proposal to merge the three media groups – Sin Chew Media Corporation Berhad (Malaysia), Nanyang Press Holdings Berhad (Malaysia) and Ming Pao Enterprise Corporation Limited (Hong Kong). The merged group, named Media Chinese International Limited was dual-listed on the main boards of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and the Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad in April 2008. All of the existing groups retain their existing publications and independent operations.

The website of Ming Pao was set up in 1995, one of the earliest newspaper websites in Hong Kong.{{Cite web|url=http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200303/01/0301106.htm|title=Ten websites honoured for providing healthy contents|website=www.info.gov.hk|access-date=2017-04-20|archive-date=21 April 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170421093311/http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200303/01/0301106.htm|url-status=live}}

Since April 2008, Ming Pao is published by Ming Pao Newspapers Limited, a subsidiary of Media Chinese International Limited.

International development

{{see also|Ming Pao Daily News (Canada)}}

Ming Pao set up a Toronto office{{cite web|title=Ming Pao Canada Website|url=http://www.mingpaocanada.com/Tor/htm/Responsive/info.cfm?ty=about_ch|website=Ming Pao (Canada)|access-date=30 April 2015|archive-date=23 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150423141229/http://www.mingpaocanada.com/Tor/htm/Responsive/info.cfm?ty=about_ch|url-status=live}} in Canada in May 1993 to publish the Ming Pao Eastern Edition ({{zh|t=明報(加東版)|first=t}}), then set up a Vancouver office in October the same year for the Ming Pao Western Edition ({{zh|t=明報(加西版)|first=t}}).

In April 1997, the group set up a New York office and started publishing the Ming Pao US East Coast Edition ({{zh|t=明報(美東版)|first=t}}). The journal launched in the San Francisco Bay Area in April 2004 with a print run of 25,000, the sixth Chinese newspapers to be distributed in the region.{{cite web|url=http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2004%2F08%2F03%2FBAGI781MM91.DTL|title=SAN FRANCISCO / Newspaper war in the Bay Area / Ming Pao becomes 6th Chinese-language daily|website=Sfgate.com|date=3 August 2004|author=Vanessa Hua|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=16 May 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120516065222/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2004%2F08%2F03%2FBAGI781MM91.DTL|url-status=live}} In 2007, the office also published the New York Free Newspaper ({{zh|t=紐約免費報|first=t}}).

Ming Pao New York and Ming Pao San Francisco ceased operations on 31 January and 14 February 2009, respectively. The closing of NY operations was a symbol of the weakening of ethnic newspapers of the region.{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/nyregion/23ethnic.html|title=Plan to Close Chinese-Language Paper Deepens a Shadow Over the Ethnic Press|website=The New York Times|date=22 January 2009|author=Kirk Semple|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=16 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916202555/https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/nyregion/23ethnic.html|url-status=live}} The group merged the resources of Ming Pao New York and the New York Free Newspaper to create Ming Pao Daily Free News (New York) ({{zh|t=明報(紐約)免費報|first=t}}), serving the Chinese community along the US East Coast.

Controversies

= Accusations of Chinese Communist Party influence =

A 2001 report on Chinese media censorship by the Jamestown Foundation cited Ming Pao as one of the four major Chinese newspapers in the United States directly or indirectly controlled by Beijing.Duzhe, Mei. China Brief Vol1, Issue 10. [http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=28481&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=191&no_cache=1#.Vqaf_RgrKvN "How China's Government is Attempting to Control Chinese Media in America"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160206174939/http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=28481&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=191&no_cache=1#.Vqaf_RgrKvN|date=6 February 2016}} "Jamestown Foundation." 2001 "Employees at Ming Pao's New York office have told sources that their 'true boss' is none other than the Chinese Consulate [in New York], and that they are obligated to do whatever the Consulate asks," it said.

A 2006 study of Ming Pao editorials noted a tendency toward self-censorship concerning criticism toward Beijing. According to a 2013 report by the Center for International Media Assistance, this came after a number of newspapers, including Ming Pao Daily, were bought by business tycoons with interests in China and close ties to mainland officials before and after the handover of Hong Kong in 1997.{{cite web |last=Cook |first=Sarah |date=22 October 2013 |title=The Long Shadow of Chinese Censorship: How the Communist Party's Media Restrictions Affect News Outlets Around the World |url=http://cima.ned.org/sites/default/files/CIMA-China_Sarah%20Cook.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140209121944/http://cima.ned.org/sites/default/files/CIMA-China_Sarah%20Cook.pdf |archive-date=9 February 2014 |access-date=1 October 2017 |publisher=Center for International Media Assistancee |page=25}}

= Assault on former chief editor Kevin Lau =

{{main|Knife attack on Kevin Lau}}

Kevin Lau, who had been chief editor of the journal until January 2014, was attacked in the morning of 26 February 2014 in Sai Wan Ho, Hong Kong. He was seriously injured in a targeted knife attack. It was widely speculated that the attack may have been driven by political motivation, and related to its role in investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) into the offshore assets of China's leaders, including relatives of Communist Party general secretary Xi Jinping, former Premier Wen Jiabao, and several members of the National People's CongressMitra-Thakur, Sofia (28 February 2014). [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/hong-kong-former-editor-kevin-lau-chunto-stabbed-in-triadstyle-hit-9161357.html "Hong Kong: Former editor Kevin Lau Chun-to stabbed in triad-style hit "] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150925184100/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/hong-kong-former-editor-kevin-lau-chunto-stabbed-in-triadstyle-hit-9161357.html |date=25 September 2015 }}. The Independent.Mullany, Gerry (25 February 2014). [http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/25/hong-kong-editor-whose-ouster-stirred-protests-is-reported-stabbed/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0 "Hong Kong Editor Whose Ouster Stirred Protests Is Slashed"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205120454/http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/25/hong-kong-editor-whose-ouster-stirred-protests-is-reported-stabbed/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0 |date=5 February 2015 }}. The New York Times Journalists and press of the world saw the attack as an attack on press freedom. Thousands of people, led by leading journalists, attended a rally to denounce violence and intimidation of the media.Siu, Beatrice (3 March 2014). [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=143071&sid=41713438&con_type=3&d_str=20140303&fc=10 "Pressing the point"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205120956/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=11&art_id=143071&sid=41713438&con_type=3&d_str=20140303&fc=10 |date=5 February 2015 }}. The Standard.

During the court hearings of the two suspects, one declared that he was looking to get a $100,000 reward with this attack.{{cite web|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-crime/article/1842786/hitmen-offered-hk100000-each-chop-former-ming-pao-chief|title=Knifemen offered HK$100,000 each to attack former Ming Pao chief editor Kevin Lau, court hears|website=Scmp.com|date=23 July 2015|author=Julie Chu|access-date=16 September 2018|archive-date=16 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180916164140/https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-crime/article/1842786/hitmen-offered-hk100000-each-chop-former-ming-pao-chief|url-status=live}}

= Appointment of Chong Tien Siong =

In 2014, the appointment of new chief editor Chong Tien Siong sparked controversy and internal revolt, due to Siong's close ties to Beijing, and was seen as a major threat to the Chinese-language newspaper's editorial independence.Lam, Jeffie & Lau, Stewart. 21 January 2014 [http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1410017/controversial-new-boss-chong-tien-siong-may-join-ming-pao-2-weeks “Controversial new boss Chong Tien Siong may join Ming Pao in 2 weeks”] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303211145/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1410017/controversial-new-boss-chong-tien-siong-may-join-ming-pao-2-weeks |date=3 March 2016 }} South China Morning Post

= Censorship of 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre =

Ming Pao was subject to controversy in 2015 after editor-in-chief Chong Tien-siong ordered that a story detailing the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre be replaced with a story about Chinese Internet giant Alibaba as a "role model for young, would-be entrepreneurs". Chum Shun-kin said the story that was pulled contained details about the history of the massacre, including eyewitness accounts of the killing of civilians and information from diplomatic cables from Canada. The pulling of the Tiananmen story has been criticised by some, including Civic Party lawmaker Claudia Mo who said that Chong appears to "want to shield Beijing from embarrassment, instead of acting in the interests of the public and protecting their right to information".{{cite web|title=Removal of Tiananmen Crackdown Story Prompts Questions in Hong Kong|url=http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/story-02032015105301.html|website=Radio Free Asia|access-date=11 February 2015|archive-date=11 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150211234610/http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/story-02032015105301.html|url-status=live}}

Hong Kong Journalists Association spokeswoman Shum Yee-lan called on Chong to "communicate" with his own staff.

= Termination of chief editor Keung Kwok-yuen =

The journal's executive chief editor, Keung Kwok-yuen ({{zh|t=姜國元|link=no}}), was abruptly terminated on 20 April 2016, the same day that a report based on the Panama Papers was published on its front page. Management said that the paper's turnover had been falling in since last year and the Keung had been laid off with immediate effect due to difficult operating conditions.{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-36098809|title=Hong Kong journalists' shock at Ming Pao editor's sacking|newspaper=BBC News|date=21 April 2016|access-date=21 June 2018|archive-date=18 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180918054414/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-36098809|url-status=live}} The timing of Keung's removal led to speculation that the Panama Papers report, which connected a number of influential individuals in the territory to tax havens abroad, may have been considered sensitive, thus being the real reason for the dismissal.

Keung had written several weeks earlier about the suppression of Ten Years, a dystopian film about Hong Kong in the year 2025 that was banned in mainland China. Staff and the union publicly denounced editor-in-chief Chong Tien Siong's decision to "punish editorial staff who have different opinions", and questioned the cost reduction pretext as an excuse.{{cite web |url=http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/Policy-Politics/HK-freedoms-under-spotlight-as-Ming-Pao-sacks-editor |date=21 April 2016 |title=HK freedoms under spotlight as Ming Pao sacks editor |author=LO, Jennifer |access-date=26 April 2016 |archive-date=24 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160424145951/http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/Policy-Politics/HK-freedoms-under-spotlight-as-Ming-Pao-sacks-editor |url-status=live }} Journalists at Ming Pao manifested the concern felt by the media at large, several of them protested by filed blank space reports in an edition the Sunday following the dismissal.{{cite web |url=http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=73955 |title=Columnists continue Ming Pao protest |date=25 April 2016 |website=The Standard |access-date=26 April 2016 |archive-date=1 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160601131141/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/breaking-news.php?id=73955 |url-status=live }}{{cite web|url=http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1938021/hong-kong-daily-ming-pao-runs-blank-columns-protest-sacking|title=Hong Kong daily Ming Pao runs blank columns in protest at sacking of top editor|date=24 April 2016|work=South China Morning Post|access-date=26 April 2016|archive-date=27 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160427081104/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/1938021/hong-kong-daily-ming-pao-runs-blank-columns-protest-sacking|url-status=live}}

=Editorials for 2019 anti-extradition bill protests=

On 13–14 June 2019, Ming Pao published editorials to define the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests as a riot ({{zh|t=暴動|link=no}}), blaming the violence of the protesters.{{cite news|url=https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%E7%A4%BE%E8%A9%95/article/20190613/s00003/1560365273945/%E7%A4%BE%E8%A9%95-%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B%E7%84%A1%E8%A3%9C%E6%96%BC%E4%BA%8B-%E5%94%AF%E7%9B%BC%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%B9%B3%E5%AE%89|script-title=zh:暴力無補於事 唯盼香港平安|type=editorial|date=13 June 2019|access-date=14 June 2019|newspaper=Ming Pao|publisher=Media Chinese International|language=zh-hk|archive-date=13 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190613220256/https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%e7%a4%be%e8%a9%95/article/20190613/s00003/1560365273945/%e7%a4%be%e8%a9%95-%e6%9a%b4%e5%8a%9b%e7%84%a1%e8%a3%9c%e6%96%bc%e4%ba%8b-%e5%94%af%e7%9b%bc%e9%a6%99%e6%b8%af%e5%b9%b3%e5%ae%89|url-status=live}}{{cite news|url=https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%e7%a4%be%e8%a9%95/article/20190614/s00003/1560451177698/%e7%a4%be%e8%a9%95-%e6%94%bf%e5%ba%9c%e4%bf%ae%e4%be%8b%e5%bc%b7%e6%8b%94%e5%bf%83%e4%b8%ad%e5%88%ba-%e7%ae%a1%e6%b2%bb%e5%a4%b1%e6%95%88%e4%bb%a3%e5%83%b9%e9%9b%a3%e5%bd%8c%e8%a3%9c|script-title=zh:政府修例強拔心中刺 管治失效代價難彌補|date=14 June 2019|access-date=14 June 2019|newspaper=Ming Pao|publisher=Media Chinese International|language=zh-hk|type=editorial|archive-date=11 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811115104/https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%25E7%25A4%25BE%25E8%25A9%2595/article/20190614/s00003/1560451177698/%25E7%25A4%25BE%25E8%25A9%2595-%25E6%2594%25BF%25E5%25BA%259C%25E4%25BF%25AE%25E4%25BE%258B%25E5%25BC%25B7%25E6%258B%2594%25E5%25BF%2583%25E4%25B8%25AD%25E5%2588%25BA-%25E7%25AE%25A1%25E6%25B2%25BB%25E5%25A4%25B1%25E6%2595%2588%25E4%25BB%25A3%25E5%2583%25B9%25E9%259B%25A3%25E5%25BD%258C%25E8%25A3%259C|url-status=live}} However, on 14 June, the instant news section of mingpao.com, the web portal of the publisher, published a statement to declare that the editorial represents the newspaper, but not the frontier staff of the publisher.{{cite news|url=https://news.mingpao.com/ins/%e6%b8%af%e8%81%9e/article/20190614/s00001/1560469019200/%e6%98%8e%e5%a0%b1%e8%81%b2%e6%98%8e|script-title=zh:明報聲明 (07:35)|date=14 June 2019|department=instant news section|website=mingpao.com|publisher=Media Chinese International|language=zh-hk|access-date=14 June 2019|archive-date=14 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614110714/https://news.mingpao.com/ins/%e6%b8%af%e8%81%9e/article/20190614/s00001/1560469019200/%e6%98%8e%e5%a0%b1%e8%81%b2%e6%98%8e|url-status=live}} The translator of the editorial refused to translate the article to English as well as any editorials in the future in protest.{{cite news|url=https://thestandnews.com/politics/6-12-%E4%BD%94%E9%A0%98-%E6%98%8E%E5%A0%B1-%E7%A4%BE%E8%A9%95%E5%AE%9A%E6%80%A7%E7%82%BA-%E6%9A%B4%E5%8B%95-%E7%BF%BB%E8%AD%AF%E8%80%85%E6%8B%92%E8%AD%AF%E6%88%90%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87-%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E8%B2%BC%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%97%E5%A0%B1%E8%A1%A8%E4%B8%8D%E6%BB%BF/|script-title=zh:【6.12 佔領】不滿社評定性為「暴動」 翻譯者拒為《明報》譯英文 職員貼標語:社評不代表員工|date=13 June 2019|access-date=14 June 2019|work=The Stand News|language=zh-hk|archive-date=14 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614033316/https://thestandnews.com/politics/6-12-%E4%BD%94%E9%A0%98-%E6%98%8E%E5%A0%B1-%E7%A4%BE%E8%A9%95%E5%AE%9A%E6%80%A7%E7%82%BA-%E6%9A%B4%E5%8B%95-%E7%BF%BB%E8%AD%AF%E8%80%85%E6%8B%92%E8%AD%AF%E6%88%90%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87-%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E8%B2%BC%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%97%E5%A0%B1%E8%A1%A8%E4%B8%8D%E6%BB%BF/|url-status=live}}

On 17 June 2019, Ming Pao published an open letter written by some of its employees criticizing the 13 June editorial for being biased towards the establishment and damaging the reputation of the newspaper.{{cite news|url=https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%E8%A7%80%E9%BB%9E/article/20190617/s00012/1560711181259/%E4%B8%80%E7%BE%A4%E3%80%8A%E6%98%8E%E5%A0%B1%E3%80%8B%E5%93%A1%E5%B7%A5-%E5%81%8F%E8%A2%92%E6%94%BF%E6%AC%8A%E6%AF%81%E6%90%8D%E5%A0%B1%E6%A0%BC-%E8%AD%B0%E4%BA%8B%E9%A0%88%E6%8C%81%E5%85%AC%E7%BE%A9%E8%89%AF%E7%9F%A5-%E4%B8%80%E7%BE%A4%E3%80%8A%E6%98%8E%E5%A0%B1%E3%80%8B%E5%93%A1%E5%B7%A5%E5%8F%8D%E5%B0%8D%E3%80%8C6-13%E7%A4%BE%E8%A9%95%E3%80%8D%E5%85%AC%E9%96%8B%E4%BF%A1|script-title=zh:偏袒政權毁損報格 議事須持公義良知—— 一群《明報》員工反對「6.13社評」公開信|type=editorial|date=17 June 2019|access-date=29 June 2019|newspaper=Ming Pao|publisher=Media Chinese International|language=zh-hk|archive-date=24 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190824121643/https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%E8%A7%80%E9%BB%9E/article/20190617/s00012/1560711181259/%E4%B8%80%E7%BE%A4%E3%80%8A%E6%98%8E%E5%A0%B1%E3%80%8B%E5%93%A1%E5%B7%A5-%E5%81%8F%E8%A2%92%E6%94%BF%E6%AC%8A%E6%AF%81%E6%90%8D%E5%A0%B1%E6%A0%BC-%E8%AD%B0%E4%BA%8B%E9%A0%88%E6%8C%81%E5%85%AC%E7%BE%A9%E8%89%AF%E7%9F%A5-%E4%B8%80%E7%BE%A4%E3%80%8A%E6%98%8E%E5%A0%B1%E3%80%8B%E5%93%A1%E5%B7%A5%E5%8F%8D%E5%B0%8D%E3%80%8C6-13%E7%A4%BE%E8%A9%95%E3%80%8D%E5%85%AC%E9%96%8B%E4%BF%A1|url-status=live}}

See also

References

{{reflist}}