Misinformation related to abortion

• "Abortion is a dangerous procedure": When performed by trained providers in developed countries, abortion is among the safest procedures in medicine.{{cite journal |last1=Grimes |first1=David A. |last2=Benson |first2=Janie |last3=Singh |first3=Susheela |last4=Romero |first4=Mariana |last5=Ganatra |first5=Bela |last6=Okonofua |first6=Friday E. |last7=Shah |first7=Iqbal H. |title=Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic |journal=The Lancet |date=25 November 2006 |volume=368 |issue=9550 |pages=1908–1919 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6 |pmid=17126724 |quote=Unsafe abortion is a persistent, preventable pandemic.{{nbsp}}[...] By contrast, legal abortion in industrialised nations has emerged as one of the safest procedures in contemporary medical practice, with minimum morbidity and a negligible risk of death.}}{{cite journal |last1=Grimes |first1=David A. |last2=Creinin |first2=Mitchell D. |title=Induced Abortion: An Overview for Internists |journal=Annals of Internal Medicine |date=20 April 2004 |volume=140 |issue=8 |pages=620–626 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-140-8-200404200-00009 |pmid=15096333 |quote=Abortion is one of the safest procedures in contemporary practice.}}{{Cite web |title=Abortion |url=https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion |date= 17 May 2024 |access-date=2025-03-27 |website=World Health Organization |language=en |quote=Abortion is a common health intervention. It is very safe when carried out using a method recommended by WHO, appropriate to the pregnancy duration and by someone with the necessary skills.}}{{Cite news |last=Kodjak |first=Alison |date=2018-03-16 |title=Landmark Report Concludes Abortion In U.S. Is Safe |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/03/16/593447727/landmark-report-concludes-abortion-is-safe |access-date=2025-03-27 |work=NPR |language=en}} The complications related to childbirth are more common and serious than the complications related to abortion.{{cite web |title=What facts about abortion do I need to know? |url=https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/considering-abortion/what-facts-about-abortion-do-i-need-know |access-date=30 September 2023 |website=www.plannedparenthood.org |language=en}}{{Cite report |title=The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States |author1=((National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine)) |date=2018-03-16 |doi=10.17226/24950 |publisher=The National Academies Press |place=Washington, D.C. |page=11 |isbn=978-0-309-46818-3 |quote=Legal abortions—whether by medication, aspiration, D&E, or induction—are safe. Serious complications are rare and occur far less frequently than during childbirth.}}
• "Abortion is a rare procedure": Abortion is a very common procedure with over 73 million of them taking place per year worldwide. Approximately 60% of all unintended pregnancies end in an induced abortion.{{Cite web |date=2020-06-10 |title=Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion Worldwide {{!}} Guttmacher Institute |url=https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-worldwide |access-date=2025-03-27 |website=www.guttmacher.org |language=en}} In the United States, nearly 1 in 4 women will have undergone an abortion before 45 years of age.{{Cite web |last1=Guttmacher Institute |last2=Wind |first2=Rebecca |date=2017-10-18 |title=Abortion Is a Common Experience for U.S. Women, Despite Dramatic Declines in Rates {{!}} Guttmacher Institute |url=https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2017/abortion-common-experience-us-women-despite-dramatic-declines-rates |access-date=2025-03-27 |website=www.guttmacher.org |language=en}}{{Cite web |last=Mundell |first=Ernie |date=2024-04-30 |title=1 in 4 U.S. Women Will Have an Abortion in Their Lifetime |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2024-04-30/1-in-4-u-s-women-will-have-an-abortion-in-their-lifetime |website=US News}} Each year, hundreds of thousands of more abortions happen in the US than other surgeries like appendicectomy or hysterectomy.{{cite web |title=We polled 1,060 Americans about abortion. This is what they got wrong. What Americans think about abortion |url=https://www.vox.com/a/abortion-statistics-opinions-2016/poll |access-date=30 September 2023 |website=Vox.com}}
• "Abortion pills are unsafe": Medical abortion is both safe and effective for when taken as directed by regulated healthcare bodies.{{cite web |title=Gendered Health Misinformation |url=https://meedan.com/report/gendered-health-misinformation |access-date=30 September 2023 |website=meedan.com |language=en}}{{Cite web |last=Branstetter |first=Ziva |date=2024-09-16 |title=How Do Abortion Pills Work? Answers to Frequently Asked Questions. |url=https://www.propublica.org/article/abortion-pills-safety-questions-answered |access-date=2025-04-02 |website=ProPublica |language=en}} The risk of death for medication abortion is about fourteen times less than the risk of giving birth.{{Cite web |last=NY Dept of Health |title=Medication Abortion |url=https://www.health.ny.gov/publications/26005.pdf |website=NY State Department of Health}}
• "Undergoing abortion increases the risk for breast cancer": Neither induced abortions nor miscarriages raise the risk of breast cancer.{{Cite journal |last=Tanne |first=Janice Hopkins |date=2007-05-05 |title=Abortion does not raise risk of breast cancer, US study finds |url=https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.39199.487789.DB |journal=BMJ |language=en |volume=334 |issue=7600 |pages=923.1–923 |doi=10.1136/bmj.39199.487789.DB |issn=0959-8138 |pmc=1865434}}{{Cite web |title=Abortion and Cancer Risk {{!}} Abortion and Breast Cancer Risk |url=https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/medical-treatments/abortion-and-breast-cancer-risk.html |access-date=2025-04-05 |website=American Cancer Society |language=en|quote=Higher-quality studies have generally found no link between abortions and breast cancer risk. Researchers have also found flaws in previous studies that reported abortion may raise a woman’s risk for breast cancer. The best scientific evidence does not support a link between abortion and breast cancer risk.}}{{cite journal |last1=Rowlands |first1=Sam |title=Misinformation on abortion |journal=The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care |date=2011 |volume=16 |issue=4 |pages=233–240 |doi=10.3109/13625187.2011.570883 |pmid=21557713 |s2cid=13500769 |url=http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/066f/7b25549bcca2ee95d0818b2020653620ccdf.pdf |access-date=30 September 2023 |archive-date=17 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190217170124/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/066f/7b25549bcca2ee95d0818b2020653620ccdf.pdf |url-status=live}}{{Cite journal |last1=Tong |first1=Huazhang |last2=Wu |first2=Yifan |last3=Yan |first3=Yin |last4=Dong |first4=Yonghai |last5=Guan |first5=Xihong |last6=Liu |first6=Yun |last7=Lu |first7=ZhiHui |date=May 2020 |title=No association between abortion and risk of breast cancer among nulliparous women: Evidence from a meta-analysis |journal=Medicine |volume=99 |issue=19 |pages=e20251 |doi=10.1097/MD.0000000000020251 |issn=1536-5964 |pmc=7220471 |pmid=32384520}}
• "Abortion will result in negative mental health outcomes": There is no increased risk of mental health problems compared to women who deliver an unwanted pregnancy.{{cite journal |last1=Rowlands |first1=Sam |date=2011 |title=Misinformation on abortion |url=http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/066f/7b25549bcca2ee95d0818b2020653620ccdf.pdf |url-status= |journal=The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care |volume=16 |issue=4 |pages=233–240 |doi=10.3109/13625187.2011.570883 |pmid=21557713 |s2cid=13500769 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190217170124/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/066f/7b25549bcca2ee95d0818b2020653620ccdf.pdf |archive-date=2019-02-17 |access-date=2023-09-30}} (See Abortion and mental health)
• "There is an increased risk of fertility problems after abortion": Most women will not experience infertility or problematic pregnancies after undergoing an abortion.{{Cite web |title=Elective abortion: Does it affect subsequent pregnancies? |url=https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/getting-pregnant/expert-answers/abortion/faq-20058551 |access-date=2025-03-27 |website=Mayo Clinic |language=en}} Abortion does not substantially increase the risk of infertility, pregnancy-related hypertension, or most other complications in future pregnancies. Higher risks of very preterm birth may occur if there were multiple prior aspiration abortions or if conception happens within six months after an abortion.{{Citation |last1=National Academies of Sciences |first1=Engineering |title=Long-Term Health Effects |date=2018-03-16 |work=The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507237/ |access-date=2025-03-27 |publisher=National Academies Press (US) |language=en |last2=Division |first2=Health and Medicine |last3=Services |first3=Board on Health Care |last4=Practice |first4=Board on Population Health and Public Health |last5=U.s |first5=Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the}}
• "All embryos and fetuses can feel pain": The prevailing viewpoint among most medical organizations is that fetal pain is not possible in embryos or fetuses younger than 24 weeks of gestation due to the connection between the thalamus and cortex of the brain of the fetus not being fully developed until the 24th week of gestation.{{Cite journal |last=Bellieni |first=Carlo V. |date=2019-08-01 |title=New insights into fetal pain |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1744165X19300319 |journal=Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine |series=PAIN MANAGEMENT IN THE NEONATE |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=101001 |doi=10.1016/j.siny.2019.04.001 |pmid=31160226 |issn=1744-165X|url-access=subscription }}{{Cite web |last=ACOG |title=Fetal Pain |url=https://www.acog.org/advocacy/facts-are-important/gestational-development-capacity-for-pain |access-date=2025-04-07 |website=American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists |language=en}}
• "Herbal medicine can help provide safe abortion": There is no sufficient scientific evidence showing any herbal products being able to provide safe abortion. In fact, use of some herbs for abortion might cause serious health problems. Additionally, if the abortion effort was unsuccessful, some herbal medication can cause lasting damage to the fetus if it is brought to term.

Digital platforms have often been a source of misinformation regarding abortion. A 2014 investigation into the websites of crisis pregnancy centers revealed that 80% of these sites disseminated inaccurate information, frequently perpetuating unfounded myths about the health risks associated with abortion.{{cite journal |last1=Bryant |first1=Amy G. |last2=Narasimhan |first2=Subasri |last3=Bryant-Comstock |first3=Katelyn |last4=Levi |first4=Erika E. |date=December 2014 |title=Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation |url=https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.contraception.2014.07.003 |journal=Contraception |volume=90 |issue=6 |pages=601–605 |doi=10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003 |pmid=25091391 |access-date=30 September 2023|url-access=subscription }} An additional study that analyzed data for 36 crisis pregnancy center websites in North Carolina found that 31 out of 36 made misinformation available to those accessing their site.

File:Lincoln Nebraska crisis pregnancy center on 48th Street image 2.jpg

Another study analyzing the first five results from Google searches related to abortion medication found the majority of these pages propagated similar misinformation. Common inaccuracies on these web pages include claims that abortion medication can lead to mental illness, adversely affect fertility, or elevate mortality risk, despite none of those things being backed up by science.{{cite journal |last1=Pleasants |first1=Elizabeth |last2=Guendelman |first2=Sylvia |last3=Weidert |first3=Karen |last4=Prata |first4=Ndola |date=21 January 2021 |title=Quality of top webpages providing abortion pill information for Google searches in the USA: An evidence-based webpage quality assessment |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=e0240664 |bibcode=2021PLoSO..1640664P |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0240664 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=7819599 |pmid=33476340 |doi-access=free}}

A report from the Guttmacher Institute showed that information presented in the state health departments of the United States sometimes contain inaccurate or incomplete information, including out-of-date and biased information.{{cite web |date=9 November 2015 |title=Misinformed Consent: The Medical Accuracy of State-Developed Abortion Counseling Materials |url=https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2006/10/misinformed-consent-medical-accuracy-state-developed-abortion-counseling-materials |access-date=30 September 2023 |website=Guttmacher Institute |language=en}} The same report and another study showed that an overwhelming majority of the crisis pregnancy centers provided misleading information related to abortion.{{cite journal |last1=Bryant |first1=Amy G. |last2=Narasimhan |first2=Subasri |last3=Bryant-Comstock |first3=Katelyn |last4=Levi |first4=Erika E. |date=December 2014 |title=Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25091391/ |journal=Contraception |volume=90 |issue=6 |pages=601–605 |doi=10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003 |issn=1879-0518 |pmid=25091391 |access-date=30 September 2023}} Conducting an analysis of crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina found that they offered misinformation on abortions concerning their connections to health problems, including breast cancer, to women that visited.{{Cite journal |last1=Bryant |first1=Amy G. |last2=Levi |first2=Erika E. |date=2012-12-01 |title=Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina |url=https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(12)00415-5/abstract |journal=Contraception |language=English |volume=86 |issue=6 |pages=752–756 |doi=10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.001 |issn=0010-7824 |pmid=22770790|url-access=subscription }} 26% of the North Carolina crisis pregnancy centers analyzed in the study supplied misleading information between abortion and infertility, along with abortion and issues pertaining to mental health.

Reproductive healthcare topics, including abortion, have been confined online in terms of what content can be shared surrounding the topics.{{Cite journal |last1=John |first1=Jennifer N. |last2=Gorman |first2=Sara |last3=Scales |first3=David |last4=Gorman |first4=Jack |date=2025-04-01 |title=Online Misleading Information About Women's Reproductive Health: A Narrative Review |journal=Journal of General Internal Medicine |language=en |volume=40 |issue=5 |pages=1123–1131 |doi=10.1007/s11606-024-09118-6 |issn=1525-1497 |pmc=11968640 |pmid=39511120}} A narrative review of preexisting literature found that 1/3 of misinformation related to associations with unattributed risks, 23% of recommendations were not akin to professional advice, and 14% encouraged the use of alternative methods for medicine.{{Cite journal |last1=John |first1=Jennifer N. |last2=Gorman |first2=Sara |last3=Scales |first3=David |last4=Gorman |first4=Jack |date=2025-04-01 |title=Online Misleading Information About Women's Reproductive Health: A Narrative Review |journal=Journal of General Internal Medicine |language=en |volume=40 |issue=5 |pages=1123–1131 |doi=10.1007/s11606-024-09118-6 |issn=1525-1497 |pmc=11968640 |pmid=39511120}}

A study showed that 36.5% of the posts related to abortion on Instagram contained misinformation. Out of the misinformation posts containing medical information, 84.2% were anti-abortion. Around 97% of misinformation posts were created by non-medical providers.{{cite journal |last1=Potter |first1=Kaylee |last2=Bauer |first2=Callie Cox |last3=Laiwalla |first3=Rahim |last4=Lanza |first4=Shannon |date=May 2023 |title=A Look at Social Media and Misinformation in Regard to Abortion [ID: 1379920] |url=https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2023/05001/A_Look_at_Social_Media_and_Misinformation_in.311.aspx# |journal=Obstetrics & Gynecology |volume=141 |issue=5S |pages=91S |doi=10.1097/01.AOG.0000931104.72428.c0 |issn=0029-7844 |s2cid=258767793 |access-date=30 September 2023|url-access=subscription }}

Facebook ads for abortion reversal, an unproven and unsafe medical procedure, deliberately targeted women and girls as young as 13 and have been shown to Facebook users up to 18.4 million times. Google also placed ads for abortion reversal in as much as 83% of the searches related to abortion.{{cite web |title=Endangering Women for Profit |url=https://counterhate.com/research/endangering-women-for-profit/ |website=Center for Countering Digital Hate {{!}} CCDH |access-date=30 September 2023}}

Misinformation related to abortion among healthcare professionals and legislators may lead to abortion legislation being written vaguely or inaccurately.{{Cite journal |last1=Pagoto |first1=Sherry L |last2=Palmer |first2=Lindsay |last3=Horwitz-Willis |first3=Nate |date=May 2023 |title=The Next Infodemic: Abortion Misinformation |journal=Journal of Medical Internet Research |language=en |volume=25 |pages=e42582 |doi=10.2196/42582 |issn=1438-8871 |pmc=10196890 |pmid=37140975 |doi-access=free}}{{Cite web |date=2024-10-24 |title=How Abortion Misinformation Gives Rise to Restrictive Abortion Laws - KFF Health Misinformation Monitor - |url=https://www.kff.org/health-misinformation-monitor/how-abortion-misinformation-gives-rise-to-restrictive-abortion-laws/ |access-date=2025-01-01 |website=KFF |language=en-US}} The recent overturning of Roe v. Wade has impacted abortion laws in the states, thus making it unknown how those experiencing unanticipated complications, or serious cases of unwanted pregnancies, will be treated in certain geographical areas and whether they will have the ability to receive an abortion.{{Cite journal |last1=Whitby |first1=Orin G. |last2=Korte |first2=Kealy |last3=Terry |first3=Sharon F. |date=August 2022 |title=Impacts of Overturning Roe v. Wade on Reproductive Health Care |url=https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/gtmb.2022.0159 |journal=Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers |volume=26 |issue=7–8 |pages=349–350 |doi=10.1089/gtmb.2022.0159 |pmid=36027037 |issn=1945-0265|url-access=subscription }} Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, reproductive care, prenatal care, and fetal care, among other maternal care methods, could be affected in certain states depending on news laws being implemented. In part due to misinformation related to abortion, in some states, abortion has been heavily criminalized, including becoming classified as a felony that could carry heavy jail time.{{Cite web |last=Abreu |first=Danielle |date=2023-01-20 |title=Is abortion legal in your state? A state-by-state guide to current laws |url=https://www.nbcboston.com/news/national-international/where-is-abortion-legal-a-state-by-state-guide-to-current-laws/2950911/ |access-date=2024-12-31 |website=NBC Boston |language=en-US}} John Becker, an Ohio lawmaker, introduced a bill that would subject doctors to murder charges if they did not do everything possible to save the life of fetus - specifically including trying to re-implant an ectopic pregnancy, despite that not being scientifically possible.{{Cite web |date=2019-12-12 |title=Lawmaker Says He Didn't Research Ectopic Pregnancy Procedure Before Adding To Bill |url=https://www.wosu.org/news/2019-12-12/lawmaker-says-he-didnt-research-ectopic-pregnancy-procedure-before-adding-to-bill |access-date=2025-01-01 |website=WOSU Public Media |language=en}} Becker later stated he had not researched ectopic pregnancies before writing the bill.{{Cite web |last=Tenbarge |first=Kat |title=An Ohio lawmaker admitted he hadn't researched ectopic pregnancies before proposing an abortion restriction bill |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/ohio-lawmaker-says-he-didnt-research-ectopic-pregnancy-abortion-bill-2019-12?op=1 |access-date=2025-01-01 |website=Business Insider |language=en-US}}

Confusing information related to abortion may also cause physicians to deny abortions in instances where the patient's complications are considered to not have met the legal threshold for "life threatening,"{{Cite web |title=Emergency doctors grapple with abortion bans |url=https://www.aamc.org/news/emergency-doctors-grapple-abortion-bans |access-date=2025-01-01 |website=AAMC |language=en}}{{Cite web |last=Simmons-Duffin |first=Selena |date=November 2022 |title=Doctors who want to defy abortion laws say it's too risky |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/11/23/1137756183/doctors-who-want-to-defy-abortion-laws-say-its-too-risky |website=NPR}} with several pregnant people dying because of delated care.{{Cite web |date=2024-09-21 |title=A dramatic rise in pregnant women dying in Texas after abortion ban |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/texas-abortion-ban-deaths-pregnant-women-sb8-analysis-rcna171631 |access-date=2024-12-31 |website=NBC News |language=en}}

{{main|Impacts of restrictive abortion laws in the United States}}

Abortion misinformation results in physicians getting less opportunities or having less incentives to practice abortion care, resulting in fewer physicians qualifying for performing procedural abortions.{{cite journal |last1=Pagoto |first1=Sherry L |last2=Palmer |first2=Lindsay |last3=Horwitz-Willis |first3=Nate |date=4 May 2023 |title=The Next Infodemic: Abortion Misinformation |journal=Journal of Medical Internet Research |volume=25 |pages=e42582 |doi=10.2196/42582 |issn=1439-4456 |pmc=10196890 |pmid=37140975 |doi-access=free}} A lack of medical training regarding abortion hinders future physician's learning of required skills that are necessary when dealing with complications pertaining to pregnancy.{{Cite journal |last1=Traub |first1=Ariana M. |last2=Mermin-Bunnell |first2=Kellen |last3=Pareek |first3=Priyasha |last4=Williams |first4=Sonya |last5=Connell |first5=Natalie B. |last6=Kawwass |first6=Jennifer F. |last7=Cwiak |first7=Carrie |date=2022-10-01 |title=The implications of overturning Roe v. Wade on medical education and future physicians |journal=The Lancet Regional Health – Americas |language=English |volume=14 |doi=10.1016/j.lana.2022.100334 |issn=2667-193X|doi-access=free |pmid=36777391 |pmc=9904004 }}

The impact of abortion misinformation is wide-reaching, influencing individuals across the spectrum of beliefs about abortion. Marginalized communities often face heightened adverse effects from abortion misinformation due to their higher abortion rates, reduced access to healthcare, lower levels of health literacy, limited access to reliable health information, and a diminished trust in healthcare providers, as well as due to a prolonged history of systemic racism in healthcare.

A survey found that 67% of "pro-choice" respondents and 88% of "pro-life" respondents believed that childbirth is either safer or as safe as undergoing an abortion. Contrary to these beliefs, childbirth's mortality rate is considerably higher, ranging between 50 and 130 times greater than that of abortion.{{cite web |title=We polled 1,060 Americans about abortion. This is what they got wrong. What Americans think about abortion |url=https://www.vox.com/a/abortion-statistics-opinions-2016/poll |access-date=30 September 2023 |website=Vox.com}}

About 25 to 30% of American women will have an abortion at some point in their lives. However, highly educated and higher-income Americans are likely to believe that abortion is rare. Among Americans without a college degree, 54% underestimate abortion rates, compared with 70% of those with graduate degrees. The frequency of abortion is underestimated by 67% of men and 57% of women. Low income and less educated women, the group that is more likely to undergo an abortion, were more likely to estimate the abortion rates correctly.

{{main|Anti-abortion violence}}

Due to the high prevalence of abortion infodemic, physicians who speak publicly about abortion have been targeted and harassed. Physicians providing abortion services may face stigma in the workplace, in their communities, and from colleagues.{{cite web |title=Increasing Access to Abortion |url=https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2020/12/increasing-access-to-abortion |access-date=30 September 2023 |website=www.acog.org |language=en}}

Additionally, danger has risen for physicians who perform abortion, such as arson causing the burning down of several clinics.{{Cite web |last=Barringer |first=Felicity |date=March 1993 |title=ABORTION CLINICS SAID TO BE IN PERIL |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/06/us/abortion-clinics-said-to-be-in-peril.html |website=New York Times}} Several medical providers and volunteers have suffered injuries or death from forms of violence such as shooting and bombs over the years:{{Cite magazine |last=Dickson |first=Ej |date=2019-05-31 |title=How Nothing and Everything Has Changed in the 10 Years Since George Tiller's Murder |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/george-tiller-death-abortion-10-year-anniversary-842786/ |access-date=2025-01-01 |magazine=Rolling Stone |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |last=Frostenson |first=Sarah |date=2015-12-01 |title=40 years of attacks on abortion clinics, mapped |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/12/1/9827886/abortion-clinic-attacks-mapped |access-date=2025-01-01 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}

{{reflist}}{{Abortion}}{{Disinformation}}

Category:Abortion in media

Category:Abortion debate

Category:Misinformation