Moore v. Younger
{{short description|Legal case}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox court case
|name = Moore v. Younger
|court = California Court of Appeals
|image = Great Seal of California.svg
|imagesize =
|imagelink =
|imagealt =
|caption =
|full name = Everett T. Moore et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Evelle J. Younger, as Attorney General, Defendant and Respondent.
|date decided = {{start date|1976|01|30}}
|citations = 54 Cal.App.3d 1122; 127 Cal. Rptr. 171
|ECLI =
|transcripts =
|judges = Otto M. Kaus, Herbert L. Ashby, James H. Hastings
|number of judges = 3
|decision by = Kaus
|concurring = Ashby, Hastings
|dissenting =
|concur/dissent =
|prior actions =
|appealed from =
|appealed to =
|subsequent actions =
|related actions =
|opinions =
|keywords = {{Hlist|Censorship|Intellectual freedom}}
|italic title =
}}
The United States court case of Moore v. Younger, {{law report|54|Cal. App. 3d|1122}} (Cal. App. 1976) originated from a somewhat ambiguous law, California's Harmful Matter Statute. California Attorney General Evelle J. Younger "claimed that individual librarians could be prosecuted for giving juveniles access to questionable reading materials."Caiger, Anne & Cube, Caroline. (2006) [http://content.cdlib.org/view?docId=kt438nb23j&doc.view=entire_text&brand=oac Regent of the University of California, Files relating to intellectual freedom issues, 1960-1969]. Retrieved September 18, 2008 University of California, Los Angeles Librarian Everett T. Moore, as plaintiff, challenged the Attorney General through legal action.Minow, Mary. (2002) [http://www.llrx.com/features/obscenitylaws.htm Features - Constitutional, Federal and State Legal Definitions of Child Pornography, Obscenity and "Harmful to Minors" of Interest to California Libraries] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150819000832/http://www.llrx.com/features/obscenitylaws.htm |date=2015-08-19 }}. LLRX, Retrieved September 18, 2008 In February 1976, one month after he retired from UCLA, Moore won his case. All librarians in California were found to be exempt from the Harmful Matter Statute by the California Court of Appeals.Obituary: The ALA Yearbook of Library and Information Services, v13, 1988. (p 238)
References
{{reflist}}
External links
- [https://web.archive.org/web/20150819000832/http://www.llrx.com/features/obscenitylaws.htm California Harmful Matter Statute]
- [http://www.ideals.uiuc.edu/bitstream/2142/6534/1/librarytrendsv19i1b_opt.pdf Excerpt from Everett T. Moore]
- [https://web.archive.org/web/20090626000941/http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group=00001-01000&file=313-313.5 Penal Code Section 313-313.5]
Category:Censorship in the United States
Category:California state case law