National Strategic Computing Initiative

The program has five strategic themes:{{Cite web|url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/nsci_fact_sheet.pdf|title=FACT SHEET: National Strategic Computing Initiative|date=July 29, 2015|publisher=Office of Science and Technology Policy|access-date=April 5, 2016|url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170122211333/https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/nsci_fact_sheet.pdf|archive-date=January 22, 2017}}

• To unite the traditional high-performance computing (HPC) focus on physical simulations for scientific research and engineering, which focuses on increasing the computing speed, with "big data" applications that are optimized for working with large amounts of data
• To preserve the United States' dominance and leadership role in HPC in the face of advances by other nations, by supporting users, vendor companies, software developers, and researchers
• To improve the interoperability of software between different supercomputers, reducing the need to laboriously optimize programs in the context of specific machines
• To provide widespread access to and training for HPC resources to public and private sector researchers, including through remote access
• To develop post-silicon technologies for alternative computing to support future improvements in hardware

At an April 2016 forum, engaging independent software vendors to develop software platforms for HPC was seen as a major hurdle of the initiative, as was attracting a workforce to work on HPC given the dominance of startup companies in attracting talent, and raising awareness of government HPC resources to outside parties.

Justifications for the initiative include the increasing capabilities of China in supercomputing, as well as the increasing relevance of HPC to industry rather than only academic applications.{{Cite news|url=https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/288315-strategic-investments-in-high-performance-computing-enhance-us/|title=Strategic investments in high-performance computing enhance U.S. competitiveness|last=Mannel|first=Bill|date=July 20, 2016|work=The Hill|access-date=January 11, 2017}}

There are three lead agencies: the Department of Energy and Department of Defense will jointly focus on advanced simulation, with Defense also focusing on data analysis, while the National Science Foundation will focus on scientific discovery and workforce development. Energy's involvement will be through the Office of Science and the National Nuclear Security Administration. The FY2017 budget proposal envisions the preexisting Exascale Computing Initiative continuing to deal with research and development for exascale computing, but a new Exascale Computing Program would assume responsibility for development and procurement of actual machines, along the lines of Energy's other scientific instruments such as the Advanced Photon Source the Spallation Neutron Source.{{Cite web|url=https://www.hpcwire.com/2016/02/12/obama-budget-reveals-new-elements-exascale-program/|title=Budget Request Reveals New Elements of US Exascale Program|last=Trader|first=Tiffany|date=February 12, 2016|website=HPCwire|access-date=April 5, 2016}} The National Science Foundation's involvement would mainly be centered in its Advanced Cyberinfrastructure program, although the Mathematical and Physical Sciences Directorate would co-lead.{{Cite news|url=https://www.aaas.org/news/guide-presidents-budget-research-and-development-fy-2017|title=Guide to the President's Budget: Research and Development FY 2017|last1=Hourihan|first1=Matt|last2=Parkes|first2=David|date=March 22, 2016|publisher=American Association for the Advancement of Science|page=48|access-date=April 21, 2016|language=en}}

There are two foundational research and development agencies: the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) will focus on alternative post-silicon computing paradigms, while the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will focus on measurement science needed for future computing technologies. IARPA's programs in superconducting computing are aligned with the initiative.{{Cite news|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/will-the-nsa-finally-build-its-superconducting-spy-computer|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160224235630/http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/will-the-nsa-finally-build-its-superconducting-spy-computer|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 24, 2016|title=Will the NSA Finally Build Its Superconducting Spy Computer?|last=Brock|first=David C.|date=April 24, 2016|work=IEEE Spectrum|issn=0018-9235|access-date=April 21, 2016|language=en}}

The five deployment agencies, which will be involved in design and testing for projects related to their missions, are NASA, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Institutes of Health, Department of Homeland Security, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). While NASA and NOAA already have high-performance computing programs, those at the other three deployment agencies would be new.{{cn|date=July 2023}}

The initiative was created by Executive Order 13702, signed by President Barack Obama on July 29, 2015. The initiative had been under development since 2012. The July 2015 executive order formally establishing the program was seen as the result of deadlock and opposition in Congress to the Obama administration's fiscal year 2016 budget request.{{cn|date=July 2023}} As part of the initiative, a request for information on "Science Drivers Requiring Capable Exascale High Performance Computing" was issued by the National Science Foundation on September 15, 2015.{{Cite news|url=https://insidehpc.com/2016/04/nsci-2/|title=NSCI Update from the HPC User Forum - insideHPC|last=Brueckner|first=Rich|date=April 14, 2016|work=InsideHPC|access-date=April 17, 2016|language=en-US}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.hpcwire.com/2015/10/06/speak-up-nsf-seeks-science-drivers-for-exascale-and-the-nsci/|title=Speak Up: NSF Seeks Science Drivers for Exascale and the NSCI|last=Russell|first=John|date=October 6, 2015|website=HPCwire|access-date=April 20, 2016}} The initiative's Implementation Plan was issued on October 27, 2015, although it was not immediately released to the public to avoid preempting higher-level budgetary planning.

Although the Obama administration's fiscal year 2017 budget request, released in February 2016, included $285 million for the Department of Energy and $33 million for the National Science Foundation through the NSCI,{{Cite web|url=https://www.hpcwire.com/2016/03/29/ostp-provide-nsci-update-hpc-user-forum/|title=Gonzalez Martirena of OSTP to Provide NSCI Update at HPC User Forum|last=Russell|first=John|date=2016-03-29|website=HPCwire|access-date=April 5, 2016}} few additional details about the initiative had emerged in the following months.{{Cite web|url=https://www.hpcwire.com/2016/04/20/nsci-discussion-hpc-user-forum-shows-hunger-details/|title=NSCI Discussion at HPC User Forum Shows Hunger for Details|last=Russell|first=John|date=April 20, 2016|website=HPCwire|access-date=April 20, 2016}} Although there was concern that the initiative might not survive the upcoming elections and change of presidential administration, Office of Science and Technology Policy director John Holdren in May 2016 expressed confidence that it would survive into the next administration regardless of who the next President would be.{{Cite journal|last=Kramer|first=David|date=May 6, 2016|title=Holdren lauds Obama's science and technology accomplishments|url=http://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.5.1071/full|journal=Physics Today|language=en|doi=10.1063/pt.5.1071|issn=0031-9228|url-access=subscription}}

The strategic plan was released in July 2016, on the first anniversary of the initiative.{{Cite news|url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/07/29/national-strategic-computing-initiative-turns-one|title=The National Strategic Computing Initiative Turns One|last1=Szulman|first1=Erin|last2=Drosback|first2=Meredith|last3=Polk|first3=Tim|date=July 29, 2016|access-date=January 1, 2017|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|language=en}} It was reported that the perceived delay in implementation was due to its expansiveness across many government agencies and that it was during a contentious election year. Workforce development was cited as a particularly thorny issue during a July 2016 NSCI workshop in Washington, D.C.{{Cite web|url=https://www.hpcwire.com/2016/08/01/d-c-workshop-strives-keep-nsci-flame-burning-growing/|title=D.C. Workshop Strives to Keep NSCI Flame Burning and Growing|last=Russell|first=John|date=August 1, 2016|website=HPCwire|access-date=January 1, 2017}} At the time the initiative was criticized for bringing existing programs, such as the Cancer Breakthroughs 2020, under a new umbrella initiative rather than starting new programs.{{Cite web|url=https://www.enterprisetech.com/2016/12/22/fast-rewind-2016-wild-ride-hpc/|title=Fast Rewind: 2016 Was a Wild Ride for HPC|last=Russell|first=John|date=December 22, 2016|website=EnterpriseTech|access-date=January 1, 2017}} In late 2016, the first exascale systems were expected to be operational by 2022.{{Cite web|url=https://www.hpcwire.com/2016/12/12/us-moves-exascale-goalpost-targets-2021-delivery/|title=US Moves Exascale Goalpost, Targets 2021 Delivery|last=Trader|first=Tiffany|date=December 12, 2016|website=HPCwire|access-date=January 1, 2017}}

• Strategic Computing Initiative
• Advanced Simulation and Computing Program
• Precision Medicine Initiative
• Networking and Information Technology Research and Development

{{Reflist|30em}}

• {{official website}}
• [https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/images/NSCI%20Strategic%20Plan.pdf 2016 Strategic Plan]

Category:Supercomputing

Category:Research and development in the United States