Nichols v. United States
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Nichols v. United States
|ArgueDate=March 1
|ArgueYear=2016
|DecideDate=April 4
|DecideYear=2016
|FullName=Lester Ray Nichols, Petitioner v. United States
|Docket=15-5238
|USVol=578
|USPage=___
|ParallelCitations=136 S. Ct. 1113; 194 L. Ed. 2d 324
|Prior=United States v. Nichols, 775 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20141230056 1225] (10th Cir. 2014); rehearing en banc denied, 784 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20150415063 666] (10th Cir. 2015); cert. granted, 136 S. Ct. 445 (2015).
|Subsequent=
|Holding=The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act does not require an individual to update his registration once departing a state.
|Majority=Alito
|JoinMajority=unanimous
|LawsApplied=Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act
}}
Nichols v. United States, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) does not require an individual to update his registration after departing a state.[http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/nichols-v-united-states/ SCOTUSblog coverage]
Background
In 2003, Lester Ray Nichols was convicted of "traveling with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor" under {{usc|18|2423(b)}}.Nichols v. United States, [https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5238_khlo.pdf No. 15–5238], 578 U.S. ____ (2016). Congress passed the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) in 2006 and the United States Attorney General determined in 2007 that the law applied retroactively. When Nichols was released in December 2011, he complied with SORNA's registration requirements, registering as a sex offender in Kansas. In November 2012, Nichols abruptly decided to leave Kansas and move to Manila in the Philippines.
Nichols was arrested and charged with violating SORNA reporting requirements. He filed a motion to "dismiss the indictment on the ground that SORNA did not require him to update his registration in Kansas"; however his motion was denied and "Nichols conditionally pleaded guilty, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion."
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed his conviction.United States v. Nichols, 775 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20141230056 1225] (10th Cir. 2014); rehearing en banc denied, 784 F.3d [https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20150415063 666] (10th Cir. 2015). In a 2013 case involving a man from the Kansas City area who had also moved to the Philippines, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held in United States v. Lunsford that the defendant had no obligation to update his registration.{{cite court |litigants=United States v. Lunsford |vol=725 |reporter=F.3d |opinion=859 |pinpoint= |court=8th Cir. |date=2013 |url=https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20130805090 |accessdate=2018-12-04 |quote=}} The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the circuit split.
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Samuel Alito authored a unanimous decision holding that a plain text reading of SORNA applies to a place in which a resident resides, not resided. Because the Philippines is a foreign jurisdiction where SORNA is inapplicable and because the law uses the present tense, Nichols had no obligation under this federal law to update his registration. Under Kansas state law and under the subsequently enacted federal legislation, Nichols does have an obligation to update his registration information.
References
{{reflist}}
External links
- {{caselaw source
| case = Nichols v. United States, {{Ussc|578|___|2016|el=no}}
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/578/15-5238/
| oyez =https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/15-5238
| other_source1 = Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
| other_url1 =https://web.archive.org/web/0/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-5238_khlo.pdf
}}
- [http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/nichols-v-united-states/ SCOTUSblog coverage]
Category:United States Supreme Court cases
Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
Category:2016 in United States case law
Category:Philippines–United States relations
Category:Sex offender registries in the United States
{{SCOTUS-Roberts-stub}}