Non-binding resolution

Non-binding resolutions are usually specific simple or concurrent resolutions that are not passed on to the executive branch to be signed into the law.{{cite web | url=http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1153AP_US_Iraq_Nonbinding.html | title=What's a nonbinding resolution? | date=2007-02-03 | access-date=2007-02-17 | author=The Associated Press | author-link=Associated Press | publisher=nwsource.com}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}} These resolutions differ from pure concurrent resolutions (that are used for various procedural requests such as adjourning sessions) in that they are designed to express formally, document opinions and not initiate a process.

These resolutions offer a means for elected officials to publicly air the concerns of their constituents{{cite news | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2006/06/16/publiceye/entry1723490.shtml | title=Why A Non-Binding Resolution Gets A Lot of Attention | access-date=2007-02-17 | publisher=cbsnews.com | date=2006-06-16 | first=Hillary | last=Profita}} and are closely followed by major media outlets. Additionally, these resolutions can be used to state the position of the legislature, showing a preview of how they will vote on future legislation and budget allocations.

• Private Members Motion 296 in support of Jordan's Principle was passed unanimously in the House of Commons of Canada on December 12, 2007.

• Motion 312 was a motion introduced to the Parliament of Canada by Stephen Woodworth, MP for Kitchener Centre, in 2012. M-312 called for the formation of a committee "to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth".{{cite web|title=Vote No. 466|url=http://www.parl.gc.ca/HouseChamberBusiness/ChamberVoteDetail.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=41&Ses=1&Vote=466|work=House of Commons Chamber Business|publisher=Parliament of Canada|access-date=11 November 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304043729/http://www.parl.gc.ca/HouseChamberBusiness/ChamberVoteDetail.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=41&Ses=1&Vote=466|archive-date=4 March 2016|url-status=dead}}

• Motion 103 was a non-binding motion in the 42nd Canadian Parliament stating that the members of the House of Commons called on the Government of Canada to condemn Islamophobia in Canada. It also called on the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to carry out a study on how racism and religious discrimination can be reduced and collect data on hate crimes. The motion was introduced by Iqra Khalid, the Liberal MP representing Mississauga—Erin Mills. The motion passed by a vote of 201–91 on March 23, 2017.

{{Main|United Nations resolution|United Nations General Assembly Resolution|United Nations Security Council Resolution}}

• All United Nations General Assembly resolutions that are not about matters internal to the UN (such as the structure of the UN or the creation of UN agencies) are inherently and explicitly (in the UN Charter) non-binding.
• The United Nations Security Council has the power to pass both binding and non-binding resolutions; whether a resolution is binding depends on what section of the Charter it is enacted under.

In the United States Congress, non-binding resolutions are frequently titled as a "Sense of Congress" resolution, if both houses pass the measure (a concurrent resolution), or as a "Sense of the Senate" or "Sense of the House" resolution, if the measure is passed by only one house (a simple resolution).{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k1GakqXKXdsC&q=%22sense+of+the+senate%22&pg=PA322 |title=American Foreign Policy and Process |page=322 |last=McCormick |first=James M. |year=2014 |publisher=Wadsworth |isbn=978-1-4354-6272-4 |lccn=2012955710}}{{cite book |title=The Oxford Handbook of U.S. National Security |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bHhUDwAAQBAJ&q=%22sense+of+congress%22&pg=PA161 |page=161 |editor1-last=Reveron |editor1-first=Derek S. |editor2-last=Gvosdev |editor2-first=Nikolas K. |editor3-last=Cloud |editor3-first=John A. |year=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780190680015 |lccn=2017043933 |last1=Serafino |first1=Nina M. |last2=Ekmektsioglou |first2=Eleni G. |chapter=Congress and National Security}}

• The House of Representatives chose its Speaker using a non-binding resolution in 1936 (H.Res. 543, 74th Congress) and again in 1940 (H.Res. 602, 76th Congress).{{cite web| last1=Heitshusen| first1=Valerie| last2=Beth| first2=Richard S.| title=Speakers of the House: Elections, 1913–2019| date=January 4, 2019| work=CRS Report for Congress| url=https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL30857.pdf| publisher=Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress| location=Washington, D.C.| access-date=March 18, 2019}}
• On June 22, 1971, the Senate passed a non-binding resolution in support of withdrawing troops from Vietnam.{{cite web|url=http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/vietnam/index-1969.html|access-date=2007-10-11|publisher=The History Place|title=Vietnam War 1969–1975}}
• In July 1998, the Senate passed a non-binding resolution{{cite news | url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/07/10/taiwan/ | access-date=2007-02-15 | date=1998-07-01 | publisher=cnn.com | title=Senate Passes Non-Binding Resolution To Reassure Taiwan | last=Moore | first=Janet}} affirming their commitment to a democratic Taiwan.
• In February 2007, the House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution,{{cite web | url=http://www.speaker.gov/pdf/IRAQCR.pdf | access-date=2007-02-15 | publisher=speaker.gov | title=110th Congress, 1st Session H. CON. RES. | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927022832/http://www.speaker.gov/pdf/IRAQCR.pdf | archive-date=2007-09-27 }} House Concurrent resolution 63,{{cite web | url=http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/index.asp | title=U.S. House of Representatives Roll Call Votes 110th Congress, 1st Session | year=2007 | access-date=2007-02-17 | publisher=clerk.house.gov}} to formally express its disapproval of President Bush's troop buildup in Iraq.{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/13/washington/13cong.html?_r=1 | access-date=2007-02-15 | title=House Democrats Unveil Measure Denouncing Iraq Buildup | work=The New York Times | last=Toner | first=Robin |author2=Michael Luo | date=2007-02-13}}
• House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution (HRES 224),{{cite web

| url = http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc111/hr224_eh.xml

| title = H. Res. 224

| access-date = 2009-03-14

| date = 2009-03-12

| archive-date = 2014-12-10

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141210160940/http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc111/hr224_eh.xml

| url-status = dead

}} recognizing March 14, 2009, as National Pi Day.{{cite news

| url = http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10194354-38.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5

| title = National Pi Day? Congress makes it official

| work = Politics and Law

| last = McCullagh

| first = Declan

| publisher = CNET News

| date = March 11, 2009

| access-date = 2009-03-14

| archive-date = 2022-03-18

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220318035357/https://www.cnet.com/13578_3-10194354-38.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5

| url-status = dead

}}

A "sense of Congress" clause may also be used within legislation to direct the actions which Congress wishes the executive to undertake, for example:

{{quote|"It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should take appropriate steps to provide for upgrading information technology systems for the reserve contingents ..."[https://www.congress.gov/106/plaws/publ398/PLAW-106publ398.pdf Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001], Public Law 106-398, section 815}}

The legislatures of the 50 U.S. states also frequently adopt non-binding resolutions. For example:

• In February 2007, the Vermont State House of Representatives{{Cite web|url=http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/legdoc.cfm?URL=/docs/2008/resolutn/house/HR0011.HTM|title = Legislative Documents}} and Senate{{Cite web|url=http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/legdoc.cfm?URL=/docs/2008/resolutn/SR0011.HTM|title = Legislative Documents}} passed non-binding resolutions calling for the orderly withdrawal of American military forces from Iraq to commence immediately.

• Resolution (law)
• Non-binding referendum

{{Reflist}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Non-Binding Resolution}}

Category:Resolutions (law)