Nonperson treatment

{{Short description|A level of social interaction}}

Nonperson treatment is a level of social interaction at which one person does not acknowledge the presence of another person. The concept was introduced by American sociologist, social psychologist Erving Goffman.The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, 1956Asylums: Essays on the Condition of the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, 1961Behavior in Public Places, 1963Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, 1963 For comparison, Goffman describes two other levels of social interaction: " civil inattention", whereby some form of subtle, implicit acknowledgement is provided, and "encounter", which is an explicit engagement.

Goffman gives examples of people commonly subject to nonperson treatment: "... it may be seen in our society in the way we sometimes treat children, servants, Negroes, and mental patients." {{Rp|page=84}}{{Rp|page=151-153}} Panhandlers are another category of people who receive the nonperson treatment.Lankenau, S.E. (1999). Panhandling repertoires and routines for overcoming the nonperson treatment. Deviant Behavior, 20(2), 183-206. Goffman, in his 1953 Ph.D. thesis writes: Chapter XVI: On Kinds of Exclusion from Participation, In: Erving Goffman, [https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/60113/goffman-1953-communication-conduct.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y Communication Conduct In An Island Community], Ph.D. thesis, 1953

We are familiar with treatment of a person as virtually absent in many situations. Domestic servants and waitresses, in certain circumstances, are treated as not present and act, ritually speaking, as if they were not present. The young and, increasingly, the very old,

may be discussed “to their faces” in the tone we would ordinarily use

for a person only if he were not present. Mental patients are often

given similar non-person treatment. Finally, there is an increasing

number of technical personnel who are given this status (and take

the non-person alignment) at formally organized interplays. Here we

refer to stenographers, cameramen, reporters, plainclothes guards,

and technicians of all kinds.

Following the theory of Goffman for nonperson treatment as a technique of diminishing the social status of a person, Roscoe Scarborough applies it to inequal treatment of contingent faculty in American higher education [https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1186&context=jppsThe Nonperson Treatment in Higher Education: The Case of Contingent Faculty] {{doi|10.62915/2154-8935.1186}} and Jon Frederickson and James F. Rooney do the same for free-lance musicians.[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229934151_The_Free-Lance_Musician_as_A_Type_of_Non-Person_An_Extension_of_the_Concept_of_Non-Personhood The Free-Lance Musician as A Type of Non-Person: An Extension of the Concept of Non-Personhood] {{doi|10.1111/j.1533-8525.1988.tb01252.x}}

Chapter 7 of the book Absentees: On Variously Missing Persons by Daniel Heller-Roazen contains a discussion of Erving Goffman’s work on social participation and exclusion, in particular, the concept of "nonperson treatment".Daniel Heller-Roazen, [https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9781942130475/absentees Absentees: On Variously Missing Persons], 2021, {{ISBN|9781942130475}}

• [https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/719467# Book review]