Origen the Pagan

{{Short description|3rd century Alexandrian Platonist philosopher}}

{{For|the Christian theologian and philosopher|Origen}}

Origen the Pagan ({{langx|el|Ὠριγένης}}; fl. early 3rd century) was a Platonist philosopher who lived in Alexandria. He was a student of Ammonius Saccas and a contemporary of Plotinus in Ammonius's philosophy school in Alexandria.Ramelli, "Origen and the Platonic Tradition" Some researchers posit that this Origen is the very same famous Christian philosopher and theologian Origen of Alexandria, who was educated by Ammonius Saccas.{{Citation |last=Edwards |first=Mark J. |title=Origen |date=2022 |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/origen/ |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |edition=Summer 2022 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2022-11-30}}{{Cite journal |last=Ramelli |first=Ilaria L. E. |date=February 2017 |title=Origen and the Platonic Tradition |journal=Religions |language=en |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=21 |doi=10.3390/rel8020021 |issn=2077-1444|doi-access=free }} The pagan philosopher is sometimes referred to as Origenes to distinguish him more easily from the Christian Origen.As in {{cite book |year=2018 |editor-last=Tarrant |editor-first=Harold |editor-last2=Layne |editor-first2=Danielle A. |editor-last3=Baltzly |editor-first3=Dirk |editor-last4=Renaud |editor-first4=François |chapter=Introduction: Early Christianity and Late Antique Platonism |location=Leiden |publisher=Koninklijke Brill |isbn=978-9004355385 |title=Brill's Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity |page=252 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=loRXDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA252}}

Origen is mentioned three times in Porphyry's Life of Plotinus,Porphyry, Life of Plotinus, chapters iii, xiv, and xx. where he is treated much more kindly than the Christian Origen, whom Porphyry disliked.Armstrong 1967, p. 198 He is also mentioned several times by Proclus, and it is clear that Origen's fellow students Plotinus and Longinus treated him with respect. According to Porphyry, Plotinus estimated him so far as to say that he has nothing to teach him.

The only aspect of his philosophical views which are known is that he did not make the first principle of reality the One beyond intellect and being as Plotinus did, but rather the first principle was the supreme intellect and primary being,Proclus, In Platonis Theologiam, ii. 4 which suggests that his views were that of traditional Middle Platonism, rather than the Neoplatonism of Plotinus.Armstrong 1967, p. 199