Ortiz v. Jordan

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Ortiz v. Jordan

|ArgueDate=

|ArgueYear=

|DecideDate=January 24

|DecideYear=2011

|FullName=

|USVol=562

|USPage=180

|Docket=

|ParallelCitations=

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding=A party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.

|Majority=Ginsburg

|JoinMajority=unanimous

|LawsApplied=Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

}}

Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.{{ussc|name=Ortiz v. Jordan|volume=562|page=180|year=2011}}.{{Cite web |date=2011-01-31 |title=Last week's opinions: In Plain English |url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2011/01/last-weeks-opinions-in-plain-english/ |access-date=2024-11-14 |website=SCOTUSblog |language=en-US}}