Padma Bridge graft scandal
{{Short description|Political scandal in Bangladesh}}
{{EngvarB|date=April 2017}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2017}}
{{Sheikh Hasina sidebar}}
The Padma Bridge graft scandal was a political scandal in Bangladesh during 2016 and 2017, involving allegations of bribery linked to the construction of the Padma Bridge, the country's longest road-rail bridge spanning {{convert|6.15|km|adj=on|sp=us}} across the Padma River.
The scandal implicated officials associated with the Bangladesh Awami League government and raised concerns about transparency in the project's funding and contracting process.
The World Bank, which had committed {{BDT|11,367}} crore ({{USD|1.2}} billion) in credit for the project, withdrew its funding, citing evidence of corruption.{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-18655846|title=World Bank cancels Bangladesh bridge loan over corruption|date=30 June 2012|newspaper=BBC News|language=en-GB|access-date=31 December 2016}}
The allegations centered on the claim that the Canadian construction firm SNC-Lavalin had offered bribes to Bangladeshi officials in exchange for securing a contract. Two SNC-Lavalin executives were charged in Canada in connection with the alleged bribery scheme. However, after the court ruled to exclude key wiretap evidence, the prosecution withdrew the charges, and the case was subsequently dismissed.{{cite news |url=https://www.thedailystar.net/world/north-america/canada-court-finds-no-proof-padma-bridge-graft-conspiracy-1359397|title=Canada court finds no proof of Padma bridge bribery conspiracy|date=11 February 2017|work=The Daily Star|access-date=7 February 2019}}{{Cite web|title=Did a Canada Court Really Clear Bangladesh Officials of Corruption?|url=https://thewire.in/south-asia/did-a-canada-court-really-clear-bangladesh-officials-of-corruption|access-date=2022-01-01|website=thewire.in}}
World Bank personal statement
The World Bank has published a detailed statement about their allegation of corruption relating to the Padma Bridge and their subsequent pullout from the financing of the project.{{Cite news|url=http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2012/06/29/world-bank-statement-padma-bridge|title=World Bank Statement on Padma Bridge|newspaper=World Bank|language=en|access-date=13 January 2017}} They have also published a FAQ ("Frequently Asked Questions" document) in order to better explain their position and activities.{{Cite news|url=http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2012/07/17/frequently-asked-questions-related-to-the-cancellation-of-world-bank-credit-for-padma-multipurpose-bridge-project|title=Frequently Asked Questions Related to the Cancellation of the World Bank Credit for the Padma Multipurpose Bridge Project|newspaper=World Bank|language=en|access-date=13 January 2017}}
The World Bank alleged that, there had been a "conspiracy" plotted to stage a high-level corruption in the project:{{citation needed|date=January 2023}}
The World Bank has credible evidence corroborated by a variety of sources which points to a high-level corruption conspiracy among Bangladeshi government officials, SNC Lavalin executives, and private individuals in connection with the Padma Multipurpose Bridge Project.
They have provided the Bangladeshi government with evidence of the corruption plot and stated that they could not move forward with the loan if no action was taken:{{citation needed|date=January 2023}}
To be willing to go forward with the alternative turnkey-style approach, they sought the following actions: (i) place all public officials suspected of involvement in the corruption scheme on leave from Government employment until the investigation is completed; (ii) appoint a special inquiry team within the ACC to handle the investigation, and (iii) agree to provide full and adequate access to all investigative information to a panel appointed by the World Bank composed of internationally recognized experts so that the panel can give guidance to the lenders on the progress, adequacy, and fairness of the investigation. We worked extensively with the Government and the ACC to ensure that all actions requested were fully aligned with Bangladeshi laws and procedures.
They also said that they had sent a delegation to the Government of Bangladesh to seek an explanation from them, but the explanation from the Bangladeshi side was unsatisfactory:{{citation needed|date=January 2023}}
... we sent a high-level team to Dhaka to fully explain the Bank’s position and receive the Government’s response. The response has been unsatisfactory at the time.
Investigation
=Canadian court=
SNC-Lavalin official Ramesh Saha's diary had a list of Bangladeshi citizens who were to receive 10–12% commission for awarding the Padma Bridge contract to SNC-Lavalin.{{Cite news |url=http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2013/10/30/1532/print|title=ACC hopeful of getting vital info from Canada|work=The Financial Express|date=30 October 2013|access-date=6 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170207112807/http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2013/10/30/1532/print|archive-date=7 February 2017}} According to her diary: "Padma PCC, 4% Min, 2% Kaiser, 2% Nixon, 1% Secretary and 1% Moshi Rahman." According to the documents, "Min" referred to former communication minister Syed Abul Hossain; "Kaiser" is former state minister for foreign affairs Abul Hasan Chowdhury; "Nixon" is the prime minister's nephew Mujibur Rahman; "Secretary" is former Bridges Division secretary Mosharraf Hossain Bhuiyan; and "Moshi Rahman" is the prime minister's economic affairs adviser Mashiur Rahman. Another 2% was kept for someone, but the name was not available.{{Cite news |url=https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/bangladesh-others/27041/padma-bridge-scam-acc-attempts-to-obtain-original|title=Padma Bridge scam: ACC attempts to obtain original copy of Ramesh's diary |work=Dhaka Tribune|language=en|access-date=6 February 2017}}{{Cite news |title=PM rejects her family's involvement in Padma graft |url=https://www.dhakatribune.com/uncategorized/2013/05/20/pm-rejects-her-familys-involvement-in-padma-graft |newspaper=Dhaka Tribune |date=20 May 2013 |access-date=6 February 2017}}
=CBC TV=
CBC TV of Canada performed investigative journalism, and they speculated that there was a wide-ranged plot of corruption in the project.{{Citation|title=SNC and A Bridge for Bangladesh [CBC News] – May 15, 2013|date=19 May 2013|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHdt0hhXQm0|publisher=YouTube|access-date=13 January 2017}}
Aftermath
The World Bank blacklisted the Canadian firm, SNC-Lavalin Inc, and banned it from any business for 10 years due to the firm's alleged involvement in Padma Bridge project corruption scandal.{{Cite web|url=http://news.trust.org//item/?map=world-bank-blacklists-snc-lavalin-over-corruption-in-padma-bridge-project|title=World Bank blacklists SNC-Lavalin over corruption in Padma Bridge project|website=News.trust.org|access-date=30 December 2016}} Since the World Bank withdrew its involvement, the estimated cost of the bridge has climbed by over US$3 billion{{cite web |url= http://www.padmabridge.gov.bd/rdpp.php|title = Project Cost as per RDPP|publisher= Padma Multipurpose Bridge Project |access-date= 22 December 2020}} and the expected completion date is being pushed back by four years to 2022.{{cite news |title=Padma Bridge likely to open to traffic by June 2022
|url=https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2020/12/10/padma-bridge-likely-to-open-for-traffic-by-june-2022 |work=Dhaka Tribune |access-date=22 December 2020}}{{Cite web|url=https://globalanticorruptionblog.com/2015/11/06/when-should-corruption-be-tolerated-the-case-of-the-padma-bridge/|title=When Should Corruption Be Tolerated? The Case of the Padma Bridge|last=Binette|first=Daniel|date=6 November 2015|website=GAB {{!}} The Global Anticorruption Blog|access-date=30 December 2016}} The bridge has been completed and inaugurated in 2022 in Bangladesh with its own resources.{{cite news |title=By self-funding the Padma dridge, Dhaka has got the West off its back |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/by-self-funding-the-padma-bridge-dhaka-has-got-the-west-off-its-back/articleshow/36626594.cms |access-date=22 December 2020 |work=The Economic Times}} On 24 January 2017, in her speech in the parliament, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina blamed Muhammad Yunus for the World Bank pulling out of the project.{{Cite news|url=http://en.prothom-alo.com/bangladesh/news/137137/PM-blames-Yunus-for-cancellation-of-WB-s-Padma|title=PM blames Yunus for cancellation of WB's Padma financing|newspaper=Prothom Alo|access-date=26 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170125165107/http://en.prothom-alo.com/bangladesh/news/137137/PM-blames-Yunus-for-cancellation-of-WB-s-Padma|archive-date=25 January 2017|url-status=dead}} According to her, Yunus lobbied with the former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to persuade the World Bank to terminate the loan.{{Cite news|url=http://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2017/01/25/nobel-laureate-yunus-got-hillary-clinton-to-stop-wb-funding-for-padma-bridge-says-hasina|title=Nobel laureate Yunus got Hillary Clinton to stop WB funding for Padma Bridge, says Hasina|newspaper=bdnews24.com|access-date=26 January 2017}}
Dismissal of charges by a Canadian court and Bangladesh ACC
In 2015, Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) investigated the case after the World Bank continuously pushed the government to take action against the alleged perpetrators. After 53 days of investigation, ACC found nobody to be guilty. On the basis of ACC's report, Dhaka district judge court acquitted all the seven government officials who were alleged to have been involved in the corruption plot.{{Cite news|url=http://www.thedailystar.net/all-padma-bridge-graft-accused-acquitted-47466|title=All Padma bridge graft accused acquitted|date=26 October 2014|newspaper=The Daily Star|language=en|access-date=26 January 2017}} Before that, the ACC exonerated Syed Abul Hossain and ex-state minister for foreign affairs Abul Hasan Chowdhury from the allegation of involvement in the corruption conspiracy.{{Cite news |url=http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/10/27/63153/print|title=Padma Bridge graft case: All acquitted|work=The Financial Express|access-date=26 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202031054/http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/10/27/63153/print|archive-date=2 February 2017|url-status=dead}}
On 11 February 2017, a Canadian court acquitted ex-SNC-Lavalin executives, dismissing the case.{{cite news |url=https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/corruption/2017/02/11/3-snc-lavalin-officials-acquitted-padma-bridge-graft-case/|title=Court throws out Padma Bridge case|date=11 February 2017|work=Dhaka Tribune|access-date=7 February 2019}} The wire tap evidence was ruled inadmissible.