Peak ground acceleration
{{Short description|Maximum ground acceleration during an earthquake at a location}}
Peak ground acceleration (PGA) is equal to the maximum ground acceleration that occurred during earthquake shaking at a location. PGA is equal to the amplitude of the largest absolute acceleration recorded on an accelerogram at a site during a particular earthquake.{{Cite journal|title = Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates|journal = Earth-Science Reviews|date = 2003-04-01|pages = 43–104|volume = 61|issue = 1–2|doi = 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00112-5|first = J|last = Douglas|bibcode = 2003ESRv...61...43D|url = https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/53451/1/Douglas_ESR_2003_Earthquake_ground_motion_estimation_using_strong_motion.pdf}} Earthquake shaking generally occurs in all three directions. Therefore, PGA is often split into the horizontal and vertical components. Horizontal PGAs are generally larger than those in the vertical direction but this is not always true, especially close to large earthquakes. PGA is an important parameter (also known as an intensity measure) for earthquake engineering, The design basis earthquake ground motion (DBEGM)[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf18.html Nuclear Power Plants and Earthquakes] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090722210420/http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf18.html |date=2009-07-22 }}. Retrieved 8 April 2011. is often defined in terms of PGA.
Unlike the Richter and moment magnitude scales, it is not a measure of the total energy (magnitude, or size) of an earthquake, but rather of how much the earth shakes at a given geographic point. The Mercalli intensity scale uses personal reports and observations to measure earthquake intensity but PGA is measured by instruments, such as accelerographs. It can be correlated to macroseismic intensities on the Mercalli scale{{cite web|title=ShakeMap Scientific Background. Rapid Instrumental Intensity Maps|url=https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/background.php#intmaps|department=Earthquake Hazards Program|publisher=United States Geological Survey|access-date=22 March 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110623092131/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/background.php#intmaps|archive-date=23 June 2011}} but these correlations are associated with large uncertainty.{{Cite book|title = "Best Practices" for Using Macroseismic Intensity and Ground Motion Intensity Conversion Equations for Hazard and Loss Models in GEM1|last = Cua|first = G.|publisher = Global Earthquake Model|year = 2010|url = http://www.globalquakemodel.org/media/publication/GEM-TechnicalReport_2010-4.pdf|display-authors = etal|access-date = 11 November 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151227050149/http://www.globalquakemodel.org/media/publication/GEM-TechnicalReport_2010-4.pdf|archive-date = 27 December 2015}}See also: Seismic magnitude scales
The peak horizontal acceleration (PHA) is the most commonly used type of ground acceleration in engineering applications. It is often used within earthquake engineering (including seismic building codes) and it is commonly plotted on seismic hazard maps.{{Cite web|url = http://www.efehr.org:8080/jetspeed/portal/hazard.psml|title = The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM13)|year = 2013|access-date = 11 November 2015|publisher = EFEHR|last = European Facilities for Earthquake Hazard & Risk|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151227080447/http://www.efehr.org:8080/jetspeed/portal/hazard.psml|archive-date = 27 December 2015}} In an earthquake, damage to buildings and infrastructure is related more closely to ground motion, of which PGA is a measure, rather than the magnitude of the earthquake itself. For moderate earthquakes, PGA is a reasonably good determinant of damage; in severe earthquakes, damage is more often correlated with peak ground velocity.
Geophysics
Earthquake energy is dispersed in waves from the hypocentre, causing ground movement omnidirectionally but typically modelled horizontally (in two directions) and vertically. PGA records the acceleration (rate of change of speed) of these movements, while peak ground velocity is the greatest speed (rate of movement) reached by the ground, and peak displacement is the distance moved.{{cite web|title=Explanation of Parameters|url=https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2002/documentation/parm.php|department=Geologic Hazards Science Center|publisher=United States Geological Survey|access-date=22 March 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721070322/https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2002/documentation/parm.php|archive-date=21 July 2011}} These values vary in different earthquakes, and in differing sites within one earthquake event, depending on a number of factors. These include the length of the fault, magnitude, the depth of the quake, the distance from the epicentre, the duration (length of the shake cycle), and the geology of the ground (subsurface). Shallow-focused earthquakes generate stronger shaking (acceleration) than intermediate and deep quakes, since the energy is released closer to the surface.{{cite web|url=https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2007ewac.php#summary|title=Magnitude 6.6 – Near the west coast of Honshu, Japan|work=Earthquake summary|publisher=United States Geological Survey|date=16 July 2001|access-date=15 March 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110314201821/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2007ewac.php#summary|archive-date=14 March 2011}}
Peak ground acceleration can be expressed in fractions of g (the standard acceleration due to Earth's gravity, equivalent to g-force) as either a decimal or percentage; in m/s2 (1 g = 9.81 m/s2); or in multiples of Gal, where 1 Gal is equal to 0.01 m/s{{sup|2}} (1 g = 981 Gal).
The ground type can significantly influence ground acceleration, so PGA values can display extreme variability over distances of a few kilometers, particularly with moderate to large earthquakes.{{cite web|title=ShakeMap scientific background. Peak acceleration maps|url=https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/background.php#accmaps|department=Earthquake Hazards Program|publisher=United States Geological Survey|access-date=22 March 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110623092131/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/background.php#accmaps|archive-date=23 June 2011}} The varying PGA results from an earthquake can be displayed on a shake map.{{cite web|title=ShakeMap Scientific Background|url=https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/background.php|department=Earthquake Hazards Program|publisher=United States Geological Survey|access-date=22 March 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110623092131/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/background.php|archive-date=23 June 2011}}
Due to the complex conditions affecting PGA, earthquakes of similar magnitude can offer disparate results, with many moderate magnitude earthquakes generating significantly larger PGA values than larger magnitude quakes.
During an earthquake, ground acceleration is measured in three directions: vertically (V or UD, for up-down) and two perpendicular horizontal directions (H1 and H2), often north–south (NS) and east–west (EW). The peak acceleration in each of these directions is recorded, with the highest individual value often reported. Alternatively, a combined value for a given station can be noted. The peak horizontal ground acceleration (PHA or PHGA) can be reached by selecting the higher individual recording, taking the mean of the two values, or calculating a vector sum of the two components. A three-component value can also be reached, by taking the vertical component into consideration also.
In seismic engineering, the effective peak acceleration (EPA, the maximum ground acceleration to which a building responds) is often used, which tends to be {{frac|2|3}} – {{frac|3|4}} the PGA.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}}
Seismic risk and engineering
Study of geographic areas combined with an assessment of historical earthquakes allows geologists to determine seismic risk and to create seismic hazard maps, which show the likely PGA values to be experienced in a region during an earthquake, with a probability of exceedance (PE). Seismic engineers and government planning departments use these values to determine the appropriate earthquake loading for buildings in each zone, with key identified structures (such as hospitals, bridges, power plants) needing to survive the maximum considered earthquake (MCE).
Damage to buildings is related to both peak ground velocity (PGV) and the duration of the earthquake – the longer high-level shaking persists, the greater the likelihood of damage.
Comparison of instrumental and felt intensity
Peak ground acceleration provides a measurement of instrumental intensity, that is, ground shaking recorded by seismic instruments. Other intensity scales measure felt intensity, based on eyewitness reports, felt shaking, and observed damage. There is correlation between these scales, but not always absolute agreement since experiences and damage can be affected by many other factors, including the quality of earthquake engineering.
Generally speaking,
- 0.001 g (0.01 m/s{{sup|2}}) – perceptible by people
- 0.02 g (0.2 m/s{{sup|2}}) – people lose their balance
- 0.50 g (5 m/s{{sup|2}}) – very high; well-designed buildings can survive if the duration is short.{{cite web|url=http://www.wbdg.org/resources/seismic_design.php|title=Seismic Design Principles|author=Lorant, Gabor|work=Whole Building Design Guide|publisher=National Institute of Building Sciences|date=17 June 2010|access-date=15 March 2011}}
=Correlation with the Mercalli scale=
The United States Geological Survey developed an Instrumental Intensity scale, which maps peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity on an intensity scale similar to the felt Mercalli scale. These values are used to create shake maps by seismologists around the world.
class="wikitable" style="font-size: 90%; text-align: left; " |
align="center" | Instrumental Intensity ! align="center" | Acceleration ! align="center" | Velocity ! align="center" | Perceived shaking ! align="center" | Potential damage |
---|
align="center" | I
| align="center" | < 0.000464 | align="center" | < 0.0215 | align="center" | Not felt | align="center" | None |
align="center" | II–III
| align="center" | 0.000464 – 0.00297 | align="center" | 0.135 – 1.41 | align="center" | Weak | align="center" | None |
align="center" | IV
| align="center" | 0.00297 – 0.0276 | align="center" | 1.41 – 4.65 | align="center" | Light | align="center" | None |
align="center" | V
| align="center" | 0.0276 – 0.115 | align="center" | 4.65 – 9.64 | align="center" | Moderate | align="center" | Very light |
align="center" | VI
| align="center" | 0.115 – 0.215 | align="center" | 9.64 – 20 | align="center" | Strong | align="center" | Light |
align="center" | VII
| align="center" | 0.215 – 0.401 | align="center" | 20 – 41.4 | align="center" | Very strong | align="center" | Moderate |
align="center" | VIII
| align="center" | 0.401 – 0.747 | align="center" | 41.4 – 85.8 | align="center" | Severe | align="center" | Moderate to heavy |
align="center" | IX
| align="center" | 0.747 – 1.39 | align="center" | 85.8 – 178 | align="center" | Violent | align="center" | Heavy |
align="center" | X+
| align="center" | > 1.39 | align="center" | > 178 | align="center" | Extreme | align="center" | Very heavy |
=Other intensity scales=
In the 7-class Japan Meteorological Agency seismic intensity scale, the highest intensity, Shindo 7, covers accelerations greater than 4 m/s{{sup|2}} (0.41 g).
PGA hazard risks worldwide
In India, areas with expected PGA values higher than 0.36 g are classed as "Zone 5", or "Very High Damage Risk Zone".
Notable earthquakes
See also
References
{{reflist}}
Bibliography
- {{Cite journal
| last = Murphy
| first = J.R.
|author2=o'brien
| year = 1977
| title = The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters
| journal = Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
| volume = 67
| issue = 3
| pages = 877–915
| doi = 10.1785/BSSA0670030877
| bibcode = 1977BuSSA..67..877M
| s2cid = 129134843
}}
- {{Cite journal
| last = Campbell
| first = K.W.
| year = 1997
| title = Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra
| journal = Seismological Research Letters
| volume = 68
| issue = 1
| pages = 154–179
| doi = 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.154
| bibcode = 1997SeiRL..68..154C
}}
- {{Cite journal
| last = Campbell
| first = K.W.
|author2=Y. Bozorgnia
| year = 2003
| title = Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra
| journal = Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
| volume = 93
| issue = 1
| pages = 314–331
| doi = 10.1785/0120020029
|bibcode = 2003BuSSA..93..314C | url = http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/ssabull/93/4/1872.full.pdf
}}
- {{Cite journal
| last = Wald
| first = D.J. |author2=V. Quitoriano |author3=T.H. Heaton |author4=H. Kanamori
| year = 1999
| title = Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California
| journal = Earthquake Spectra
| volume = 15
| pages = 557
| doi = 10.1193/1.1586058
| issue = 3
| bibcode = 1999EarSp..15..557W | s2cid = 110698014 }}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Peak Ground Acceleration}}