Pershing Map

{{short description|Blueprint for a U.S. highway system}}

File:Pershing Map 1922.png

The Pershing Map was an early blueprint for a national highway system in the United States, with many of the proposed roads later forming a substantial portion of the Interstate Highway System.{{Cite web |last=Delight |first=Sightseers’ |title=Pershing Map |url=https://sightseersdelight.com/encyclopedia/pershing-map/ |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=Sightseers' Delight |language=en-US}} It's the first official United States road map, and many of the proposed roadways were later incorporated into the current highway system.{{Cite web |date=2023-10-16 |title=Transportation Economics in the 21st Century - Highway Data |url=https://www.nber.org/research/data/transportation-economics-21st-century-highway-data |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=NBER |language=en}}

History

When the United States Army realized it could not satisfactorily meet its World War I logistical needs by railroad alone, it organized truck convoys to supplement them, with the first run in 1917 from Toledo, Ohio, to Baltimore, Maryland. Following the two-month ordeal of the U.S. Army Transcontinental Motor Convoy in 1919, which included future president Dwight D. Eisenhower, a major proponent of the Interstate Highway System, the need for better infrastructure became even clearer.{{Cite web |title=National Museum of the United States Army |url=https://www.thenmusa.org/armyinnovations/nationalhighwaysystem/ |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=www.thenmusa.org}} Having to demolish and rebuild numerous bridges, the 3,400-mile trip took 62 days and averaged just 6 mph. The duration and condition of the journey proved that the nation's interstate roads were in great need of improvement.

In 1921, Thomas H. MacDonald, the newly appointed head of the Bureau of Public Roads, requested the Army provide it with a list of roads of "prime importance in the event of war".{{cite journal |url= http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/spring96/p96sp44.htm |journal= Public Roads |date= Spring 1996 |title= Milestones For U.S. Highway Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration |last= Weingroff |first= Richard F. |location= Washington, DC |publisher= Federal Highway Administration |volume= 59 |issue= 4 |accessdate= May 23, 2012 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100528095019/http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/spring96/p96sp44.htm |archive-date= May 28, 2010 |url-status= dead }} MacDonald had the Geological Survey and later his own staff painstakingly draft out the details of the Army's request, and presented the sum of these drawings in a massive {{convert|32|ft|m|sing=on}}-long map to Army War Plans.{{cite book |last= McNichol |first= Dan |title= The Roads That Built America: The Incredible Story of the U.S. Interstate System |year= 2006 |location= New York |publisher= Sterling Publishing |page= 62 |isbn= 9781402734687}} General of the Armies John Pershing himself reported the results back to Congress in 1922, with the proposal becoming known as the "Pershing Map". Pershing and his staff compiled {{Convert|78000|mi|km|abbr=on}} of public roads that were both useful for interconnected interstate travel, and, as the Army felt, for national defense. The map provided an early model for coast-to-coast, connected interstate highways, with additional access between and through major urban areas.

Most of the {{convert|78000|mi|km}} of roads requested were eventually built, with a number of routes becoming interstate highways. The proposal emphasized coastal and Mexican border defense and industrial needs of the time rather than economic development, with high priority routes going to such checkpoints as Sault Ste Marie, Michigan, yet bypassing nearly the entire Deep South. Professor Steven Dutch points out that this routing reflected the technology and needs of the post-World War I military. Coal fields and iron ports were critical for steel production, but the then-nascent oil fields in West Texas and Oklahoma were not yet important, and with little infrastructure, southern Florida was not a priority since any army landing there would have had no method to advance northwards.{{cite web |first= Steve |last= Dutch |date= June 2, 2010 |url= http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/EnvirGeolNotes/Military.HTM |title= Military Impacts on the Environment |publisher= University of Wisconsin-Green Bay |accessdate= May 23, 2012 |url-status= dead |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20130404184641/http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/EnvirGeolNotes/Military.HTM |archivedate= April 4, 2013 }}

References

{{reflist}}