Personalism

{{short description|Philosophical and theological school of thought}}

{{for|the type of dictatorship|Personalist dictatorship|Personalismo}}

{{related|Personism|Theistic Personalism}}

{{multiple image|caption_align=center

| total_width = 425

| image1 = George Holmes Howison.jpg

| width1 = 700

| height1 = 828

| alt1 =

| link1 =

| caption1 = George Howison

| image2 = Scheler max.jpg

| width2 = 700

| height2 = 828

| alt2 =

| link2 =

| caption2 = Max Scheler

| image3 = JohannesPaul2-portrait.jpg

| width3 = 700

| height3 = 828

| alt3 =

| link3 =

| caption3 = John Paul II

}}

Personalism is an intellectual stance that emphasizes the importance of human persons. Personalism exists in many different versions, and this makes it somewhat difficult to define as a philosophical and theological movement.{{cite SEP |url-id= personalism |title= Personalism |last= Williams |first= Thomas D.}} Friedrich Schleiermacher first used the term personalism ({{langx |de| Personalismus}}) in print in 1799.F. D. E. Schleiermacher Über die Religion (1799), Hrsg. v. Andreas Arndt. Meiner, Hamburg 2004, {{ISBN|3-7873-1690-6}} In the original German language: der Personalismus. One can trace the concept back to earlier thinkers in various parts of the world.

Thomas O. Buford, [https://www.iep.utm.edu/personal/ Personalism], Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Overview

Writing in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Thomas D. Williams{{cite web | url=http://ww.thomasdwilliams.com/scholarly_articles.html | title=Thomas D. Williams, PhD - Theologian, Author, Consultant - Scholarly Articles }} and Jan Olof Bengtsson{{cite web | url=https://janolofbengtsson.com/publications/ | title=Publications | date=4 August 2010 }}{{Cite web | title=Jan Bengtsson (Lund University) - PhilPeople | url=https://philpeople.org/profiles/jan-bengtsson | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127110538/https://philpeople.org/profiles/jan-bengtsson | access-date=2025-03-24 | archive-date=2020-11-27}} cite a plurality of "schools" holding to a "personalist" ethic and "Weltanschauung", arguing:

{{blockquote|

Personalism exists in many different versions, and this makes it somewhat difficult to define as a philosophical and theological movement. Many philosophical schools have at their core one particular thinker or even one central work which serves as a canonical touchstone. Personalism is a more diffused and eclectic movement and has no such common reference point. It is, in point of fact, more proper to speak of many personalisms than one personalism. In 1947 Jacques Maritain could write that there are at least "a dozen personalist doctrines, which at times have nothing more in common than the word 'person.'" Moreover, because of their emphasis on the subjectivity of the person, some of the more important exponents of personalism have not undertaken systematic treatises of their theories.

It is perhaps more proper to speak of personalism as a "current" or a broader "worldview", since it represents more than one school or one doctrine while at the same time the most important forms of personalism do display some central and essential commonalities. Most important of the latter is the general affirmation of the centrality of the person for philosophical thought. Personalism posits ultimate reality and value in personhood – human as well as (at least for most personalists) divine. It emphasizes the significance, uniqueness and inviolability of the person, as well as the person's essentially relational or social dimension. The title "personalism" can therefore legitimately be applied to any school of thought that focuses on the centrality of persons and their unique status among beings in general, and personalists normally acknowledge the indirect contributions of a wide range of thinkers throughout the history of philosophy who did not regard themselves as personalists. Personalists believe that the person should be the ontological and epistemological starting point of philosophical reflection. Many are concerned to investigate the experience, the status, and the dignity of the human being as person, and regard this as the starting-point for all subsequent philosophical analysis.{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Williams |first1=Thomas D. |last2=Bengtsson |first2=Jan Olof |year=2020 |title=Personalism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/personalism/ |editor-last=Zalta |editor-first=Edward N. |editor-link=Edward N. Zalta |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |edition=Spring 2020 |access-date=3 August 2020}}{{longquote|date=August 2022}}

}}

Thus, according to Williams, one ought to keep in mind that although there may be dozens of theorists and social activists in the West adhering to the rubric "personalism," their particular foci may, in fact, be asymptotic, and even diverge at material junctures.

Variants

=Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev=

Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev (1874–1948) was a Russian religious and political philosopher who emphasized human freedom, subjectivity and creativity.{{cite book | chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-8870-8_3 | doi=10.1007/978-94-011-8870-8_3 | chapter=Existentialism: A Personalist Philosophy of History | title=Berdyaev's Philosophy of History | date=1968 | last1=Richardson | first1=David Bonner | pages=90–137 | isbn=978-94-011-8210-2 }}

=Emmanuel Mounier=

{{further|Non-conformists of the 1930s|Alexandre Marc}}

In France, philosopher Emmanuel Mounier (1905–1950) was the leading proponent of personalism, around which he founded the review Esprit, which exists to this day. Under Jean-Marie Domenach's direction, it criticized the use of torture during the Algerian War. Personalism was seen as an alternative to both liberalism and Marxism, which respected human rights and the human personality without indulging in excessive collectivism. Mounier's personalism had an important influence in France, including in political movements, such as Marc Sangnier's Ligue de la jeune République (Young Republic League) founded in 1912.

=Catholic personalism<!--Ethical personalism' redirects here-->=

{{Catholic philosophy |expanded=all}}

{{main|Phenomenological Thomism}}

Following on the writings of Dorothy Day, a distinctively Christian personalism developed in the 20th century.McCook, Kathleen. “Social Justice, Personalism, and the Practice of Librarianship,” Catholic Library World

72 (Winter, 2001): 80-84. Its main theorist was the Polish philosopher Karol Wojtyła (later Pope John Paul II). In his work, Love and Responsibility, first published in 1960, Wojtyła proposed what he termed 'the personalistic norm':

{{blockquote|This norm, in its negative aspect, states that the person is the kind of good which does not admit of use and cannot be treated as an object of use and as such the means to an end. In its positive form the personalistic norm confirms this: the person is a good towards which the only proper and adequate attitude is loveLove and Responsibility (Ignatius Press, 1993), pg. 41}}

This brand of personalism has come to be known as "Thomistic" because of its efforts to square modern notions regarding the person with the teachings of Thomas Aquinas.{{cite web|last=Williams |first=Thomas D.|title=What Is Thomistic Personalism?|publisher=Alpha Omega|url-status=dead |url=http://www.uprait.org/archivio_pdf/ao42_williams1.pdf|access-date=20 June 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130425213150/http://www.uprait.org/archivio_pdf/ao42_williams1.pdf |archive-date=25 April 2013}} Wojtyła was influenced by the ethical personalism of German phenomenologist Max Scheler.[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personalism/ Personalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)]

A first principle of Christian personalism is that persons are not to be used, but to be respected and loved. In Gaudium et spes, the Second Vatican Council formulated what has come to be considered the key expression of this personalism: "man is the only creature on earth that God willed for its own sake and he cannot fully find himself except through a sincere gift of himself".Gaudium et spes, no. 24. This apparently paradoxical idea - if you seek your life selfishly, you will lose it; if you are generous in giving it, you will find it - is rooted in the gospel: cf. Mt. 16:25; Mk 8:35; Lk 17:33.

This formula for self-fulfillment offers a key for overcoming the dichotomy frequently felt between personal "realization" and the needs or demands of social life. Personalism also implies inter-personalism, as Benedict XVI stresses in Caritas in Veritate:

{{blockquote|As a spiritual being, the human creature is defined through interpersonal relations. The more authentically he or she lives these relations, the more his or her own personal identity matures. It is not by isolation that man establishes his worth, but by placing himself in relation with others and with God.Caritas in veritate, #53}}

Renowned laity contribute significantly to the modern Catholic disposition on personalism as well. For example, Dietrich von Hildebrand noted:

{{blockquote|[Moral values] can only grow out of conscious, free attitudes; man himself must essentially cooperate for their realization. They can only develop through his conscious, free abandonment of himself to genuine values. In proportion to man’s capacity to grasp values, in so far as he sees the fullness of the world of values with a clear and fresh vision, in so far as his abandonment to this world is pure and unconditional, will he be rich in moral values.”Dietrich von Hildebrand, Fundamental Moral Attitudes, retrieved 2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20190531043632/https://www.ewtn.com/library/theology.funmor.htm}}

=Boston personalism<!--'Boston personalism' redirects here-->=

Personalism flourished in the early 20th century at Boston University in a movement known as Boston personalism led by theologian Borden Parker Bowne. Bowne emphasized the person as the fundamental category for explaining reality and asserted that only persons are real. He stood in opposition to certain forms of materialism which would describe persons as mere particles of matter. For example, against the argument that persons are insignificant specks of dust in the vast universe, Bowne would say that it is impossible for the entire universe to exist apart from a person to experience it. Ontologically speaking, the person is "larger" than the universe because the universe is but one small aspect of the person who experiences it. Personalism affirms the existence of the soul. Most personalists assert that God is real and that God is a person (or as in Christian trinitarianism, three 'persons', although it is important to note that the nonstandard meaning of the word 'person' in this theological context is significantly different from Bowne's usage).

Bowne also held that persons have value (see axiology, value theory, and ethics). In declaring the absolute value of personhood, he stood firmly against certain forms of philosophical naturalism (including social Darwinism) which sought to reduce the value of persons. He also stood against certain forms of positivism which sought to render ethical and theological discourse meaningless and dismiss talk of God a priori.

Georgia Harkness was a major Boston personalist theologian.{{cite book | last=Miles | first=R. | title=Georgia Harkness: The Remaking of a Liberal Theologian | publisher=Westminster John Knox Press | series=Library of theological ethics | year=2010 | isbn=978-0-664-22667-1 }}{{pn|date=October 2023}}{{cite book | last=Burrow | first=R. |year=1999| title=Personalism: a Critical Introduction |location=St. Louis, MO | publisher=Chalice Press | isbn=978-0-8272-3055-2 }}{{pn|date=October 2023}}{{cite book | last1=Deats | first1=P. | last2=Robb | first2=C. | title=The Boston Personalist Tradition in Philosophy, Social Ethics, and Theology | publisher=Mercer University Press | year=1986 | isbn=978-0-86554-177-1 }}{{pn|date=October 2023}}{{cite thesis |last1=Carpenter |first1=Dianne E. |title=Georgia Harkness's Distinctive Personalistic Synthesis |date=1988 |hdl=2144/38009 }}{{pn|date=October 2023}} Francis John McConnell was a major second-generation advocate of Boston personalism who sought to apply the philosophy to social problems of his time.{{cite journal |last=Burrow|first=Rufus Jr. |title=Francis John McConnell and personalistic social ethics |journal=Methodist History |volume=31 |number=2 |year=1993 |hdl=10516/5872 }}

=California personalism<!--'Personal idealism' and 'Boston personalism' redirect here-->=

George Holmes Howison taught a metaphysical theory called personal idealism{{cite web |url=http://www.howison.us/george_holmes_howison.htm |title=George Holmes Howison |access-date=2012-08-17 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120707190718/http://www.howison.us/george_holmes_howison.htm |archive-date=2012-07-07 }} or California personalism. Howison maintained that both impersonal, monistic idealism and materialism run contrary to the moral freedom experienced by persons. To deny the freedom to pursue the ideals of truth, beauty, and "benignant love" is to undermine every profound human venture, including science, morality, and philosophy. Thus, even the personalistic idealism of Borden Parker Bowne and Edgar S. Brightman and the realistic personal theism of Thomas Aquinas are inadequate, for they make finite persons dependent for their existence upon an infinite Person and support this view by an unintelligible doctrine of creatio ex nihilo.{{cite book|url=http://www.bookrags.com/research/howison-george-holmes-18341916-eoph/|title=Research Howison, George Holmes (1834-1916) - Encyclopedia of Philosophy|website=www.bookrags.com|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121002094713/http://www.bookrags.com/research/howison-george-holmes-18341916-eoph/|archive-date=2012-10-02}}

The Personal Idealism of Howison was explained in his book The Limits of Evolution and Other Essays Illustrating the Metaphysical Theory of Personal Idealism. Howison created a radically democratic notion of personal idealism that extended all the way to God, who was no more the ultimate monarch, no longer the only ruler and creator of the universe, but the ultimate democrat in eternal relation to other eternal persons. Howison found few disciples among the religious, for whom his thought was heretical; the non-religious, on the other hand, considered his proposals too religious; only J. M. E. McTaggart's idealist atheism or Thomas Davidson's apeirotheism seem to resemble Howison's personal idealism.{{cite journal |last1=McLachlan |first1=James |title=George Holmes Howison: The City of God and Personal Idealism |journal=The Journal of Speculative Philosophy |date=2006 |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=224–242 |id={{Project MUSE|209478}} }}

= Critical personalism =

Critical personalism is a German development. Based on humanistic considerations (e.g. Spaemann), African Theories on Personhood (e.g. Wiredu) receptions of communitarian theories (e.g. Taylor) and empirical findings of developmental, social and personality psychology it addresses the issue of the development of personhood in community. Each person does not only reach a certain position within community but also forms an individual personality over his or her life span. In doing so, they determine a relationship to their selves and to other people. The development of personality appears as a way to take responsibility in community. Communities are thought of as by nature infinitely diverse associations, which are not characterised by fixed values, but rather by the fact that they constantly communicate about values as they constantly arise due to actual praxis. On the basis of discourse ethics (Habermas, Apel) and the methodology of critical mediation,{{cite book |first1=Klaus |last1=Geiselhart |chapter=Truth and academia in times of fake news, alternative facts and filter bubbles: A pragmatist notion of critique as mediation |pages=139–156 |jstor=j.ctv11vc913.12 |editor1-first=Jane |editor1-last=Wills |editor2-first=Robert W. |editor2-last=Lake |title=The power of pragmatism: Knowledge production and social inquiry |date=2020 |publisher=Manchester University Press |isbn=978-1-5261-3494-3 }} critical personalism in given social contexts reflects on communication practices and the societal conditions for personality development.

= Tartu school of personalism =

German philosopher Gustav Teichmüller (1832–1888) founded the personalism school when he came to Tartu in 1871. The core of the group consisted of the first Latvian philosopher Jēkabs Osis (1860–1920),{{Cite journal |last=Hiršs |first=A |date=2015 |title=THE FIRST LATVIAN PHILOSOPHER JĒKABS OSIS AND THE SEARCH FOR SUBSTANCE |url=http://www.kirj.ee/?id=26002&tpl=1061&c_tpl=1064 |journal=Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences |language=en |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=95 |doi=10.3176/tr.2015.2.01 |issn=1406-0922}} the Russian philosopher Yevgeni Bobrov (1867–1933), the Lithuanian Włodzimierz Szyłkarski (1884–1960), and the Polish thinker Wincenty Lutosławski (1863–1954).{{Cite journal |last=Hiršs |first=Andris |date=2024-10-23 |title=Influence of personalism on Latvian theory up to the early twentieth century: substantiality and panentheism |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11212-024-09678-7 |journal=Studies in East European Thought |language=en |doi=10.1007/s11212-024-09678-7 |issn=1573-0948|url-access=subscription }} This group of philosophers came together to revise German idealism and fight materialistic tendencies. Teichmüller criticised Hegel and Kant’s followers. He believed in a new doctrine that would reveal and justify the importance of an individual personality as the only true source of existence. Teichmüller significantly influenced Russian and Latvian{{Cite journal |last=Hiršs |first=Andris |date=2023-10-18 |title=Tendencies in the Historiography of Latvian Philosophy |url=https://zurnalai.vu.lt//problemos/article/view/33373 |journal=Problemos |volume=104 |pages=21–35 |doi=10.15388/Problemos.2023.104.2 |issn=2424-6158|doi-access=free }} philosophical thought.

Antecedents and influence

Philosopher Immanuel Kant, though not formally considered a personalist, made an important contribution to the personalist cause by declaring that a person is not to be valued merely as a means to the ends of other people, but that he possesses dignity (an absolute inner worth) and is to be valued as an end in himself.

Catholic philosopher and theologian John Henry Newman, has been posited as a main proponent of personalism by John Crosby of Franciscan University in his book Personalist Papers. Crosby notes Newman's personal approach to faith, as outlined in Grammar of Assent as a main source of Newman's personalism.{{cite book|last=Crosby|first=John|title=Personalist Papers|year=2003 |publisher=Catholic University of America Press |location=Washington, DC|isbn=978-0-8132-1317-0 |pages=280}}

Martin Luther King Jr. was greatly influenced by personalism in his studies at Boston University. King came to agree with the position that only personality is real. It solidified his understanding of God as a personal god. It also gave him a metaphysical basis for his belief that all human personality has dignity and worth.{{cite web |title=My Pilgrimage to Nonviolence |url=https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/my-pilgrimage-nonviolence |website=The Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute }}

Paul Ricœur explicitly sought to support personalist movement by developing its theoretical foundation and expanding it with a new personalist social ethic.{{r|Deweer 2013|p=3}} However, he later had significant disagreements with Mounier and criticized other personalist writers for insufficient conceptual clarity. Ricœur also disagreed with the other personalists in asserting the significance of justice as a value in its own right and gave this primary in the public sphere, whereas Mounier characterized all relationships including public and political ones in terms of love and friendship.{{cite journal |last1=Deweer |first1=Dries |title=Ricœur and the Pertinence of a Political Education: On Crisis and Commitment |journal=Archivio di Filosofia |date=2013 |volume=81 |issue=1/2 |pages=71–79 |jstor=24488484 }}

Pope John Paul II was also influenced by the personalism advocated by Christian existentialist philosopher Søren Kierkegaard. Before his election to the Roman papacy, he wrote The Acting Person (sometimes mistranslated as Person and Act), a philosophical work suffused with personalism.{{Cite book | isbn=978-90-277-0985-1|title = The Acting Person|last1 = Wojtyla|first1 = Karol| date=1979-02-28| publisher=Springer }} Though he remained well within the traditional stream of Catholic social and individual morality, his explanation of the origins of moral norms, as expressed in his encyclicals on economics and on sexual morality, for instance, was largely drawn from a personalist perspective.see Doran, Kevin P. Solidarity: A Synthesis of Personalism and Communalism in the Thought of Karol Wojtyła/John Paul II. New York: Peter Lang, 1996. {{ISBN|0-8204-3071-4}} His writings as Roman pontiff, of course, influenced a generation of Catholic theologians who have since taken up personalist perspectives on the theology of the family and social order.

Notable personalists

{{more citations needed section|date=June 2018}}

{{quote box|quote="Start your work from where you live, with the small concrete needs right around you. Help ease tension in your workplace. Help feed the person right in front of you. Personalism holds that we each have a deep personal obligation to live simply, to look after the needs of our brothers and sisters, and to share in the happiness and misery they are suffering."

|author=David Brooks

|source={{cite book|title=The Road to Character |date=2015|title-link=The Road to Character}}

|align=right

|width=30em

}}

{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}

  • Randall Auxier
  • Willem Banning
  • Martin Buber
  • Edgar S. Brightman
  • Borden Parker Bowne
  • Bernard Charbonneau
  • Dorothy Day[https://www.youtube.com/user/4854derrida Dorothy Day interviews on YouTube:] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121211022947/http://www.youtube.com/user/4854derrida |date=2012-12-11 }} with Christopher Closeup (1971) and Hubert Jessup/WCVB-TV Boston (1974) where she discusses her personalist views{{cite book |title=Revolution of the Heart: The Dorthy Day Story |date=March 6, 2020 |publisher=Maryland Public Television |at=(Personalism: minute 13:15+) |url=https://www.pbs.org/video/revolution-of-the-heart-the-dorothy-day-story-lwz697/ |access-date=April 1, 2021 |archive-date=April 11, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210411024645/https://www.pbs.org/video/revolution-of-the-heart-the-dorothy-day-story-lwz697/ |url-status=dead }}
  • Jacques Ellul
  • Ralph Tyler Flewelling
  • George Holmes Howison
  • Bogumil Gacka
  • Albert C. Knudson
  • Edvard Kocbek
  • Milan Komar
  • Feliks Koneczny
  • Edwin Lewis
  • Nikolay Lossky
  • John Macmurray
  • Gabriel Marcel
  • Peter Maurin
  • J. M. E. McTaggart
  • Walter George Muelder
  • A. J. Muste
  • Ngô Đình DiệmKolko, Gabriel, Anatomy of a War pages 83-84, {{ISBN|1-56584-218-9}}
  • Ngô Đình NhuKarnow, Stanley, Vietnam: A History p. 259Nguyen, Duy Lap. The Unimagined Community: Imperialism and Culture in South Vietnam. Manchester University Press, 2020, pages 51-152
  • Madame Ngô Đình Nhu
  • Michael O'Brien (Canadian author){{cite book |first=Michael |last=O'Brien |title=The Family & the New Totalitarianism |publisher=Divine Providence Press |date=2019 |isbn=9780991583263 }}
  • Constantin Rădulescu-Motru
  • Charles Renouvier
  • Herman Van Rompuy{{efn|Herman Van Rompuy, former Prime Minister of Belgium and President of the European Council, frequently referred to personalism and wrote extensively about Catholic personalist philosophy.{{cite book |last=Foret |first=FranÇois |editor1-first=François |editor1-last=Foret |editor2-first=Xabier |editor2-last=Itçaina |chapter=Theories of European integration and religion: A critical assessment |title=Politics of Religion in Western Europe |publisher=Routledge |date=22 August 2011 |isbn=978-0-203-80385-1 |doi=10.4324/9780203803851|url=https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/99765/1/ch09.pdf }}{{cite magazine |last=Crosby |first=John F. |title=The Witness of Dietrich von Hildebrand |magazine=First Things |number=168 |date=1 November 2006|pages=7–9 |url=https://www.firstthings.com/article/2006/12/the-witness-of-dietrich-von-hildebrand}}{{cite journal |last=Gourlay |first=Thomas V. |title=Book Review: Dietrich von Hildebrand, Liturgy and PersonalityLiturgy and Personality. By von HildebrandDietrich. Steubenville, OH: Hildebrand Press, 2016. Pp. 160. US$17.99. {{Text|ISBN}} 9781939773005. |journal=The Downside Review |volume=136 |issue=2 |date=9 February 2018 |doi=10.1177/0012580618758961 |pages=137–138|s2cid=149688189 }}{{cite journal |last=Kitzinger |first=Denis |title=Towards a Model of Transnational Agency: the Case of Dietrich von Hildebrand |journal=The International History Review |volume=33 |issue=4 |year=2011 |doi=10.1080/07075332.2011.620740 |pages=669–686|s2cid=144076453 }}|name=|group=}}
  • Denis de Rougemont
  • Francisco de Sá Carneiro, Prime Minister of Portugal{{cite web|url=http://www.tsdnacional.com/pdf/mocao-sn.pdf|title=X CONGRESSO da TSD - Trabalhadores Social Democratas (Social Democratic Workers)|access-date=2008-01-07|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041021093509/http://www.tsdnacional.com/pdf/mocao-sn.pdf|archive-date=2004-10-21|language=pt|page=7}}
  • Robert Spaemann
  • F. C. S. Schiller
  • William Stern
  • Gustav Teichmüller
  • Pierre Trudeau{{cite book |author=John English |title=Citizen of the World |isbn=978-0-676-97521-5 |publisher=Knopf Canada |page=147 |date=2006-10-06}}
  • Max StirnerThe False Principle of Our Education " I rather say, we need from now on a personal education (not the impressing of convictions). If one wants to call again those who follow this principle -ists, then, in my opinion, one may call them personalists."
  • Dietrich von Hildebrand
  • Pope John Paul II{{cite journal |last1=Gronbacher |first1=Gregory M. A. |title=The need for economic personalism |journal=Journal of Markets & Morality |date=Spring 1998 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=1–35 |id={{Gale|A186469651}} {{ProQuest|1438897603}} |url=https://www.marketsandmorality.com/index.php/mandm/article/view/660 }}{{cite book |last1=Schmitz |first1=Kenneth L. |title=At the Center of the Human Drama: The Philosophical Anthropology of Karol Wojtyła/Pope John Paul II |date=1993 |publisher=CUA Press |isbn=978-0-8132-0780-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=li2fr5PLBjEC&pg=PA35 |page=35f}}Lawler, R. D. (1982). The Christian Personalism of Pope John Paul II (Vol. 1). Franciscan Pr.{{cite book |last1=Woznicki |first1=Andrew N. |title=A Christian Humanism: Karol Wojtyla's Existential Personalism |date=1980 |publisher=Mariel Publications |oclc=567903880 }}{{pn|date=October 2023}}Doran, K. (1996). Solidarity: a synthesis of personalism and communalism in the thought of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II (Vol. 190). Peter Lang Pub Inc.{{pn|date=October 2023}}Cooper, J. W. (1995). Body, soul, and life everlasting: biblical anthropology and the monism-dualism debate. Vancouver: Regent College Bookstore.{{pn|date=October 2023}}

{{Div col end}}

See also

{{Portal|Philosophy}}

Notes

{{notelist}}

References

{{reflist}}

Further reading

{{refbegin}}

  • {{cite book |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297191.001.0001 |title=The Worldview of Personalism |date=2006 |last1=Bengtsson |first1=Jan Olof |isbn=978-0-19-929719-1 }}
  • {{cite journal | last=Bengtsson | first=Jan Olof |year=2008 |title=Reply to Phillip Ferreira |journal=The Pluralist |volume=3 | pages=47–61 |number=2 | doi=10.2307/20708936 |jstor=20708936| s2cid=254491996 }}
  • {{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1689 |chapter=Personalism |title=Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions |date=2013 |last1=Bengtsson |first1=Jan Olof |pages=1626–1634 |isbn=978-1-4020-8264-1 }}
  • Burrow, R. (1999). Afrikan American Contributions to Personalism. Encounter-Indianapolis-, 60, 145–168.
  • {{cite journal | last=De Tavernier | first=Johan | title=The Historical Roots of Personalism | journal=Ethical Perspectives | volume=16 | issue=3 | date=30 September 2009 | doi=10.2143/ep.16.3.2042719 | pages=361–392 }}
  • {{Cite SSRN |last=Schmiesing |first=Kevin |date=December 2000 |title=A History of Personalism |ssrn=1851661}}
  • {{cite book |last=Williams |first=Thomas D. |year=2005 |title=Who Is My Neighbor? Personalism and the Foundations of Human Rights |publisher=Catholic University of America Press | isbn=978-0-8132-1391-0}}
  • Andris, Hiršs (2024) Influence of personalism on Latvian theory up to the early twentieth century: substantiality and panentheism. Studies in East European Thought. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09678-7 Link: https://rdcu.be/dXVTG

{{refend}}