Plan S#Transformative journal

Plan S is an initiative for open-access science publishing launched in 2018{{cite news |title=Coalition of European Funders Announces 'Plan S' to Require Full OA, Cap APCs, & Disallow Publication in Hybrid Journals |url=https://sparcopen.org/news/2018/coalition-european-funders-announces-plan-s/ |work=SPARC |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=16 January 2019 |archive-date=16 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190116100408/https://sparcopen.org/news/2018/coalition-european-funders-announces-plan-s/ |url-status=live }}{{cite web |title=Plan S: Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications |url=https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Plan_S.pdf |website=Science Europe |access-date=13 September 2018 |date=4 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904122211/https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Plan_S.pdf |archive-date=4 September 2018 |url-status=dead }} by "cOAlition S",{{Cite web|url=https://www.scienceeurope.org/coalition-s/|title=Science Europe – cOAlition S|website=scienceeurope.org|access-date=15 September 2018|archive-date=5 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005074754/https://www.scienceeurope.org/coalition-s/|url-status=live}} a consortium of national research agencies and funders from twelve European countries. The plan requires scientists and researchers who benefit from state-funded research organisations and institutions to publish their work in open repositories or in journals that are available to all by 2021.{{cite news |title=European countries demand that publicly funded research should be free to all |url=https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/09/15/european-countries-demand-that-publicly-funded-research-should-be-free-to-all |newspaper=The Economist |date=15 September 2018 |access-date=13 September 2018 |archive-date=2 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211002110323/https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/09/15/european-countries-demand-that-publicly-funded-research-be-free |url-status=live }} The "S" stands for "shock".{{cite news |title=Hobbels op weg naar open wetenschap |first=Claud |last=Biemans |url=https://www.ntvn.nl/archief/2019/ |journal=Nederlands Tijschrift voor Natuurkunde |date=March 2019 |language=nl |quote=De S staat voor shock. (Robbert-Jan Smits, presentation at the Physics@Veldhoven conference, 22 January 2019). |access-date=25 February 2019 |archive-date=25 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190225162142/https://www.ntvn.nl/archief/2019/ |url-status=live }}

Per 2017 figures, the mandate of Plan S will cover about 6% of worldwide research articles, including about one third of articles in Nature and Science. Major publishers have been planning to accommodate this mandate by offering (or allowing) open access options to authors.

Principles

The plan, launched in 2018, was structured around ten principles. The key principle states that by 2021, research funded by public or private grants must be published in open-access journals or platforms, or made immediately available in open access repositories without an embargo. The ten principles are:

authors should retain copyright on their publications, which must be published under an open license such as Creative Commons;
the members of the coalition should establish robust criteria and requirements for compliant open access journals and platforms;
they should also provide incentives for the creation of compliant open access journals and platforms if they do not yet exist;
publication fees should be covered by the funders or universities, not individual researchers;
such publication fees should be standardized and capped;
universities, research organizations, and libraries should align their policies and strategies;
for books and monographs, the timeline may be extended beyond 2021;
open archives and repositories are acknowledged for their importance;
hybrid open-access journals are not compliant with the key principle;
members of the coalition should monitor and sanction non-compliance.

In October 2023, cOAlition S released a proposal that would "reimagine scientific publishing without any author fees" (diamond open access).{{cite journal | last=Sanderson | first=Katharine | title=Who should pay for open-access publishing? APC alternatives emerge | journal=Nature | publisher=Nature Publishing Group | date=2023-11-14 | volume=623 | issue=7987 | pages=472–473 | doi=10.1038/d41586-023-03506-4 | pmid=37964063 | bibcode=2023Natur.623..472S | s2cid=265152169 | url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03506-4 | access-date=2023-11-23| url-access=subscription }}{{cite web | title=Towards Responsible Publishing | website='Plan S' and 'cOAlition S' – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications | url=https://www.coalition-s.org/towards-responsible-publishing/ | access-date=2023-11-23}}

Specific implementation guidance

File:2019 Requirements for Plan S compliance in one page by Philipp Zumstein.png

A task force of Science Europe, led by John-Arne Røttingen (RCN) and David Sweeney (UKRI), has developed a specific implementation guidance on the Plan S principles, released on 27 November 2018.{{cite news |title=Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/wp-content/uploads/271118_cOAlitionS_Guidance.pdf |access-date=27 November 2018 |work=cOAlition S |date=27 November 2018 |archive-date=11 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200211124954/https://www.coalition-s.org/wp-content/uploads/271118_cOAlitionS_Guidance.pdf |url-status=live }} The development of the implementation guidance also drew on input from interested parties such as research institutions, researchers, universities, funders, charities, publishers, and civil society.{{cite news |title=cOAlition S Adopts Implementation Guidance on Plan S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-adopts-implementation-guidance/ |access-date=22 November 2018 |work=cOAlition S |date=22 November 2018 |archive-date=21 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121203039/https://www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-adopts-implementation-guidance/ |url-status=live }}

= Transition period =

{{anchor|Transformative journal}}During a transition period, it will remain permissible to publish in so-called transformative journals, defined as hybrid journals that are covered by an agreement to become a full open-access venue.{{cite news |last1=Else |first1=Holly |title=Funders flesh out details of Europe's bold open-access plan |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07557-w |access-date=27 November 2018 |work=Nature |date=27 November 2018 |archive-date=5 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105144712/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07557-w |url-status=live }} The contracts of such transformative agreements need to be made publicly available (including costs), and may not last beyond 2023.

= Green open access =

Publishing in any journal will continue to be permissible subject to the condition that a copy of the manuscript accepted by the journal, or the final published article, will be deposited in an approved open-access repository (green open access) with no embargo on access and with a CC BY licence.

As part of the Rights retention strategy, Coalition S plans to override journal policies that would forbid this.{{cite journal | title=Open-access Plan S to allow publishing in any journal | journal=Nature | date=2020-07-16 | doi=10.1038/d41586-020-02134-6 | url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02134-6 | access-date=2020-07-24 | archive-date=16 July 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200716190558/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02134-6 | url-status=live | last1=Van Noorden | first1=Richard | pmid=32678332 | s2cid=220610171 | url-access=subscription }}{{citation |url=https://www.arl.org/news/arl-welcomes-coalitions-rights-retention-strategy-calling-for-open-access-to-results-of-funded-research/ |title=ARL Welcomes cOAlitionS Retention Strategy Calling for Open Access to Results of Funded Research |date=15 July 2020 |publisher=Association of Research Libraries |location=US |access-date=15 July 2020 |archive-date=26 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201026040449/https://www.arl.org/news/arl-welcomes-coalitions-rights-retention-strategy-calling-for-open-access-to-results-of-funded-research/ |url-status=live }} As of October 2021, this was done for over 500 works published in various venues.

= Licensing and rights =

To re-use scholarly content, proper attribution needs to be given to the authors, and publications need to be granted a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to share and adapt the work for any purpose, including commercially. Scholarly articles must be published under a Creative Commons Attribution license CC BY 4.0, or alternatively CC BY-SA 4.0 Share-alike or CC0 Public Domain.

In particular, this allows them to be used in Wikipedia.

= Mandatory criteria for open access journals and platforms =

Open access journals and platforms need to meet the following criteria to be compliant with Plan S:

All scholarly content must be immediately accessible upon publication without any delay and free to read and download, without any kind of technical or other form of obstacles.
Content needs to be published under CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0.
The journal/platform must implement and document a solid review system according to the standards within the discipline, and according to the standards of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
The journal/platform must be listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) or be in the state of being registered.
Automatic article processing charge waivers for authors from low-income countries and discounts for authors from middle-income countries must be provided.
Details about publishing costs (including direct costs, indirect costs and potential surplus) impacting the publication fees must be made transparent and be openly available on the journal website/publishing platform.
DOIs must be used as permanent identifiers.
Long-term digital preservation strategy by deposition of content in an archiving programme such as LOCKSS/CLOCKSS.
Accessibility of the full text in a machine readable format (e.g. XML / JATS) to foster Text and Data Mining (TDM).
Link to raw data and code in external repositories.
Provide high quality and machine readable article level metadata and cited references under a CC0 public domain dedication.
Embed machine readable information on the open access status and the license of the article.

Mirror journals, where one part is subscription based, with the other part being open access, are considered to be de facto hybrid journals. Mirror journals are not compliant with Plan S unless they are a part of a transformative agreement.

= Public feedback =

The implementation guidance was open for general feedback until 8 February 2019.{{cite news |title=Public Feedback on the Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S |url=https://surveys.scienceeurope.org/index.php/746597?lang=en |access-date=17 January 2019 |work=cOAlition S |date=27 November 2018 |archive-date=8 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181208140509/https://surveys.scienceeurope.org/index.php/746597?lang=en |url-status=deviated}} On 31 May 2019 the cOAlition S published an updated version of their implementation guidance in light of the feedback received during the consultation.{{Cite web|url=https://www.coalition-s.org/revised-implementation-guidance/|title=cOAlition S Releases Revised Implementation Guidance on Plan S Following Public Feedback Exercise {{!}} Plan S|website=www.coalition-s.org|access-date=4 June 2019|archive-date=30 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190530233807/https://www.coalition-s.org/revised-implementation-guidance/|url-status=live}}

COAlition S

Some commentators have suggested that the adoption of Plan S in one region would encourage its adoption in other regions.{{cite web |last1=Rabes |first1=Tania |title=Will the world embrace Plan S, the radical proposal to mandate open access to science papers? |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/will-world-embrace-plan-s-radical-proposal-mandate-open-access-science-papers |website=Science |date=2 January 2019 |access-date=7 January 2019 |archive-date=3 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190103233212/https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/01/will-world-embrace-plan-s-radical-proposal-mandate-open-access-science-papers |url-status=live }}

= Member organisations =

{{As of| October 2018}}, organisations in the coalition behind Plan S included:{{Cite web |date=9 October 2018 |title=National Research Funding Organisations Participating in cOAlition S |url=https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/cOAlitionS_National_Funders.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190514100341/https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/cOAlitionS_National_Funders.pdf |archive-date=14 May 2019 |access-date=10 October 2018 |website=Science Europe}}

Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council;{{Cite web |date=19 September 2022 |title=NHMRC's revised Open Access Policy released |url=https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/news-centre/nhmrcs-revised-open-access-policy-released}}
Austria: Austrian Science Fund;
Finland: Academy of Finland;{{Cite journal |last=Else |first=Holly |date=28 September 2018 |title=Finland joins Europe's bold open-access push |journal=Nature |doi=10.1038/d41586-018-06895-z |s2cid=158296679}}
France: Agence nationale de la recherche;
Ireland: Science Foundation Ireland;
Italy: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare;
Canada: Québec Research Funds;{{Cite web |date=June 2021 |title=The Fonds de recherche du Québec support open science by joining cOAlition S |url=https://frq.gouv.qc.ca/en/les-fonds-de-recherche-du-quebec-appuient-la-science-ouverte-en-joignant-la-coalition-s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210601200817/https://frq.gouv.qc.ca/en/les-fonds-de-recherche-du-quebec-appuient-la-science-ouverte-en-joignant-la-coalition-s/ |archive-date=1 June 2021 |access-date=2 June 2021 |website=frq.gouv.qc.ca}}
Luxembourg: {{illm|Luxembourger National Research Fund|lb|Fonds national de la recherche}};
Netherlands: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research;
Norway: Research Council of Norway;
Poland: National Science Centre;
Portugal: Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia;{{Cite web |title=Portugal's national funding agency for science, research and technology joins cOAlition S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/fct-joins-coalition-s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126192241/https://www.coalition-s.org/fct-joins-coalition-s/ |archive-date=26 January 2021 |access-date=27 January 2021 |website=www.coalition-s.org}}
Slovenia: {{illm|Slovenian Research Agency|sl|Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije}};
South Africa: South African Medical Research Council;{{Cite web |title=SAMRC - making open access to research publications a reality |url=https://www.samrc.ac.za/media-release/samrc-making-open-access-research-publications-reality |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210131223108/https://www.samrc.ac.za/media-release/samrc-making-open-access-research-publications-reality |archive-date=31 January 2021 |access-date=27 January 2021 |website=www.samrc.ac.za}}
Sweden: {{illm|Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (Formas)|sv|Formas}};Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte); Vinnova.{{Cite news |date=22 May 2019 |title=Vinnova, Sweden's Innovation Agency, Joins cOAlition S |work=cOAlition S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/vinnova-joins-coalition-s/ |url-status=live |access-date=27 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107232716/https://www.coalition-s.org/vinnova-joins-coalition-s/ |archive-date=7 November 2020}}
Switzerland: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF);{{Cite web |date=1 June 2022 |title=SNSF joins cOAlition S – immediate Open Access to scientific articles |url=https://www.snf.ch/en/sOqgLwEnxtgZsCD8/news/snsf-joins-coalition-s-immediate-open-access-to-scientific-articles}}
Jordan:{{Cite web |last=Craig Nicholson |date=12 February 2019 |title=India agrees to sign up to Plan S |url=https://www.researchresearch.com/news/article/?articleId=1379797 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108001805/https://www.researchresearch.com/news/article/?articleId=1379797 |archive-date=8 November 2020 |access-date=12 February 2019 |website=researchresearch.com}} Higher Council for Science and Technology{{Cite web |last=Mohammad |date=13 March 2019 |title=The Higher Council for Science and Technology is the first organisation in the Middle East who joined cOAlition PLAN S |url=http://www.hcst.gov.jo/en/node/963 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190325143413/http://www.hcst.gov.jo/en/node/963 |archive-date=25 March 2019 |access-date=25 March 2019 |website=hcst.gov.jo}}{{Cite web |title=The Higher Council for Science and Technology Joins cOAlition S {{!}} Plan S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/the-higher-council-for-science-and-technology-joins-coalition-s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190326090225/https://www.coalition-s.org/the-higher-council-for-science-and-technology-joins-coalition-s/ |archive-date=26 March 2019 |access-date=26 March 2019 |website=www.coalition-s.org}}
United Kingdom: United Kingdom Research and Innovation; Wellcome Trust{{Cite news |last=Noorden |first=Richard Van |date=5 November 2018 |title=Wellcome and Gates join bold European open-access plan |journal=Nature |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07300-5 |url-status=live |access-date=5 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116071302/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07300-5 |archive-date=16 November 2020 |doi=10.1038/d41586-018-07300-5}}
United States: Gates Foundation;{{Cite news |last=Moody |first=Glyn |date=6 November 2018 |title=Big Boost For Open Access As Wellcome And Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Back EU's 'Plan S' |work=Techdirt |url=https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181106/06451540987/big-boost-open-access-as-wellcome-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-back-eus-plan-s.shtml |url-status=live |access-date=8 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181108144915/https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181106/06451540987/big-boost-open-access-as-wellcome-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-back-eus-plan-s.shtml |archive-date=8 November 2018}} Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Templeton World Charity Foundation{{Cite web |title=The Templeton World Charity Foundation joins cOAlition S {{!}} Plan S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/the-templeton-world-charity-foundation-joins-coalition-s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127194736/https://www.coalition-s.org/the-templeton-world-charity-foundation-joins-coalition-s/ |archive-date=27 November 2020 |access-date=2021-03-11 |website=www.coalition-s.org}}
Zambia: National Science and Technology Council (NSTC){{Cite web |title=Plan S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-welcomes-its-first-african-member-and-receives-strong-support-from-the-african-academy-of-sciences/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220160011/https://www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-welcomes-its-first-african-member-and-receives-strong-support-from-the-african-academy-of-sciences/ |archive-date=20 February 2019 |access-date=15 April 2020 |website=cOAlition S Welcomes its First African Member and Receives Strong Support from the African Academy of Sciences}}

International organizations that are members:

[https://parkinsonsroadmap.org/ Aligning Science Across Parkinson's]{{Cite web |title=Aligning Science Against Parkinson's (ASAP) Joins cOAlition S {{!}} Plan S |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/asap-joins-coalition-s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190926070147/https://www.coalition-s.org/asap-joins-coalition-s/ |archive-date=26 September 2019 |access-date=26 September 2019 |website=www.coalition-s.org}}{{Cite journal |last1=Schekman |first1=Randy |last2=Riley |first2=Ekemini AU |date=25 September 2019 |title=Coordinating a new approach to basic research into Parkinson's disease |journal=eLife |volume=8 |doi=10.7554/eLife.51167 |pmc=6760967 |pmid=31551111 |doi-access=free }}

Plan S is also supported by:

European Commission,{{Cite web |date=4 September 2018 |title='Plan S' and 'cOAlition S' – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications – European Commission |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/moedas/announcements/plan-s-and-coalition-s-accelerating-transition-full-and-immediate-open-access-scientific_en |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904143859/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/moedas/announcements/plan-s-and-coalition-s-accelerating-transition-full-and-immediate-open-access-scientific_en |archive-date=4 September 2018 |access-date=15 September 2018 |website=European Commission}}
World Health Organization{{Cite web |title=WHO and TDR join coalition for free digital access to health research |url=https://www.who.int/tdr/news/2019/WHO-TDR-join-coalition-free-digital-acces/en/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200114150151/https://www.who.int/tdr/news/2019/WHO-TDR-join-coalition-free-digital-acces/en/ |archive-date=14 January 2020 |access-date=29 August 2019 |website=WHO}}

= Public figures =

Robert-Jan Smits stepped down in March 2019{{Cite web |date=7 February 2019 |title=Departure of Special Envoy for Open Access and Plan S Architect, Robert-Jan Smits |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/departure-of-special-envoy-for-open-access-and-plan-s-architect-robert-jan-smits/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190304132811/https://www.coalition-s.org/departure-of-special-envoy-for-open-access-and-plan-s-architect-robert-jan-smits/ |archive-date=4 March 2019 |access-date=15 April 2020 |website=Plan S}} and later wrote a book about Plan S. Johan Rooryck of Leiden University was appointed Open Access Champion by cOAlition S on 28 August 2019;{{cite web | title=cOAlition S Appoints Johan Rooryck as Open Access Champion | website=Plan S | url=https://www.coalition-s.org/oa-champion-announced/ | access-date=15 April 2020 | archive-date=28 August 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190828084920/https://www.coalition-s.org/oa-champion-announced/ | url-status=live }}

= Organisations that withdrew or declined to join =

In October 2018 the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) made it clear that US federal funders would not be signing up to Plan S. In an interview with the American Institute of Physics published 30 April 2019, OSTP Director Kelvin Droegemeier stated with regard to Plan S: "One of the things this government will not do is to tell researchers where they have to publish their papers. That is absolutely up to the scholar who's doing the publication. There's just no question about that."{{cite news |title=An Interview with OSTP Director Kelvin Droegemeier |first=Kelvin |last=Droegemeier |url=https://www.aip.org/fyi/2019/interview-ostp-director-kelvin-droegemeier |publisher=American Institute of Physics |date=30 April 2019 |language=nl |quote='One of the things this government will not do is to tell researchers where they have to publish their papers. That is absolutely up to the scholar who's doing the publication. There's just no question about that.' |access-date=2 May 2019 |archive-date=12 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012214202/https://www.aip.org/fyi/2019/interview-ostp-director-kelvin-droegemeier |url-status=live }}

In 2018 Swedish Riksbank's Jubilee Fond (RJ) used to be a member,{{cite news |last1=Noorden |title=RJ ansluter sig till Plan S |url=https://www.rj.se/Forskningsnyheter/2018/rj-ansluter-sig-till-plan-s/ |access-date=13 November 2018 |date=9 November 2018 |language=SV |archive-date=6 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806111340/https://www.rj.se/Forskningsnyheter/2018/rj-ansluter-sig-till-plan-s/ |url-status=live }} but left the coalition in 2019 after concerns about the timelines of Plan S.{{Cite web |title=Riksbankens Jubileumsfond steps away from Plan S |url=https://www.rj.se/en/Researcher-news/general-news/riksbankens-jubileumsfond-steps-away-from-plan-s/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190606095123/https://www.rj.se/en/Researcher-news/general-news/riksbankens-jubileumsfond-steps-away-from-plan-s/ |archive-date=6 June 2019 |access-date=6 June 2019 |website=www.rj.se}}

On 25 October 2019, Vijay Raghavan announced that India would not be joining cOAlition S,{{cite web |url=https://thewire.in/the-sciences/plan-s-open-access-scientific-publishing-article-processing-charge-insa-k-vijayraghavan |title=India Will Skip Plan S, Focus on National Efforts in Science Publishing |date=26 October 2019 |access-date=20 November 2019 |archive-date=27 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191027152220/https://thewire.in/the-sciences/plan-s-open-access-scientific-publishing-article-processing-charge-insa-k-vijayraghavan |url-status=live }} despite his supportive comments earlier in the same year.

The European Research Council initially supported Coalition S in 2018,{{Cite news|url=https://erc.europa.eu/news/erc-supports-full-open-access|title=ERC Scientific Council joins new effort to push for full open access|date=3 September 2018|work=ERC: European Research Council|access-date=15 September 2018|archive-date=23 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201223173323/https://erc.europa.eu/news/erc-supports-full-open-access|url-status=live}}

but withdrew support in July 2020.{{cite web | title=ERC Scientific Council calls for open access plans to respect researchers' needs | website=ERC: European Research Council | date=2020-07-20 | url=https://erc.europa.eu/news/erc-scientific-council-calls-open-access-plans-respect-researchers-needs | access-date=2020-07-24 | archive-date=20 July 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200720195520/https://erc.europa.eu/news/erc-scientific-council-calls-open-access-plans-respect-researchers-needs | url-status=live }}

Reactions

= Institutional reactions =

The following institutional statements of support were issued:

African Academy of Sciences (AAS){{cite web |title=Supporting Plan S, a model making research accessible & advancing science globally |url=https://www.aasciences.africa/news/supporting-plan-s-model-making-research-accessible-and-advancing-science-globally |access-date=17 October 2021}}
All European Academies (ALLEA){{cite news |url=https://www.allea.org/systemic-reforms-and-further-consultation-needed-to-make-plan-s-a-success/ |title=Systemic reforms and further consultation needed to make Plan S a success |date=12 December 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=15 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215231646/https://www.allea.org/systemic-reforms-and-further-consultation-needed-to-make-plan-s-a-success/ |url-status=live }}
Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology{{cite news |last1=Roussi |first1=Antoaneta |title=China backs Plan S |url=https://www.researchresearch.com/news/article/?articleId=1378740 |access-date=5 December 2018 |work=researchresearch.com |date=5 December 2018 |archive-date=2 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211002110323/https://www.researchresearch.com/news/article/?articleId=1378740 |url-status=live }}{{cite news |last1=Schiermeier |first1=Quirin |title=China backs bold plan to tear down journal paywalls |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07659-5 |access-date=5 December 2018 |work=Nature |date=5 December 2018 |archive-date=6 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181206094724/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07659-5 |url-status=live }}
Confederation of Open Access Repositories{{cite news |url=https://www.coar-repositories.org/news-media/coars-response-to-plan-s/ |title=COAR's response to Plan S |date=12 September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126142059/https://www.coar-repositories.org/news-media/coars-response-to-plan-s/ |archive-date=26 November 2018 |url-status=dead }}{{cite news |url=https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/advocacy-leadership/open-science-and-sustainable-development/ |title=Building a Sustainable Knowledge Commons. COAR's response to the draft implementation requirements in Plan S |date=13 December 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181215224108/https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/advocacy-leadership/open-science-and-sustainable-development/ |archive-date=15 December 2018 |url-status=dead }}
Council of Australian University Librarians and the Australasian Open Access Strategy Group{{Cite web|url=https://www.caul.edu.au/news/joint-statement-caulaoasg-plan-s|title=Joint statement by CAUL/AOASG on Plan S|date=11 February 2019|website=CAUL|access-date=4 June 2019|archive-date=4 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190604062608/https://www.caul.edu.au/news/joint-statement-caulaoasg-plan-s|url-status=live}}
DARIAH-EU
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft{{cite news |url=https://www.dfg.de/foerderung/info_wissenschaft/2018/info_wissenschaft_18_56/ |title=Stellungnahme der DFG zur Gründung von "cOAlition S" zur Unterstützung von Open Access |work=Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft |date=4 September 2018 |language=de |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=26 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126135241/http://www.dfg.de/foerderung/info_wissenschaft/2018/info_wissenschaft_18_56/ |url-status=live }}
EU-Life{{cite news |url=https://eu-life.eu/article/eu-life-reacts-plan-s-support-open-access-and-10-key-recommendations |title=EULIFE reacts to Plan S: Support to Open Access and 10 key recommendations |work=EU-Life |date=12 November 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126135242/https://eu-life.eu/article/eu-life-reacts-plan-s-support-open-access-and-10-key-recommendations |archive-date=26 November 2018 |url-status=dead }}
Eurodoc
European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO){{cite news |url=http://embo.org/news/articles/2018/response-to-science-europe-s-open-access-plan |title=Response to Science Europe's Open Access plan |work=EMBO |date=September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=7 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190107233910/http://embo.org/news/articles/2018/response-to-science-europe-s-open-access-plan |url-status=dead }}
European University Association{{Cite web|url=https://eua.eu/resources/publications/746:open-access-by-2020-eua-supports-plan-s-for-an-open-scholarly-system.html|title=Publications|website=eua.eu|access-date=13 January 2019|archive-date=8 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181208115750/https://eua.eu/resources/publications/746:open-access-by-2020-eua-supports-plan-s-for-an-open-scholarly-system.html|url-status=live}}
Faculty of 1000{{cite news |url=https://blog.f1000.com/2018/09/04/f1000-supports-ecs-plan-for-full-and-immediate-open-access-plan-s/ |title=F1000 supports EC's plan for full and immediate open access (Plan S) |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=26 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126180749/https://blog.f1000.com/2018/09/04/f1000-supports-ecs-plan-for-full-and-immediate-open-access-plan-s/ |url-status=live }}
Fair Open Access Alliance{{cite news |url=https://www.fairopenaccess.org/2018/09/20/the-fair-open-access-alliance-foaa-on-plan-s/ |title=The Fair Open Access Alliance (FOAA) on Plan S |date=19 September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=26 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126134917/https://www.fairopenaccess.org/2018/09/20/the-fair-open-access-alliance-foaa-on-plan-s/ |url-status=usurped }} Further detailed recommendations for the implementation of Plan S were published on 19 October 2018 by the board of the FOAA.{{cite news |title=FOAA Board recommendations for the implementation of Plan S |url=https://www.fairopenaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Fair-Open-Access-Alliance-recommendations-Plan-S.pdf |access-date=28 October 2018 |work=Fair Open Access Alliance (FOAA) |date=19 October 2018 |archive-date=19 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181019104610/https://www.fairopenaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Fair-Open-Access-Alliance-recommendations-Plan-S.pdf/ |url-status=usurped }}
Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT){{cite news |url=https://www.fct.pt/noticias/index.phtml.en?id=372&/2018/10/Posi%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_Portugal_e_da_FCT_em_rela%C3%A7%C3%A3o_ao_Plano_S%3chttps://www.fct.pt/noticias/index.phtml.en?id=372&/2018/10/Posi%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_Portugal_e_da_FCT_em_rela%C3%A7%C3%A3o_ao_Plano_S |title=Portugal and FCT'S position towards Plan S |work=Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) |date=2 October 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=26 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126135316/https://www.fct.pt/noticias/index.phtml.en?id=372&%2F2018%2F10%2FPosi%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_Portugal_e_da_FCT_em_rela%C3%A7%C3%A3o_ao_Plano_S%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.fct.pt%2Fnoticias%2Findex.phtml.en%3Fid=372&%2F2018%2F10%2FPosi%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_Portugal_e_da_FCT_em_rela%C3%A7%C3%A3o_ao_Plano_S |url-status=live }}
Joint statement of 113 institutions from 37 nations and 5 continents, affirming that there is a strong alignment among the approaches taken by OA2020, Plan S, the Jussieu Call for Open science and bibliodiversity, and others to facilitate a full transition to immediate open access{{cite news |url=https://oa2020.org/b14-conference/final-statement/ |title=Final Statement of the 14th Berlin Open Access Conference |date=4 December 2018 |access-date=5 December 2018 |archive-date=7 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181207191950/https://oa2020.org/b14-conference/final-statement/ |url-status=live }}{{cite news |url=https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois |title=Expression of interest in the large-scale implementation of Open Access to scholarly journals |date=4 December 2018 |access-date=5 December 2018 |archive-date=7 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181207191930/https://oa2020.org/mission/#eois |url-status=live }}
League of European Research Universities (LERU){{cite news |url=https://mailchi.mp/leru/accelerating-the-transition-to-full-and-immediate-open-access-to-scientific-publications-lerus-reaction-to-plan-s?e=12dd65b911 |title=Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications: LERU's reaction to Plan S |work=LERU |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=27 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227215245/https://mailchi.mp/leru/accelerating-the-transition-to-full-and-immediate-open-access-to-scientific-publications-lerus-reaction-to-plan-s%3Fe%3D12dd65b911 |url-status=live }}
Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche (LIBER){{cite news |url=https://libereurope.eu/blog/2018/09/04/liber-supports-new-plan-to-make-open-access-a-reality-by-2020/ |title=LIBER Supports New Plan to Make Open Access A Reality By 2020 |work=LIBER |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=1 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181101122842/https://libereurope.eu/blog/2018/09/04/liber-supports-new-plan-to-make-open-access-a-reality-by-2020/ |url-status=live }}
Marie Curie Alumni Association{{cite news|url=http://eurodoc.net/sites/default/files/news/2018/09/24/attachments/joint-statement-plan-s.pdf|title=Joint Statement on Open Access for Researchers via Plan S|date=September 2018|work=Researchers Support Open Access via Plan S|access-date=24 September 2018|archive-date=13 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190113232604/http://eurodoc.net/sites/default/files/news/2018/09/24/attachments/joint-statement-plan-s.pdf|url-status=live}}
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR){{cite web |title=NIHR gives support to international Open Access initiative |url=https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/nihr-gives-support-to-international-open-access-initiative/10068 |date=17 January 2019 |access-date=17 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119121701/https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/nihr-gives-support-to-international-open-access-initiative/10068 |archive-date=19 January 2019 |url-status=dead }}
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Science and Technology Library (NSTL), China
National Science Library (NSL), China
Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw){{cite news |url=https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/actueel/nieuws/detail/item/internationale-coalitie-wil-versnelling-open-access/ |title=Internationale coalitie wil versnelling Open Access |work=ZoneMw |language=nl |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=9 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180909064859/https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/actueel/nieuws/detail/item/internationale-coalitie-wil-versnelling-open-access/ |url-status=live }}
Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA){{cite news |url=https://oaspa.org/oaspa-offers-support-on-the-implementation-of-plan-s/ |title=OASPA Offers Support on the Implementation of Plan S |date=2 October 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=2 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181002160142/https://oaspa.org/oaspa-offers-support-on-the-implementation-of-plan-s/ |url-status=live }}
OpenAIRE{{cite news |url=https://www.openaire.eu/plan-s-a-european-open-access-mandate |title=Plan S: A European Open Access Mandate |date=5 October 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=26 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126135349/https://www.openaire.eu/plan-s-a-european-open-access-mandate |url-status=live }}
SPARC Europe{{cite news |url=https://sparceurope.org/new-coalition-of-european-funders-join-together-to-place-unprecedented-mandate-on-researchers-to-publish-oa/ |title=New coalition of European funders join together to place unprecedented mandate on researchers to publish OA |date=5 September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=26 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126152741/https://sparceurope.org/new-coalition-of-european-funders-join-together-to-place-unprecedented-mandate-on-researchers-to-publish-oa/ |url-status=live }}
Swedish Research Council{{cite news |url=https://www.vr.se/english/justnow/news/thetransfertoopenaccessshouldtakeplaceassoonasitispossible.5.30d42bf1659263a4d934c.html |title=The transfer to open access should take place as soon as it is possible |work=Swedish Research Council |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=26 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126135129/https://www.vr.se/english/justnow/news/thetransfertoopenaccessshouldtakeplaceassoonasitispossible.5.30d42bf1659263a4d934c.html |url-status=live }}
Young Academy of Europe{{Cite web|url=http://eurodoc.net/plan-s|title=PRESS RELEASE: Researchers Support Open Access via Plan S {{!}} Eurodoc|website=eurodoc.net|access-date=13 January 2019|archive-date=24 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180924224927/http://eurodoc.net/plan-s|url-status=live}}
Young European Research Universities Network (YERUN){{cite news |work=Young European Research Universities Network |url=https://www.yerun.eu/strategic-actions/yerun-position-statement-on-plan-s/ |title=YERUN Position Statement on Plan |date=18 October 2018 |access-date=13 December 2018 |archive-date=20 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181020140930/https://www.yerun.eu/strategic-actions/yerun-position-statement-on-plan-s/ |url-status=live }}
Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities (DARIAH) endorsed on 25 October 2018 the main ambitions set out by the Plan S, namely the elimination of paywalls, copyright retention, and the rejection of hybrid models of open access publishing.{{cite news |title=Towards a Plan(HS)S: DARIAH's position on PlanS |url=https://www.dariah.eu/2018/10/25/towards-a-planhss-dariahs-position-on-plans/ |access-date=28 October 2018 |work=DARIAH-EU |date=25 September 2018 |archive-date=27 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181027232104/https://www.dariah.eu/2018/10/25/towards-a-planhss-dariahs-position-on-plans/ |url-status=live }} DARIAH published recommendations{{cite news |title=Towards a Plan(HS)S: DARIAH's position on PlanS. Recommendations |url=https://www.dariah.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Towards-a-PlanHSS-excerpt.pdf |access-date=28 October 2018 |work=DARIAH-EU |date=25 September 2018 |archive-date=27 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181027233558/https://www.dariah.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Towards-a-PlanHSS-excerpt.pdf |url-status=live }} for the practical implementation of the principles of the Plan S. DARIAH perceived a strong bias toward the STEM perspective within the current principles of Plan S, and called for a broader range of publication funding mechanisms to better cover the situation for researchers in the arts and humanities. DARIAH was established as a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) in August 2014 and {{As of|2019|1|1|lc=y}} had 17 member countries and several cooperating partners in eight non-member countries.{{cite news |title=Members and Cooperating Partners |url=https://www.dariah.eu/about/partners-countries/ |access-date=1 January 2019 |work=DARIAH-EU |archive-date=12 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612143821/https://www.dariah.eu/about/partners-countries/ |url-status=live }}
European University Association (EUA) published on 7 September 2018 a statement in which it generally welcomed the Plan's ambitions to turn open access into reality by 2020, but stated that, while the plan developed a bold vision for the transition, it hinged on turning principles into practice.{{Cite web|url=https://eua.eu/resources/publications/746:open-access-by-2020-eua-supports-plan-s-for-an-open-scholarly-system.html|title=Open Access by 2020: EUA supports Plan S for an open scholarly system|date=7 September 2018|website=European University Association|access-date=16 November 2018|archive-date=16 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181116173645/https://eua.eu/resources/publications/746:open-access-by-2020-eua-supports-plan-s-for-an-open-scholarly-system.html|url-status=live}}
OA2020 Mainland China signatory libraries held a meeting on 26 March 2019 at the National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing at which they clarified their position with regard to Plan S.{{cite web |url=http://english.las.cas.cn/ns/ne/201904/t20190402_207494.html |title=OA2020 Mainland China Signatory Libraries responded to Plan S Guidance on Implementation |date=26 March 2019 |access-date=15 April 2019 |archive-date=27 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227215249/http://english.las.cas.cn/ns/ne/201904/t20190402_207494.html |url-status=live }}

= Reactions by researchers =

Reactions included an Open Letter, signed by more than 1790 researchers, expressing their concerns about perceived unintended outcomes of the Plan if implemented as stated before the publication of the specific implementation guidance.Open Letter from Undersigned Researchers. [https://sites.google.com/view/plansopenletter Reaction of Researchers to Plan S: Too Far, Too Risky] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181108164714/https://sites.google.com/view/plansopenletter |date=8 November 2018 }}. Retrieved 15 November 2018. Another Open Letter in support of mandatory open access was issued after the publication of the specific implementation guide, and had been signed by over 1,900 researchers by the end of 2018. However, it did not reference Plan S specifically.[http://michaeleisen.org/petition/ Open Letter in Support of Funder Open Publishing Mandates] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190305172212/http://michaeleisen.org/petition/ |date=5 March 2019 }}. Retrieved 1 January 2019.{{cite news |last1=Van Noorden |first1=Richard |title=Researchers sign petition backing plans to end paywalls |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07632-2 |access-date=4 December 2018 |work=Nature |date=4 December 2018 |archive-date=7 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181207020130/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07632-2 |url-status=live }}

Stephen Curry, a structural biologist and open access advocate at Imperial College London, called the policy a "significant shift" and "a very powerful declaration". Ralf Schimmer, head of the Scientific Information Provision at the Max Planck Digital Library, told The Scientist that "This will put increased pressure on publishers and on the consciousness of individual researchers that an ecosystem change is possible ... There has been enough nice language and waiting and hoping and saying please. Research communities just aren't willing to tolerate procrastination anymore." Political activist George Monbiot – while acknowledging that the plan was "not perfect" – wrote in The Guardian that the publishers' responses to Plan S was "ballistic", and argued that Elsevier's response regarding Wikipedia "inadvertently remind[ed] us of what happened to the commercial encyclopedias". He said that, until Plan S is implemented, "The ethical choice is to read the stolen material published by Sci-Hub."{{cite news |last1=Monbiot |first1=George |title=Scientific publishing is a rip-off. We fund the research – it should be free |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/13/scientific-publishing-rip-off-taxpayers-fund-research |access-date=13 September 2018 |work=The Guardian |date=13 September 2018 |archive-date=13 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180913071701/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/13/scientific-publishing-rip-off-taxpayers-fund-research |url-status=live }}

Herpetologist Malcolm L. McCallum suggested that science requires a diversity of publishing types to serve the needs of the entire scientific community.{{cite journal|last=McCallum|first= M.L. |year=2019|title= RE: Scientific societies worry about threat from Plan S|journal= Science|volume=372|issue=3|pages= 332–333 |doi= 10.1126/science.363.6425.332 |pmid= 30679353 |bibcode= 2019Sci...363..332B |s2cid= 59251411 |url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.363.6425.332|url-access= subscription}}

Individual Plan S policies have also received a mixed reception from academics. For example, the Rights Retention Strategy has been enthusiastically promoted by Cambridge neuroscientist Stephen Eglen because it can be used by anyone to make their work open access.{{Cite web |last=Eglen |first=Stephen J |date=2021-03-27 |title=Primer on the Rights Retention Strategy |url=https://zenodo.org/record/4641799 |doi=10.5281/zenodo.4641799 |s2cid=244968062}} In contrast, computational biochemist Lynn Kamerlin criticized the Rights Retention Strategy because, while it would create obligations for grantees it was unclear whether it would create legal obligations for publishers.{{Cite journal|date=2020-10-05|title=Open Access, Plan S, and researchers' needs|journal=EMBO Reports|volume=21|issue=10|pages=e51568|doi=10.15252/embr.202051568|issn=1469-221X|pmc=7534613|pmid=32896098|last1=Kamerlin|first1=Shina Caroline Lynn}} Similarly, Shaun Khoo has argued that the Rights Retention Strategy is a complex approach that creates an unrealistic burden for authors and may produce legal risk for authors, institutions and readers.{{Cite journal|last=Khoo|first=Shaun Yon-Seng|date=2021-10-06|title=The Plan S Rights Retention Strategy is an administrative and legal burden, not a sustainable open access solution|journal=Insights|language=en|volume=34|issue=1|pages=22|doi=10.1629/uksg.556|s2cid=241975805|issn=2048-7754 |doi-access=free |hdl=1866/25762|hdl-access=free}}

= Reactions by journals and publishers =

The plan was initially met with opposition from a number of publishers of non-open access journals, as well as from learned societies.{{Cite journal|author=Vuong, Q.-H.|year=2020|title=Plan S, self-publishing, and addressing unreasonable risks of society publishing |journal=Learned Publishing|volume=33|issue=1|pages=64–68|doi=10.1002/leap.1274|doi-access=free}} Springer Nature "urge[d] research funding agencies to align rather than act in small groups in ways that are incompatible with each other, and for policymakers to also take this global view into account", adding that removing publishing options from researchers "fails to take this into account and potentially undermines the whole research publishing system".{{cite journal |last1=Else |first1=Holly |title=Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions |journal=Nature |date=September 2018 |volume=561 |issue=7721 |pages=17–18 |doi=10.1038/d41586-018-06178-7 |pmid=30181639 |issn=0028-0836|bibcode=2018Natur.561...17E |doi-access=free }} The AAAS, publisher of the journal Science, argued that Plan S "will not support high-quality peer-review, research publication and dissemination", and that its implementation "would disrupt scholarly communications, be a disservice to researchers, and impinge academic freedom" and "would also be unsustainable for the Science family of journals".{{cite journal |last1=Yeager |first1=Ashley |title=Open-Access Plan in Europe Bans Publishing in Paywalled Journals |journal=The Scientist |date=4 September 2018 |url=https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/open-access-plan-in-europe-bans-publishing-in-paywalled-journals-64748 |access-date=13 September 2018 |archive-date=15 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180915100223/https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/open-access-plan-in-europe-bans-publishing-in-paywalled-journals-64748 |url-status=live }} Tom Reller of Elsevier said, "if you think that information should be free of charge, go to Wikipedia".{{cite news |title=11 EU-landen besluiten: vanaf 2020 moet alle wetenschappelijke literatuur gratis beschikbaar zijn |first=Maarten |last=Keulemans |url=https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/11-eu-landen-besluiten-vanaf-2020-moet-alle-wetenschappelijke-literatuur-gratis-beschikbaar-zijn~be002c39/ |newspaper=De Volkskrank |date=4 September 2018 |access-date=25 September 2018 |language=nl |quote=Als je vindt dat informatie gratis moet zijn: ga naar Wikipedia. |archive-date=7 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180907221521/https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/11-eu-landen-besluiten-vanaf-2020-moet-alle-wetenschappelijke-literatuur-gratis-beschikbaar-zijn~be002c39/ |url-status=live }}

On 12 September 2018 UBS repeated their "sell" advice on Elsevier (RELX) stocks.{{cite news |last1=Elder |first1=Bryce |title=Stocks to watch: SSE, BAT, Galápagos, RELX, Telefónica, RBS |url=https://www.ft.com/content/2a2064e2-b669-11e8-bbc3-ccd7de085ffe |access-date=14 October 2018 |work=Financial Times |date=12 September 2018 |archive-date=14 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181014204035/https://www.ft.com/content/2a2064e2-b669-11e8-bbc3-ccd7de085ffe |url-status=live }} Elsevier's share price fell by 13% between 28 Aug and 19 September 2018.{{cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Richard |title=Film. The business of academic publishing: "a catastrophe" | journal=The Lancet | volume=392 | issue=10152 | pages=1186–1187 |date=6–12 October 2018 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32353-5 |pmid=30712703 |s2cid=54405007 }}

According to the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA), whose aim is to transform the business model of the largest publishers (by supporting projects like Project DEAL), Plan S puts smaller and emerging fully open access publishers at a competitive disadvantage, and potentially harms their prospects. Pure "gold" open access publishers may be put out of business by incentivizing authors to publish with large publishers which have the market power to negotiate their transition plans with funders, while no incentives are provided to authors to publish with smaller fully open access publishers and scholarly societies.{{cite web |title=OASPA Feedback on Plan S Implementation Guidance |url=https://oaspa.org/oaspa-feedback-on-plan-s-implementation-guidance/ |website=OASPA |date=8 February 2019 |access-date=26 October 2019 |archive-date=26 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191026221958/https://oaspa.org/oaspa-feedback-on-plan-s-implementation-guidance/ |url-status=live }}

= Policy changes by journals and publishers =

On 28 November 2018 the journal Epidemiology and Infection published by Cambridge University Press announced that it would convert to the open access model of publication from 1 January 2019, citing changed funder policies and Plan S.{{cite news |last1=Norman |first1=Noah |title=Epidemiology & Infection goes open access |journal=Epidemiology and Infection |date=2 December 2018 |volume=147 |doi=10.1017/S0950268818003047 }}

On 8 April 2020, Springer Nature announced that many of its journals, including Nature, would become compatible with Plan S by publishing open access articles from 2021 and committing to an eventual transition to full open access.{{cite journal | last=Van Noorden | first=Richard | title=Nature to join open-access Plan S, publisher says | journal=Nature | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | date=9 April 2020 | issn=0028-0836 | doi=10.1038/d41586-020-01066-5 | pmid=32273623 | s2cid=215725652 }}

On 15 January 2021, the AAAS, which publishes Science, announced a trial OA policy that accommodates Plan S's green open access rules. This policy allows the distribution of an article's accepted version under a free license, without embargo and without charge. However, this is only permitted to authors who are under mandates by their Coalition S funders.

In February 2021, more than 50 publishers, including Elsevier, Wiley and Springer Nature, announced their opposition to the rights retention strategy of Coalition S. More specifically, Springer Nature announced their intention to override that strategy by making authors sign a license to that effect.

= Policy changes by member organizations =

In 2024, the Gates Foundation announced a "preprint-centric" open access policy, and their intention to stop paying article-processing charges. This policy is not “entirely in line with cOAlition S”, because it does not mandate that an accepted manuscript be openly accessible.{{cite journal | last=Lenharo | first=Mariana | title=Will the Gates Foundation's preprint-centric policy help open access? | journal=Nature | publisher=Nature Publishing Group | date=2024-04-04 | doi=10.1038/d41586-024-00996-8 | pmid=38575826 | url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00996-8 | access-date=2024-04-06| url-access=subscription }}

References

{{reflist|30em|refs =

{{cite book | last1=Smits | first1=Robert-Jan | last2=Pells | first2=Rachael | title=Plan S for Shock: Science. Shock. Solution. Speed. | publisher=Ubiquity Press | date=2022-01-27 | isbn=978-1-914481-16-1 | doi=10.5334/bcq | page=| s2cid=246369795 | doi-access=free }}

{{cite web | date= 2021-09-02| website=Plan S | title=cOAlition S statement on Open Access for academic books | url=https://www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-statement-on-open-access-for-academic-books/ | access-date=2021-11-17}}

{{cite web | last = Mounce | first = Ross | title=Observing the success so far of the Rights Retention Strategy | date=2021-10-05 | website = Plan S | url=https://www.coalition-s.org/blog/observing-the-success-so-far-of-the-rights-retention-strategy/ | access-date=2021-11-17}}

{{cite web | title=Continuing the open access transition in 2021 and beyond - Advancing Discovery | website=Springer Nature | date=2021-04-08 | url=https://www.springernature.com/gp/advancing-discovery/blog/blogposts/continuing-the-open-access-transition/19045440 | access-date=2021-04-09 | archive-date=9 April 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210409130817/https://www.springernature.com/gp/advancing-discovery/blog/blogposts/continuing-the-open-access-transition/19045440 | url-status=live }}

{{cite journal | last=Else | first=Holly | title=A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishing | journal=Nature | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | date=2021-04-08 | issn=0028-0836 | doi=10.1038/d41586-021-00883-6 | page=| pmid=33833458 | s2cid=233191526 }}

{{cite journal | last=Van Noorden | first=Richard | title=Science family of journals announces change to open-access policy | journal=Nature | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | date=2021-01-15 | volume=589 | issue=7843 | issn=0028-0836 | doi=10.1038/d41586-021-00103-1 | page=505| pmid=33452512 | bibcode=2021Natur.589..505V | doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal | last=Brainard | first=Jeffrey | title=A new mandate highlights costs, benefits of making all scientific articles free to read | journal=Science | publisher=American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) | date=2021-01-01 | issn=0036-8075 | doi=10.1126/science.abg3557 | s2cid=234138307 }}

{{cite journal | title=Nature journals reveal terms of landmark open-access option | journal=Nature | date=2020-11-24 | doi=10.1038/d41586-020-03324-y | url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03324-y | access-date=2020-11-24 | archive-date=24 November 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124070500/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03324-y | url-status=live | last1=Else | first1=Holly | volume=588 | issue=7836 | pages=19–20 | pmid=33235382 | bibcode=2020Natur.588...19E | s2cid=227166081 | url-access=subscription }}

{{cite journal | last=Else | first=Holly | title=Powerful US research funder unveils strict open-access policy | journal=Nature | publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC | date=2020-10-01 | issn=0028-0836 | doi=10.1038/d41586-020-02793-5 | pmid=33005051 | s2cid=222159534 }}

{{cite web | title=HHMI Announces Open Access Publishing Policy | website=HHMI.org | url=https://www.hhmi.org/news/hhmi-announces-open-access-publishing-policy | access-date=2020-10-05 | archive-date=3 October 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201003201252/https://www.hhmi.org/news/hhmi-announces-open-access-publishing-policy | url-status=live }}

{{cite web | title=The Howard Hughes Medical Institute joins cOAlition S - Plan S | website='Plan S' and 'cOAlition S' – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications | date=2020-10-01 | url=https://www.coalition-s.org/the-howard-hughes-medical-institute-joins-coalition-s/ | access-date=2020-10-05 | archive-date=2 October 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201002110526/https://www.coalition-s.org/the-howard-hughes-medical-institute-joins-coalition-s/ | url-status=live }}

{{cite journal | last=Brainard | first=Jeffrey | title=HHMI, one of the largest research philanthropies, will require immediate open access to papers | journal=Science | publisher=American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) | date=2020-10-01 | issn=0036-8075 | doi=10.1126/science.abf0595 | s2cid=224876749 }}

}}

External links

{{Official website|coalition-s.org/}}
{{cite web |url= https://www.coalition-s.org/wp-content/uploads/271118_cOAlitionS_Guidance.pdf |title= Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S |id= 271118 |date= 23 November 2018 }}
[https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Open_Access_Tracking_Project Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)]
{{cite web |url= http://tagteam.harvard.edu/hubs/oatp/tag/oa.plan_s |title= Articles tagged with oa.plan_s for the Open Access Tracking Project |work= TagTeam |publisher= Harvard University}}
[https://oa2020.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/B14-11-Robert-Jan-Smits.pdf Plan S: Making Open Access a Reality by 2020] (pdf). Slides by Robert-Jan Smits (2019).
{{youTube|YLjiv5pWFu0|Smits, Robert-Jan. (2018) Plan S: Making Open Access a Reality by 2020. Vienna: COASP }}
{{cite web |url= https://www.rj.se/globalassets/forskningsnyheter/2019/coalition-s_rj_190306.pdf |title = Letter by Swedish Riksbankens Jubileumsfond to withdraw support for Plan S}}