Plyscraper

There are four main types of engineered wood used for mass timber including cross-laminated timber (CLT), glued laminated timber (glulam), laminated strand lumber (LSL), and laminated veneer lumber (LVL). Of these three wood systems, CLT is the most commonly used.

When other materials, such as concrete or steel, are used in conjunction with engineered wood, these plyscrapers are called “hybrids”. For hybrid buildings, there are some approaches to how different materials can be used including the “Cree’s System” which was developed by Cree Buildings, and the “Finding the Forest Through the Trees" (FFTT) construction model” developed by Michael Green. Cree's System combines the use of concrete and wood mainly in its hybrid flooring systems. In some instances, concrete can also be used as a core or for the foundation of a building because wood is too light. The FFTT construction model incorporates a wooden core and wooden floor slabs mixed with steel beams to provide ductility to the building.{{Cite journal |last=Harris |first=Mark |date=October 2012|title=Wood goes high-rise |url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6411635/;jsessionid=9d_iWF3gYSGOsENe5XZT4MzxY6uEL-892AqreDXxGWWTJdBV3lzw!-8583702 |journal=Engineering & Technology |volume=7 |issue=9 |pages=43–45 |doi=10.1049/et.2012.0902 |issn=1750-9637}}{{Cite web |date=2016-10-06 |title=The Tallest Timber Tower Yet: Perkins + Will's Concept Proposal for River Beech Tower |url=https://www.archdaily.com/796649/the-tallest-timber-tower-yet-perkins-plus-wills-concept-proposal-for-river-beech-tower |access-date=2022-12-05 |website=ArchDaily |language=en-US}}

When considering which engineered wood system to use for a plyscraper the individual benefits of each must be compared. CLT has a high fire resistance due to the fire-resistant adhesive used and the surface char layer that forms when it is exposed to fire. The surface char layer protects the interior of the wood from further damage. Glulam is typically used for columns and beams as an alternative to commonly used steel and concrete.{{Cite web |last=Gorvett |first=Zaria |title='Plyscrapers': The rise of the wooden skyscraper |url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171026-the-rise-of-skyscrapers-made-of-wood |access-date=2022-12-05 |website=www.bbc.com |language=en}} This is because it has a greater tensile strength-to-weight ratio than steel and can resist compression better than concrete.  LVL also has the same strength as concrete.{{Cite journal |last1=Thorhallsson |first1=Eythor Rafn |last2=Hinriksson |first2=Gudmundur Ingi |last3=Snæbjörnsson |first3=Jonas Thor |date=2017-04-15 |title=Strength and stiffness of glulam beams reinforced with glass and basalt fibres |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836816320947 |journal=Composites Part B: Engineering |series=Composite lattices and multiscale innovative materials and structures |language=en |volume=115 |pages=300–307 |doi=10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.074 |issn=1359-8368}}  As plyscrapers are made from wood, they sequester carbon during construction and are renewable if the forests that they are sourced from are sustainably managed.

Despite these benefits, there are bound to be some drawbacks when using the various engineered woods.  Steel overall has a greater strength and durability for the same sized profile when compared to its wood counterpart.{{Cite web|date=2021-07-14 |title=Steel Beams vs. Wood Beams: Which One is Better for Your Home? - FSW |url=https://fsw-denver.com/heres-why-steel-beams-are-better-than-wood-beams-for-your-home-build/ |access-date=2022-12-05 |website=Flawless Steel Welding |language=en-US}} Thus, a building made with steel beams would require smaller beams than the same building constructed with wooden beams.  Walls and columns in the interior spaces of these plyscrapers can get so thick that the size of said interior space gets heavily reduced. This issue however, does not occur within shorter buildings.

File:Mjøstårnet.jpg

Over the years, many plyscrapers have been constructed, each becoming taller than the last.  In 2017, the tallest habitable plyscraper was Brock Commons Tallwood House, on the campus of the University of British Columbia near Vancouver, Canada  and measured 53 meters tall (174 feet).{{Cite web |date=2017-09-18 |title=Inside Vancouver's Brock Commons, the World's Tallest Mass Timber Building |url=https://www.archdaily.com/879625/inside-vancouvers-brock-commons-the-worlds-tallest-timber-structured-building |access-date=2022-12-05 |website=ArchDaily |language=en-US}}  It was overtaken in 2019, when the Mjøstårnet was built in Brumunddal, Norway. The Mjøstårnet measured 85.4 meters (280 ft).{{Cite web |date=2019-04-11 |title=The world's tallest 'plyscraper' completes in Norway |url=https://thespaces.com/the-worlds-tallest-plyscraper-completes-in-norway/ |access-date=2019-10-15 |website=The Spaces |language=en-US}} However, in 2022, the title of the tallest habitable plyscraper shifted once again when the Ascent MKE Building, located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin was built measuring 86.56 meters (284 ft).{{Cite web |date=2022-07-29 |title=World's tallest timber building opens |url=https://www.fs.usda.gov/inside-fs/delivering-mission/apply/worlds-tallest-timber-building-opens |access-date=2022-12-05 |website=US Forest Service |language=en}}

The use of mass timber has been popular in Europe for a few years but has started to gain traction in the United States as knowledge of engineered woods has developed and experience with them as construction materials has increased.{{Cite journal |last1=Ahmed |first1=Shafayet |last2=Arocho |first2=Ingrid |date=2020-12-01 |title=Mass timber building material in the U.S. construction industry: Determining the existing awareness level, construction-related challenges, and recommendations to increase its current acceptance level |journal=Cleaner Engineering and Technology |language=en |volume=1 |pages=100007 |doi=10.1016/j.clet.2020.100007 |issn=2666-7908|doi-access=free }} Plyscrapers are still in their infancy stage, but as we learn more about mass timber and become more proficient using it, many mass-timber buildings are currently being proposed.  In fact, they are becoming increasingly popular among contractors and builders due to the ease of construction, as putting together a plyscraper is faster and quieter compared to its steel and concrete counterparts.

Proposals to build more plyscrapers are in the works around the globe. In Tokyo, a 350m (1,148 ft)-tall plyscraper called the W350 Project has been proposed with a 2041 completion target{{Cite web |date=2018-02-16 |title=Plyscraper city: Tokyo to build 350m tower made of wood |url=http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/feb/16/plyscraper-city-tokyo-tower-wood-w350 |access-date=2022-12-05 |website=the Guardian |language=en}} that would be a hybrid of 90% engineered wood and 10% steel. Research and planning are underway in London for the Oakwood Tower, which will reach an estimated 300m (984 ft) into the sky{{Cite web |title=Oakwood Timber Tower: Timber towers could transform London's skyline |url=https://urbannext.net/oakwood-timber-tower/}}, making it an 80-story addition to the London skyline. And a design team in Chicago has proposed a concept for a building to be called the River Beech Tower that would be 228m (748 ft) tall and deploy an "exterior diagrid system" to exploit timber's natural axial strength, allowing efficient load distribution throughout the building.

• List of tallest wooden buildings
• Skyscraper design and construction
• Skyline

{{reflist}}

• [http://www.woodskyscrapers.com/ Wood Skyscrapers, Home to Tall Wood Architecture]
• [http://www.treehugger.com/green-architecture/2016-year-wood-construction.html 2016: The year in wood construction] TreeHugger, 2016

Category:Wooden architecture

Category:Plyscraper

de:Holzturm