Portal:U.S. roads/Selected article/Recommend/2008

{{talkarchive}}

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the {{{type|proposal}}}. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

{{{result|The result of the {{{type|proposal}}} was}}} Support I-355. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

  • Interstate 355 - one of our best interstate highway articles. —JA10 TalkContribs 20:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Support, high-quality GA, passed its ACR, might be a featured article in the future. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 03:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong support extremely well-written, possibly brilliant. 哦,是吗?(review O) 04:00, 17 December 2007 (GMT)
  • U.S. Route 99 - a great U.S. Route page with very good details. -ComputerGuy890100 (talk) 04:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose, woefully under-referenced and is tagged for cleanup. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose List-box in route description, needs more references. Pepper6181 (talk) 23:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the {{{type|proposal}}}. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Support OK-74. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Support I-70 CO. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

April 2008

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was U.S. Route 50 in Nevada chosen (apparently). --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

May 2008

:The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was NY-22 since it's been up there for a while. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

June 2008

:The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was M-35 to maintain regional balance --Imzadi1979 (talk) 03:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

:Update, M-35 has passed FA tonight. Imzadi1979 (talk) 03:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

July 2008

:The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was U.S. Route 12 in Washington because it was the only nominee. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 00:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the {{{type|proposal}}}. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

{{{result|The result of the {{{type|proposal}}} was}}} Support Chickasaw Turnpike. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 04:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

  • Chickasaw Turnpike, a Featured Article. Helps to prep it for a potential Main Page day in September. —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 20:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Nice regional balance (New York → Michigan → Washington → Oklahoma). --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 00:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment If the article is nominated by you to go on the Main Page on September 1, according to the criteria, Chickasaw Turnpike would have 3 points. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 00:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Support --Admrb♉ltz (tc • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user=Admrboltz}} log]) 07:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
  • It's settled, Chickasaw Turnpike is August's selected article. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 03:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was support. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (tĔώ) 22:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Utah State Route 128 - An A class article, hopefully FA by the time this comes up. A unique highway with a unique history. Dave (talk) 21:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Support --Admrb♉ltz (tc • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user=Admrboltz}} log]) 23:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support as well - CL — 00:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - Nicely done. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (tĔώ) 21:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was support Vermont Route 17. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (tĔώ) Review me! 16:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Vermont Route 17 - A GA and to maintain regional balance. ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (tĔώ) Review me! 01:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Support - CL — 01:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
  • 20px Support – Admrb♉ltz (tc • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user=Admrboltz}} log]) 03:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was support MD 36. ~~ ComputerGuy 18:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

  • Interstate 82 – GA with a pretty long lead. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 01:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support – As nominator. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 01:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose - has some issues - and we have higher class articles. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Washington State Route 527 – Fifth Washington GA. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 16:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support – As nominator. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 16:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose we have higher class articles... --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Maryland State Route 36 - new FA - and we've never had a MD article on the portal before. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Support as nominator. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)'
  • Support - Good. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 18:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was support U.S. Route 491. ~~ ComputerGuy 18:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

:Tentative support, I have nominated this to be TFA for December 5th. If this gets approved and on the main page, I would rather find a different article (overkill). However, if the nomination fails, the article has December relevance, so would be a good fit. Dave (talk) 16:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

:The above is an archived roads debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.