Proconodontida

Cavidonts were simple conodonts, tending to maintain smooth and thin-walled elements with a hyaline structure. They were often coniform (horn- or tooth-shaped) with a semi-symmetrical or elliptical cross-section.{{Citation |last=Jain |first=Sreepat |title=Conodonts |date=2020 |work=Fundamentals of Invertebrate Palaeontology |series=Springer Geology |pages=93–115 |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-81-322-3962-8_5 |access-date=2024-03-27 |place=New Delhi |publisher=Springer India |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-81-322-3962-8_5 |isbn=978-81-322-3960-4|url-access=subscription }} The basal cavity was deeper than in early members of their sister taxon Conodonti. The apparatus is quinquimembrate at most (with five or fewer different element forms) and P elements are infrequent.

Lateral keels and subtle lines of serrations are frequently found in the hook-shaped elements of bellodelids, while other proconodonts rarely deviate from one or more basic conical structures. The Ordovician proconodont Fryxellodontus is occasionally considered ancestral to Polonodus and pygodontids, which had more unusual elements covered with ridges, nodes, and denticles.{{Citation |last=Bergström |first=Stig M. |title=Taxonomy, ecology and identity of conodonts |chapter=Biogeography, evolutionary relationships, and biostratigraphic significance of Ordovician platform conodonts |date=1983-12-15 |series=Fossils and Strata |volume=15 |pages=35–58 |editor-last=Martinsson |editor-first=Anders |chapter-url=https://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/8200067378-1983-05 |access-date=2024-03-27 |publisher=Universitetsforlaget |language=en |doi=10.18261/8200067378-1983-05 |isbn=978-82-00-06737-5 |editor2-last=Bengtson |editor2-first=Stefan}}

Cavidonti and its interrelationships were first established by Sweet (1988).{{Cite book |last1=Sweet |first1=W. C. |url=https://archive.org/details/conodontamorphol0000swee/mode/1up |title=The Conodonta: morphology, taxonomy, paleoecology and evolutionary history of a long-extinct animal phylum |series=Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics |volume= 10|year=1988 |isbn=978-0-19-504352-5 |pages=1–211 |url-access=}} Many families and larger groups are paraphyletic and not yet evaluated by cladistic analyses.{{Cite journal |last=Sweet |first=W. C. |last2=Donoghue |first2=P. C. J.|year=2001 |title=Conodonts: Past, Present, Future |url=https://donoghue.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/files/2019/08/Sweet_Donoghue_2001.pdf |journal=Journal of Paleontology |volume=75 |issue=6 |pages=1174–1184 |doi=10.1666/0022-3360(2001)075<1174:CPPF>2.0.CO;2 |s2cid=53395896 |archive-url= |archive-date=}}

• Cavidonti Sweet, 1988
• Proconodontida Sweet, 1988
• Proconodontus Miller, 1969 (family Proconodontidae Lindström, 1970{{Cite journal |last=Lindström |first=Maurits |date=1970 |title=A suprageneric taxonomy of the conodonts |url=https://www.idunn.no/doi/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1970.tb00834.x |journal=Lethaia |language=en |volume=3 |issue=4 |pages=427–445 |doi=10.1111/j.1502-3931.1970.tb00834.x |issn=0024-1164|url-access=subscription }}) - Ancestral to Cordylodontidae, Fryxellodontidae, and Belodellidae?
• Pseudooneotodus? Drygant, 1974 (family Pseudooneotodidae Wang & Aldridge, 2010) (affinities very uncertain){{Cite journal |last1=Ferretti |first1=Annalisa |last2=Corradini |first2=Carlo |last3=Fakir |first3=Sana |last4=Malferrari |first4=Daniele |last5=Medici |first5=Luca |date=2023 |title=To be or not to be a conodont. The controversial story of Pseudooneotodus and Eurytholia |journal=Marine Micropaleontology |language=en |volume=182 |pages=102258 |doi=10.1016/j.marmicro.2023.102258|doi-access=free |hdl=11380/1329541 |hdl-access=free }}
• Cordylodontidae Lindström, 1970
• Fryxellodontidae Miller, 1981 - Possibly ancestral to Pygodontidae?
• Pygodontidae? Bergstrom, 1981 (may be prioniodontids instead){{Cite book |last=Clark |first=David L. |url=https://journals.ku.edu/InvertebratePaleo/issue/view/522 |title=Part W, Miscellanea, Supplement 2: Conodonta |publisher=Geological Society of America; University of Kansas |year=1981 |isbn=0-8137-3028-7 |editor-last=Moore |editor-first=Raymond C. |edition= |series=Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology |volume= |location=Boulder, Colorado; Lawrence, Kansas |pages=111–180 |chapter=Chapter 3: Systematic Descriptions |display-authors= |editor-last2=Robison |editor-first2=R.A. |chapter-url=https://journals.ku.edu/InvertebratePaleo/article/view/5663/5137}}
• Belodellida? Sweet, 1988
• Ansellidae? Fåhraeus & Hunter, 1985
• Belodellidae Khodalevich & Tschernich, 1973 - Ancestral to Ansellidae and Dapsilodontidae?
• Dapsilodontidae? Sweet, 1988

A different taxonomic arrangement, proposed by Dzik (1991), does not use Cavidonti as a grouping. Instead, it classifies proconodontids (families Proconodontidae, Cordylodontidae, and Fryxellodontidae) as members of the order Panderodontida and the superfamily Cordylodontacea. The order Belodellida is broken up and removed from their status as descendants of proconodontids. Bellodellidae and the component taxa of Dapsilodontidae (Besselodus and Dapsilodus) were moved into the superfamily Panderodontacea, closer to Panderodontidae and Strachanognathidae. Ansellidae is given a more distant placement among the Prioniodontida.{{Cite journal |last=Dzik |first=Jerzy |date=1991 |title=Evolution of oral apparatuses in the conodont chordates |url=https://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Publications/apparatusesDzik.pdf |journal=Acta Palaeontologica Polonica |volume=36 |issue=3 |pages=265–323}} A 1994 reevaluation of Panderodus argued that Belodellidae may have close affinities to Panderodontida, while Besselodus and Dapsilodus are best classified within the order Protopanderodontida.{{Cite journal |last1=Samson |first1=Ivan J. |last2=Armstrong |first2=Howard A. |last3=Smith |first3=M. Paul |date=1994 |title=The apparatus architecture of Panderodus and its implications for coniform conodont classification |url=https://www.palass.org/sites/default/files/media/publications/palaeontology/volume_37/vol37_part4_pp781-799.pdf |journal=Palaeontology |volume=37 |issue=4 |pages=781–799}}

{{Reflist}}

• The conodont apparatus as a food-gathering mechanism. Maurits Lindström, palaeontology, volume17, part 4, pages 729-744
• Taxonomy, Evolution, and Biostratigraphy of Conodonts from the Kechika Formation, Skoki Formation, and Road River Group (Upper Cambrian to Lower Silurian), Northeastern British Columbia. Leanne J. Pyle and Christopher R. Burnes, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 38(10), pages 1387–1401, 2001, {{doi|10.1139/e01-033}}

{{Conodonts|2}}

{{Taxonbar|from=Q21292362}}

†

{{Conodont-stub}}