Property Company of Friends

{{Short description|Real estate developer in the Philippines}}

{{Infobox company |

| name = Property Company of Friends Inc.

| logo = File:Profriends logo.jpg

| type = Wholly owned subsidiary of Profriends Group, Inc. Private

| founder = Guillermo Choa

| foundation = Mandaluyong, Philippines in 1999

| location = Pro-Friends Center, 55 Tinio St., Mandaluyong, Philippines

| key_people = Guillermo C. Choa, Chairman
Jocelyn Guzman, President and CEO

| revenue = PHP 5.36 billion (approx US$119.11 million USD) (2014){{cite news|title=ProFriends Revenue up 13.3% to 5.36B in June 2014|url=http://www.tribune.net.ph/business/pro-friends-revenue-up-13-3-to-p5-36b-in-june-2014|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=The Daily Tribune|date=6 October 2014}}

| net_income = PHP 1.9 billion (approx US$42.2 million USD) (2014){{cite web|title=Profriends Group holds off IPO pricing|url=http://www.dealstreetasia.com/stories/profriends-group-holds-off-ipo-pricing-1439/|website=Deal Street Asia|accessdate=3 February 2015|date=16 December 2014}}

| homepage = [http://www.profriends.com www.profriends.com]

|}}

Property Company of Friends, Inc., commonly known as Pro-Friends is a real estate company in the Philippines owned by Guillermo Choa. It is engaged in low-cost housing and condominium development. Its projects are on Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. Its banner project{{cite web|title=PRO-FRIENDS Signs MOA with AAB and San Agustin Bus Lines for Lancaster Estates Transportation Services|url=http://www.profriends.com/updates/news/pro-friends-signs-moa-with-aab-and-san-agustin-bus-lines-for-lancaster-estates-transportation-services/|website=Profriends|accessdate=2 February 2015}} is Lancaster New City, which occupies three towns in Cavite from Kawit, Imus, and General Trias. It has applied for its IPO under its holding entity, Amicus Holdings, which in turn has its subsidiary, Williamton, to handle in-house financing at second quarter of 2014 but was abandoned since March 2015.{{cite news|title=Amicus Holdings plans P8-B IPO|url=http://www.rappler.com/business/industries/210-capital-markets/67274-amicus-holdings-raise-p8b-ipo|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Rappler|date=26 August 2014}}

History

Property Company of Friends, Inc. was established in 1999. Constructing homes with precast concrete technology.{{cite news|author1=Janica Monick Riego|title=Pro-Friends Ensures House Safety with Sound Technology|agency=BusinessMirror|date=19 November 2014|page=A5}}

Projects

Subsidiaries

  • Profriends Group, Inc. (formerly Amicus Holdings, Inc){{cite web|title=Current Companies|url=http://www.profriendsgroup.com/current-companies.html|website=Profriends Group, Inc.|accessdate=2 February 2015}}
  • Firm Builders Realty Development Corporation
  • Micara Land, Inc.
  • Williamton Holdings, Inc.

Road to Public Offering and Acquisition

In August 2014, Pro-Friends announced that they are eyeing an initial public offering by September or October of the same year.{{cite news|title=Pro-Friends eyes IPO in Q3|url=http://www.philstar.com/business/2014/08/11/1356094/pro-friends-eyes-ipo-q3|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Philippine Star|date=11 August 2014}} However, there was no IPO that happened along the mentioned months and a press release was made December of the same year that the Securities and Exchange Commission has approved its IPO set on January 14, 2015{{cite news|title=SEC okays Pro-Friends IPO|url=http://www.philstar.com/business/2014/12/04/1398696/sec-okays-pro-friends-ipo|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Philippine Star|date=4 December 2014}} citing that the reason for the delay is due to negative leads brought about by a competitor prompting SEC to require Pro-Friends to clarify the allegations before the IPO application is processed. However, the reason for the delay was refuted by the Chief Operating Officer of PSE, Roel Refran.{{cite news|title=Real estate competitor not a fan of Profriends|url=http://manilastandardtoday.com/2014/12/14/real-estate-competitor-not-a-fan-of-profriends/|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Manila Standard Today|date=14 December 2014}}

On January 9, 2015, SEC has approved a PHP 7.7 billion (approx US$175 million USD) IPO and the listing date was set January 14, 2015.{{cite news|title=Profriends' P7.7-b IPO approved|url=http://manilastandardtoday.com/2015/01/07/profriends-p7-7-b-ipo-approved/|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Manila Standard Today|date=7 January 2015}} Eventually, the IPO offering expired as the Philippine Stock Exchange has not given a go-signal for ProFriends due to outstanding issues and non-compliance with the standard requirements. The company has abandoned the offering since March 2015.{{cite news|last1=Refran|first1=Roel|title=Pro-Friends does not have a pending listing application|url=http://manilastandardtoday.com/2015/07/07/pro-friends-does-not-have-a-pending-listing-application|accessdate=18 July 2015|publisher=Manila Standard Today|date=17 July 2015}}{{cite news|last1=Austria|first1=Jennifer|title=Profriends postpones P7.7-b IPO|url=http://manilastandardtoday.com/2015/05/21/profriends-postpones-p7-7-b-ipo/|accessdate=2 June 2015|publisher=The Standard|date=22 May 2015}} In August 2015, Pro-Friends has abandoned its IPO when George Ty's GT Capital Holdings acquired 22.68 percent of its stake.{{cite news|last1=Austria|first1=Jennifer|title=GT Capital acquires 22.7% of Profriends|url=http://manilastandardtoday.com/business/184103/gt-capital-acquires-22-7-of-profriends.html|accessdate=10 May 2016|publisher=The Standard|date=7 August 2015}}

On the second quarter of 2016, an additional 28.30% of Property Company of Friends Inc. was also acquired by GT Capital Holdings, Inc.. The deal increases GT Capital's economic stake in Pro-Friends from 22.70 percent to 51.0 percent.{{cite news|last1=Dumlao-Abadilla|first1=Doris|title=GT Capital gains 51% control of Pro-Friends|url=http://business.inquirer.net/211533/211533|accessdate=28 October 2016|publisher=Inquirer.net|date=1 July 2016}}

Marketing

Property Company of Friends is highly active on their marketing activities, being a sponsor for the location on the reality TV show I Do, existence of sponsored articles on various online and paper publications, advertisements on radio stations, and hired Janette Toral, to set up its SEO Lead Generation Program (July 2014 to December 2014{{cite web|title=Answers to ProFriends Lancaster New City Issues|url=https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20141002003614-121115-answers-to-profriends-and-lancaster-new-city-issues|website=Janette Toral - LinkedIn|accessdate=3 February 2015|date=2 October 2014}}).{{cite news|title=Toral: Dirty online attacks|url=http://www.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/business/2014/09/30/toral-dirty-online-attacks-368490|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Sunstar Cebu|date=30 September 2014}}

The company's aggressive marketing has been criticized by some real-estate analysts as creating a breeding culture of "The customer is not always right."; which was brought about by their focus on creative marketing even though its core business is building houses.{{cite web|title=A plea to Profriends to contribute in nation-building |url=http://pinoydreamhousetoday.com/a-plea-to-profriends-to-contribute-in-nation-building/ |website=Philippine Real Estate and Construction |accessdate=4 February 2015 |date=20 August 2014 |url-status=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150204080613/http://pinoydreamhousetoday.com/a-plea-to-profriends-to-contribute-in-nation-building/ |archivedate=February 4, 2015 }}

Controversies

File:Gabrielle unit construction at Lancaster New City.jpg

The company has been marred by controversies such as false advertising, delayed turn-overs,{{cite web|last1=Tulfo|first1=Ben|title=Pro-Friends|url=http://www.bitagtheoriginal.com/files/theme/ng_050215-Pro-Friends.htm|website=Bitag The Original|accessdate=7 May 2015|date=2 May 2015}}{{cite news|last1=Tulfo|first1=Ben|title=Non-delivery ng kontrata, proyekto|url=http://www.philstar.com/psn-opinyon/2015/05/04/1450908/non-delivery-ng-kontrata-proyekto|accessdate=7 May 2015|agency=Pilipino Star Ngayon|date=4 May 2015}} illegal control of homeowners associations within their projects, quality and structural integrity issues, hazardous location based on Good Building Design and Construction in the Philippines by UNISDR, no inspection policy during construction, and lawsuits.{{cite news|title=Probable Case Against Property Firm Found|url=http://www.tribune.net.ph/business/probable-cause-to-file-case-against-property-firm-found|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=The Daily Tribune|date=14 August 2014}}{{cite news|title=Pro-Friends Dapat Busisiin ng Kongreso|url=http://www.remate.ph/2014/09/pro-friends-dapat-busisiin-ng-kongreso/|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Remate|date=3 September 2014}}

File:Alice unit construction at Lancaster New City.jpg

=Senate Resolutions Concerning Allegations of Laws Violated by Pro-Friends=

On August 20, 2014, concerned citizens have pushed Philippine Senator and head of the Senate Commission on Urban Planning, Housing and Resettlement, JV Ejercito, to conduct an inquiry in aid of legislation regarding the alleged violations of Pro-Friends on several housing laws such as [http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno6541.htm Republic Act 6541] of the National Building Code of the Philippines and the alleged passive treatment of the housing regulation entity of the Philippines, the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB). Senate Resolution No. 859 Series of 2014 has been released by the 16th Congress.{{cite web|title=Senate Resolution No. 859 Property Company of Friends, Inc.|url=http://www.senate.gov.ph/lis/bill_res.aspx?congress=16&q=SRN-859|website=Senate of the Philippines|accessdate=2 February 2015|date=20 August 2014}} On December 9, 2014, a new Senate Resolution 1054 has been released from the office of the same senator to upgrade Resolution 859 by including alleged violations of real-estate developers on the independence of homeowners associations from control of real estate developers as mentioned in [http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2010/ra_9904_2010.html Republic Act 9904] implementation.{{cite web|title=Senate Resolution No. 1054 Real Estate Developers Owners and Operators|url=http://www.senate.gov.ph/lis/bill_res.aspx?congress=16&q=SRN-1054|website=Senate of the Philippines|accessdate=2 February 2015|date=9 December 2014}}{{cite news|last1=Manalo|first1=Charlie|title=A not so friendly developer|url=http://www.tribune.net.ph/commentary/a-not-so-friendly-developer|accessdate=12 May 2015|agency=The Daily Tribune|date=12 May 2015}}

= Protests, Exposé and Lawsuits =

In October 2015, due to allegations of violations, a surge of online protests and weblogs about the quality of construction and unsuited location of projects of the real-estate developer has prompted the company to file libel complaints to its complaining customers and individuals,{{cite news|last1=Agoncillo|first1=Daniel|title=Pro-Friends victims' plaints not mere propaganda|url=http://opinion.inquirer.net/91914/pro-friends-victims-plaints-not-mere-propaganda|accessdate=10 May 2016|publisher=Inquirer.net|date=11 January 2016}} including Ervin Malicdem, a hazards mapper.{{cite news|last1=Nonato|first1=Vince Alvic|title=Profriends sues hazards mapper for cyberlibel|url=http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Nation&title=profriends-sues-hazards-mapper-for-cyberlibel&id=117531|accessdate=10 May 2016|publisher=Business World|date=26 October 2015}} The complaint however was dismissed by the Mandaluyong Prosecutor's Office as the information exposed was "made in good faith and there is truth to the claim, while Pro-Friends was not able to controvert the allegations against them."{{cite journal|last1=Magpantay|first1=Arnold|title=Resolution to Motion for Reconsideration|journal=Department of Justice Office of the City Prosecutor of Mandaluyong|date=14 April 2016|volume=NPS Docket XV-06-INV-15I-01649|issue=Resolution to Motion for Reconsideration|page=3}}

In March 2016, Congressman Karlo Nograles has urged the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council to cease the operations of Pro-Friends due to increasing number of complaints, including the presence of improper drainage that causes severe flooding, defective sewerage system and substandard materials were used for construction.{{cite news|title=Labor panel chief wants HUDCC to stop operation of Pro-Friends|url=http://mindanaodailymirror.com/labor-panel-chief-wants-hudcc-stop-operation-pro-friends-13812|accessdate=16 November 2016|publisher=Mindanao Daily Mirror|date=7 March 2016}} HUDCC on the other hand, under the chairmanship of Vice President Leni Robredo, posted an advisory regarding the complaints hurled against the real-estate developer, prompting confirmation of 415 cases filed in HLURB that resulted in favor of the buyers. {{cite web |last1=Robredo |first1=Leni |title=Advisory to the Public regarding Pro-Friends |url=http://ovp.gov.ph/index.php/14-press-release/housing/1154-advisory-to-the-public-regarding-pro-friends |website=Office of the Vice President, Republic of the Philippines |access-date=10 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161128040435/http://ovp.gov.ph/index.php/14-press-release/housing/1154-advisory-to-the-public-regarding-pro-friends |archive-date=28 November 2016 |date=2 November 2016}}

=The company's response=

According to Property Company of Friends, turn-over delays are present as they continue to improve the efficiency of their processes while they are placing the safety of their customers as the priority. This paved way for the reason why prohibition of buyer inspections during construction phase are in effect. Additionally, flooding is brought about by the abnormal rainfall that inundated Cavite during Typhoon Maring of 2013 that reached 475 mm.{{cite web|title=FAQ|url=https://www.facebook.com/LancasterNewCityOfficial/app_784204398305580|website=Lancaster Estates by Profriends (Official) on Facebook|accessdate=2 February 2015}} However, petitioners have remained unsatisfied with the response as their policies are allegedly in violation of some tenets in the [http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno7394.htm Consumer Act of the Philippines] and [http://www.chanrobles.com/presidentialdecrees/presidentialdecreeno957.html#.VM_kVWiUeM4 Presidential Decree 957].As for the flooding caused by TS Maring, it only dropped 335 mm{{cite news|title='Maring' may turn into typhoon before heading to Taiwan — Pagasa|url=http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/469103/maring-may-turn-into-typhoon-before-heading-to-taiwan-pagasa|accessdate=2 February 2015|agency=Philippine Daily Inquirer|date=19 August 2013}} over a 24-hour period at Cavite City; which is twelve kilometers away from Lancaster New City. Residents of one their Cavite project believe the flooding was only caused partly by the amount of rainfall.

See also

References

{{Reflist|30em}}