Prorogation

{{Short description|Parliamentary term}}

{{more citations needed|date=September 2019}}

Prorogation in the Westminster system of government is the action of proroguing, or interrupting, a parliament, or the discontinuance of meetings for a given period of time,{{Cite EB1911 |wstitle=Prorogation |volume=22 |page=450}} without a dissolution of parliament. The term is also used for the period of such a discontinuance between two legislative sessions of a legislative body.

Ancient Rome

{{Main|Prorogatio}}

In the constitution of ancient Rome, prorogatio was the extension of a commander's imperium beyond the one-year term of his magistracy, usually that of consul or praetor. Prorogatio developed as a legal procedure in response to Roman expansionism and militarization.Andrew Lintott, The Constitution of the Roman Republic (Oxford University Press, 1999.), p. 113 ff. [https://books.google.com/books?id=yaFPohP2lB8C&dq=%22In+the+early+Republic+the+need+for+extra+military+commanders%22&pg=PA113 online.]

This usage is unrelated to the modern parliamentary term.

Australia

{{Main|Section 5 of the Constitution of Australia}}

In Australia, prorogation- a power of the Governor-General- is the ending of a session in the Australian Parliament pursuant to section 5 of the Constitution of Australia. It is constitutionally distinct from dissolution, another power of the Governor-General, which removes all serving MPs from office pending the election of new ones. A prorogation conventionally occurs at the same time as a dissolution, for the purpose of bringing all business in Parliament to an end prior to an election.

The Prime Minister of Australia may request that the Governor-General prorogue parliament. Although prorogation before the end of a parliamentary term isn't unconstitutional, it is usually rejected by the Governor-General.{{cn|date=March 2025}}

Canada

{{Main|Prorogation in Canada}}

Prorogation is the end of a session in the Parliament of Canada.

India

Prorogation implies the end of the sitting as well as the session and not the dissolution of the House in the Indian Parliament. The Rajya Sabha is not dissolved as it is a permanent House, only the Lok Sabha is dissolved. The President can prorogue the House while in session also.

New Zealand

{{Main|New Zealand Parliament#Term}}

Prorogation is the end of a session in the New Zealand Parliament pursuant to the Constitution Act 1986. The ability of the speaker to recall parliament during an adjournment has rendered prorogation almost obsolete, and the procedure was last used in 1991.{{cite web |title=Chapter 10 Summoning, Proroguing and Dissolving Parliament |url=https://www.parliament.nz/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/parliamentary-practice-in-new-zealand/chapter-10-summoning-proroguing-and-dissolving-parliament/ |website=www.parliament.nz |publisher=New Zealand Parliament |access-date=23 May 2022 |language=en-NZ |date=8 June 2017}}

Northern Ireland

{{Main|House of Commons of Northern Ireland#Procedure}}

Prorogation in Northern Ireland was the end of a session in the Parliament of Northern Ireland (1921–1972).

Pakistan

According to clause (1) of Article 54 of the Constitution of Pakistan, the President of Pakistan can from time to time prorogue the sessions of Parliament, both the National Assembly of Pakistan and the Senate of Pakistan.

United Kingdom

{{Main|Prorogation in the United Kingdom}}

{{See also|Prorogation Act 1867|2019 British prorogation controversy}}

Prorogation is the formal ending of a Parliamentary session in the UK Parliament.{{Cite web|url=http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/occasions/prorogation/|title=Prorogation|website=UK Parliament|language=en|access-date=2017-05-26}}{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/aug/28/protests-sparked-by-boris-johnsons-plan-to-suspend-parliament|title='Stop the coup': Protests across UK over Johnson's suspension of parliament|last1=Mohdin|first1=Aamaa|date=28 August 2019|work=The Guardian|last2=Wolfe-Robinson|first2=Maya|last3=Kalukembi|first3=Marvel}}

United States

{{See also|Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Clause_3:_Extraordinary_sessions_and_prorogation_of_Congress|label 1=Article II, Section 3, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution|Federalist No. 69}}

Under Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution the President of the United States technically has the authority to adjournThe terms "prorogue" and "prorogation" are not found in the text of the Constitution. the United States Congress "to such Time as he shall think proper" when it is unable to agree on a time of adjournment. However, this is a procedural ability that has so far never been used. The members of the Constitutional Convention agreed to limit executive authority in order to prevent autocracy.{{Cite web|url=http://theconversation.com/the-american-founders-made-sure-the-president-could-never-suspend-congress-122703|title=The American Founders made sure the president could never suspend Congress|last=Gould|first=Eliga|website=The Conversation|date=3 September 2019 |language=en|access-date=2020-04-19}} In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton differentiated the President's authority to prorogue Congress from the King of Great Britain's ability to dissolve Parliament.

On April 15, 2020, while Congress was in recess due to the COVID-19 pandemic but still holding pro forma sessions, President Donald Trump threatened to use the presidential prerogative powers to adjourn both the House of Representatives and the Senate in order to make recess appointments for positions such as Director of National Intelligence and the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, citing what he argued was obstructionism and extreme partisanship from the Democratic Party.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-26/|title=Remarks by President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Members of the Coronavirus Task Force in Press Briefing|language=en-US|via=National Archives|work=whitehouse.gov|access-date=2020-04-22}} However, constitutional law experts and politicians have argued that President Trump did not have the constitutional authority to do so under those conditions, as both houses had agreed on a date of adjournment, and President Trump's argument that the President can force Congress to adjourn was widely condemned by both Republicans and Democrats.{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/493044-trump-threatens-to-adjourn-both-chambers-of-congress|title=Trump threatens to adjourn both chambers of Congress|last=Zilbermints|first=Regina|date=2020-04-15|website=The Hill|language=en|access-date=2020-04-16}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-15/trump-says-he-has-constitutional-authority-to-adjourn-congress|title=Trump Claims Untested Power to Adjourn Congress in Nominee Fight|last1=Parker|first1=Mario|last2=Sink|first2=Justin|website=Bloomberg News |date=2020-04-15|agency=Bloomberg News|access-date=2020-04-16}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-threatens-to-adjourn-congress-to-get-his-nominees-through/2020/04/15/e3bfc4c6-7f6a-11ea-9040-68981f488eed_story.html|title=Trump threatens to adjourn Congress to get his nominees but likely would be impeded by Senate rules|author=Itkowitz, Colby|author2=DeBonis, Mike|date=April 16, 2020|access-date=2020-04-16|newspaper=The Washington Post}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/banana-republic-trump-threatens-to-unilaterally-suspend-congress-20200416-p54kaq.html|title='Banana republic': Trump threatens to unilaterally suspend Congress|last=Knott|first=Matthew|date=2020-04-15|website=The Sydney Morning Herald|language=en|access-date=2020-04-22}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/trump-adjournment-constitution/610171/|title=Trump Is Threatening to Subvert the Constitution|first1=Neal K. |last1=Katyal |last2=Schmidt|first2=Thomas P.|date=2020-04-17|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2025-05-25}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/04/recess-appointments-president-trump-empty-threat-congressional-adjournment/|title=The President's Empty Threat on Recess Appointments|date=2020-04-18|website=National Review|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-22}} In order to prorogue Congress, the Senate would have to set a different date of adjournment than the House of Representatives. Although President Trump called on the Senate to set a new adjournment date, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell indicated that he would not alter the planned adjournment date of January 3, 2021, and any motion to alter the date would require the approval of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the Democratic members of the Senate through the Senate Standing Rules.{{Cite web|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/news/mcconnell-dismisses-trumps-call-to-adjourn-congress-to-make-federal-appointments/|title=McConnell Dismisses Trump's Call to Adjourn Congress to Make Federal Appointments|date=2020-04-16|website=National Review|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-19}}

See also

References