Purdue Pegboard Test

{{short description|Test of dexterity}}

{{Infobox diagnostic |

Name = Purdue Pegboard Test |

Image = |

Caption = |

ICD10 = |

ICD9 = |

purpose = manual dexterity|

OPS301 = |

OtherCodes = |

}}

The Purdue Pegboard Test is a psychomotor test of manual dexterity and bimanual coordination.{{cite book|author=Esther Strauss|title=A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jQ7n4QVw7-0C&pg=PA1042|accessdate=19 August 2013|year=2006|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-515957-8|pages=1042–}} The test involves two different abilities: gross movements of arms, hands, and fingers, and fine motor extremity, also called "fingerprint" dexterity.{{cite book|author1=Jack M. Guralnik|author2=Linda P. Fried|author3=Eleanor M. Simonsick |author4=Judith D. Kasper |author5=Mary E. Lafferty|title=The Women's Health and Aging Study: Health and Social Characteristics of Older Women With Disability|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9eJ174um3VIC&pg=PA39|accessdate=19 August 2013|date=1 July 1995|publisher=DIANE Publishing|isbn=978-0-7881-3122-6|pages=39–}} Poor Pegboard performance is a sign of deficits in complex, visually guided, or coordinated movements that are likely mediated by circuits involving the basal ganglia.{{cite book|author1=Davide Martino|author2=James F. Leckman|title=Tourette Syndrome|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fI1otjutSmoC&pg=PA113|accessdate=19 August 2013|date=9 May 2013|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-979626-7|pages=113–}}

History

Joseph Tiffin, an Industrial Psychologist at Purdue University, designed the test in 1948. It was originally intended for assessing the dexterity of assembly line workers.{{cite book|author1=Mary Vining Radomski|author2=Catherine A. Trombly Latham|title=Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hczaxaAXCDsC&pg=PA1140|accessdate=19 August 2013|year=2008|publisher=Lippincott Williams & Wilkins|isbn=978-0-7817-6312-7|pages=1140–}}

Method and interpretation

The pegboard consists of a board with two parallel rows with 25 holes into which cylindrical metal pegs are placed by the examinee. The test involves a total of four trials.{{cite book|author1=Patricia Espe-Pfeifer|author2=Jana Wachsler-Felder|title=Neuropsychological Interpretations of Objective Psychological Tests|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7O66Q2-Oa9gC&pg=PA26|accessdate=19 August 2013|date=30 April 2000|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-0-306-46224-5|pages=26–}} To begin, there is a brief practice. The subsets for preferred, non-preferred, and both hands require the patient to place the pins in the holes as quickly as possible, with the score being the number of pins placed in 30 seconds.

=Neurocognitive disorders=

The Purdue Pegboard test predicted worse adult tic severity and correlated with tic severity at the time of childhood assessment.

Purdue Pegboard performance deficiencies have been linked to poor social functioning in schizophrenia.

=Industry=

Results from a correlation analysis suggested that a person's capability on the Purdue Pegboard Test is a good predictor of their ability to use a mobile phone in cold weather.{{cite book|author1=Patrick Langdon|author2=John Clarkson|author3=Peter Robinson|title=Designing Inclusive Interactions: Inclusive Interactions Between People and Products in Their Contexts of Use|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ghS8ovXfhPoC&pg=PA33|accessdate=19 August 2013|date=28 February 2010|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-1-84996-166-0|pages=33–}}

Reliability

One-trial administration of the Purdue Pegboard Test produced test-retest reliability of 0.60 to 0.79. The three-trial administration test-retest reliability ranged from 0.82 to 0.91.

References

{{reflist}}

{{Neuropsychology tests}}

Category:Neuropsychological tests

Category:Cognitive tests