Qalipu First Nation

Prior to the time of European contact, the Mi'kmaq people inhabited Miꞌkmaꞌki, their vast territories which encompassed much of modern-day Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island, as well as portions of northeastern New Brunswick and Quebec's Gaspé Peninsula.

By the 17th century, the Mi'kmaq would often visit the island they called Taqamkuk (present-day Newfoundland) by crossing the Cabot Strait in shallops that they adopted from European fur traders.[http://www.heritage.nf.ca/articles/aboriginal/mikmaq-history.php "The History of the Newfoundland Mi'kmaq"], Heritage Newfoundland and Labrador, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1998 They visited the island and hunted along its south coast, going as far east as Placentia Bay, before returning to Unamaki{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}}. Gradually, Taqamkuk became one of their "domain of islands". Some {{who|date=September 2019}} Mi'kmaq individuals have stated{{citation needed|date=September 2019}} that, in addition to those traveling to the island to hunt, a group of their people had already lived on the island for hundreds of years. The island's historical populace, the Beothuk, are thought to have died out in the early 1800s. Shanawdithit was the last full-blooded, known living member of the Beothuk people; she eventually died with no known living descendants.

During Canada's 18th-century colonial period, French and British forces warred for rights to North American land claims. The Mi'kmaq, and several other First Nations, became closely allied with France, with whom they frequently traded furs and other goods and necessities. Together, they raided British colonial settlements in New England, as well as the Atlantic regions of what would become Canada. In 1763, after France was defeated by Britain in the Seven Years' War, the country ceded all land east of the Mississippi River to Great Britain, including the Mi'kmaq long-held traditional land. After this, numerous British colonists entered the territories and tried to settle.

Newfoundland, however, was still sparsely populated, and most Europeans lived on the eastern portion of the island, in small and isolated coastal fishing settlements. The Mi'kmaq living on the island were, essentially, able to continue their traditional way of life on the island's west coast and within the interior. After the Beothuk people disappeared in the 1800s, the Mi'kmaq no longer shared Newfoundland's interior with another people. In 1857, a colonial census of Newfoundland recorded Mi'kmaq settlements at St. George's Bay, Codroy Valley, Bay d'Espoir and the Bay of Exploits.

The English and other Europeans had little knowledge of the interior and relied on the Mi'kmaq for support.{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}} In 1822, explorer William Cormack traversed the island's interior from Trinity Bay to St. George's Bay, guided by a Mi'kmaw man named Sylvester Joe. In the 1860s, the British hired a group of Mi'kmaq men for overland postal delivery via a network of trails to reach the northern communities.

In 1898, a railway was constructed across the island, giving Europeans greater access to Newfoundland's interior. Numerous settlers thus arrived to hunt the caribou and moose, in addition to other animals, causing a sharp decline in local wildlife populations. The caribou, for example, had served as one of the main sources of food and supplies for the Mi'kmaq, and their decline adversely affected the survival of the people. Starting in the 1920s, global fur prices began to decline as the demand for fur dropped, resulting in some Mi'kmaq quitting trapping to work for Europeans as loggers.{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}}

In 1972, activists formed the Native Association of Newfoundland and Labrador as the main organization representing the Mi'kmaq, Innu and Inuit peoples of Newfoundland and Labrador.{{Cite web|url=http://www.heritage.nf.ca/articles/aboriginal/mikmaq.php|title = The Mi'kmaq (Micmac)}} After the Labrador Innu and Inuit left the Association in 1975, the organization was renamed as the Federation of Newfoundland Indians (FNI). The FNI included six Mi'kmaq bands: the Benoits Cove Band, the Corner Brook Indian Band, the Flat Bay Indian Band, the Gander Bay Indian Band, the Glenwood Mi'kmaq First Nation and the Port au Port Indian Band. The provincial government supported the FNI.{{Cite web|url=http://qalipu.ca/enrolment/|title=Enrolment – Qalipu}} The federal government approved only the petition for recognition made by the Mi'kmaq at Conne River. In 1987, the Miawpukek Mi'kmaq First Nation was recognized under the Indian Act, and their community of Conne River was classified as reserved land for the Mi'kmaq.{{cite web|url=http://www.mfngov.ca/about-miawpukek/|title=About Miawpukek|access-date=Oct 16, 2020|publisher=Miawpukek Mi'kamawey Mawi'omi}}

Recognition for the remainder of Newfoundland's Mi'kmaq was a much longer process; the group's attempts to obtain status under the Indian Act were fruitless, and led to a Federal Court action in 1989, in which the FNI sought a declaration that its members were Indians within the meaning of the 1867 Constitution Act.{{Cite web |last=Meloney |first=Nic |date=2018-03-01 |title=Who belongs in Canada's newest and possibly largest First Nation? |url=https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longform/who-belongs-in-qalipu-mikmaq-first-nation |website=CBC News}} Minister David Crombie was willing to work with the FNI and the government of Newfoundland, but the provincial government considered it to be a federal matter.

In 2003, Minister Andy Scott was presented with a report that recommended a First Nations band without any reserved land to represent the Mi'kmaq of Newfoundland. An Agreement-in-principle was reached in 2006, which the FNI accepted in 2007. The federal government ratified it in 2008.{{cite news |last1=Contenta |first1=Sandro |title=In Newfoundland, too many want recognition as Mi'kmaq Indians, federal government says |url=https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2013/05/05/in_newfoundland_too_many_want_recognition_as_mikmaq_indians_federal_government_says.html |access-date=9 November 2021 |work=The Toronto Star |date=5 May 2013 |language=en-CA}}

The Government of Canada had expected band membership to be similar to the membership of the Federation of Newfoundland Indians, around 5,000 people. Instead, around 105,000 people, or the equivalent of one-fifth of the population of Newfoundland, applied to become band members.

After the first round of enrollment, 23,000 of 30,000 applicants were accepted. Although not yet functional, the band became the second largest by membership in Canada.[https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-moves-to-tighten-aboriginal-membership-criteria/article17954032/ "Ottawa Moves to Tighten Aboriginal Membership Criteria"], The Globe and Mail This put the enrolment process to a halt and a supplemental agreement between the Federation of Newfoundland Indians and Canada was formed in 2013.{{Cite web |last=Hillier |first=Bernice |date=2017-02-04 |title=Decision week for thousands of applicants to the Qalipu band |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/decision-week-for-qalipu-band-1.3967117 |website=CBC News}} The rest of the outstanding applications were put in indefinite storage. In 2013 applicants organized a new group, the Mi’kmaq First Nations Assembly of Newfoundland to lobby to continue the enrollment process. They began to prepare for a legal action regarding the enrollment process should lobbying fail.{{Cite web|url=http://www.mfnan.org/?page_id=310|title=Mi'Kmaq First Nations Assembly of Newfoundland | Mission & Mandate}} In 2014, parliament passed Bill C-25, authorizing it to review all applications and retroactively reject some, based on criteria similar to those used in the R v Powley case that defined rights for the Métis people.{{Cite web |date=2014-02-26 |title=New Qalipu bill would give feds too much power: Gerry Byrne |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/new-qalipu-bill-would-give-feds-too-much-power-gerry-byrne-1.2552109 |website=CBC News}}{{cite web |url=http://www.thewesternstar.com/News/Local/2014-03-07/article-3641400/Bill-C-25-reflects-information-already-provided-to-Qalipu-applicants%3A-Sheppard/1 |title=Bill C-25 reflects information already provided to Qalipu applicants: Sheppard - Local - the Western Star |website=www.thewesternstar.com |access-date=19 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140314144802/http://www.thewesternstar.com/News/Local/2014-03-07/article-3641400/Bill-C-25-reflects-information-already-provided-to-Qalipu-applicants%3A-Sheppard/1 |archive-date=14 March 2014 |url-status=dead}} The 2013 agreement tightened rules and criteria thus leaving 80,000+ applicants rejected in its wake.{{Cite web |last=Howells |first=Laura |date=2016-03-27 |title=6,500 rejected Qalipu Mi'kmaq band applications to be reconsidered |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/qalipu-mikmaq-reconsidered-1.3506061 |website=CBC News}}{{Cite web |last=Newell |first=David |date=2016-12-22 |title=Scrap Qalipu membership requirements, says Mi'kmaq association chair |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/qalipu-mi-kmaq-dave-wells-discrimination-indigenous-1.3908859 |website=CBC News}}{{cite news |last1=Thomson |first1=Aly |title=About 80,000 denied eligibility for Newfoundland first nation band |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/only-18000-eligible-for-newfoundland-first-nation-band-its-discriminatory/article33925034/ |access-date=9 November 2021 |work=The Globe and Mail |date=7 February 2017 |language=en-CA}} In 2017, only 18,044 were eligible for membership.{{Cite web |last=Connors |first=Colleen |date=2017-12-08 |title=Thousands of Qalipu Mi'kmaq applicants rejected again |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/appeals-rejected-qalipu-mi-kmaq-1.4439574}} In 2018, the Qalipu First Nation announced that the updated Founding Members List for the Band was adopted by way of an Order in Council which came into effect on June 25, 2018. The 2018 Band list included 18,575 members.{{cite web | url=https://qalipu.ca/updated-founding-members-list-for-the-qalipu-first-nation-adopted-through-order-in-council/ | title=Updated Founding Members List for the Qalipu First Nation Adopted Through Order in Council – Qalipu |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20230930000432/https://qalipu.ca/updated-founding-members-list-for-the-qalipu-first-nation-adopted-through-order-in-council/ |archivedate=30 September 2023}} By 2021, nearly 24,000 people were recognized as founding members, in 67 Newfoundland communities and abroad.{{Cite web |last=Connors |first=Colleen |date=2021-09-23 |title=Qalipu First Nation marks a milestone, celebrating 10 years as recognized Indigenous band |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/qalipu-10-years-1.6186538 |website=CBC News}}

In 2013, Chiefs Terrance Paul and Gerard Julian, co-chairs of the Assembly of Nova Scotia Chiefs, sent a joint letter to the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. They presented their concerns regarding the legitimacy of the Qalipu band, and asked for further clarification and explanation by the federal government. They disputed the authority of the federal government to determine who qualifies as Mi’kmaq. They said that, while the government of Canada may have jurisdiction over who is an Indian, they do not have the constitutional right to determine who is a Mi’kmaq.{{cite news |last1=Battiste |first1=Jaimie |title=Nova Scotia Chiefs Raise Concerns over Qalipu Mi'kmaq Band |url=http://mikmaqrights.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Qalipu-Article-Final-.pdf |access-date=4 January 2019 |work=mikmaqrights.com |agency=Mi'kmaq Rights Initiative}}

Later in 2013, the Mi’kmaq Grand Council, the traditional government of the Mi'kmaq people, issued a statement to the United Nations denouncing the Qalipu band as illegitimate. The letter stated, "These new Qalipu members we simply do not know and do not recognize as Mi’kmaq."{{cite journal |last1=Grand Council of Micmacs |title=STATEMENT TO UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ANAYA |date=4 October 2013 |url=http://www.eskasoni.ca/uploads/newsletter/Sante-Mawiomi-Statement-to-UN-Special-Rapporteur.pdf |access-date=4 January 2019}} The Mi'kmaq Rights Initiative assert that the Qalipu were created as an entity by the federal government, and they do not consider them as part of the broader Mi'kmaq nation.{{cite journal |last1=Battiste |first1=Jaime |title=Defining Aboriginal Identity: What the Courts Have Stated |website=mikmaqrights.com |url=http://mikmaqrights.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Defining-Aboriginal-Identity-Final-draft-for-MMN.pdf |access-date=4 January 2019 |archive-date=4 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190104231129/http://mikmaqrights.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Defining-Aboriginal-Identity-Final-draft-for-MMN.pdf |url-status=dead }} The Friends of Qalipu Advocacy Association is currently taking Qalipu First Nation (and its precursor) to court over the enrolment process.{{cite news |last1=Meloney |first1=Nic |title=Canada signed private agreement with Qalipu Mi'kmaq days before contentious changes to application process |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/qalipu-mikmaq-enrolment-indemnity-agreement-1.4631899 |access-date=9 November 2021 |date=April 25, 2018}}

A band council is elected under the Qalipu Mi’kmaq First Nation Band Custom Election Rules, which were a part of the agreement with the Canadian government. Changes to the Custom Election Rules can be made only after a referendum voted on by the whole band membership.[http://qalipu.ca/site/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Governance-Qalipu-MiKmaq-First-Nation-24-July-2013.pdf "Governance"], Qalipu First Nation In 2021, a referendum passed changing terms of office to four years starting in 2024.{{cite news |title=Qalipu First Nation members vote in record numbers, re-electing Brendan Mitchell as chief |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/mitchell-qalipu-re-elected-highest-voter-turnout-1-6222574-1.6222574 |publisher=CBC News |date=October 23, 2021}}

Members of the Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation elect a Chief (currently Jenny Brake), two Vice Chiefs, and councillors representing a total of nine wards.{{Cite web |url=http://qalipu.ca/about/ward-structure/ |title=Ward Structure – Qalipu |access-date=2016-07-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160607235358/http://qalipu.ca/about/ward-structure/ |archive-date=2016-06-07 |url-status=dead }}

Shown below are the electoral districts and the results from the 2021 election.{{Citation |title=Vote Count - Summary |date=2021-10-22 |url=https://qalipu.ca/qalipu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/VoteCount_Summary_NoAudit.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006144211/https://qalipu.ca/qalipu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/VoteCount_Summary_NoAudit.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-06}}

{{reflist}}

{{First Nations in Newfoundland and Labrador}}

{{authority control}}

Category:First Nations in Newfoundland and Labrador

Category:First Nations governments in Atlantic Canada

Category:2011 establishments in Newfoundland and Labrador

Category:Indigenous peoples in Newfoundland and Labrador