Radar astronomy

{{Short description|Observing nearby astronomical objects by analyzing reflected microwaves}}

Radar astronomy is a technique of observing nearby astronomical objects by reflecting radio waves or microwaves off target objects and analyzing their reflections. Radar astronomy differs from radio astronomy in that the latter is a passive observation (i.e., receiving only) and the former an active one (transmitting and receiving). Radar systems have been conducted for six decades applied to a wide range of Solar System studies. The radar transmission may either be pulsed or continuous.

The strength of the radar return signal is proportional to the inverse fourth-power of the distance. Upgraded facilities, increased transceiver power, and improved apparatus have increased observational opportunities.

Radar techniques provide information unavailable by other means, such as testing general relativity by observing Mercury{{cite conference |title=Radar and spacecraft ranging to Mercury between 1966 and 1988 |author=Anderson, John D. |author2=Slade, Martin A. |author3=Jurgens, Raymond F. |author4=Lau, Eunice L. |author5=Newhall, X. X. |author6=Myles, E. |journal=Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia |conference=IAU, Asian-Pacific Regional Astronomy Meeting, 5th, Proceedings |location=Sydney, Australia |date=July 1990 |type=Held July 16–20, 1990 |publisher=Astronomical Society of Australia |issn=0066-9997 |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=324 |bibcode=1991PASAu...9..324A }} and providing a refined value for the astronomical unit. Radar images provide information about the shapes and surface properties of solid bodies, which cannot be obtained by other ground-based techniques.

File:MillstoneHill.jpg

File:ADU-1000-4.jpg, USSR, 1960]]

Relying upon high-powered terrestrial radars (of up to one megawatt),{{cite web |url=http://www.naic.edu/~nolan/radar/radarstatus.html |title=Arecibo Radar Status |author= |access-date=22 December 2012}} radar astronomy is able to provide extremely accurate astrometric information on the structure, composition and movement of Solar System objects.{{cite web |url=http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/introduction.html |title=Asteroid Radar Research Page |last1= Ostro |first1= Steven |date=1997 |publisher= JPL |access-date=22 December 2012}} This aids in forming long-term predictions of asteroid-Earth impacts, as illustrated by the object 99942 Apophis. In particular, optical observations measure where an object appears in the sky, but cannot measure the distance with great accuracy (relying on parallax becomes more difficult when objects are small or poorly illuminated). Radar, on the other hand, directly measures the distance to the object (and how fast it is changing). The combination of optical and radar observations normally allows the prediction of orbits at least decades, and sometimes centuries, into the future.

In August 2020 the Arecibo Observatory (Arecibo Planetary Radar) suffered a structural cable failure, leading to the collapse of the main telescope in December of that year.{{cite web |title=Giant Arecibo radio telescope collapses in Puerto Rico|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/01/arecibo-radio-telescope-collapses-puerto-rico |website=www.theguardian.com |date=December 2020 |access-date=March 5, 2021 |language=en }}

As of 2023, there were two radar astronomy facilities in regular use, the Goldstone Solar System Radar and Evpatoria Planetary Radar.{{Cite conference |last=Bezrukovs |first=Vladislavs |last2=Dugin |first2=Nikolai |last3=Skirmante |first3=Karina |last4=Jasmonts |first4=Gints |last5=Šteinbergs |first5=Jānis |date=2023 |title=The forward scatter radar method for detecting space objects using emission of extraterrestrial radio sources |url=https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/neosst2/paper/125 |conference=2nd NEO and Debris Detection Conference |language=en}}

Advantages

  • Control of attributes of the signal [i.e., the waveform's time/frequency modulation and polarization]
  • Resolve objects spatially.
  • Delay-Doppler measurement precision.
  • Optically opaque penetration.
  • Sensitive to high concentrations of metal or ice.

Disadvantages

The maximum range of astronomy by radar is very limited, and is confined to the Solar System. This is because the signal strength drops off very steeply with distance to the target, the small fraction of incident flux that is reflected by the target, and the limited strength of transmitters.{{Cite book | last = Hey | first = J. S. | title = The Evolution of Radio Astronomy | publisher = Paul Elek (Scientific Books) | series = Histories of Science Series | volume = 1 | date = 1973 }} The distance to which the radar can detect an object is proportional to the square root of the object's size, due to the one-over-distance-to-the-fourth dependence of echo strength. Radar could detect something ~1 km across a large fraction of an AU away, but at 8-10 AU, the distance to Saturn, we need targets at least hundreds of kilometers wide. It is also necessary to have a relatively good ephemeris of the target before observing it.

History

The Moon is comparatively close and was detected by radar soon after the invention of the technique in 1946.{{cite journal |first=Jack |last=Mofensen |url=http://www.eagle.ca/~harry/ba/eme/index.htm |title=Radar echoes from the moon |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081029000712/http://www.eagle.ca/~harry/ba/eme/index.htm |archive-date=2008-10-29 |journal=Electronics |volume=19 |pages=92–98 |date=April 1946}}{{cite journal |first=Zoltán |last=Bay |author-link=Zoltán Lajos Bay |title=Reflection of microwaves from the moon |journal=Hungarica Acta Physica |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=1–22 |date=January 1947 |doi=10.1007/BF03161123 |doi-access=free |url=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03161123.pdf}} Measurements included surface roughness and later mapping of shadowed regions near the poles.

The next easiest target is Venus. This was a target of great scientific value, since it could provide an unambiguous way to measure the size of the astronomical unit, which was needed for the nascent field of interplanetary spacecraft. In addition such technical prowess had great public relations value, and was an excellent demonstration to funding agencies. So there was considerable pressure to squeeze a scientific result from weak and noisy data, which was accomplished by heavy post-processing of the results, utilizing the expected value to tell where to look. This led to early claims (from Lincoln Laboratory,{{cite journal

|title=Radar Echoes from Venus: Advances in several arts made possible this experiment in radio astronomy performed during the IGY

|last1=Price |first1=R |last2=Green Jr |first2=PE |last3=Goblick Jr |first3=TJ |last4=Kingston |first4=RH

|last5=Kraft Jr |first5=LG |last6=Pettengill |first6=GH |last7=Silver |first7=R |last8=Smith |first8=WB

|journal=Science

|volume=129

|issue=3351

|pages=751--753

|year=1959

|publisher=American Association for the Advancement of Science

|url=https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.129.3351.751}} Jodrell Bank,{{cite journal

|title=Radio echo observations of Venus

|last1=Evans |first1=JV |last2=Taylor |first2=GN

|journal=Nature

|volume=184

|issue=4696

|pages=1358--1359

|year=1959

|publisher=Nature Publishing Group UK London}} and Vladimir A. Kotelnikov of the USSR{{cite journal

|title=Radar contact with Venus

|last1=Kotelnokov |first1=VA

|journal=Journal of the British Institution of Radio Engineers

|volume=22

|issue=4

|pages=293--295

|year=1961

|publisher=IET

|url=http://vak.rutgers.edu/Chapters_T2/020_060%20Radar%20Contact%20with%20Venus%20(1961).pdf}}) which are now known to be incorrect. All of these agreed with each other and the conventional value of AU at the time, {{val|149467000|u=km}}.{{cite book |url=https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4218/sp4218.htm |title=NASA SP-4218: To See the Unseen - A History of Planetary Radar Astronomy |chapter=Chapter 2: Fickle Venus |chapter-url=http://history.nasa.gov:80/SP-4218/ch2.htm |first=Andrew J. |last=Butrica |publisher = NASA | date=1996 |access-date=2008-05-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070823124845/https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4218/sp4218.htm |archive-date=2007-08-23 |url-status=live}}

The first unambiguous detection of Venus was made by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory on 10 March 1961. JPL established contact with the planet Venus using a planetary radar system from 10 March to 10 May 1961. Using both velocity and range data, a new value of {{val|149598500|500|u=km}} was determined for the astronomical unit.

{{cite journal

| last1 = Malling | first1 = L. R. |last2 = Golomb |first2 = S. W.

| title = Radar Measurements of the Planet Venus

| journal = Journal of the British Institution of Radio Engineers| volume = 22 | issue = 4 | pages = 297–300

| date = October 1961

| url = https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5259664

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180125020130/http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5259664/

| url-status = dead

| archive-date = January 25, 2018

| doi = 10.1049/jbire.1961.0121

| format = PDF

| url-access = subscription

}}{{cite journal

| title=The astronomical unit determined by radar reflections from Venus

| last1=Muhleman |first1=Duane O. |last2=Holdridge |first2=D. B. |last3=Block |first3=N.

| journal=Astronomical Journal |volume=67 |issue=4 |pages=191–203 |date=May 1962

| doi=10.1086/108693 |bibcode=1962AJ.....67..191M

|doi-access=free }} Using further analysis, this gives a refined figure of {{val|149598845|250|u=km}}. Once the correct value was known, other groups found echos in their archived data that agreed with these results.

The Sun has been detected several times starting in 1959. Frequencies are usually between 25 and 38 MHz, much lower than for interplanetary work. Reflections from both the photosphere and the corona were detected.{{Cite web |last=Ohlson |first=John E. |date=August 1967 |title=A RADAR INVESTIGATION OF THE SOLAR CORONA |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19680007049/downloads/19680007049.pdf |website=NASA Technical Reports Server}}

The following is a list of planetary bodies that have been observed by this means:

Image:Asteroid-Kleopatra-radar.png, based on radar analysis.]]

Image:Radar images and computer model of asteroid 1999 JM8.jpg

Asteroids and comets

Radar provides the ability to study the shape, size and spin state of asteroids and comets from the ground. Radar imaging has produced images with up to 7.5-meter resolution. With sufficient data, the size, shape, spin and radar albedo of the target asteroids can be extracted.

As of 2016, only 19 comets had been studied by radar, including 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann, along with radar observations of 612 Near-Earth asteroids and 138 Main belt asteroids.{{cite web|url = http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/|title = Radar-Detected Asteroids and Comets|publisher = NASA/JPL Asteroid Radar Research|access-date = 2016-04-25}} By 2025, this had grown to 138 main-belt asteroids, 1148 near-Earth asteroids, and 23 comets.

Many bodies are observed during their close flyby of Earth.

While operational the Arecibo Observatory provided information about Earth threatening comet and asteroid impacts, allowing impact and near miss predictions decades into the future such as those for Apophis and other bodies. Being smaller, the Goldstone Solar System Radar is less sensitive and unable to provide the same predictive capacity.

Telescopes and facilities

The Goldstone Solar System Radar is the only planetary radar in current regular operation.{{cite journal

|title=Planetary radar—State-of-the-art review

|last1= Virkki |first1= Anne K. |last2= Neish |first2= Catherine D. |last3= Rivera-Valentín |first3= Edgard G.

|last4= Bhiravarasu |first4= Sriram S. |last5= Hickson |first5= Dylan C. |last6= Nolan |first6= Michael C.

|last7= Orosei |first7= Roberto

|journal=Remote Sensing

|volume=15

|issue=23

|pages=5605

|year=2023

|publisher=MDPI

|url=https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/23/5605 }} Others are or were:

  • The planetary radar at Arecibo Observatory, which collapsed in 2020.
  • The Soviet planetary radar at the Pluton complex, since dismantled.
  • The Millstone Hill and Haystack radio telescopes of the Haystack Observatory made radar observations from 1958 through at least 1970.{{cite journal

|title=The Haystack Planetary Ranging Radar

|last1=Evans |first1=JV |last2=Ingalls |first2=RP |last3=Pettengill |first3=GH

|journal=Technical Report-Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

|issue=32

|pages=27

|year=1970

|publisher=Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology}}

  • The Yevpatoria RT-70 radio telescope is equipped with a powerful transmitter, and has been used in bi-static radar observations.{{cite web |url=https://www.ursi.org/proceedings/procGA02/papers/p1745.pdf |title=BISTATIC RADAR TEST ACTIVITIES AT THE ITALIAN MEDICINA RADIOTELESCOPES}}

There are proposals and prototypes for possible additional radars:

  • The Green Bank Observatory is investigating a Ku-band radar for its 100 meter radio telescope.{{cite web |url=https://amostech.com/TechnicalPapers/2022/Poster/Taylor.pdf |title=The next generation planetary radar system on the Green Bank Telescope}} Its low power prototype has imaged the moon.
  • China is developing a planetary radar.{{cite web |url=https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/info/1320/11412.htm |title=China begins construction on world’s most far-reaching radar system, to boost defense against near-Earth asteroid impact}} Their initial phase has imaged the moon.

See also

{{Commons category}}

References

{{Reflist}}