Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles

|ArgueDate=April 26

|ArgueYear=1923

|DecideDate=June 11

|DecideYear=1923

|FullName=Rindge Co., et al. v. County of Los Angeles

|USVol=262

|USPage=700

|ParallelCitations=43 S. Ct. 689; 67 L. Ed. 1186; 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2678

|Prior=County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Co., 53 Cal.App. 166, 200 P. 27 (Dist. App. 2d Dist. 1921)

|Subsequent=

|Holding=A county government can use its power of eminent domain to take land from a private landowner to build a scenic highway.

|Majority=Sanford

|JoinMajority=Taft, McKenna, Holmes, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Butler

|NotParticipating=Sutherland

|LawsApplied=

}}

Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 262 U.S. 700 (1923), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a county government could use its power of eminent domain to take land from a private landowner to build a scenic highway.

{{blockquote|these roads, especially the main road, through its connection with the public road coming along the shore from Santa Monica, will afford a highway for persons desiring to travel along the shore to the county line, with a view of the ocean on one side, and of the mountain range on the other, constituting, as stated by the trial judge, a scenic highway of great beauty. Public uses are not limited, in the modern view, to matters of mere business necessity and ordinary convenience, but may extend to matters of public health, recreation and enjoyment. Thus, the condemnation of lands for public parks is now universally recognized as a taking for public use. A road need not be for a purpose of business to create a public exigency; air, exercise and recreation are important to the general health and welfare; pleasure travel may be accommodated as well as business travel; and highways may be condemned to places of pleasing natural scenery.{{ussc|name=Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles|volume=262|page=700|pin=707-08|year=1923}}. {{usgovpd}}}}

Background

File:Supreme Court of the United States - Taft Court - c.1923 - (1923-1925) LCCN2016861504.png]]

According to the Adamson House tour guides:

{{blockquote|In 1892, Henry Keller sold the {{convert|13000|acre|km2|adj=on}} Rancho Topanga Malibu Sequit or 'Rancho Malibu' to Rhoda May Knight Rindge and Frederick H. Rindge, for a price variously reported as $10-$22 per acre. Keller, it is said, had acquired it for 10 cents an acre in 1854. Rindge, from Cambridge, Massachusetts, had recently inherited an estate of more than $2 million and moved to Los Angeles, California, where he wrote a book called "Happy Days in Southern California." Then he looked for "a farm near the ocean, and under the lee of the mountain, with a trout brook, wild trees, a lake, good soil, and excellent climate." He found his farm in Malibu Canyon. He described the Malibu coast as the American Riviera.[http://www.adamsonhouse.org/Tour/tour.html Adamson House Tour]}}

May Rindge of Trenton, Michigan owned {{convert|17000|acre|km2}} of ranch land, much of what has been incorporated into the city of Malibu, California. First, the Southern Pacific Railroad tried to take her land, so, according to the city of Malibu:

{{blockquote|Upon hearing of the Southern Pacific's plans, Mr. Rindge decided to build a private railroad through his ranch to keep the bigger railroad company out of his domain. A little-known law prevented duplication of an existing railroad line. Before any tracks could be laid, however, Mr. Rindge died. It was left to his widow to carry out his plans, which she did with {{convert|15|mi|km}} of standard gauge tracks called the Hueneme, Malibu and Port Los Angeles Railway. May Rindge became its president and one of the few women ever to become president of a railroad.[http://www.ci.malibu.ca.us/index.cfm?fuseaction=detail&navid=9&cid=428 Chapter Four]}}

The rails were later reused to build Rindge Dam.